5570-095P-2020.pdf

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 197.80

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER COUNTY ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LOOKING SOUTH

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-095P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020

WEST SIDE

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-095P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 197.80 INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUDNATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1 - CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: . 35.4 FT (10.8 M)

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ......... 28 FT (8.5 M)

6 - BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ..................... 32.4 FT (9.9 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: .... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

6 - N/A YEAR BUILT:

1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: . 0

3H17 SKEW ANGLE: .................... 0 °

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ....... N

1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2007, 2013-STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES REPAVED;

PAVEMENT SAWCUT AND SEALED OVER FRAME ENDS.

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

STATE: .............................. 284 - MISSISSIPPI

FACILITY CARRIED: ......... NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: COUNTY ROAD

MILE POINT: .. 197.80 (KM PT 60.29)

LOCATION: .... 6.3 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. ROUTE 82

INSPECTION TEAM: B. Cazenas, R. Silvestry

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Reinaldo Silvestry

REPORT REVIEW:

Marcus Miller

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 03/04/2021

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete frame bridge is generally in good condition overall, with some issues that require attention. Main problem at this time is the settlement of both approaches with up to 2" settlement of the approach pavement and full width transverse crack of the wearing surface over both ends. Additional problems include missing and deteriorated filler material in the curb and railing expansion joints, and in the vertical joints between the abutment breastwalls and wingwalls; and several areas of minor spalling on the bridge railing. In addition, object markers at both approaches of underpass road are missing.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-095P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 197.80 INSPECTION DATE : 10/29/2020

PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D

Item No.

Maintenance Recomendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

222.7

INSTALL OBJECT MARKERS AT ABUTMENTS FOR

UNDERPASS ROADWAY.

58.7,222.

PERIODICALLY REMOVE DEBRIS FROM INLET DRAINS

AND ALONG CURBLINES

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

58.2,60.8 REPLACE FILLER MATERIAL IN CURB

EXPANSION JOINTS AND IN VERTICAL JOINTS

BETWEEN ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS AND

WINGWALLS.

222.6 REPAIR APPROACH SETTLEMENT.

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, DESIGN, AND

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (70% TOTAL

REHAB COST) PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-095P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 197.80 INSPECTION DATE: 10/28/2020

58. DECK

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.OTHER:

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

61. CHANNEL

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

222. APPROACHES

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

223. RETAINING WALL

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

G

G

G

F

G

G

N

N

N

G

N

N

N

N

N

G

G

N

N

N

N

N

F

G

G

G

N

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS P

3. WEARING SURFACE G

N FT

F

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N

5. FOUNDATIONS N

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES G

8. EXPANSION JOINTS P

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11.SLOPE PROTECTION N

12.OTHER N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

N

N

N

PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N

N

N

N

N

N

N

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

16.FOUNDATIONS

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19.OTHER

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-095P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

58.1

59.3

MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON ALL OUTSIDE CORNERS OF FRAME AT SPRINGLINE. WIDESPREAD MINOR TO MODERATE SCALING OF SLAB UNDERSIDE. MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE

OF SLAB EDGES.

58.2 FILLER MATERIAL MISSING OR SEVERELY DETERIORATED IN CURB AND RAILING EXPANSION JOINTS.

58.3

222.4

222.6

PAVEMENT SAWCUT AND SEALED OVER ENDS OF STRUCTURE; SETTLEMENT OF APPROACH BEHIND ABUTMENTS. MODERATE

TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT.

58.5

58.6

MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF CURBS; MINOR POPOUTS. MINOR SCRAPES ON EAST CURB.

MINOR VERTICAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF RAILINGS. MINOR SPALLING OF RAIL AND ONE POST AT SOUTHEAST CORNER OF STRUCTURE. MINOR SPALL ON WEST RAIL NEAR MIDSPAN. MINOR EDGE SPALL ON TOP OF WEST RAIL AT NORTH

APPROACH. MINOR SPALLING AND MOWER DAMAGE AT PARAPET ENDS.

58.7 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IN BOTH CURBLINES.

60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACK NEAR CENTERLINE OF NORTH ABUTMENT. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH FLAKING OF FINISH COAT AT SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS. STAINING AT SIDES OF BREASTWALLS. HEAVY GRAFFITI ON BOTH

ABUTMENTS.

60.6 MINOR SCRAPES AT BASE OF WINGWALLS. MINOR HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

WINGWALLS WITH FLAKING OF FINISH COAT AT CRACKS. LIGHT GRAFFITI ON WINGWALLS.

60.8 SEVERE DETERIORATION OF FILLER MATERIAL IN VERTICAL JOINTS BETWEEN WINGWALLS AND ABUTMENTS WITH MINOR MOSS

GROWTH IN SOME JOINTS.

222.7 5" X 16" BLACK AND YELLOW STRIPED OBJECT MARKERS IN PLACE AT ALL PARAPET ENDS.

MISSING OBJECT MARKERS AT BOTH APPROACHES FOR UNDERPASS ROAD.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-095P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 25 23

HS 26 24 44 40

TYPE 3 22 20 38 34

TYPE 3S2 34 31 57 52

TYPE 3-3 44 40 73 66

DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 05/16/2019

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: POSITIVE MOMENT

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-095P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 197.80

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-095 P

4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................DANCY

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3H17

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........3018A

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

284 - MISSISSIPPI

01019 CHEROKEE

00000

1 6 1 00001 0

COUNTY ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570095P0000000

6 3 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. ROUTE 82

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

197.8 (KM PT: 60.29)

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

CULVERTS)

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............28 FT ( 8.5 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 35.4 FT ( 10.8 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-

CAPACITY RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............26 TONS ( 23.6 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............44 TONS ( 39.9 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-095P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 27'59 20" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°12 '53 20" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.4 FT ( 9.9 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 15 MI ( 24 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......02 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 1 - HIGHWAY, WITH OR W/OUT (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

PEDESTRIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1075 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1183 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........N - NOT APPLICABLE, NO WATERWAY RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:..............................6.00 FT ( 1.83 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2 50 FT ( 0.76 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 15.58 FT ( 4.75 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............7 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(61) CHANNEL:................................N (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:........... N

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 6 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... N - NOT OVER WATERWAY

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PROPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 2000

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 17000

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2007, 2013-STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES REPAVED; PAVEMENT SAWCUT AND SEALED OVER FRAME ENDS.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

Inspector: Reinaldo Silvestry Structure Number: 5570095P0000000

Inpsection Date: 10/29/2020 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING NORTHBOUND TOWARD TUPELO

PHOTO 4

Description EAST SIDE; NOTE MISSING OBJECT MARKERS AT ENDS OF ABUTMENTS FOR

UNDERPASS ROAD

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO 6

Description LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE AT SOUTH

APPROACH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AROUND DRAINAGE INLET AT SOUTHWEST CORNER

PHOTO 8

Description FULL WIDTH TRANSVERSE CRACK OF WEARING SURFACE AT SOUTH END; NOTE ALSO

UP TO 2" SETTLEMENT OF SOUTH APPROACH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description WEST RAILING TOWARDS NORTH SIDE; NOTE SPALLING

PHOTO 10

Description FULL WIDTH TRASNVERSE CRACK OF WEARING SURFACE OVER NORTH END; NOTE

ALSO SETTLEMENT OF NORTH APPROACH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description CLOSE UP VIEW OF PREVIOUS PHOTO; NOTE 2" OFFSET DUE TO SETTLEMENT OF

NORTH APPROACH

PHOTO 12

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTHEAST WINGWALL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description VEGETATION GROWTH ADJACENT TO NORTHWEST WINGWALL

PHOTO 14

Description HORIZONTAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT BEARING AREA ON WEST SIDE OF

NORTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description OPEN VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINT AT NORTHEAST SIDE

PHOTO 16

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE WEST WEEP HOLE IS PARTIALLY BURIED

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description SLAB UNDERSIDE LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 18

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE GRAFFITI

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description HORIZONTAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT BEARING AREA ON WEST SIDE OF

SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 20

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTHWEST WINGWALL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 21

Description OPEN VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINT AT SOUTHEAST SIDE