5570-106P-2018.pdf

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-106P

DRY CREEK CANAL BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 12/4/18

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 32.5 FT (9.9 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 32.5 FT (9.9 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 32.4 FT (9.9 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 3J6 / 2292B SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 10 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ N/A

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1980-JOINT REPAIR. 2010 - ROADWAY RESURFACED

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 186.28 (KM PT 299.78)

STATE: ................................. MISSISSIPPI LOCATION: 9.0 MILES SOUTH OF MS ROUTE 9

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. DRY CREEK CANAL

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete frame bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include severe deterioration of the expansion joint material in the curbs, railings, and vertical expansion joints; and erosion along the northeast wingwall and at the northeast parapet end.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: M. REGER, Z. BAILEY

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

MICHAEL REGER, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-948-1424

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/31/19

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-106P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D 226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

58.2, 60.8 REPLACE EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL IN CURBS, RAILINGS, AND VERTICAL

JOINTS.

61.4 REMOVE DEBRIS DAM FROM UPSTREAM CHANNEL.

60.9 REPAIR EROSION ALONG NORTHEAST WINGWALL AND NORTHEAST PARAPET

END.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-106P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

N N G N N N N N G

N G

G G G F G N

N

P

G

G

58.1, 59.3 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ALONG CONSTRUCTION

JOINTS AND ALONG CENTERLINE ON DECK UNDERSIDE.

HORIZONTAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT ALL FRAME

CORNERS. DETERIORATION OF WHITE LANE LINES.

58.2 SEVERELY DETERIORATED EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL IN CURBS

AND RAILINGS.

58.5 MINOR CRACKING OF CURBS. SURVEY MARKER AT NORTH END OF

EAST CURB.

58.6 MINOR CRACKING AND SPALLING OF RAILINGS AT EXPANSION

JOINTS. SPALL ON BACKSIDE OF EAST RAILPOST AT SOUTH JOINT.

60.1 MINOR SCALING ALONG LOWER PORTION OF NORTH ABUTMENT

BREASTWALL.

60.6 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON ALL WINGWALLS.

MINOR MOWER DAMAGE TO WINGWALLS.

60.7 WEEP HOLES ARE COVERED WITH SOIL AT SOUTH ABUTMENT.

EMBANKMENT LOSS THROUGH CENTER WEEP HOLE AT NORTH

ABUTMENT.

60.8 VERTICAL JOINT FILLER MATERIAL IS SEVERELY DETERIORATED OR

MISSING BETWEEN WINGWALLS AND ABUTMENTS.

60.9 EROSION AT SOUTHWEST PARAPET END. MODERATE EROSION

ALONG NORTHWEST WINGWALL. EROSION AT NORTHEAST

PARAPET END AND ALONG NORTHEAST WINGWALL IS 2'D X 2'W X

20' LONG. MODERATE EROSION ALONG NORTH BREASTWALL AND

EAST END.

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N

5. FOUNDATIONS N

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES F

8. EXPANSION JOINTS P

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR F

10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11. SLOPE PROTECTION N

12. OTHER N

PIER(S)

N 13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

N 14. PILE BENTS

N 15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

N 16. FOUNDATIONS

N 17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

N 18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

N 19. OTHER

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-106P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

61. CHANNEL 6

1. ALIGNMENT F

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR F

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION N

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS F

5. OTHER N

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING SUFF

7. NORMAL VELOCITY MED

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 10 FT.

9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :

SILT

222. APPROACHES 7

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

N N N G G G G G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

N N N

61.1 CHANNEL IS MIGRATING NORTH WARD.

61.2 MINOR TO MODERATE EROSION ALONG CHANNEL EMBANKMENTS.

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

61.4 DEBRIS DAM IN UPSTREAM CHANNEL NEAR BRIDGE.

222.3 MINOR SCRAPING OF NORTH APPROACH CURB. MINOR SPALLS AT

PARAPET ENDS.

222.7 TYPE 3 OBJECT MARKERS AT ALL 4 CORNERS.

36.A RAIL HEIGHT OF 1'-10" DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM HEIGHT

REQUIREMENT OF 2'-3".

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-106P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 17 15 29 26

HS 29 26 49 44

TYPE 3 26 24 43 39

TYPE 3S2 40 36 67 61

TYPE 3-3 51 46 85 77

DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 8/15

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-106P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 284 - MISSISSIPPI (MS)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... DRY CREEK CANAL BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 019 - CHOCTAW

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5570-106P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... DRY CREEK CANAL

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........106P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5570106P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 9.0 MILES SOUTH OF MS RO

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. KOSCIUSKO (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................3J6 (11) MILE POINT: .............................186.28 (KM PT 299.78)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 2292B (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

1 - CONCRETE

07 - FRAME

32.5 FT (9.9 M)

32.5 FT (9.9 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 29.0 TONS (26.3 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 49.0 TONS (44.5 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 12/18 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-106P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 33°21'06.80"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 89°20'36.70"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 25 MI (40 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

28.0 FT (8.5 M)

32.4 FT (9.9 M)

32.0 FT (9.8 M)

22.0 FT (6.7 M)

5.0 FT (1.5 M)

5.0 FT (1.5 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

10 °

NO

28.0 FT (8.5 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

1 - CONCRETE

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

1.83 FT (0.56 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ...........................N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

5 - Stable; scour within limits of

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

$7,000

$0

$0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1980-JOINT REPAIR. 2010 - ROADWAY RESURFACED

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5570-106P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-106P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING NORTHBOUND TOWARD TUPELO

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - EAST (UPSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH; NOTE

DETERIORATION OF LANE LINES

PHOTO #4 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH; NOTE

EFFLORESCENCE ALONG LONGITUDINAL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS

PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

CURB AND RAIL JOINT FILLER, SOUTHWEST

SIDE SHOWN; NOTE CRACK THROUGH

RAILING

PHOTO #6 - SPALLING AND CRACKING OF

EAST RAIL AND RAIL POST, SOUTH END

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURB LINES AND

MOSS GROWTH ON CURB UNDER RAILING, WEST RAILING SHOWN

PHOTO #8 - DROP OFF DUE TO EROSION AT SOUTHWEST PARAPET

END; NOTE MOWER SPALLS

PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL SPALLING OF PARAPET, NORTH END OF WEST

PARAPET; NOTE TYPICAL MOWER SCRAPES ALSO VISIBLE

PHOTO #10 - VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN

NORTHEAST WINGWALL

PHOTO #11 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL HORIZONTAL CRACKING

WITH EFFLORESCENCE , SOUTHWEST

CORNER SHOWN; NOTE TYPICAL

DETERIORATION OF VERTICAL JOINT FILLER

PHOTO #13 - EROSION OF EMBANKMENT

SLOPE ADJACENT TO NORTHEAST WINGWALL

PHOTO #14 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #15 - DEBRIS DAM IN UPSTREAM CHANNEL

PHOTO #16 - DEBRIS DAM IN UPSTREAM CHANNEL

PHOTO #17 - VIEW LOOKING UPSTREAM

PHOTO #18 - VIEW LOOKING DOWNSTREAM