5570-108P-2022.pdf
PDF 5 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-24-R-000004
About this file
This bridge inspection report details the condition of a concrete bridge carrying the Natchez Trace Parkway over Poplar Creek Branch. The 105-foot-long structure was built in 1949 and last inspected on March 11, 2022. It consists of three spans supported by concrete abutments and piers with spread footings on piles.
The report documents numerous deficiencies including cracking and efflorescence of the deck and girders, spalling of concrete with exposed rebar, and scour around piers. Maintenance needs include repairing the scour, replacing expansion joint material, and cleaning exposed rebar. The structure's priority of improvement is listed as minor. Accompanying photos depict the noted deficiencies. The related federal contract opportunity is for drainage improvements along the Natchez Trace Parkway, with a pre-solicitation notice and information on the contracting agency.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 59 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
POPLAR CREEK BRANCH BRIDGE
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER POPLAR CREEK BRANCH
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
LS
STRUCTURE NO. 5570-108P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 3/11/2022
WD
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
MILE POINT: 181.08
KILOMETER POINT: 55.19
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-108P
POPLAR CREEK BRANCH BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 03/11/2022
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
Item No.
Maintenance Recommendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
60.6
FILL SINKHOLE AT NORTHEAST WINGWALL.
58.7
ROUTINELY REMOVE DEBRIS AND VEGETATION ALONG
CURBS.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
Item No.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
REHAB RECONSTR
60.17 REPAIR SCOUR AT NORTH AND SOUTH PIER
WITH ENGINEERED RIPRAP.
58.2 REPLACE EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL IN
RAILINGS.
60.1,60.3 CLEAN AND COAT EXPOSED REBAR AT
BREASTWALL BEARING SEATS AND ON
UNDERSIDE.
58.3,222.
SEAL CRACKS IN PAVEMENT OVER
STRUCTURE AND AT APPROACHES.
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-108P
POPLAR CREEK BRANCH BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 03/11/2022
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-108P
POPLAR CREEK BRANCH BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 03/10/2022
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 18 16 30 27
HS 22 20 38 34
TYPE 3 22 20 36 33
TYPE 3S2 26 24 44 40
TYPE 3-3 36 33 60 54
DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 05/16/2019
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: NEGATIVE MOMENT
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-108P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............POPLAR CREEK BRANCH BRIDGE
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-108 P
4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 108P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................KOSCIUSKO
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3J7
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........2293B
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
284 - MISSISSIPPI
28019 CHOCTAW
00000
1 6 1 00001 0
POPLAR CREEK BRANCH
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
5570108P0000000
14.2 MILES SOUTH OF MS ROUTE 9
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
181.0 (KM PT: 55.19)
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 01 - SLAB (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............003 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............40 FT ( 12.2 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 105. FT ( 32.1 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-
CAPACITY RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............22 TONS ( 20 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............38 TONS ( 34.5 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/11/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 5 - SCOUR INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-108P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 17'48.60" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°24 '02.60" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.4 FT ( 9.9 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 25 MI ( 40 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1230 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1353 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT
REQUIRED)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2 33 FT ( 0.71 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 6 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............6 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 6 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N
(61) CHANNEL:................................6 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 4 - ACTION IS REQUIRED TO
PROTECT EXPOSED FOUNDATIONS
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1981-JOINT REPAIR. 2010 - ROADWAY RESURFACED
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
Inspector: Killian Baptiste Structure Number: 5570108P0000000
Inspection Date: 03/11/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING NORTH TOWARD TUPELO
PHOTO 4
Description EAST (UPSTREAM) SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO 6
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF CENTER SPAN LOOKING SOUTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SOUTH SPAN LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO 8
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF NORTH SPAN LOOKING SOUTH; NOTE TYPICAL
CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ALONG COLD JOINTS AND CENTERLINE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description TRANSVERSE CRACK AND POT HOLE IN SOUTBOUND LANE OF SOUTH APPROACH
PHOTO 10
Description TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE ALONG CENTERLINE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF SHOULDER LANE STRIPING, EAST SHOULDER SHOWN
PHOTO 12
Description TYPICAL MISSING FILLER MATERIAL IN RAILING EXPANSION JOINTS, EAST RAILING OVER
NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE DIAGONAL CRACK IN RAIL POST
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF RAILINGS, EAST RAILING NEAR MIDSPAN SHOWN
PHOTO 14
Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG CURBLINES, EAST
CURBLINE SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description TYPICAL MOSS GROWTH ON SIDES OF STRUCTURE, WEST SIDE SHOWN
PHOTO 16
Description LONGITUDINAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ALONG CENTERLINE OF SOUTH SPAN;
NOTE LEAKAGE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ALONG COLD JOINTS OF SOUTH
SPAN, WEST SIDE SHOWN
PHOTO 18
Description SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON UNDERSIDE OF CENTER SPAN AT NORTH PIER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ALONG COLD JOINTS OF
CENTER SPAN, EAST SIDE SHOWN
PHOTO 20
Description HONEYCOMBING OF CENTER SPAN AT CENTERLINE 10' FROM NORTH PIER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 21
Description TRANSVERSE CRACK OF CENTER SPAN AT MIDSPAN
PHOTO 22
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 23
Description SPALL ON WEST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 24
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH FACE OF NORTH PIER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 25
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH FACE OF SOUTH PIER; NOTE SCOUR AND EROSION OF
EMBANKMENT
PHOTO 26
Description EROSION AT WEST END OF SOUTH PIER; NOTE SCALING ALONG WATERLINE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 27
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 28
Description SPALL ON EAST SIDE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 29
Description WATER LEAKING AT CENTER OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 30
Description TYPICAL MOWER SCRAPES ON WINGWALLS, SOUTHEAST WINGWALL SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 31
Description EROSION HOLE AT NORTHEAST WINGWALL
PHOTO 32
Description TYPICAL EDGE SPALLING OF PARAPETS, NORTHWEST PARAPET SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 33
Description LOOKING UPSTREAM FROM DECK
PHOTO 34
Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM FROM DECK
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .