5570-093P-2020.pdf

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 201.90

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER COUNTY ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LOOKING NORTH

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-093P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020

EAST SIDE

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-093P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 201.90 INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUDNATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1 - CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: . 49.5 FT (15.1 M)

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ......... 37.5 FT (11.4 M)

6 - BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ..................... 32.3 FT (9.8 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: .... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

6 - N/A YEAR BUILT:

1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: . 0

3H16 SKEW ANGLE: .................... 40 °

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ....... N

1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2014-STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES REPAVED, PAVEMENT

SAWCUT AND SEALED OVER ENDS OF STRUCTURE, DRAINAGE INLETS INSTALLED

AT NE AND SW CORNERS.

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

STATE: .............................. 284 - MISSISSIPPI

FACILITY CARRIED: ......... NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: COUNTY ROAD

MILE POINT: .. 201.90 (KM PT 61.54)

LOCATION: .... 2.3 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. ROUTE 82

INSPECTION TEAM: B. Cazenas, R. Silvestry

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Reinaldo Silvestry

REPORT REVIEW:

Marcus Miller

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 03/04/2021

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete frame bridge is generally in good condition overall. Problems at this time include; missing filler material in the curbs, railings, and vertical joints; moderate collision damage to both sides and underside of the slab; and minor outward rotation of all the wingwalls (3/4" maximum), which has not change since previous inspection.

Other problems include buried weep holes at the abutments and a broken utility conduit at the north abutment.

The condition of the slab and the wingwalls will continue to be monitored during future inspection cycles.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-093P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 201.90 INSPECTION DATE : 10/29/2020

PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D

Item No.

Maintenance Recomendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

60.7

UNCOVER WEEP HOLES IN ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS.

222.7

INSTALL VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGN ON WEST SIDE OF

SLAB.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

58.2,60.8 REPLACE FILLER MATERIAL IN CURBS,

RAILINGS, AND VERTICAL JOINTS.

60.12 REPAIR BROKEN UTILITY CONDUIT AT NORTH

ABUTMENT.

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, DESIGN, AND

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (70% TOTAL

REHAB COST) PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-093P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 201.90 INSPECTION DATE: 10/28/2020

58. DECK

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.OTHER:

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

61. CHANNEL

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

222. APPROACHES

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

223. RETAINING WALL

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

F

G

G

G

G

G

N

N

N

F

N

N

N

N

N

G

G

N

N

N

N

N

F

G

G

G

G

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS P

3. WEARING SURFACE G

N FT

DROP INLETS

F

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N

5. FOUNDATIONS N

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES F

8. EXPANSION JOINTS P

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11.SLOPE PROTECTION N

12.OTHER UTILITY/DRAINAGE F

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

N

N

N

PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N

N

N

N

N

N

N

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

16.FOUNDATIONS

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19.OTHER

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-093P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

58.1

59.3

MINOR TO MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE AND EVIDENCE OF WATER LEAKAGE ON SLAB UNDERSIDE ALONG LONGITUDINAL CONSTRUCTION JOINT. MINOR TO MODERATE SCALING THROUGHOUT UNDERSIDE. MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF SLAB UNDERSIDE EDGES WITH EFFLORESCENCE. MINOR POPOUTS ON SLAB SIDES AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS. LIGHT GRAFFITI ON

SLAB UNDERSIDE.

MODERATE COLLISION DAMAGE TO BOTH SIDES AND UNDERSIDE; SPALLING ON EDGES AND SCRAPES ON UNDERSIDE.

MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINT BETWEEN EDGE OF SLAB AND

ABUTMENT AT CORNERS OF FRAME.

58.2 FILLER MATERIAL IS MISSING IN CURB AND RAILING EXPANSION JOINTS.

58.3

222.4

PAVEMENT SAWCUT AND SEALED OVER ENDS OF STRUCTURE. MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT;

MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF SOUTH APPROACH PAVEMENT.

58.5

58.6

MINOR CRACKING OF CURBS AND RAILINGS AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS WITH POPOUTS PRESENT. MINOR VEHICLE SCRAPES AT ENDS OF RAILINGS AND CURBS. MINOR SCALING ON TOP OF RAILS THROUGHOUT. RANDOMLY LOCATED MINOR FLAKING OF

FINISH COAT ON CURBS.

58.7 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS ALONG CURBLINES.

60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF BREASTWALLS. MODERATE GRAFFITI ON BOTH BREASTWALLS. MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACK

FOR FULL LENGTH OF NORTH BREASTWALL, 3" BELOW SLAB, WITH EFFLORESCENCE.

60.6 MINOR VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON ALL WINGWALLS. MINOR MOWER DAMAGE AT ALL WINGWALL ENDS; MINOR MOWER SCRAPES ALONG ALL WINGWALLS. MINOR FLAKING OF FINISH COAT ON SOUTHWEST

WINGWALL; MINOR 8" EROSION HOLE ON SOUTHEAST WINGWALL.

60.7 SEVERAL WEEP HOLES ARE BURIED.

60.8 MISSING FILLER MATERIAL IN VERTICAL JOINTS.

60.10 MINOR OUTWARD ROTATION OF WINGWALLS, MEASURED FROM TOP: 1/4" AT SOUTHWEST, 1/2" AT NORTHEAST, 3/4" AT

SOUTHEAST, AND 1/2" AT NORTHWEST (NO CHANGE SINCE LAST INSPECTION).

60.12 UTILITY LINE ATTACHED TO NORTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL. CONDUIT IS BROKEN. PREVIOUSLY NOTED PONDING WATER IN

FRONT OF ABUTMENTS NOT PRESENT AT TIME OF INSPECTION.

222.5

222.9

DRAINAGE INLETS ARE PARTIALLY BLOCKED WITH LEAVES AND PINE STRAW.

222.6 SETTLEMENT OF ROADWAY BEHIND SOUTHWEST ABUTMENT. MINOR SETTLEMENT OF ROADWAY BEHIND SOUTHEAST

ABUTMENT AND NORTHEAST ABUTMENT.

222.7 TYPE 3 OBJECT MARKERS IN PLACE ON UNDERPASS ROADWAY. "12 FT 6 IN" VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS ON EAST SIDES OF SLAB HAS BEEN MODIFIED TO READ "12 FT 0 IN"; WEST SIDE VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGN MISSING.

5" X 16" BLACK AND YELLOW STRIPED ON ENDS OF PARAPET WALLS.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-093P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 25 23

HS 21 19 35 32

TYPE 3 18 16 31 28

TYPE 3S2 28 25 48 44

TYPE 3-3 36 33 60 54

DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 05/30/2019

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT, AS PER AASHTO MANUAL FOR BRIDGE EVALUATION (MBE)SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR

LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-093P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 201.90

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-093 P

4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................DANCY

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3H16

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........3017A

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

284 - MISSISSIPPI

01019 CHEROKEE

00000

1 6 1 00001 0

COUNTY ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570093P0000000

2 3 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. ROUTE 82

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

201.9 (KM PT: 61.54)

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

CULVERTS)

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............37.5 FT ( 11.4 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 49.5 FT ( 15.1 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-

CAPACITY RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............21 TONS ( 19.1 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............35 TONS ( 31.8 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

https://LENGTH:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-093P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 30'52.60" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°10 '34.10" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.3 FT ( 9.8 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 15 MI ( 24 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......02 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 1 - HIGHWAY, WITH OR W/OUT (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

PEDESTRIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1075 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 40 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1183 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........N - NOT APPLICABLE, NO WATERWAY RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:...............................4.00 FT ( 1.22 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2.42 FT ( 0.74 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 12.50 FT ( 3.81 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............6 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(61) CHANNEL:................................N (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:........... N

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 6 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... N - NOT OVER WATERWAY

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PROPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 2500

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 17000

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2014-STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES REPAVED, PAVEMENT SAWCUT AND SEALED OVER ENDS OF STRUCTURE, DRAINAGE INLETS

INSTALLED AT NE AND SW CORNERS.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

https://30'52.60

Inspector: Reinaldo Silvestry Structure Number: 5570093P0000000

Inpsection Date: 10/29/2020 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD JACKSON

PHOTO 4

Description WEST SIDE; NOTE OBJECT MARKERS AT APPROACHES AND MISSING VERTICAL

CLEARANCE SIGN AT WEST APPROACH OF UNDERPASS

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 6

Description LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE OVER SOUTH

APPROACH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE AT EAST SIDE OF

NORTH APPROACH

PHOTO 8

Description FULL WIDTH TRANSVERSE CRACK OF WEARING SURFACE OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT DUE

TO SETTLEMENT OF SOUTH APPROACH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description CLOSE UP VIEW OF SETTLEMENT OF SOUTH APPROACH PAVEMENT OVER SOUTH

ABUTMENT; NOTE UP TO 1.5" SETTLEMENT OF APPROACH

PHOTO 10

Description NORTH ABUTMNET EXPANSION JOINT; NOTE TRANSVERSE CRACKING RUNNING ALONG

SIDE JOINT INDICATING APPROACH SETTLEMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AROUND DRAINAGE INLET AT SOUTHWEST CORNER

PHOTO 12

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTHEAST WINGWALL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description SOUTHEAST WINGWALL; NOTE OPEN EXPANSION JOINT WITH VEGETATION GROWTH

PHOTO 14

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTHWEST WINGWALL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE GRAFFITI

PHOTO 16

Description SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE WATER PONDING ALONG BASE OF ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SLAB LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 18

Description SPALLING DUE TO COLLISION DAMAGE AT WEST SIDE OF SLAB

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description SPALLING DUE TO COLLISION DAMAGE AT EAST SIDE OF SLAB

PHOTO 20

Description SLAB UNDERSIDE LOOKING SOUTH; NOTE STAINING AT BOTH ENDS OF CENTERLINE

LONGITUDINAL CONSTRUCTION JOINT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 21

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE GRAFFITI

PHOTO 22

Description VERTICAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT NORTHWEST WINGWALL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 23

Description OPEN VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINT AT SOUTHWEST WINGWALL