5570-092P-2020.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-24-R-000004
About this file
This document contains a bridge inspection report and related federal contract opportunity. The bridge inspection report provides details of an inspection conducted on October 30, 2020 of Structure No. 5570-092P, the Irving Branch Bridge over the Natchez Trace Parkway in Mississippi. The report documents the condition of the various bridge components and includes recommendations and cost estimates for maintenance and rehabilitation work. The related federal contract opportunity is solicitation number 693C73-24-R-000004 for drainage improvements along the Natchez Trace Parkway, specifically work at milepoints NP-NATR 3N17 3H26. The solicitation is listed as a pre-solicitation notice. The contracting agency is the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. The document provides key information on existing infrastructure and upcoming rehabilitation projects for a federal land management agency.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 59 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
IRVING BRANCH BRIDGE
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER IRVING BRANCH
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
LOOKING NORTH
STRUCTURE NO. 5570-092P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 10/30/2020
EAST (UPSTREAM) SIDE
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-092P
IRVING BRANCH BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/30/2020
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:
MAIN SPAN TYPE:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .
DECK TYPE:
WEARING SURFACE:
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:
PIER FOUDNATION(S):
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:
NPS ROAD CLASS:
STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
01 - SLAB NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: . 85.0 FT (25.9 M)
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ......... 32 FT (9.8 M)
6 - BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ..................... 32.4 FT (9.9 M)
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: .... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES YEAR BUILT:
1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: . 0
3H5 SKEW ANGLE: .................... 40 °
1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ....... N
1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2014-STRUCTURE REPAVED, PAVEMENT SAWCUT AND
SEALED OVER ENDS OF STRUCTURE.
LOCATION
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
STATE: .............................. 284 - MISSISSIPPI
FACILITY CARRIED: ......... NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: IRVING BRANCH
MILE POINT: .. 202.60 (KM PT 61.75)
LOCATION: .... 1.6 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. ROUTE 82
INSPECTION TEAM: B. Cazenas, R. Silvestry
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
Reinaldo Silvestry
REPORT REVIEW:
Marcus Miller
REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 03/04/2021
Jorgomai Ceesay
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This continuous concrete slab bridge remains in good to fair condition overall. The main problem is the extensive random cracking with moderate to heavy efflorescence throughout the sides of the slabs, the slab underside, and the curbs. This condition has not change significantly since last inspection. Additional problems include erosion trenches at the north abutment, scour at the downstream end of both piers due to runoff, and faded object marker at northeast corner.
Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-092P
IRVING BRANCH BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 10/30/2020
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
Item No.
Maintenance Recomendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
60.1,60.
REMOVE VEGETATION GROWTH FROM PIERS AND
ABUTMENTS.
222.7
REPLACE OBJECT MARKER AT NORTHEAST CORNER
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
Item REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
UNIT
UNIT PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
No. (TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. COST
REHAB RECONSTR
60.9,60.
11,60.17
PLACE SCOUR COUNTERMEASURES AT NORTH
ABUTMENT AND AT DOWNSTREAM END OF
BOTH PIERS.
58.5 REMOVE UNSOUND CONCRETE FROM EAST
CURB ALONG CENTER SPAN, CLEAN REBAR,
AND REPLACE CONCRETE TO ORIGINAL
DIMENSIONS.
58.3,222.
SEAL TRANSVERSE AND DIAGONAL CRACKS
ON WEARING SURFACE AND APPROACH
PAVEMENT ON BOTH APPROACHES.
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, DESIGN, AND
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING
(APPROXIMATELY 70% OF TOTAL REHAB COST)
PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-092P
IRVING BRANCH BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 10/30/2020
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : ..
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-092P
IRVING BRANCH BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020
58. DECK
1. DECK SLAB
4. RIDEABILITY
5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
8. UTILITIES
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10.OTHER:
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
1. BEARING DEVICES
2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS
3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
5. TRUSSES
6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
7. PAINT
8. FASCIA(E)
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10.ALIGNMENT
11.OTHER
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
61. CHANNEL
1. ALIGNMENT
2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
3. CHANNEL PROTECTION
4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS
5. OTHER
6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING
7. NORMAL VELOCITY
8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING
9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:
222. APPROACHES
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER
223. RETAINING WALL
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
F
G
F
G
G
G
N
N
N
F
N
N
N
N
N
G
G
N
G
G
G
G
N
1- SUFF
1 - HIGH
N
N
N
G
G
G
G
N
N
2. EXPANSION JOINTS G
3. WEARING SURFACE G
N 8 FT
G
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLEN
EXCELLENT CONDITION9
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6
FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
Structure is closed to
FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0
SAND, SILT
ABUTMENTS
1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G
2. PILE BENTS N
3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G
4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N
5. FOUNDATIONS N
6. WINGWALLS G
7. WEEP HOLES G
8. EXPANSION JOINTS N
9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G
10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G
11.SLOPE PROTECTION N
12.OTHER N
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:
B. TRANSITIONS:
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:
N
N
N
PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS G
N
G
N
G
G
N
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.
15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
16.FOUNDATIONS
17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.
18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
19.OTHER
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-092P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
58.1
59.3
59.10
MINOR TO MODERATE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND WATER LEAKAGE ON SLAB UNDERSIDE, PRIMARILY NEAR OUTSIDE EDGES AND CENTERLINE AT NORTH AND SOUTH SPANS. MODERATE CRACKING WITH HEAVY EFFLORESCENCE WITH
STALACTITES ON SLAB SIDES AND UNDERSIDE IN CENTER SPAN; POPOUTS ALSO PRESENT.
SLAB HAS SHIFTED AND ROTATED OUT 1" AT SOUTHEAST AND NORTHWEST CORNERS; CONDITION IS DUE TO THERMAL
EXPANSION AT SKEWED STRUCTURE.
58.2 SEVERELY DETERIORATED OR MISSING FILLER MATERIAL IN RAILING EXPANSION JOINTS; MINOR DETERIORATION OF FILLER
MATERIAL IN CURB EXPANSION JOINTS.
58.3
222.4
WEARING SURFACE PAVEMENT SAWCUT AND SEALED OVER ENDS OF STRUCTURE; MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACK ON CENTER
LINE RUNNING ENTIRE STRUCTURE LENGTH.
MINOR TRANSVERSE, DIAGONAL, AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT AT BOTH APPROACHES.
58.5
58.6
MINOR TO MODERATE RANDOM CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND SPALLING OF CURBS; MINOR FLAKING OF COATING AT
BOTH ENDS OF EAST CURB; MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG EAST CURB.
MINOR POPOUTS AND CRACKING OF RAILINGS. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON RAIL POSTS. MINOR
SPALLING OF EAST RAIL UNDERSIDE AT NORTH END.
60.1
60.3
MINOR SCALING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS BELOW WEEP HOLES. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND
VEGETATION GROWTH ON NORTH BREASTWALL.
MINOR DETERIORATION OF BITUMINOUS MATERIAL AT ABUTMENT BEARING SEATS.
60.6 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WINGWALLS. MINOR MOWER DAMAGE AT ALL WINGWALL ENDS; MINOR MOWER SCRAPES ALONG ALL WINGWALLS. MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WINGWALLS AT CORNERS
OF BEARING SEAT; MINOR SPALL ON SOUTHEAST WINGWALL.
60.9
60.17
MINOR EROSION AT ABUTMENTS AND PIERS DUE TO RUNOFF.
60.13 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON PIERS. VEGETATION GROWTH ON ENDS OF PIER WALLS.
61.2
61.3
MINOR TO MODERATE SLOUGHING ALONG CHANNEL BANKS. CHANNEL BENEATH BRIDGE IS LINED WITH ASPHALT.
SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.
222.7 5"X16" BLACK AND YELLOW STRIPED OBJECT MARKERS IN PLACE; NORTHEAST OBJECT MARKER MISSING.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-092P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 21 19 35 32
HS 36 33 61 55
TYPE 3 31 28 51 46
TYPE 3S2 43 39 72 65
TYPE 3-3 57 52 95 86
DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 07/13/2015
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: MOMENT
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-092P
IRVING BRANCH BR DGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............IRVING BRANCH BRIDGE
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-092 P
4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................DANCY
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3H5
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
284 - MISSISSIPPI
01019 CHEROKEE
00000
1 6 1 00001 0
IRVING BRANCH
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
5570092P0000000
1.6 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. ROUTE 82
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
202.6 (KM PT: 61.75)
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 01 - SLAB (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............003 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............32 FT ( 9.8 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 85.0 FT ( 25.9 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-
CAPACITY RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............23 TONS ( 20.9 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............38 TONS ( 34.5 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 10/30/2020 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-092P
IRVING BRANCH BR DGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 31'19 20" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°10 '02.70" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.4 FT ( 9.9 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 15 MI ( 24 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1075 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 40 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1183 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT
REQUIRED)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2.42 FT ( 0.74 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 6 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............6 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 6 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N
(61) CHANNEL:................................7 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF
FOOTING OR PILES
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PROPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 1500
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 56000
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2014-STRUCTURE REPAVED, PAVEMENT SAWCUT AND SEALED OVER ENDS OF STRUCTURE.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
Inspector: Reinaldo Silvestry Structure Number: 5570092P0000000
Inpsection Date: 10/30/2020 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD TUPELO
PHOTO 4
Description WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO 6
Description JOINT OVER NORTH ABUTMEN; NOTE TRANSVERSE CRACKING ALONG JOINT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description LONGITUDINAL CRACK OF WEARING SURFACE ALONG CENTERLINE
PHOTO 8
Description CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE, DELAMINATION, AND SPALLING OF CONCRETE
ALONG EAST CURB
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description TRANSVERSE CRACK OF WEARING SURFACE OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT JOINT
PHOTO 10
Description FADED OBJECT MARKER AT NORTHEAST CORNER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description HORIZONTAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE OVER NORTH PIER AT EAST EXTERIOR
FACE OF CURB
PHOTO 12
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTHEAST WINGWALL; NOTE AREA OF SPALL ON SOUTH CORNER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description BEARING AREA AT EAST SIDE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE DIAGONAL CRACKING
PHOTO 14
Description UP TO 1" OFFSET OF SLAB AT SOUTHEAST CORNER OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description SOUTH ABUTMENT WEST SIDE; NOTE DELAMINIATION IN PREVIOUSLY PATCHED AREA
PHOTO 16
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE FILTERS IN PLACE AT WEEP HOLES
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description LONGITUDINAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SLAB UNDERSIDE AT EAST SIDE OF
SOUTH SPAN
PHOTO 18
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PIER; SOUTH FACE SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PIER; NORTH FACE SHOWN
PHOTO 20
Description UNDERSIDE VIEW OF CENTER SPAN LOOKING SOUTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 21
Description LONGITUDINAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ALONG WEST SIDE OF SLAB UNDERSIDE
ON CENTER SPAN
PHOTO 22
Description LONGITUDINAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ALONG EAST SIDE OF SLAB UNDERSIDE
ON CENTER SPAN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 23
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH PIER; SOUTH FACE SHOWN
PHOTO 24
Description LONGITUDINAL CRACKS WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT EAST SIDE OF SLAB UNDERSIDE ON
NORTH SPAN NEAR NORTH PIER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 25
Description UNDERSIDE VIEW OF NORTH SPAN LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO 26
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE EROSION TRENCHES
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 27
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTHWEST WINGWALL
PHOTO 28
Description LOOKING UPSTREAM
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 29
Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .