5570-098P-2020.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-24-R-000004
About this file
This bridge inspection report details the condition of Structure No. 5570-098P, the Big Byway Creek Bridge located on the Natchez Trace Parkway in Mississippi. The multi-beam steel bridge was built in 1956 and is in overall fair condition. It carries the Natchez Trace Parkway over Big Byway Creek and is maintained by the National Park Service. Primary needs include installing scour countermeasures, stabilizing erosion under deck drains, and cleaning and painting bearings. The deck, superstructure and substructure were rated fair, with minor cracking and deterioration noted. The channel and approaches also received fair ratings, with moderate erosion present. The report recommends rehabilitation work including scour countermeasures, erosion repairs, bearing cleaning and painting, and joint resealing. Preliminary total rehabilitation cost is estimated at $123,000.
The related federal contract opportunity is a pre-solicitation for drainage improvements on the Natchez Trace Parkway, including work on Structure No. 5570-098P. The solicitation number is 693C73-24-R-000004 and is being conducted by the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. No other details are provided on requirements, pricing, response dates or awardees.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 59 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
BIG BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER BIG BYWAY CREEK
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
LOOKING NORTH
STRUCTURE NO. 5570-098P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 10/30/2020
EAST (UPSTREAM) SIDE
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-098P
BIG BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/30/2020
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:
MAIN SPAN TYPE:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .
DECK TYPE:
WEARING SURFACE:
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:
PIER FOUDNATION(S):
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:
NPS ROAD CLASS:
STRUCTURE HISTORY:
4 - STEEL CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
5 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: . 171.0 FT (52.1 M)
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ......... 65 FT (19.8 M)
6 - BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ..................... 32.4 FT (9.9 M)
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: .... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES YEAR BUILT:
1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: . 0
3H7 SKEW ANGLE: .................... 25 °
1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ....... N
1985-SUPERSTRUCTURE PAINTED. 2007-NEW PAVEMENT. 2012-STRUCTURE AND
APPROACHES REPAVED.
LOCATION
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
STATE: .............................. 284 - MISSISSIPPI
FACILITY CARRIED: ......... NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: BIG BYWAY CREEK
MILE POINT: .. 196.20 (KM PT 59.8)
LOCATION: .... 8.2 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. ROUTE 82
INSPECTION TEAM: B. Cazenas, R. Silvestry
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
Reinaldo Silvestry
REPORT REVIEW:
Marcus Miller
REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 03/04/2021
Jorgomai Ceesay
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This steel multi-beam bridge is in fair condition overall. Primary issues include minor to moderate erosion of the channel banks, erosion of the soil below the scuppers and weep holes in the north and south spans, and rusting of the bearings. Other problems include adhesion failure of the expansion joint material in the wearing surface, and debris accumulation at bearing seats.
Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-098P
BIG BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 10/30/2020
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
Item No.
Maintenance Recomendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
60.3
REMOVE DEBRIS FROM BEARING SEATS AT BOTH
ABUTMENTS.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
Item No.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
REHAB RECONSTR
61.2 INSTALL SCOUR COUNTERMEASURES ON
CHANNEL BANKS AT STRUCTURE.
60.9 STABILIZE EROSION UNDER DECK SCUPPER
DRAINS AND WEEP HOLE DRAINAGE IN NORTH
AND SOUTH SPANS AS NEEDED.
59.1,59.7 CLEAN AND PAINT BEARINGS.
58.2 CLEAN AND RESEAL EXPANSION JOINTS IN
WEARING SURFACE.
222.4 SEAL TRANSVERSE CRACKS AT APPROACHES.
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING
(APPROXIMATELY 70% OF TOTAL REHAB COST)
PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-098P
BIG BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 10/30/2020
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : ..
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-098P
BIG BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020
58. DECK
1. DECK SLAB
4. RIDEABILITY
5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
8. UTILITIES
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10.OTHER:
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
1. BEARING DEVICES
2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS
3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
5. TRUSSES
6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
7. PAINT
8. FASCIA(E)
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10.ALIGNMENT
11.OTHER
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
61. CHANNEL
1. ALIGNMENT
2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
3. CHANNEL PROTECTION
4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS
5. OTHER
6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING
7. NORMAL VELOCITY
8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING
9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:
222. APPROACHES
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER
223. RETAINING WALL
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
F
G
F
F
G
G
N
F
F
N
N
N
G
F
F
G
G
N
G
F
N
G
N
1- SUFF
2 - MED
N
N
N
G
G
G
G
N
N
2. EXPANSION JOINTS P
3. WEARING SURFACE G
N 16 FT
G
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLEN
EXCELLENT CONDITION9
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6
FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
Structure is closed to
FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0
CLAY, SAND
ABUTMENTS
1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G
2. PILE BENTS N
3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G
4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS G
5. FOUNDATIONS N
6. WINGWALLS G
7. WEEP HOLES G
8. EXPANSION JOINTS N
9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR F
10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G
11.SLOPE PROTECTION N
12.OTHER N
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:
B. TRANSITIONS:
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:
N
N
N
PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS G
N
G
N
F
G
N
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.
15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
16.FOUNDATIONS
17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.
18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
19.OTHER
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-098P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
58.1 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE IN CENTER AND NORTH SPANS. WATER STAINING ON THE DECK UNDERSIDE ALONG TOP FLANGE OF BEAM #3 FROM NORTH SPAN ADJACENT TO NORTH PIER.
HONEYCOMBING (4'L X 1.5'W) ON DECK UNDERSIDE IN SOUTH SPAN BAY #1.
58.2
58.3
ADHESION FAILURE THROUGHOUT PREVIOUSLY SEALED DECK JOINTS.
SEVERE DETERIORATION OF EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL IN RAILS WITH MATERIAL FALLING OUT OR MISSING. ISOLATED
AREAS OF ADHESION FAILURE IN CURB JOINTS.
58.5
58.6
MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF CURBS AND RAILINGS WITH SPALLING NEAR JOINTS. 18"X6" SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR AT EXTERIOR FACE OF EAST RAIL AT NORTH ABUTMENT. MINOR MOWER DAMAGE AT NORTH END OF WEST CURB.
MODERATE SPALL (12"L X 4"H X 11-1/2"W) WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON WEST RAIL IN SOUTH APPROACH AT JOINT.
58.7 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS ALONG EAST AND WEST SHOULDERS.
59.1
59.7
MINOR RUSTING OF BEARINGS; MODERATE WITH MINOR SECTION LOSS AT BEARING # 2 ON NORTH ABUTMENT. ANCHOR BOLTS LEANING AT ABUTMENTS. NUT NOT TIGHT ON WEST SIDE OF BEARING #3 AT SOUTH ABUTMENT.
59.2
59.7
MINOR SPOT RUSTING OF TOP AND BOTTOM FLANGES OF SOME BEAMS.
59.8 MODERATE SPALLING (10"L X FULL WIDTH X UP TO 4-1/2"H) WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON CONCRETE FASCIA AT NORTH ABUTMENT, EAST SIDE. SEVERAL OTHER MINOR AREAS OF MOWER DAMAGE ALONG BOTTOM OUTSIDE EDGE OF FASCIA, NORTH AND SOUTH SPANS. MINOR RANDOM CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON BOTH FASCIAS.
60.3 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON ABUTMENT BEARING SEATS. MINOR SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON EAST SIDE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT BEARING SEAT. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WEST SIDE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT BEARING
SEAT. STAINING/LEAKAGE FROM DECK EXPANSION JOINT AT NORTH ABUTMENT BEARING SEAT.
60.4 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING AND HONEYCOMBING OF ABUTMENT BACKWALLS. MINOR SPALLING OF NORTH ABUTMENT
BACKWALL; MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON BOTH ENDS.
60.6 MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKING, SOME WITH EFFLORESCENCE, ON WINGWALLS EXTENDING FROM CORNER OF BEARING SEAT.
MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON NORTHWEST WINGWALL.
60.9
60.17
61.2
MODERATE EROSION (5' DIAMETER X 4'D) UNDER SCUPPERS AND MINOR EROSION IN FRONT OF BREASTWALLS DUE TO DISCHARGE FROM SCUPPERS AND WEEP HOLES. SOIL AT SOUTH ABUTMENT IS MOUNDED IN FRONT OF BREASTWALL CAUSING
WATER TO POND AND ACCELERATING EROSION ALONG FACE OF BREASTWALL.
MINOR TO MODERATE EROSION (UP TO 8'W X UP TO 6'D) AROUND BOTH PIERS.
MINOR TO MODERATE EROSION OF CHANNEL BANKS.
SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.
60.13 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF PIER WALLS; MOISTURE LEAKAGE ON SOUTH FACE OF NORTH PIER.
222.4 FULL WIDTH TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF SOUTH APPROACH PAVEMENT. MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING AT NORTH APPROACH
PAVEMENT.
222.7 5"X16" BLACK AND YELLOW STRIPED OBJECT MARKER IN PLACE AT PARAPET ENDS.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-098P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 16 15 27 24
HS 29 26 48 44
TYPE 3 34 31 57 52
TYPE 3S2 40 36 67 61
TYPE 3-3 41 37 69 63
DESIGN LOADING: 0 - UNKNOWN
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 05/19/2016
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: EXTERIOR GIRDER - MOMENT
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-098P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............BIG BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-098 P
4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................DANCY
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3H7
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........2353A
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
284 - MISSISSIPPI
01019 CHEROKEE
00000
1 6 1 00001 0
BIG BYWAY CREEK
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
5570098P0000000
8 2 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. ROUTE 82
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
196.2 (KM PT: 59.8 )
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........4 - STEEL CONTINUOUS (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
GIRDER
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............003 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............65 FT ( 19.8 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 171. FT ( 52.1 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-
CAPACITY RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............29 TONS ( 26.3 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............48 TONS ( 43.5 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 10/30/2020 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-098P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 26'53 80" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°13 '56.70" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.4 FT ( 9.9 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 15 MI ( 24 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1075 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 25 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1183 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT
REQUIRED)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2 33 FT ( 0.71 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 6 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............6 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N
(61) CHANNEL:................................6 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF
FOOTING OR PILES
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PROPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 1000
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 123000
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1985-SUPERSTRUCTURE PAINTED. 2007-NEW PAVEMENT. 2012-STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES REPAVED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
Inspector: Reinaldo Silvestry Structure Number: 5570098P0000000
Inpsection Date: 10/30/2020 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD JACKSON
PHOTO 4
Description WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO 6
Description TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE OVER SOUTH APPROACH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description NORTH APPROACH; NOTE TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE
PHOTO 8
Description AREA OF SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR AT WEST RAILING ON SOUTH APPROACH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON OUTWARD FACE OF EAST RAILING OVER NORTH
ABUTMENT
PHOTO 10
Description DELAMINATION AND SPALLING OF EAST RAILING OVER NORTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description SPALLING OF NORTHEAST EDGE OF SLAB AT BEARING AREA OVER NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 12
Description CONCRETE SPALLING AT BEARING AREA ON WEST SIDE OF NORTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description TYPICAL RUSTING AND SECTION LOSS OF BEARINGS OVER NORTH ABUTMENT; BEARING
#2 SHOWN
PHOTO 14
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH PIER; SOUTH FACE SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description EROSION TRENCH UNDER NORTH SPAN WITH UP TO 8' DROP OFF BEHIND NORTH PIER
PHOTO 16
Description UNDERSIDE VIEW OF CENTER SPAN LOOKING NORTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description TRANSVERSE CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE; BAYS #3 AND #4 ON
CENTER SPAN SHOWN
PHOTO 18
Description CLOSE UP VIEW OF SPLICE ZONE AT BAY #3 ON CENTER SPAN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description NORTH PIER BAY #4; NOTE TRANSVERSE CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SLAB
UNDERSIDE
PHOTO 20
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PIER; SOUTH FACE SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 21
Description AREA OF HONEYCOMBING (4' X 1.5') ON DECK UNDERSIDE AT BAY #1 ON SOUTH SPAN
PHOTO 22
Description TRANSVERSE CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE AT BAY #4 ON
SOUTH SPAN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 23
Description UP TO 5FT HIGH EROSION TRENCH AT EAST SIDE OF SOUTH SPAN UNDER DECK DRAINS
PHOTO 24
Description EROSION TRENCH UNDER DECK DRAIN AT WEST SIDE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT SLOPE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 25
Description BEARING #2 OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE BENT ANCHOR BOLT
PHOTO 26
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT; BEARING #5 SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 27
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 28
Description LOOKING UPSTREAM; NOTE SEVERAL FALLEN TREES
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 29
Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM; NOTE FALLEN TREES ABOUT 150FT DOWNSTREAM
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .