5570-098P-2020.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
Natchez Trace Parkway Drainage Improvements - NP-NATR 3N17 3H26 ETC
Solicitation number
693C73-24-R-000004
Issued by

About this file

This bridge inspection report details the condition of Structure No. 5570-098P, the Big Byway Creek Bridge located on the Natchez Trace Parkway in Mississippi. The multi-beam steel bridge was built in 1956 and is in overall fair condition. It carries the Natchez Trace Parkway over Big Byway Creek and is maintained by the National Park Service. Primary needs include installing scour countermeasures, stabilizing erosion under deck drains, and cleaning and painting bearings. The deck, superstructure and substructure were rated fair, with minor cracking and deterioration noted. The channel and approaches also received fair ratings, with moderate erosion present. The report recommends rehabilitation work including scour countermeasures, erosion repairs, bearing cleaning and painting, and joint resealing. Preliminary total rehabilitation cost is estimated at $123,000.

The related federal contract opportunity is a pre-solicitation for drainage improvements on the Natchez Trace Parkway, including work on Structure No. 5570-098P. The solicitation number is 693C73-24-R-000004 and is being conducted by the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. No other details are provided on requirements, pricing, response dates or awardees.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
NTP 3H2 3 5-A.pdf PDF
NATR BMS FY20(1)_As-Built Drawings-Final.pdf PDF
NTP 3H2 3 5-B.pdf PDF
5570-092P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-093P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-106P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-105P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-103P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-094P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-106P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-096P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-110P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-097P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-101P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-103P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-097P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-107P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-104P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-093P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-099P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-091P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-108P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-109P-2022.pdf PDF
Amendment 0002 - NP-NATR 3N17 3H26.pdf PDF
5570-092P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-095P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-100P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-099P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-102P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-101P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-095P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-094P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-107P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-100P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-104P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-108P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-109P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-105P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-096P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-102P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-110P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-098P-2022.pdf PDF
Amendment 001 - NP NATR 3N17 3H26.pdf PDF
5570-090P-2020.pdf PDF
L_Pavement Rehabilitation and Safety Improvements_NPS CE.pdf PDF
5570-090P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-091P-2020.pdf PDF
G_NATR 2019 Traffic Counts MP 121 and 204.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B_CULVERT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A_MS NP NATR 3N17 3H26_ETC_concept plans.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 59 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

BIG BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER BIG BYWAY CREEK

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LOOKING NORTH

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-098P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 10/30/2020

EAST (UPSTREAM) SIDE

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-098P

BIG BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/30/2020

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUDNATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

4 - STEEL CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

5 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: . 171.0 FT (52.1 M)

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ......... 65 FT (19.8 M)

6 - BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ..................... 32.4 FT (9.9 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: .... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES YEAR BUILT:

1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: . 0

3H7 SKEW ANGLE: .................... 25 °

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ....... N

1985-SUPERSTRUCTURE PAINTED. 2007-NEW PAVEMENT. 2012-STRUCTURE AND

APPROACHES REPAVED.

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

STATE: .............................. 284 - MISSISSIPPI

FACILITY CARRIED: ......... NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: BIG BYWAY CREEK

MILE POINT: .. 196.20 (KM PT 59.8)

LOCATION: .... 8.2 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. ROUTE 82

INSPECTION TEAM: B. Cazenas, R. Silvestry

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Reinaldo Silvestry

REPORT REVIEW:

Marcus Miller

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 03/04/2021

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This steel multi-beam bridge is in fair condition overall. Primary issues include minor to moderate erosion of the channel banks, erosion of the soil below the scuppers and weep holes in the north and south spans, and rusting of the bearings. Other problems include adhesion failure of the expansion joint material in the wearing surface, and debris accumulation at bearing seats.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-098P

BIG BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 10/30/2020

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

Item No.

Maintenance Recomendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

60.3

REMOVE DEBRIS FROM BEARING SEATS AT BOTH

ABUTMENTS.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

61.2 INSTALL SCOUR COUNTERMEASURES ON

CHANNEL BANKS AT STRUCTURE.

60.9 STABILIZE EROSION UNDER DECK SCUPPER

DRAINS AND WEEP HOLE DRAINAGE IN NORTH

AND SOUTH SPANS AS NEEDED.

59.1,59.7 CLEAN AND PAINT BEARINGS.

58.2 CLEAN AND RESEAL EXPANSION JOINTS IN

WEARING SURFACE.

222.4 SEAL TRANSVERSE CRACKS AT APPROACHES.

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND DESIGN AND

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING

(APPROXIMATELY 70% OF TOTAL REHAB COST)

PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-098P

BIG BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 10/30/2020

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-098P

BIG BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020

58. DECK

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.OTHER:

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

61. CHANNEL

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

222. APPROACHES

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

223. RETAINING WALL

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

F

G

F

F

G

G

N

F

F

N

N

N

G

F

F

G

G

N

G

F

N

G

N

1- SUFF

2 - MED

N

N

N

G

G

G

G

N

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS P

3. WEARING SURFACE G

N 16 FT

G

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0

CLAY, SAND

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS G

5. FOUNDATIONS N

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES G

8. EXPANSION JOINTS N

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR F

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11.SLOPE PROTECTION N

12.OTHER N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

N

N

N

PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS G

N

G

N

F

G

N

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

16.FOUNDATIONS

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19.OTHER

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-098P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

58.1 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE IN CENTER AND NORTH SPANS. WATER STAINING ON THE DECK UNDERSIDE ALONG TOP FLANGE OF BEAM #3 FROM NORTH SPAN ADJACENT TO NORTH PIER.

HONEYCOMBING (4'L X 1.5'W) ON DECK UNDERSIDE IN SOUTH SPAN BAY #1.

58.2

58.3

ADHESION FAILURE THROUGHOUT PREVIOUSLY SEALED DECK JOINTS.

SEVERE DETERIORATION OF EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL IN RAILS WITH MATERIAL FALLING OUT OR MISSING. ISOLATED

AREAS OF ADHESION FAILURE IN CURB JOINTS.

58.5

58.6

MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF CURBS AND RAILINGS WITH SPALLING NEAR JOINTS. 18"X6" SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR AT EXTERIOR FACE OF EAST RAIL AT NORTH ABUTMENT. MINOR MOWER DAMAGE AT NORTH END OF WEST CURB.

MODERATE SPALL (12"L X 4"H X 11-1/2"W) WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON WEST RAIL IN SOUTH APPROACH AT JOINT.

58.7 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS ALONG EAST AND WEST SHOULDERS.

59.1

59.7

MINOR RUSTING OF BEARINGS; MODERATE WITH MINOR SECTION LOSS AT BEARING # 2 ON NORTH ABUTMENT. ANCHOR BOLTS LEANING AT ABUTMENTS. NUT NOT TIGHT ON WEST SIDE OF BEARING #3 AT SOUTH ABUTMENT.

59.2

59.7

MINOR SPOT RUSTING OF TOP AND BOTTOM FLANGES OF SOME BEAMS.

59.8 MODERATE SPALLING (10"L X FULL WIDTH X UP TO 4-1/2"H) WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON CONCRETE FASCIA AT NORTH ABUTMENT, EAST SIDE. SEVERAL OTHER MINOR AREAS OF MOWER DAMAGE ALONG BOTTOM OUTSIDE EDGE OF FASCIA, NORTH AND SOUTH SPANS. MINOR RANDOM CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON BOTH FASCIAS.

60.3 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON ABUTMENT BEARING SEATS. MINOR SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON EAST SIDE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT BEARING SEAT. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WEST SIDE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT BEARING

SEAT. STAINING/LEAKAGE FROM DECK EXPANSION JOINT AT NORTH ABUTMENT BEARING SEAT.

60.4 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING AND HONEYCOMBING OF ABUTMENT BACKWALLS. MINOR SPALLING OF NORTH ABUTMENT

BACKWALL; MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON BOTH ENDS.

60.6 MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKING, SOME WITH EFFLORESCENCE, ON WINGWALLS EXTENDING FROM CORNER OF BEARING SEAT.

MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON NORTHWEST WINGWALL.

60.9

60.17

61.2

MODERATE EROSION (5' DIAMETER X 4'D) UNDER SCUPPERS AND MINOR EROSION IN FRONT OF BREASTWALLS DUE TO DISCHARGE FROM SCUPPERS AND WEEP HOLES. SOIL AT SOUTH ABUTMENT IS MOUNDED IN FRONT OF BREASTWALL CAUSING

WATER TO POND AND ACCELERATING EROSION ALONG FACE OF BREASTWALL.

MINOR TO MODERATE EROSION (UP TO 8'W X UP TO 6'D) AROUND BOTH PIERS.

MINOR TO MODERATE EROSION OF CHANNEL BANKS.

SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

60.13 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF PIER WALLS; MOISTURE LEAKAGE ON SOUTH FACE OF NORTH PIER.

222.4 FULL WIDTH TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF SOUTH APPROACH PAVEMENT. MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING AT NORTH APPROACH

PAVEMENT.

222.7 5"X16" BLACK AND YELLOW STRIPED OBJECT MARKER IN PLACE AT PARAPET ENDS.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-098P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 16 15 27 24

HS 29 26 48 44

TYPE 3 34 31 57 52

TYPE 3S2 40 36 67 61

TYPE 3-3 41 37 69 63

DESIGN LOADING: 0 - UNKNOWN

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 05/19/2016

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: EXTERIOR GIRDER - MOMENT

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-098P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............BIG BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-098 P

4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................DANCY

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3H7

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........2353A

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

284 - MISSISSIPPI

01019 CHEROKEE

00000

1 6 1 00001 0

BIG BYWAY CREEK

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570098P0000000

8 2 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. ROUTE 82

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

196.2 (KM PT: 59.8 )

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........4 - STEEL CONTINUOUS (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

GIRDER

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............003 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............65 FT ( 19.8 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 171. FT ( 52.1 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-

CAPACITY RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............29 TONS ( 26.3 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............48 TONS ( 43.5 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 10/30/2020 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-098P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 26'53 80" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°13 '56.70" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.4 FT ( 9.9 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 15 MI ( 24 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1075 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 25 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1183 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT

REQUIRED)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2 33 FT ( 0.71 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... 6 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............6 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N

(61) CHANNEL:................................6 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF

FOOTING OR PILES

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PROPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 1000

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 123000

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1985-SUPERSTRUCTURE PAINTED. 2007-NEW PAVEMENT. 2012-STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES REPAVED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

Inspector: Reinaldo Silvestry Structure Number: 5570098P0000000

Inpsection Date: 10/30/2020 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD JACKSON

PHOTO 4

Description WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO 6

Description TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE OVER SOUTH APPROACH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description NORTH APPROACH; NOTE TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE

PHOTO 8

Description AREA OF SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR AT WEST RAILING ON SOUTH APPROACH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON OUTWARD FACE OF EAST RAILING OVER NORTH

ABUTMENT

PHOTO 10

Description DELAMINATION AND SPALLING OF EAST RAILING OVER NORTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description SPALLING OF NORTHEAST EDGE OF SLAB AT BEARING AREA OVER NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 12

Description CONCRETE SPALLING AT BEARING AREA ON WEST SIDE OF NORTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description TYPICAL RUSTING AND SECTION LOSS OF BEARINGS OVER NORTH ABUTMENT; BEARING

#2 SHOWN

PHOTO 14

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH PIER; SOUTH FACE SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description EROSION TRENCH UNDER NORTH SPAN WITH UP TO 8' DROP OFF BEHIND NORTH PIER

PHOTO 16

Description UNDERSIDE VIEW OF CENTER SPAN LOOKING NORTH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description TRANSVERSE CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE; BAYS #3 AND #4 ON

CENTER SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO 18

Description CLOSE UP VIEW OF SPLICE ZONE AT BAY #3 ON CENTER SPAN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description NORTH PIER BAY #4; NOTE TRANSVERSE CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SLAB

UNDERSIDE

PHOTO 20

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PIER; SOUTH FACE SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 21

Description AREA OF HONEYCOMBING (4' X 1.5') ON DECK UNDERSIDE AT BAY #1 ON SOUTH SPAN

PHOTO 22

Description TRANSVERSE CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE AT BAY #4 ON

SOUTH SPAN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 23

Description UP TO 5FT HIGH EROSION TRENCH AT EAST SIDE OF SOUTH SPAN UNDER DECK DRAINS

PHOTO 24

Description EROSION TRENCH UNDER DECK DRAIN AT WEST SIDE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT SLOPE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 25

Description BEARING #2 OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE BENT ANCHOR BOLT

PHOTO 26

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT; BEARING #5 SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 27

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 28

Description LOOKING UPSTREAM; NOTE SEVERAL FALLEN TREES

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 29

Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM; NOTE FALLEN TREES ABOUT 150FT DOWNSTREAM

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .