5570-105P-2018.pdf

PDF 4 MB Posted

Attached to
Natchez Trace Parkway Drainage Improvements - NP-NATR 3N17 3H26 ETC
Solicitation number
693C73-24-R-000004
Issued by

About this file

This bridge inspection report summarizes the condition of Structure No. 5570-105P, known as the McCurtain's Creek Bridge located on the Natchez Trace Parkway in Mississippi. The 104-foot long, three-span concrete slab bridge was built in 1950 and last resurfaced in 2010. It carries two lanes of traffic over McCurtain's Creek and is in generally good condition overall. Minor maintenance issues were noted including erosion, drainage problems, and deterioration of expansion joints and railings. Moderate rehabilitation work is recommended within five years to repair erosion at abutments and scour at the south pier. The estimated preliminary maintenance cost is $11,000 while rehabilitation/reconstruction costs are estimated at $11,000. Photographs document the current conditions described in the report.

This pre-solicitation notice is for the Natchez Trace Parkway Drainage Improvements project and is identified as Solicitation Number 693C73-24-R-000004. The federal agency is the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration but no other details are provided on the scope of work, response dates, or other contractual requirements.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
NTP 3H2 3 5-A.pdf PDF
NATR BMS FY20(1)_As-Built Drawings-Final.pdf PDF
NTP 3H2 3 5-B.pdf PDF
5570-092P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-093P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-098P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-106P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-103P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-094P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-106P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-096P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-110P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-097P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-101P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-103P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-097P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-107P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-104P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-093P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-099P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-091P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-108P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-109P-2022.pdf PDF
Amendment 0002 - NP-NATR 3N17 3H26.pdf PDF
5570-092P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-095P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-100P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-099P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-102P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-101P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-095P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-094P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-107P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-100P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-104P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-108P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-109P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-105P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-096P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-102P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-110P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-098P-2022.pdf PDF
Amendment 001 - NP NATR 3N17 3H26.pdf PDF
5570-090P-2020.pdf PDF
L_Pavement Rehabilitation and Safety Improvements_NPS CE.pdf PDF
5570-090P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-091P-2020.pdf PDF
G_NATR 2019 Traffic Counts MP 121 and 204.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B_CULVERT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A_MS NP NATR 3N17 3H26_ETC_concept plans.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 59 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-105P

McCURTAIN'S CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 12/5/18

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... SLAB NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 104.0 FT (31.7 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 40.0 FT (12.2 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 32.4 FT (9.9 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 3J4 / 2291B SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ N/A

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2010 - ROADWAY RESURFACED

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 186.98 (KM PT 300.91)

STATE: ................................. MISSISSIPPI LOCATION: 8.4 MILES SOUTH OF MS ROUTE 9

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. McCURTAIN'S CREEK

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete slab bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include minor to moderate erosion at the abutments and under the scuppers, and scour at the south pier. Other problems include deterioration of the expansion joint material in the curbs and railings; abandoned timber piles in the channel and in south span scour hole; and minor to moderate spalling with exposed rebar on the railings and north pier.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: M. REGER, Z. BAILEY

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

MICHAEL REGER, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-948-1424

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/31/19

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-105P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D 226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

58.1 REMOVE FALLEN TREES FROM BOTH SIDE OF STRUCTURE.

61.4 CUT OFF TIMBER PILES IN CHANNEL BELOW STREAMBED.

58.2 REPLACE EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL IN CURBS.

58.6, 60.13 CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR IN RAILS AND POSTS. CLEAN AND SEAL

EXPOSED REBAR ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF NORTH PIER.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

60.9,17 REPAIR EROSION AT ABUTMENTS AND UNDER SCUPPERS. REPAIR

SCOUR AT SOUTH PIER WITH ENGINEERED RIPRAP.

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL,

DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (APPROXIMATELY

70% OF TOTAL REHAB COST) PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-105P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

OTHER

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

FOUNDATIONS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

PIER(S)

OTHER

SLOPE PROTECTION

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

EXPANSION JOINTS

WEEP HOLES

WINGWALLS

FOUNDATIONS

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

N N G N N N N N G

N G

G N F N N F G N F G N N

G N N N P G N

11.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

58.1, 59.3 MINOR EFFLORESCENCE ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINTS ALONG

BOTH SIDES OF DECK UNDERSIDE. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING

WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK SIDES, PRIMARILY OVER PIERS.

MINOR SPALLING AT NORTHWEST AND SOUTH ENDS OF SLAB OVER

BEARING SEAT. SCRAPES AND MINOR SPALLING ON EAST EDGE OF

DECK OVER SOUTH PIER.

FALLEN TREES AGAINST STRUCTURE BOTH SIDES.

58.2 SEVERELY DETERIORATED OR MISSING EXPANSION JOINT

MATERIAL IN CURBS AND RAILINGS.

58.5 MINOR CRACKING OF CURBS.

58.6 MINOR TO MODERATE CRACKING AND SPALLING OF RAILINGS AT

EXPANSION JOINTS. SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON EAST RAIL

POST AT SOUTH ABUTMENT.

58.7 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS ALONG BOTH CURBLINES.

60.1 MOISTURE STAINING ON ABUTMENT CORNERS.

60.3 JOINT FILLER PULLING OUT AT BOTH ABUTMENTS.

60.6 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WINGWALLS. MINOR

SPALLING AND SCRAPES AT ENDS AND ALONG FACES OF

WINGWALLS.

60.9 MODERATE EROSION BELOW SCUPPERS. MINOR TO MODERATE

EROSION AND SCOUR ALONG BOTH ABUTMENTS.

G G G F G N

N

P

G

G

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-105P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL 6

G F N F N

LOW

SUFF

14 FT.

SILT

222. APPROACHES 7

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

N N N G G G G G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

N N N

60.13 MINOR SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR DUE TO INADEQUATE

CONCRETE COVER ON WEST END OF NORTH PIER. MINOR

SCALING OF CONCRETE SURFACE ALONG WATERLINE AT BOTH

PIERS. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING ALONG NORTH PIER.

60.17 SEVERE SCOUR HOLE ON SOUTH SIDE OF SOUTH PIER, WITH

EXPOSED OLD TIMBER PILES .

61.2 CHANNEL HAS LOWERED APPROXIMATELY 2' SINCE

CONSTRUCTION, EXPOSING OLD TIMBER PILES. MODERATE

SLOUGHING OF UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL BANKS.

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

61.4 LARGE TREES ACROSS UPSTREAM CHANNEL UPSTREAM. DEBRIS

DAM AT UPSTREAM SIDE OF STRUCTURE.

MINOR DEBRIS AND SEDIMENT BUILDUP IN CHANNEL UNDER

CENTER SPAN.

222.7 TYPE 3 OBJECT MARKER TAPE AT PARAPET ENDS.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-105P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 22 20 37 34

HS 33 30 56 51

TYPE 3 29 26 49 44

TYPE 3S2 39 35 66 60

TYPE 3-3 50 45 83 75

DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 6/15

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-105P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 284 - MISSISSIPPI (MS)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... McCURTAIN'S CREEK BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 019 - CHOCTAW

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5570-105P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... McCURTAIN'S CREEK

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........105P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5570105P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 8.4 MILES SOUTH OF MS RO

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. KOSCIUSKO (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................3J4 (11) MILE POINT: .............................186.98 (KM PT 300.91)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 2291B (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

01 - SLAB

40.0 FT (12.2 M)

104.0 FT (31.7 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 33.0 TONS (29.9 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 56.0 TONS (50.8 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 12/18 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 5 - SCOUR

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-105P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 33°21'28.10"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 89°20'08.90"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 25 MI (40 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

28.0 FT (8.5 M)

32.4 FT (9.9 M)

32.0 FT (9.8 M)

22.0 FT (6.7 M)

5.0 FT (1.5 M)

5.0 FT (1.5 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

0 °

NO

28.0 FT (8.5 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

1 - CONCRETE

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

2.33 FT (0.71 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ...........................N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

4 - Stable; action required to pro

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

D - MINOR

$11,000

$11,000

$0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2010 - ROADWAY RESURFACED

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5570-105P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-105P

FLOW

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD JACKSON

PHOTO #2 - WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE; NOTE FALLEN TREE ON

SOUTHWEST EMBANKMENT

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW OF

STRUCTURE LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL ADHESION FAILURE OF

SAWCUT JOINT SEALANT OVER DECK JOINTS,

JOINT OVER NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

LANE LINE, NORTH BOUND LANE LINE SHOWN

PHOTO #6 - SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON

EAST RAIL POST AT SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL MISSING FILLER

MATERIAL IN CURB AND RAILING EXPANSION

JOINTS, WEST CURB AND RAIL OVER NORTH

ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE CRACK AND SPALL

PHOTO #8 - FALLEN TREE ON SOUTHWEST

EMBANKMENT, LEANING AGAINST WEST EDGE

OF DECK AND RAIL

PHOTO #9 - CLOSE-UP OF FALLEN TREE

LEANING AGAINST WEST SIDE OF BRIDGE

PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF

DEBRIS ALONG CURBLINES, WEST CURBLINE

SHOWN

PHOTO #11 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW IN

CENTER SPAN LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE

ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINTS ON DECK

UNDERSIDE, SOUTH SPAN LOOKING NORTH

SHOWN

PHOTO #13 - VINE GROWTH AT WEST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #14 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #15 - EROSION AT NORTH ABUTMENT

(PHOTO FROM 1/14/2016 INSPECTION

REPORT)

PHOTO #16 - SCOUR HOLE AT SOUTH SIDE OF

SOUTH PIER; NOTE EXPOSED OLD TIMBER

PILE

PHOTO #17 - TYPICAL SPALLING WITH

EXPOSED REBAR ON WEST END OF NORTH

PIER

PHOTO #18 - DEBRIS AND SEDIMENT BUILDUP

IN CHANNEL UNDER CENTER SPAN; NOTE

EXPOSED OLD TIMBER PILES (PHOTO FROM

1/14/2016 INSPECTION REPORT)

PHOTO #19 - DEBRIS DAM IN UPSTREAM CHANNEL

PHOTO #20 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING UPSTREAM

PHOTO #21 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING DOWNSTREAM

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .