5570-102P-2022.pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-24-R-000004
About this file
This document is a bridge inspection report for Structure Number 5570102P0000000 on the Natchez Trace Parkway over Middle Byway Creek. The report provides details of the March 10, 2022 routine inspection including photos documenting conditions, load rating calculations, and recommendations for maintenance and rehabilitation/reconstruction. Near-term needs include debris and vegetation removal, joint material replacement, concrete repairs, and restriping. Moderate priority is given to stabilizing scour and erosion at abutments and piers. Longer-term rehabilitation/reconstruction may be needed within five years to address these issues. The related federal contract opportunity is a pre-solicitation for Natchez Trace Parkway Drainage Improvements under Solicitation Number 693C73-24-R-000004 to be issued by the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 59 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
MIDDLE BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE #1
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER MIDDLE BYWAY CREEK
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
LS
STRUCTURE NO. 5570-102P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 3/10/2022
WD
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
MILE POINT: 193.60
KILOMETER POINT: 59.01
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-102P
MIDDLE BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE #1 INSPECTION DATE : 03/10/2022
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT C
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
Item No.
Maintenance Recommendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
58.5,58.7
REMOVE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND VEGETATION
ALONG CURBS.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
Item No.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
REHAB RECONSTR
60.9,60.
17,61.2
REPAIR SCOUR AND STABILIZE EROSION AT
ABUTMENT SLOPES, PIERS, AND CHANNEL
BANKS.
58.2,58.5, 58.6
REPLACE EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL IN
CURBS AND RAILINGS AS NECESSARY.
58.6 REMOVE UNSOUND CONCRETE FROM
SECOND RAIL POST FROM SOUTH ABUTMENT
ON WEST RAILING, CLEAN REBAR, AND PLACE
NEW CONCRETE TO ORIGINAL DIMENSIONS.
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES.
58.3,222.
4,222.9
REPAINT DETERIORATED LANE STRIPING.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-102P
MIDDLE BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE #1 INSPECTION DATE : 03/10/2022
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT C
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-102P
MIDDLE BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE #1 INSPECTION DATE: 03/09/2022
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 24 22 40 36
HS 34 31 56 51
TYPE 3 32 29 54 49
TYPE 3S2 38 34 63 57
TYPE 3-3 51 46 85 77
DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 08/10/2015
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: NEGATIVE MOMENT
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-102P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............MIDDLE BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE #1
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-102 P
4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................DANCY
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3H9
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........2355A
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
284 - MISSISSIPPI
28019 CHOCTAW
00000
1 6 1 00001 0
MIDDLE BYWAY CREEK
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
5570102P0000000
1 9 MILES SOUTH OF MS ROUTE 9
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
193.6 (KM PT: 59.01)
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 01 - SLAB (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............003 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............40 FT ( 12.2 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 105. FT ( 32 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-
CAPACITY RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............34 TONS ( 30.8 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............56 TONS ( 50.8 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/10/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 5 - SCOUR INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-102P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 25'20.60" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°15 '54.10" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.3 FT ( 9.8 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 25 MI ( 40 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1230 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1353 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT
REQUIRED)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2.42 FT ( 0.74 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............7 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 5 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N
(61) CHANNEL:................................4 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 4 - ACTION IS REQUIRED TO
PROTECT EXPOSED FOUNDATIONS
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: C - MODERATE
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2007,2012-STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES REPAVED. 2020- SEALED DECK AND CURB JOINTS, NEW WEEP HOLE FILTERS.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
Inspector: Killian Baptiste Structure Number: 5570102P0000000
Inspection Date: 03/10/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING NORTH TOWARD TUPELO
PHOTO 4
Description EAST (UPSTREAM) SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO 6
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF NORTH SPAN LOOKING NORTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF CENTER SPAN LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO 8
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SOUTH SPAN LOOKING SOUTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description TYPICAL MISSING JOINT FILLER MATERIAL IN RAILINGS, WEST RAILING OVER NORTH
ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO 10
Description SPALL AND DELAMINATION ON SECOND WEST RAIL POST FROM SOUTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE AND VERTICAL CRACKING OF CURBS AND RAILINGS, WEST CURB
AND RAILING OVER NORTH SPAN SHOWN
PHOTO 12
Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF SHOULDER LANE STRIPING, WEST SHOULDER SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG CURBLINES, EAST
CURBLINE SHOWN
PHOTO 14
Description TYPICAL SPALLING OF DECK SIDES AT NORTH ABUTMENT, EAST SIDE SHOWN; NOTE
WATER LEAKAGE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 16
Description TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKS IN NORTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH FACE OF NORTH PIER
PHOTO 18
Description SCALING ON EAST FACE OF NORTH PIER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description FOOTING EXPOSED AT EAST END OF NORTH PIER
PHOTO 20
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH FACE OF SOUTH PIER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 21
Description POPOUT SPALLS AT WEST END OF SOUTH PIER
PHOTO 22
Description SCALING ON WEST END OF SOUTH PIER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 23
Description SOUTH PIER DOWNSTREAM FOOTING EXPOSED; NOTE NO UNDERMINING
PHOTO 24
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 25
Description VERTICAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON NORTHWEST WINGWALL; NOTE TYPICAL
MOWER SCRAPES
PHOTO 26
Description LOOKING UPSTREAM FROM DECK; NOTE FALLEN TREES IN CHANNEL
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 27
Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM FROM DECK
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .