5570-104P-2020.pdf

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

LITTLE BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER LITTLE BYWAY CREEK

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LOOKING SOUTH

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-104P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020

EAST (UPSTREAM) SIDE

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-104P

LITTLE BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUDNATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

01 - SLAB NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: . 102.7 FT (31.3 M)

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ......... 40.4 FT (12.3 M)

6 - BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ..................... 32.3 FT (9.8 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: .... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES YEAR BUILT:

1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .

3H4-10 SKEW ANGLE: .................... 0 °

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ....... N

1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2012-STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES REPAVED.

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: .. 192.40 (KM PT 58.64)

STATE: .............................. 284 - MISSISSIPPI LOCATION: .... 2.9 MILES SOUTH OF MS ROUTE 9

FACILITY CARRIED: ......... NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: LITTLE BYWAY CREEK

INSPECTION TEAM: B. Cazenas, R. Silvestry

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Reinaldo Silvestry

REPORT REVIEW:

Marcus Miller

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 03/05/2021

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This multi-span continuous concrete slab bridge is in fair condition overall with some problems that require attention. The main problems include moderate to severe scour along the abutments and erosion of channel banks, and moderate scour at the upstream ends of the piers. Scour has exposed and undermined the footing at the north abutment, with up to 6 timber piles exposed. The undermining of the north abutment footing should be repaired and scour countermeasures should be placed along the substructure units and channel banks to prevent further erosion and scour.

Additional problems include drift, fallen trees, and abandoned piles in the channel, deteriorated or missing expansion joint material in the curbs and rails, and moderate cracking with efflorescence on the east face and underside of slab at the north pier.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-104P

LITTLE BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020

serious or costly problems in the future.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-104P

LITTLE BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 10/29/2020

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT C

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

Item No.

Maintenance Recomendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

58.2,58.3

RESEAL JOINTS IN WEARING SURFACE.

61.4

REMOVE FALLEN TREES FROM UPSTREAM CHANNEL.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

60.9,60. REPAIR SCOUR AND UNDERMINING OF NORTH

17,61.2 ABUTMENT. REPAIR SCOUR AND EROSION AT

ABUTMENT SLOPES, PIERS, AND CHANNEL

BANKS.

58.5 REMOVE UNSOUND CONCRETE FROM EAST

CURB ABOVE NORTH PIER, CLEAN REBAR, AND

REPLACE CONCRETE TO ORIGINAL

DIMENSIONS.

61.4 REMOVE WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS FROM

CHANNEL AND UNDER STRUCTURE.

58.1,59.3, REMOVE UNSOUND CONCRETE FROM EAST

60.3 FACE OF SLAB AND EAST END OF

BREASTWALL AT NORTH ABUTMENT, CLEAN

REBAR, AND REPLACE CONCRETE TO

ORIGINAL DIMENSIONS.

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, DESIGN, AND

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING

(APPROXIMATELY 70% OF TOTAL REHAB COST)

PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-104P

LITTLE BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 10/29/2020

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT C

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-104P

LITTLE BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/28/2020

58. DECK

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.OTHER:

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

61. CHANNEL

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

222. APPROACHES

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

223. RETAINING WALL

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

F

G

F

F

G

G

N

N

N

F

N

N

N

N

N

G

G

G

P

P

N

F

N

1- SUFF

2 - MED

N

N

N

G

G

G

G

N

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS P

3. WEARING SURFACE G

N

HIGH WATER SENSOR

16 FT

G

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0

SILT

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N

5. FOUNDATIONS 14 - SPR FTG/PILES N

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES G

8. EXPANSION JOINTS N

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR P

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11.SLOPE PROTECTION N

12.OTHER N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

N

N

N

PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS G

N

G

N

P

G

N

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

16.FOUNDATIONS

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19.OTHER

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-104P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

58.1

59.3

MINOR DIAGONAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SLAB UNDERSIDE IN NORTH SPAN AT NORTH PIER. MODERATE LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST SIDE OF SLAB UNDERSIDE AT NORTH PIER.

MINOR DIAGONAL CRACK IN SLAB UNDERSIDE AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF CENTER SPAN NEAR NORTH PIER.

MODERATE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND DELAMINATION OF EAST FACE OF SLAB AT NORTH ABUTMENT. MODERATE HORIZONTAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST FACE OF SLAB OVER NORTH PIER AND IN NORTH SPAN.

58.2

58.3

222.4

ADHESION FAILURE ALONG DECK JOINTS.

EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL IS SEVERELY DETERIORATED OR MISSING IN CURBS AND RAILINGS.

58.5

58.6

MINOR TRANSVERSE AND VERTICAL CRACKING OF CURBS. MODERATE MAP CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST CURB

ABOVE NORTH PIER WITH MINOR DELAMINATION AND SPALLING UP TO 15'.

MINOR TRANSVERSE AND VERTICAL CRACKING OF RAILS; MODERATE OVER PIERS. MINOR SPALLING OF RAILS AT JOINTS.

59.11 HIGH WATER SENSOR/CABLES IN PLACE AT WEST SIDE OF NORTH SPAN,

60.1

60.3

MINOR STAINING AT ENDS OF BREASTWALLS. MODERATE SPALL WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT

BREASTWALL.

60.6

60.9

MINOR SCRAPING AT BASE OF ALL WINGWALLS. ANIMAL BURROW (1'DIA X 1-1/2'D) ALONG NORTHWEST WINGWALL.

60.9

60.5

MODERATE EROSION (8'W X 2'D) ALONG SOUTH ABUTMENT.

MODERATE SCOUR ALONG NORTH ABUTMENT WITH EXPOSED AND UNDERMINED FOOTING. UNDERMINING OF FOOTING AT WEST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT (21'L X 4'H X 2.5'D), WITH UP TO 6 PILES EXPOSED (1.5'L).

60.13 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF PIER WALLS. MINOR SPALL ON NORTH SIDE OF SOUTH PIER NEAR BEARING AREA AT CENTER.

60.17

61.2

MODERATE EROSION OF ALL CHANNEL BANKS. MODERATE EROSION TROUGH (40'L X 4'W X UP TO 5'D) BEGINNING UNDER SCUPPER IN SOUTH SPAN AND EXTENDING AROUND UPSTREAM END OF SOUTH PIER INTO CHANNEL. MODERATE SCOUR HOLE (8'DIA X 4'D) AT UPSTREAM END OF NORTH PIER; FOOTING EXPOSED UP TO 1' HIGH ALONG SOUTH SIDE OF PIER.

61.1

61.2

SHARP CURVE IN CHANNEL ON BOTH SIDES OF STRUCTURE. MODERATE EROSION OF CHANNEL BANKS AT UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL. CHANNEL MAKES A 90 DEGREE TURN AT UPSTREAM SIDE AND FLOWS DIRECTLY TOWARDS NORTH

ABUTMENT.

EROSION OF SOUTH CHANNEL BANK AT UPSTREAM SIDE EXTENDS UP TO 60' WITH A DROPOFF OF ABOUT 10'H.

SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

ABANDONED PILES EXPOSED IN CHANNEL UNDER NORTH SPAN. MODERATE ACCUMULATION OF DRIFT AND DEBRIS AT

UPSTREAM END OF NORTH PIER. TREE GROWING IN CHANNEL JUST UPSTREAM OF NORTH PIER.

222.5 MINOR EROSION AROUND SOUTH END OF EAST PARAPET.

222.7 5"X16" BLACK AND YELLOW STRIPED OBJECT MARKERS AT ALL PARAPET ENDS.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-104P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 23 21 38 34

HS 28 25 47 43

TYPE 3 26 24 44 40

TYPE 3S2 41 37 68 62

TYPE 3-3 50 45 84 76

DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 11/16/2015

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: NEGATIVE MOMENT

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-104P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............LITTLE BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-104 P

4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................DANCY

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3H4-10

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........2356A

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

284 - MISSISSIPPI

01019 CHEROKEE

00000

1 6 1 00001 0

LITTLE BYWAY CREEK

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570104P0000000

2 9 MILES SOUTH OF MS ROUTE 9

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

192.4 (KM PT: 58.64)

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 01 - SLAB (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............003 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............40.4 FT ( 12.3 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 102. FT ( 31.3 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-

CAPACITY RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............28 TONS ( 25.4 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............47 TONS ( 42.6 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

https://LENGTH:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-104P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 24'24 80" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°16 '29.10" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.3 FT ( 9.8 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 25 MI ( 40 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1230 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1353 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT

REQUIRED)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2.46 FT ( 0.75 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... 6 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............6 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 6 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N

(61) CHANNEL:................................4 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 4 - ACTION IS REQUIRED TO

PROTECT EXPOSED FOUNDATIONS

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PROPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: C - MODERATE

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 6000

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 120000

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2012-STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES REPAVED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

Inspector: Reinaldo Silvestry Structure Number: 5570104P0000000

Inpsection Date: 10/29/2020 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING NORTHBOUND TOWARD TUPELO

PHOTO 4

Description WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH; NOTE LONGITUDINAL CRACK ALONG

CENTERLINE

PHOTO 6

Description SAWCUT JOINT OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE ADHESION FAILURE AND DEBRIS

ACCUMULATION ON WEST SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTHEAST RAILING; NOTE CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE

FROM SETTLEMENT AND EROSION AT CURB END

PHOTO 8

Description EAST RAILING OVER PIER #2; NOTE MOSS GROWTH, CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE, DELAMINATION, AND SPALLING OF THE CONCRETE CURB EXTENDING UP TO 15'

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description EAST SIDE OF SLAB; NOTE HORIZONTAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE NEAR PIER #2

PHOTO 10

Description HORIZONTAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE (UP TO 7'L) AT EAST SIDE OF SLAB ON

NORTH SPAN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description EAST EDGE OF NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE CRACKING, DELAMINATION, AND SPALLING OF

CONCRETE SLAB AT BEARING AREA OVER ABUTMENT

PHOTO 12

Description NORTHWEST WINGWALL; NOTE 15' DROP OFF

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE SCOUR AND UNDERMINING WITH FOOTING AND PILES

EXPOSURE (21'L X 4'H X 3'U)

PHOTO 14

Description CLOSE UP VIEW OF FOOTING EXPOSURE WITH UNDERMINING, UP TO 3'UNDER, AT

NORTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description CLOSE UP VIEW OF UNDERMINING WITH 6 PILES EXPOSED UP TO 16"H AT NORTH

ABUTMENT

PHOTO 16

Description SCOUR HOLE, UP TO 2' DEEP, IN FRONT OF NORTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description UNDERSIDE VIEW OF NORTH SPAN LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 18

Description DIAGONAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SLAB

UNDERSIDE AT NORTH SPAN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH PIER; SOUTH FACE SHOWN

PHOTO 20

Description DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND SCOUR HOLE AT UPSTREAM SIDE OF NORTH PIER

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 21

Description CENTER SPAN SLAB UNDERSIDE LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 22

Description EROSION TRENCH FROM DECK DRAINAGE AT NORTH FACE OF SOUTH PIER NEAR EAST

END

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 23

Description UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SOUTH SPAN LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO 24

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE EROSION TRENCH AT EAST SIDE OF

ABUTMENT SLOPE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 25

Description SLOUGHING ALONG NORTH CHANNEL BANK ON UPSTREAM SIDE

PHOTO 26

Description NORTH CHANNEL BANK ON WEST SIDE; NOTE SLOUGHING OF CHANNEL BANKS

ADJACENT TO STRUCTURE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 27

Description SOUTH CHANNEL BANK UPSTREAM SIDE; NOTE CHANNEL MAKES A 90 DEFREE TURN

TOWARDS STRUCTURE AND EROSION IS GETTING CLOSER

PHOTO 28

Description LOOKING UPSTREAM

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 29

Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM