5570-105P-2018.pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-24-R-000004
About this file
This bridge inspection report summarizes the condition of Structure No. 5570-105P, known as the McCurtain's Creek Bridge located on the Natchez Trace Parkway in Mississippi. The 104-foot long, three-span concrete slab bridge was built in 1950 and last resurfaced in 2010. It carries two lanes of traffic over McCurtain's Creek and is in generally good condition overall. Minor maintenance issues were noted including erosion, drainage problems, and deterioration of expansion joints and railings. Moderate rehabilitation work is recommended within five years to repair erosion at abutments and scour at the south pier. The estimated preliminary maintenance cost is $11,000 while rehabilitation/reconstruction costs are estimated at $11,000. Photographs document the current conditions described in the report.
This pre-solicitation notice is for the Natchez Trace Parkway Drainage Improvements project and is identified as Solicitation Number 693C73-24-R-000004. The federal agency is the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration but no other details are provided on the scope of work, response dates, or other contractual requirements.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 59 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-105P
McCURTAIN'S CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 12/5/18
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... SLAB NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 104.0 FT (31.7 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 40.0 FT (12.2 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 32.4 FT (9.9 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 3J4 / 2291B SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ N/A
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2010 - ROADWAY RESURFACED
LOCATION
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 186.98 (KM PT 300.91)
STATE: ................................. MISSISSIPPI LOCATION: 8.4 MILES SOUTH OF MS ROUTE 9
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. McCURTAIN'S CREEK
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This concrete slab bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include minor to moderate erosion at the abutments and under the scuppers, and scour at the south pier. Other problems include deterioration of the expansion joint material in the curbs and railings; abandoned timber piles in the channel and in south span scour hole; and minor to moderate spalling with exposed rebar on the railings and north pier.
Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: M. REGER, Z. BAILEY
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
MICHAEL REGER, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-948-1424
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/31/19
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-105P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D 226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
58.1 REMOVE FALLEN TREES FROM BOTH SIDE OF STRUCTURE.
61.4 CUT OFF TIMBER PILES IN CHANNEL BELOW STREAMBED.
58.2 REPLACE EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL IN CURBS.
58.6, 60.13 CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR IN RAILS AND POSTS. CLEAN AND SEAL
EXPOSED REBAR ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF NORTH PIER.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST
ESTIMATES
REHAB. RECONSTR.
60.9,17 REPAIR EROSION AT ABUTMENTS AND UNDER SCUPPERS. REPAIR
SCOUR AT SOUTH PIER WITH ENGINEERED RIPRAP.
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL,
DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (APPROXIMATELY
70% OF TOTAL REHAB COST) PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-105P
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
N
58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER
ALIGNMENT
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
FASCIA(E)
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
TRUSSES
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
GIRDERS OR BEAMS
BEARING DEVICES
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
OTHER
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
UTILITIES
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
RIDEABILITY
WEARING SURFACE
EXPANSION JOINTS
DECK SLAB
OTHER
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
FOUNDATIONS
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
PILE BENTS
WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
PIER(S)
OTHER
SLOPE PROTECTION
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
EXPANSION JOINTS
WEEP HOLES
WINGWALLS
FOUNDATIONS
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
PILE BENTS
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS
ABUTMENTS
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
10.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
PAINT
11.
N N G N N N N N G
N G
G N F N N F G N F G N N
G N N N P G N
11.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
58.1, 59.3 MINOR EFFLORESCENCE ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINTS ALONG
BOTH SIDES OF DECK UNDERSIDE. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING
WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK SIDES, PRIMARILY OVER PIERS.
MINOR SPALLING AT NORTHWEST AND SOUTH ENDS OF SLAB OVER
BEARING SEAT. SCRAPES AND MINOR SPALLING ON EAST EDGE OF
DECK OVER SOUTH PIER.
FALLEN TREES AGAINST STRUCTURE BOTH SIDES.
58.2 SEVERELY DETERIORATED OR MISSING EXPANSION JOINT
MATERIAL IN CURBS AND RAILINGS.
58.5 MINOR CRACKING OF CURBS.
58.6 MINOR TO MODERATE CRACKING AND SPALLING OF RAILINGS AT
EXPANSION JOINTS. SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON EAST RAIL
POST AT SOUTH ABUTMENT.
58.7 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS ALONG BOTH CURBLINES.
60.1 MOISTURE STAINING ON ABUTMENT CORNERS.
60.3 JOINT FILLER PULLING OUT AT BOTH ABUTMENTS.
60.6 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WINGWALLS. MINOR
SPALLING AND SCRAPES AT ENDS AND ALONG FACES OF
WINGWALLS.
60.9 MODERATE EROSION BELOW SCUPPERS. MINOR TO MODERATE
EROSION AND SCOUR ALONG BOTH ABUTMENTS.
G G G F G N
N
P
G
G
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-105P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.
ALIGNMENT 1.
61. CHANNEL 6
G F N F N
LOW
SUFF
14 FT.
SILT
222. APPROACHES 7
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER
N N N G G G G G N
223. RETAINING WALL N
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS
B. TRANSITIONS
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS
N N N
60.13 MINOR SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR DUE TO INADEQUATE
CONCRETE COVER ON WEST END OF NORTH PIER. MINOR
SCALING OF CONCRETE SURFACE ALONG WATERLINE AT BOTH
PIERS. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING ALONG NORTH PIER.
60.17 SEVERE SCOUR HOLE ON SOUTH SIDE OF SOUTH PIER, WITH
EXPOSED OLD TIMBER PILES .
61.2 CHANNEL HAS LOWERED APPROXIMATELY 2' SINCE
CONSTRUCTION, EXPOSING OLD TIMBER PILES. MODERATE
SLOUGHING OF UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL BANKS.
61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.
61.4 LARGE TREES ACROSS UPSTREAM CHANNEL UPSTREAM. DEBRIS
DAM AT UPSTREAM SIDE OF STRUCTURE.
MINOR DEBRIS AND SEDIMENT BUILDUP IN CHANNEL UNDER
CENTER SPAN.
222.7 TYPE 3 OBJECT MARKER TAPE AT PARAPET ENDS.
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
N
Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
Meets currently acceptable standards.
Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-105P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 22 20 37 34
HS 33 30 56 51
TYPE 3 29 26 49 44
TYPE 3S2 39 35 66 60
TYPE 3-3 50 45 83 75
DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 6/15
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-105P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 284 - MISSISSIPPI (MS)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... McCURTAIN'S CREEK BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 019 - CHOCTAW
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5570-105P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... McCURTAIN'S CREEK
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........105P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5570105P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 8.4 MILES SOUTH OF MS RO
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. KOSCIUSKO (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................3J4 (11) MILE POINT: .............................186.98 (KM PT 300.91)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 2291B (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS
01 - SLAB
40.0 FT (12.2 M)
104.0 FT (31.7 M)
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 33.0 TONS (29.9 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 56.0 TONS (50.8 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 12/18 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 5 - SCOUR
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-105P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 33°21'28.10"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 89°20'08.90"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 25 MI (40 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
(52) DECK WIDTH:
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:
LEFT SHOULDER:
RIGHT SHOULDER:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:
(34) SKEW ANGLE:
(35) DECK FLARE?:
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT :
RIGHT :
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION:
MATERIAL:
DESIGN TYPE:
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:
28.0 FT (8.5 M)
32.4 FT (9.9 M)
32.0 FT (9.8 M)
22.0 FT (6.7 M)
5.0 FT (1.5 M)
5.0 FT (1.5 M)
0 - NO MEDIAN
0 °
NO
28.0 FT (8.5 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
1 - CONCRETE
1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
2.33 FT (0.71 M)
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT: ...........................N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
4 - Stable; action required to pro
2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
D - MINOR
$11,000
$11,000
$0
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2010 - ROADWAY RESURFACED
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5570-105P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-105P
FLOW
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD JACKSON
PHOTO #2 - WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE; NOTE FALLEN TREE ON
SOUTHWEST EMBANKMENT
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW OF
STRUCTURE LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL ADHESION FAILURE OF
SAWCUT JOINT SEALANT OVER DECK JOINTS,
JOINT OVER NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF
LANE LINE, NORTH BOUND LANE LINE SHOWN
PHOTO #6 - SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON
EAST RAIL POST AT SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL MISSING FILLER
MATERIAL IN CURB AND RAILING EXPANSION
JOINTS, WEST CURB AND RAIL OVER NORTH
ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE CRACK AND SPALL
PHOTO #8 - FALLEN TREE ON SOUTHWEST
EMBANKMENT, LEANING AGAINST WEST EDGE
OF DECK AND RAIL
PHOTO #9 - CLOSE-UP OF FALLEN TREE
LEANING AGAINST WEST SIDE OF BRIDGE
PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF
DEBRIS ALONG CURBLINES, WEST CURBLINE
SHOWN
PHOTO #11 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW IN
CENTER SPAN LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE
ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINTS ON DECK
UNDERSIDE, SOUTH SPAN LOOKING NORTH
SHOWN
PHOTO #13 - VINE GROWTH AT WEST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #14 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #15 - EROSION AT NORTH ABUTMENT
(PHOTO FROM 1/14/2016 INSPECTION
REPORT)
PHOTO #16 - SCOUR HOLE AT SOUTH SIDE OF
SOUTH PIER; NOTE EXPOSED OLD TIMBER
PILE
PHOTO #17 - TYPICAL SPALLING WITH
EXPOSED REBAR ON WEST END OF NORTH
PIER
PHOTO #18 - DEBRIS AND SEDIMENT BUILDUP
IN CHANNEL UNDER CENTER SPAN; NOTE
EXPOSED OLD TIMBER PILES (PHOTO FROM
1/14/2016 INSPECTION REPORT)
PHOTO #19 - DEBRIS DAM IN UPSTREAM CHANNEL
PHOTO #20 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING UPSTREAM
PHOTO #21 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .