5570-110P-2018.pdf

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-110P

BLACK CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 12/4/18

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... SLAB NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 200.0 FT (61.0 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 36.0 FT (11.0 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 34.2 FT (10.4 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 30.0 FT (9.1 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 3K2 / 2044B SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ N/A

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1982-JOINT REPAIR.

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 170.78 (KM PT 274.84)

STATE: ................................. MISSISSIPPI LOCATION: 5.1 MILES NORTH OF MS ROUTE 12

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. BLACK CREEK

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete slab bridge is in fair to good condition overall. The main problems include moderate spalling with exposed rebar on the abutment bearing seats and breastwalls which has been epoxy coated.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: M. REGER, Z. BAILEY

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

MICHAEL REGER, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-948-1424

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/31/19

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-110P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D 226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

58.3 SEAL CRACKS DUE TO ADHESION FAILURE OF JOINTS AT DECK ENDS WITH

APPROVED SEALANT. SEAL TRANSVERSE CRACK ON WEARING SURFACE AT

NORTH END OF EAST SHOULDER.

58.1, 59.3 CLEAN AND COAT EXPOSED REBAR IN SPAN #4 WITH APPROVED PROTECTIVE

SEALANT.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that the recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-110P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE

9 EXCELLENT CONDITION

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

58. DECK 7

1. DECK SLAB G

2. EXPANSION JOINTS F

3. WEARING SURFACE G

4. RIDEABILITY G

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN G

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS G

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE G

8. UTILITIES N

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION G

10. OTHER N

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 7

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10. ALIGNMENT

11. OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

2. PILE BENTS

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

5. FOUNDATIONS

6. WINGWALLS

7. WEEP HOLES

8. EXPANSION JOINTS

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

11. SLOPE PROTECTION

12. OTHER

PIER(S)

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

14. PILE BENTS

15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

16. FOUNDATIONS

17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19. OTHER

N N G N N N N N G G N

F N F N N G F N G G N N

G N N N F G N

58.1, 59.3

58.2

58.3

58.5

58.6

60.1,3

60.7

60.13

60.17

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND RUST

STAINING ON DECK UNDERSIDE NEAR CENTERLINE IN ALL SPANS.

MINOR HONEYCOMBING ON TURN DOWN AT EDGES OF DECK.

MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK

SIDES. MINOR SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON DECK UNDERSIDE

IN SPAN #4, EAST SIDE NEAR PIER #3. MINOR RUST STAIN ON DECK

UNDERSIDE, SPAN #5, NEAR PIER #5.

DETERIORATION OF EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL IN CURBS AND

PARAPETS. ADHESION FAILURE OF RELIEF JOINTS AT ABUTMENTS.

TRANSVERSE CRACKING ON WEARING SURFACE AT NORTH END OF

EAST SHOULDER.

MINOR CRACKING AND SCALING OF CURBS AND PARAPETS.

MOSS GROWTH ON PARAPET FACES. DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND

VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG CURBS.

MODERATE SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR AT NORTH ABUTMENT

BEARING AREA HAS BEEN SEALED.

MINOR LOSS OF EMBANKMENT THROUGH WEEP HOLES. HOLES

ARE CLOGGED WITH SOIL AT NORTH ABUTMENT.

MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF PIER WALLS. MINOR SCALING AT

BASE OF PIER #1, NOT INTENDED AS FINISH.

MINOR EROSION AROUND WEST SIDE OF ALL PIERS, EXTENDING UP

TO 15' BELOW STRUCTURE. MINOR EROSION EXTENDS ON SOUTH

SIDE OF PIER #1 AND #2 FOR FULL PIER WIDTH.

STANDING WATER UNDER SPANS #6 AND AROUND EACH PIER.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-110P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL 7

G F N G N

MED

SUFF

8 FT.

SAND

222. APPROACHES 8

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

N N N G G G G G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

N N N

61.2 MODERATE EROSION OF CHANNEL BANKS CAUSING UNDERMINING

OF TREES.

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

61.4 ABANDONED TIMBER PILES EXPOSED IN CHANNEL UNDER

STRUCTURE. MINOR DEBRIS AT UPSTREAM END OF PIER #3.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-110P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 19 17 32 29

HS 30 27 50 45

TYPE 3 26 24 43 39

TYPE 3S2 43 39 73 66

TYPE 3-3 55 50 92 83

DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 8/15

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-110P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 284 - MISSISSIPPI (MS)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... BLACK CREEK BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 007 - ATTALA

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5570-110P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... BLACK CREEK

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........110P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5570110P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 5.1 MILES NORTH OF MS RO

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. KOSCIUSKO (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................3K2 (11) MILE POINT: .............................170.78 (KM PT 274.84)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 2044B (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

01 - SLAB

36.0 FT (11.0 M)

200.0 FT (61.0 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 30.0 TONS (27.2 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 50.0 TONS (45.4 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 12/18 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-110P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 33°09'41.60"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 89°28'04.20"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 24 MI (39 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

30.0 FT (9.1 M)

34.2 FT (10.4 M)

32.0 FT (9.8 M)

22.0 FT (6.7 M)

5.0 FT (1.5 M)

5.0 FT (1.5 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

0 °

NO

30.0 FT (9.1 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

3 - PARAPET ONLY

1 - CONCRETE

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

2.42 FT (0.74 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ...........................N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

5 - Stable; scour within limits of

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

$8,000

$0

$0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1982-JOINT REPAIR.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5570-110P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-110P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING NORTHBOUND TOWARD TUPELO

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - WEST (UPSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW OF STRUCTURE LOOKING

NORTH

PHOTO #4 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF STRUCTURE IN SPAN #4

LOOKING NORTH; NOTE LONGITUDINAL CRACK WITH

EFFLORESCENCE

PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE

ON DECK UNDERSIDE NEAR CENTERLINE, LOOKING SOUTH IN SPAN #3

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE

ON DECK UNDERSIDE NEAR CENTERLINE, SPAN #1 SHOWN

PHOTO #7 - SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON

DECK UNDERSIDE IN SPAN #4 AT EAST SIDE

PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL ADHESION FAILURE OF

SAWCUT JOINT SEALANT OVER DECK JOINTS,

JOINT OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #9 - CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE IN EAST SHOULDER

AREA AT NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL MISSING FILLER MATERIAL IN CURB AND RAILING

EXPANSION JOINTS; EAST CURB AND RAIL OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT

SHOWN (PHOTO FROM 1/15/2016 INSPECTION REPORT)

PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURB AND

MOSS GROWTH ON PARAPET, EAST PARAPET SHOWN

PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL MOSS GROWTH ON PARAPET, WEST PARAPET

SHOWN

PHOTO #13 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #14 - SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR AT CENTERLINE OF

NORTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL; NOTE REBAR AND CONCRETE HAS

BEEN SEALED

PHOTO #15 - EROSION AT WEST END OF PIER #3, NORTH FACE

PHOTO #16 - PONDING AROUND WEST END OF PIER #1

PHOTO #17 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #18 - TYPICAL EROSION OF CHANNEL

BANKS, UPSTREAM SOUTH BANK SHOWN;

NOTE UNDERMINED TREE (PHOTO FROM

1/15/2016 INSPECTION REPORT)

PHOTO #19 - OLD TIMBER PILING, WATERWAY OBSTRUCTION IN

CHANNEL UNDER STRUCTURE IN SPAN #4

PHOTO #20 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING UPSTREAM

PHOTO #21 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING DOWNSTREAM