5570-102P-2020.pdf

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

MIDDLE BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE #1

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER MIDDLE BYWAY CREEK

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LOOKING NORTH

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-102P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 10/30/2020

WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-102P

MIDDLE BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE #1 INSPECTION DATE: 10/30/2020

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUDNATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

01 - SLAB NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: . 105.0 FT (32 M)

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ......... 40 FT (12.2 M)

6 - BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ..................... 32.3 FT (9.8 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: .... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES YEAR BUILT:

1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .

3H9 SKEW ANGLE: .................... 0 °

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ....... N

1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2007,2012-STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES REPAVED.

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: .. 193.60 (KM PT 59.01)

STATE: .............................. 284 - MISSISSIPPI LOCATION: .... 1.9 MILES SOUTH OF MS ROUTE 9

FACILITY CARRIED: ......... NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: MIDDLE BYWAY CREEK

INSPECTION TEAM: B. Cazenas, R. Silvestry

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Reinaldo Silvestry

REPORT REVIEW:

Marcus Miller

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 03/04/2021

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete slab bridge is in fair to good condition overall. Main problems with this structure involve severe erosion of the abutment slopes and channel banks, and severe scour along the piers and abutments with footing exposure for full length at north face of south pier. However, it should be noted that the substructure units are founded on piles and there is no imminent threat to the stability of the structure. This condition should continue to be monitored during future inspection cycles

Additional problems include fallen trees and abandoned piles in the channel; deteriorated or missing expansion joint material in the rails and curbs; and an abandoned high water sensor and cables on the east side of the deck.

It should be mentioned that repair works were in progress for this structure, at the time of inspection, under project NATR BMS FY20(1). This includes cleaning and sealing of deck joints, approach roadway joints, and curb joints over abutments; installing 6 weep hole filters.

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-102P

MIDDLE BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE #1 INSPECTION DATE: 10/30/2020

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-102P

MIDDLE BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE #1 INSPECTION DATE : 10/30/2020

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT C

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

Item No.

Maintenance Recomendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

60.9,60. PLACE SCOUR COUNTERMEASURES TO

17,61.2 ADDRESS SCOUR AND EROSION AT ABUTMENT

SLOPES, PIERS, AND CHANNEL BANKS AS

NECESSARY.

61.4 REMOVE WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS FROM

CHANNEL.

58.2 REPLACE EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL IN

CURBS AND RAILINGS. RESEAL JOINTS IN

WEARING SURFACE AS NECESSARY.

58.10 REMOVE HIGH WATER SENSOR FROM BRIDGE.

58.6 REMOVE UNSOUND CONCRETE FROM

SECOND RAIL POST FROM SOUTH ABUTMENT

ON WEST RAILING, CLEAN REBAR, AND PLACE

NEW CONCRETE TO ORIGINAL DIMENSIONS.

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, DESIGN, AND

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING

(APPROXIMATELY 70% OF TOTAL REHAB COST)

PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-102P

MIDDLE BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE #1 INSPECTION DATE : 10/30/2020

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT C

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-102P

MIDDLE BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE #1 INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020

58. DECK

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.OTHER:

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

61. CHANNEL

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

222. APPROACHES

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

223. RETAINING WALL

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

G

G

F

F

G

G

P

N

N

G

N

N

N

N

N

G

G

N

F

P

N

F

N

1- SUFF

2 - MED

N

N

N

G

G

G

G

N

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS P

3. WEARING SURFACE G

N 17 FT

G

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0

CLAY, SANDHIGH WATER SENSOR

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N

5. FOUNDATIONS N

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES G

8. EXPANSION JOINTS N

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR P

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11.SLOPE PROTECTION N

12.OTHER N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

N

N

N

PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS G

N

N

G

P

G

N

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

16.FOUNDATIONS 14 - SPR FTG/PILES

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19.OTHER

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-102P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

58.1

59.3

MINOR POPOUTS THROUGHOUT DECK SIDES. MINOR SPALLING OF DECK SIDES AT NORTH ABUTMENT CORNERS. MINOR MAP

CRACKING OF DECK UNDERSIDE AT NORTH SPAN.

58.2

58.3

PAVEMENT WAS SAW-CUT AND SEALED OVER DECK JOINTS; ISOLATED AREAS OF ADHESION FAILURE AT JOINTS OVER

ABUTMENTS.

EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL IS SEVERELY DETERIORATED OR MISSING IN CURBS AND RAILINGS.

58.5

58.6

MINOR TRANSVERSE AND VERTICAL CRACKING OF CURBS AND RAILINGS THROUGHOUT; MODERATE LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST CURB IN NORTH SPAN. MINOR MOSS GROWTH ON EAST CURB BELOW RAILING.

MINOR SPALL AND DELAMINATION OF SECOND RAIL POST FROM SOUTH ABUTMENT, WEST RAILING.

58.10 REMANANTS OF HIGH WATER SENSOR/CABLES LEFT IN PLACE OVERHANGING EAST SIDE OF DECK WITH SOURCE MOUNTED ON

NORTH ABUTMENT.

60.1 MINOR MOWER DAMAGE AT EAST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL.

60.6 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WINGWALLS; MINOR SCRAPING THROUGHOUT.

60.9

60.17

SEVERE EROSION (11'H) OF BOTH ABUTMENT SLOPES.

SEVERE SCOUR ALONG BOTH PIERS WITH FULL LENGTH OF FOOTING EXPOSED UP TO 3' HIGH ON NORTH FACE OF SOUTH PIER.

HOWEVER, FOOTINGS FOR BOTH PIERS ARE FOUNDED ON PILES.

61.1

61.2

CHANNEL FLOWS AGAINST SOUTH PIER ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE. MODERATE TO SEVERE EROSION OF BOTH CHANNEL BANKS

WITH SEVERAL TREES UNDERMINED.

SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

61.4 SEVERAL TREES DOWN IN UPSTREAM CHANNEL AND BELOW STRUCTURE. ABANDONED PILES IN CHANNEL BELOW STRUCTURE.

222.7 5"X16" BLACK AND YELLOW STRIPED OBJECT MARKERS AT ENDS OF PARAPETS.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-102P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 24 22 40 36

HS 34 31 56 51

TYPE 3 32 29 54 49

TYPE 3S2 38 34 63 57

TYPE 3-3 51 46 85 77

DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 08/10/2015

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: NEGATIVE MOMENT

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-102P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............MIDDLE BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE #1

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-102 P

4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................DANCY

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3H9

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........2355A

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

284 - MISSISSIPPI

01019 CHEROKEE

00000

1 6 1 00001 0

MIDDLE BYWAY CREEK

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570102P0000000

1 9 MILES SOUTH OF MS ROUTE 9

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

193.6 (KM PT: 59.01)

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 01 - SLAB (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............003 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............40 FT ( 12.2 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 105. FT ( 32 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-

CAPACITY RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............34 TONS ( 30.8 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............56 TONS ( 50.8 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 10/30/2020 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 5 - SCOUR INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-102P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 25'20.60" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°15 '54.10" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.3 FT ( 9.8 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 25 MI ( 40 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1230 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1353 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT

REQUIRED)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2.42 FT ( 0.74 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............7 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 5 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N

(61) CHANNEL:................................4 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 4 - ACTION IS REQUIRED TO

PROTECT EXPOSED FOUNDATIONS

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PROPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: C - MODERATE

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 0

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 260000

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2007,2012-STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES REPAVED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

https://25'20.60

Inspector: Reinaldo Silvestry Structure Number: 5570102P0000000

Inpsection Date: 10/30/2020 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO 4

Description EAST (UPSTREAM) SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 6

Description WEST RAILING LOOKING SOUTH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description NORTHWEST CORNER OF SLAB; NOTE AREA OF SPALL AND DIAGONAL CRACKING

PHOTO 8

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE ELECTRICAL BOX FOR HIGH WATER

SENSOR IS DETACHED FROM NORTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH SPAN SLAB UNDERSIDE LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 10

Description EROSION TRENCH DUE TO DECK DRAINAGE UNDER NORTH SPAN AT EAST SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description FOOTING EXPOSURE (1'H X 4'L) AT UPSTREAM SIDE OF NORTH PIER

PHOTO 12

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH PIER; SOUTH FACE SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description UNDERSIDE VIEW OF CENTER SPAN LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 14

Description NORTH FACE OF NORTH PIER; NOTE EROSION TRENCHES UNDER NORTH SPAN RUNNIG

TOWARDS PIER SIDES

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description FOOTING EXPOSURE FOR FULL LENGTH OF SOUTH PIER; NORTH FACE OF PIER SHOWN

PHOTO 16

Description CLOSE UP VIEW OF FOOTING EXPOSURE, UP TO 2' HIGH, AT DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF

SOUTH PIER

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description EROSION WITH UP TO 10' DROP OFF AT SOUTH ABUTMENT SLOPE

PHOTO 18

Description SOUTH ABUTMENT SLOPE; NOTE EROSION ALONG ABUTMENT SLOPE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description EROSION TRENCH, UNDER SPAN #1 AT EAST SIDE UNDER DECK DRAINAGE

PHOTO 20

Description UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SOUTH SPAN LOOKING SOUTH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 21

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE FILTERS IN PLACE AT ABUTMENT WEEP

HOLES

PHOTO 22

Description EROSION AT DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF SOUTH CHANNEL BANK

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 23

Description EROSION OF CHANNEL BANK ON SOUTH UPSTREAM SIDE

PHOTO 24

Description LOOKING UPSTREAM; NOTE FALLEN TREES ABOUT 100' TO 150' UPSTREAM

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 25

Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM