5570-103P-2018.pdf

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-103P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 193.00 INSPECTION DATE: 11/30/18

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 26.0 FT (7.9 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 26.0 FT (7.9 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 32.4 FT (9.9 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 3H20 / NONE SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ N/A

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2007-NEW PAVEMENT.

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 193.00 (KM PT 310.60)

STATE: ................................. MISSISSIPPI LOCATION: 2.5 MILES SOUTH OF MS ROUTE 9

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. COUNTY ROAD

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete frame bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include deteriorated expansion joint material in the curbs, railings, and vertical joints; exposed rebar on the underside of the east rail; clogged weep holes at the abutments; missing object markers at the bridge corners along the underpass roadway; and pine straw accumulation along the west curbline and on northeast drop inlet grate.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: M. REGER, R. DARJI

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

MICHAEL REGER, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-948-1424

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/31/19

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-103P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D 226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

58.2, 60.8 REPLACE EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL IN CURBS, RAILINGS AND VERTICAL

JOINTS.

58.6 CLEAN AND COAT EXPOSED REBAR ON UNDERSIDE OF EAST RAIL WITH

APPROVED PROTECTIVE COATING.

58.7 REMOVE PINE STRAW ACCUMULATION ALONG WEST CURBLINE

AND FROM GRATE OF NORTHEAST DROP INLET.

60.7 REMOVE DEBRIS FROM COVERED WEEP HOLES.

222.7 PROVIDE TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT BRIDGE CORNERS ALONG

UNDERPASS ROADWAY.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that the recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-103P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

OTHER

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

FOUNDATIONS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

PIER(S)

OTHER

SLOPE PROTECTION

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

EXPANSION JOINTS

WEEP HOLES

WINGWALLS

FOUNDATIONS

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

N N G N N N N N G

N G

G N N N N G F P G G N N

N N N N N N N

11.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

58.1, 59.3 MINOR POPOUTS THROUGHOUT DECK SIDES. MINOR SPALLING OF

DECK SIDES AT NORTH ABUTMENT CORNERS AND AT EAST EDGE

OF DECK.

MINOR MAP CRACKING OF DECK UNDERSIDE.

58.2 SEVERE DETERIORATION OF EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL IN

CURBS AND RAILINGS.

58.5,6 MINOR TRANSVERSE AND VERTICAL CRACKING OF CURBS AND

RAILINGS AT VERY ISOLATED LOCATIONS.

58.6 BOTTOM FACE OF EAST RAIL AT CENTER SPAN HAS A SPALL WITH

EXPOSED REBAR 1' LONG. MINOR SPALLING AT RAILING ENDS.

SEVERAL RAIL POSTS HAVE MINOR DELAMINATION.

58.7 PINE STRAW ACCUMULATION ALONG WEST CURBLINE AND ON TOP

OF NORTHEAST DROP INLET GRATE.

60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACK AT CENTERLINE OF BOTH BREASTWALLS;

VERY MINOR DELAMINATION OF SURFACE COAT ALONG CRACKS.

MINOR STAINING AT CORNERS OF BOTH ABUTMENTS. MINOR

COLLISION DAMAGE TO EAST SIDE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

BREASTWALL AND WEST SIDE OF NORTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL.

60.6 MINOR POPOUTS AND HORIZONTAL CRACKING OF WINGWALLS AT

SOME LOCATIONS, SOME CRACKS WITH EFFLORESCENCE.

MOWER SCRAPES ALONG NORTHWEST, SOUTHWEST, AND

SOUTHEAST WINGWALLS.

60.7 WEEP HOLES ARE COVERED.

60.8 SEVERE DETERIORATION OF VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINT FILLER

MATERIAL AT ALL WINGWALLS.

G G G G F N

N

P

G

G

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-103P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL N 222.5 ASPHALT PATCHING PLACED AT NORTHEAST PARAPET END TO

REPAIR PREVIOUS ERODED AREA; HOWEVER, MINOR EROSION

REMAINS OF EMBANKMENT REMAINS DUE TO ROADWAY RUN OFF.

222.7 OBJECT MARKER MISSING FROM BRIDGE CORNERS ALONG

UNDERPASS ROADWAY. MISSING CLEARANCE SIGNS FOR

UNDERPASS

222. APPROACHES 7

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

N N N G G G G G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-103P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 24 22 40 36

HS 43 39 71 64

TYPE 3 37 34 63 57

TYPE 3S2 57 52 96 87

TYPE 3-3 73 66 122 111

DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 5/15

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-103P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 193.00

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5570-103P

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........103P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. DANCY

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................3H20

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..

284 - MISSISSIPPI (MS)

019 - CHOCTAW

161000010

COUNTY ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570103P0000000

2.5 MILES SOUTH OF MS RO

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

193.00 (KM PT 310.60)

N/A

3 - FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

1 - CONCRETE

07 - FRAME

26.0 FT (7.9 M)

26.0 FT (7.9 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 43.0 TONS (39.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 71.0 TONS (64.4 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 11/18 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-103P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 33°24'57.30"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 89°16'16.20"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 25 MI (40 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 3.0 FT (0.9 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

28.0 FT (8.5 M)

32.4 FT (9.9 M)

32.0 FT (9.8 M)

22.0 FT (6.7 M)

5.0 FT (1.5 M)

5.0 FT (1.5 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

0 °

NO

28.0 FT (8.5 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

1 - CONCRETE

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

2.42 FT (0.74 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

13.75 FT (4.19 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N

(62) CULVERT: ...........................N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N - Not over waterway.

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

$13,000

$0

$0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2007-NEW PAVEMENT.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5570-103P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-103P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD JACKSON

PHOTO #2 - WEST SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW OF STRUCTURE LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACK IN WEARING SURFACE OF

NORTH APPROACH SLAB IN SOUTHBOUND LANE

PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL ADHESION FAILURE OF POURABLE JOINT

SEALANT

PHOTO #6 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF STRUCTURE LOOKING

EAST

PHOTO #7 - LONGITUDINAL CRACKING ALONG CENTERLINE OF SLAB

UNDERSIDE

PHOTO #8 - TRANSVERSE CRACK, VEHICULAR SCRAPES, AND SPALL

AT EAST EDGE OF SLAB UNDERSIDE

PHOTO #9 - MISSING EXPANSION JOINT

MATERIAL BETWEEN CURB AND RAILING,

NORTHWEST CORNER SHOWN

PHOTO #10 - PINE STRAW ACCUMULATION AT

DROP INLET GRATE, NORTHEAST CORNER

SHOWN

PHOTO #11 - PINE STRAW ACCUMULATION

ALONG WEST CURBLINE

PHOTO #12 - SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR

UNDER EAST RAIL

PHOTO #13 - SPALLING OF FINISH COAT ON

WEST CURB AT NORTH ABUTMENT AREA

PHOTO #14 - VERTICAL CRACK AT

CENTERLINE OF ABUTMENT WITH SPALL OF

FINISH COAT AT NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #15 - OPENED VERTICAL JOINT AT

NORTHEAST WINGWALL; NOTE

DETERIORATION OF FILLING MATERIAL

PHOTO #16 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #17 - TREE GROWING ALONG SOUTHWEST WINGWALL SIMILAR

CONDITION EXIST AT NORTHWEST WINGWALL

PHOTO #18 - WATER PONDING DUE TO DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT

SOUTH DITCH LINE OF UNDERPASS ROADWAY, SOUTHWEST CORNER