5570-093P-2022.pdf

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 201.90

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER COUNTY ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LN

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-093P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 3/9/2022

ES

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

MILE POINT: 201.90

KILOMETER POINT: 324.86

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-093P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 201.90 INSPECTION DATE : 03/09/2022

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

Item No.

Maintenance Recommendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

60.7

UNCOVER WEEP HOLES IN ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS.

58.5,58.7

REMOVE DEBRIS FROM INLETS AND ALONG CURBS.

222.7

INSTALL VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGN ON WEST SIDE OF

SLAB.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

Item REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

UNIT

UNIT PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

No. (TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. COST

REHAB RECONSTR

58.2,60.8 REPLACE FILLER MATERIAL IN CURBS,

RAILINGS, AND VERTICAL JOINTS.

58.3,222.

SEAL CRACKS IN WEARING SURFACE OVER

DECK AND AT APPROACHES.

222.3 TIGHTEN AND RE-ORIENT OFFSET BLOCK AND

REPLACE DAMAGED POST AT UNDERPASS

APPROACH GUARDRAILS.

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-093P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 201.90 INSPECTION DATE : 03/09/2022

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-093P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 201.90 INSPECTION DATE: 03/08/2022

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 25 23

HS 21 19 35 32

TYPE 3 18 16 31 28

TYPE 3S2 28 25 48 44

TYPE 3-3 36 33 60 54

DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 05/30/2019

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT, AS PER AASHTO MANUAL FOR BRIDGE EVALUATION (MBE)SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR

LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-093P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 201.90

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-093 P

4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 093P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................DANCY

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3H16

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........3017A

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

284 - MISSISSIPPI

28019 CHOCTAW

00000

1 6 1 00001 0

COUNTY ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570093P0000000

2 3 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. ROUTE 82

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

201.9 (KM PT: 324 8)

0 6

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

CULVERTS)

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............37.5 FT ( 11.4 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 49.5 FT ( 15.1 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-

CAPACITY RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............21 TONS ( 19.1 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............35 TONS ( 31.8 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/09/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-093P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 30'52.60" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°10 '34.10" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.3 FT ( 9.8 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 15 MI ( 24 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......02 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 1 - HIGHWAY, WITH OR W/OUT (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

PEDESTRIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1075 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 40 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1183 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........N - NOT APPLICABLE, NO WATERWAY RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:...............................4.00 FT ( 1.22 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2.42 FT ( 0.74 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 12.50 FT ( 3.81 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............6 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(61) CHANNEL:................................N (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:........... N

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 6 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... N - NOT OVER WATERWAY

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2014-STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES REPAVED, PAVEMENT SAWCUT AND SEALED OVER ENDS OF STRUCTURE, DRAINAGE INLETS

INSTALLED AT NE AND SW CORNERS.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

Inspector: Killian Baptiste Structure Number: 5570093P0000000

Inspection Date: 03/09/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD JACKSON

PHOTO 4

Description WEST SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 6

Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF DECK LOOKING SOUTH; NOTE WATER STAINING AND

GRAFFITI

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description SETTLEMENT CRACKING IN NORTHBOUND LANE ADJACENT TO SOUTH EXPANSION

JOINT

PHOTO 8

Description SETTLEMENT CRACKING IN NORTHBOUND LANE ADJACENT TO NORTH EXPANSION

JOINT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description TYPICAL MISSING FILLER MATERIAL IN RAIL EXPANSION JOINTS, WEST RAILING OVER

SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO 10

Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF RAILINGS, NORTH END OF WEST RAILING SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES, WEST CURBLINE SHOWN

PHOTO 12

Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT DRAIN INLETS, SOUTHWEST DRAIN INLET SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description EDGE SPALLS AND SCRAPES ALONG EAST FASCIA, NOTE EXPOSED REBAR

PHOTO 14

Description EDGE SPALLS AND SCRAPES ALONG WEST FASCIA

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description TYPICAL SCALING OF DECK UNDERSIDE

PHOTO 16

Description EFFLORESCENCE AT NORTH END OF DECK COLD JOINT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 18

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description TYPICAL CRACKING AT ABUTMENT-DECK INTERFACE, WEST SIDE OF NORTH ABUTMENT

SHOWN; NOTE MISSING FILLER MATERIAL IN JOINT WITH WINGWALL

PHOTO 20

Description TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKS IN WINGWALLS, SOUTHWEST WINGWALL SHOWN; NOTE

WATER STAINING

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 21

Description TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WINGWALLS, NORTHWEST

WINGWALL SHOWN

PHOTO 22

Description ROTATED AND OFFSET TIMBER BLOCKS ON SOUTHWEST GUARDRAIL OF UNDERPASS

ROADWAY

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 23

Description SPLIT GUARDRAIL POST OF UNDERPASS ROADWAY, THIRD POST FROM SOUTHWEST

END SHOWN

PHOTO 24

Description TYPICAL DECAY OF GUARDRAIL POSTS FOR UNDERPASS ROADWAY