5570-097P-2018.pdf

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-097P

SAND CREEK BRIDGE DANCY INSPECTION DATE: 12/6/18

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... SLAB NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 85.0 FT (25.9 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 32.0 FT (9.8 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 32.4 FT (9.9 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 3H6 / 2352A SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ N/A

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2007-NEW PAVEMENT.

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 196.50 (KM PT 316.23)

STATE: ................................. MISSISSIPPI LOCATION: 7.6 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. ROUTE 82

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. SAND CREEK

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete slab bridge is in good condition overall. These include severe deterioration of the expansion joint material in the curbs and railings, and minor debris accumulation along the curblines. In addition, the previously repair patch on the east rail over the south abutment has failed.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: M. REGER, Z. BAILEY

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

MICHAEL REGER, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-948-1424

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/31/19

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-097P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D 226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

58.2 REPLACE EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL IN CURBS AND RAILINGS.

58.7 REMOVE DEBRIS FROM ALONG CURBLINES.

60.7 CLEAN CLOGGED WEEP HOLES AT NORTH ABUTMENT.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

58.6 REMOVE AND REAPPLY PATCH ON EAST RAIL OVER SOUTH

ABUTMENT.

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL,

DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (70% TOTAL REHAB

COST) PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-097P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE

9 EXCELLENT CONDITION

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

58. DECK 7

1. DECK SLAB G

2. EXPANSION JOINTS P 58.1, 59.3

3. WEARING SURFACE G

4. RIDEABILITY G

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN G

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS F

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE F

8. UTILITIES N

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION G 58.2,3

10. OTHER N

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 7

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

N N 58.5,6

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S) G

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS N

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

N N 58.7

7. PAINT N

8. FASCIA(E) N

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION G

10. ALIGNMENT G 60.1

11. OTHER N

60. SUBSTRUCTURE 7

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G 60.3

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N

5. FOUNDATIONS N 60.6

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES G

8. EXPANSION JOINTS N

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G 60.7

10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11. SLOPE PROTECTION N

12. OTHER N

PIER(S) 60.13

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS G

14. PILE BENTS N

15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N

16. FOUNDATIONS N 60.17

17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR F

18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

19. OTHER N

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

MINOR CRACKING WITH MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK

UNDERSIDE IN SOUTH SPAN, EAST SIDE AND SOUTHWEST

CORNER, AND IN CENTER SPAN NEAR SOUTH PIER. MINOR

RANDOM CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WEST FACE OF

DECK AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SOUTH SPAN. MINOR POPOUTS

ON BOTH SIDES OF DECK.

EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL IS SEVERELY DETERIORATED OR

MISSING IN CURBS AND RAILINGS.

MINOR CRACKING OF CURBS AND RAILINGS; MOSS GROWTH

THROUGHOUT. PATCH FAILING AT EAST RAILING OVER SOUTH

ABUTMENT.

MODERATE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES.

MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTH

ABUTMENT BREASTWALL, WEST SIDE AND NORTH ABUTMENT,

BOTH SIDES.

MINOR DETERIORATION OF BOND BREAKER MATERIAL AT

ABUTMENT BEARING SEATS. MINOR SPALLING AT WEST SIDE OF

SOUTH ABUTMENT BEARING SEAT.

MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

NORTHEAST AND SOUTHEAST WINGWALLS.

CLOGGED WEEP HOLES AT NORTH ABUTMENT.

MINOR SCALING OF PIER WALLS IN NORMAL WATERLINE.

MINOR SCOUR AT BOTH SIDES OF BOTH PIERS. MINOR EROSION

OF EMBANKMENTS ALONG SOUTH PIER; MODERATE EROSION

ALONG NORTH PIER.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-097P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

61. CHANNEL 7

1. ALIGNMENT G

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION N

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS F

5. OTHER N

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING SUFF

7. NORMAL VELOCITY LOW

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 7 FT.

9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :

CLAY, SAND

222. APPROACHES 7

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

N N N G G G G G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

N N N

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

61.4 FALLEN TREES IN UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL.

222.7 MISSING TYPE 3 OBJECT MARKERS AT NORTH END OF PARAPETS.

36.A RAILING HEIGHT OF 1’-10” DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM HEIGHT

REQUIREMENT OF 2’-3” FOR TRAFFIC BARRIERS.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-097P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 25 23

HS 22 20 38 34

TYPE 3 19 17 32 29

TYPE 3S2 29 26 49 44

TYPE 3-3 39 35 65 59

DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 3/16

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-097P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 284 - MISSISSIPPI (MS)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... SAND CREEK BRIDGE DANCY (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 019 - CHOCTAW

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5570-097P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... SAND CREEK

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........097P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5570097P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 7.6 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. R

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. DANCY (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................3H6 (11) MILE POINT: .............................196.50 (KM PT 316.23)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 2352A (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

01 - SLAB

32.0 FT (9.8 M)

85.0 FT (25.9 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 22.0 TONS (20.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 38.0 TONS (34.5 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 12/18 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-097P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 33°27'04.80"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 89°13'45.90"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 15 MI (24 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

28.0 FT (8.5 M)

32.4 FT (9.9 M)

32.0 FT (9.8 M)

22.0 FT (6.7 M)

5.0 FT (1.5 M)

5.0 FT (1.5 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

0 °

NO

28.0 FT (8.5 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

1 - CONCRETE

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

1.83 FT (0.56 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ...........................N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

5 - Stable; scour within limits of

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

D - MINOR

$4,000

$2,000

$0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2007-NEW PAVEMENT.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5570-097P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-097P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD JACKSON

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - WEST (UPSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW OF STRUCTURE LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #4 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW IN CENTER SPAN LOOKING

NORTH

PHOTO #5 - DETERIORATION OF EDGE OF

LANE STRIPING ALONG WEST SIDE

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION

ALONG CURBLINES, WEST CURBLINE SHOWN;

NOTE MOSS GROWTH

PHOTO #7 - DELAMINATION, CRACKING AND SPALLING OF PATCH ON

EAST RAIL POST OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL DETERIORATED OR MISSING FILLER MATERIAL IN

CURB AND RAILING EXPANSION JOINTS, WEST CURB AND RAIL OVER

SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN (PHOTO FROM 01/13/2016 INSPECTION

PHOTO #9 - CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE

IN SOUTH SPAN ALONG EAST SIDE

PHOTO #10 - CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST DECK FACE

NEAR SOUTH PIER

PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF BOND BREAKER MATERIAL

AT ABUTMENT BEARING SEATS, NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #12 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #13 - EROSION ALONG EAST SIDE OF NORTH PIER

PHOTO #14 - NORTH FACE OF SOUTH PIER

PHOTO #15 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING UPSTREAM

PHOTO #16 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING DOWNSTREAM; NOTE

TREES IN CHANNEL