5570-100P-2022.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-24-R-000004
About this file
This document contains a bridge inspection report for Structure Number 5570100P0000000 on the Natchez Trace Parkway over County Road at Milepoint 194.60. The report provides details of the inspection conducted on March 10, 2022, including photographs and condition assessments of the bridge components. It recommends maintenance such as installing object markers and removing debris, and rehabilitation/reconstruction work within five years including replacing expansion joints, repairing spalls and settling, and related contract costs. The estimated preliminary total cost is provided. The report also includes load rating calculations and inventory data for the structure.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 59 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 194.60
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER COUNTY ROAD
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
LN
STRUCTURE NO. 5570-100P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 3/10/2022
WS
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
MILE POINT: 194.60
KILOMETER POINT: 59.31
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-100P
COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 194.60 INSPECTION DATE : 03/10/2022
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
Item No.
Maintenance Recommendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
222.7
INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT
BRIDGE CORNERS ON UNDERPASS ROADWAY.
58.7,60.6
REMOVE DEBRIS FROM ALONG CURBLINES AND TREES
FROM ALONG WINGWALLS.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
Item No.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
REHAB RECONSTR
58.2,60.8 REPLACE EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL IN
RAILINGS AND VERTICAL JOINTS.
60.9 REPAIR EROSION ADJACENT TO DRAINAGE
INLETS AT SOUTHEAST CORNERS NEAR
UNDERPASS ROADWAY, AND EROSION HOLE
AT SOUTHWEST WINGWALL.
222.4, 222.6
FILL SETTLED AREAS AT NORTH APPROACH IN
WEST SHOULDER AND REPAVE.
58.1,59.3 REPAIR IMPACT SPALLS ON DECK SIDES AND
UNDERSIDE.
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-100P
COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 194.60 INSPECTION DATE : 03/10/2022
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-100P
COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 194.60 INSPECTION DATE: 03/09/2022
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 24 22 40 36
HS 41 37 69 63
TYPE 3 36 33 60 54
TYPE 3S2 54 49 91 83
TYPE 3-3 70 64 117 106
DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 05/11/2016
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: POSITIVE MOMENT
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-100P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 194.60
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-100 P
4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 100P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................DANCY
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3H19
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........3020B
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
284 - MISSISSIPPI
28019 CHOCTAW
00000
1 6 1 00001 0
COUNTY ROAD
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
5570100P0000000
0 9 MILES SOUTH OF MS ROUTE 9
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
194.6 (KM PT: 59.31)
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
CULVERTS)
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............30 FT ( 9.1 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 37.0 FT ( 11.3 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-
CAPACITY RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............41 TONS ( 37.2 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............69 TONS ( 62.6 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/10/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-100P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 25'53 30" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.3 FT ( 8.6 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°15 '08 30" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.7 FT ( 10 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 25 MI ( 40 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......02 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 1 - HIGHWAY, WITH OR W/OUT (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
PEDESTRIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1230 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1353 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28.3 FT ( 8.6 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........N - NOT APPLICABLE, NO WATERWAY RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:..............................5.00 FT ( 1.52 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2.42 FT ( 0.74 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 13.75 FT ( 4.19 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............7 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(61) CHANNEL:................................N (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:........... N
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... N - NOT OVER WATERWAY
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2007,2012-STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES REPAVED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
Inspector: Killian Baptiste Structure Number: 5570100P0000000
Inspection Date: 03/10/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD JACKSON
PHOTO 4
Description EAST SIDE; NOTE LACK OF OBJECT MARKERS ON ABUTMENTS
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO 6
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF DECK LOOKING SOUTH; NOTE HONEYCOMBING AND
SCALING
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description TYPICAL MISSING RAILING JOINT FILLER MATERIAL, EAST RAILING OVER SOUTH
ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE DIAGONAL CRACK IN RAIL POST
PHOTO 8
Description SPALL ON EAST RAILING OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description TYPICAL EDGE SPALLING ON RAIL POST OVER ABUTMENTS, EAST RAILING OVER NORTH
ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO 10
Description SETTLEMENT OF NORTH APPROACH PAVEMENT IN WEST SHOULDER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT DRAIN INLETS, SOUTHWEST DRAIN INLET SHOWN
PHOTO 12
Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES, EAST CURBLINE SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description COLLISION DAMAGE OF WEST FASCIA OVER EASTBOUND LANE NEAR MIDSPAN
PHOTO 14
Description COLLISION DAMAGE ON EAST FASCIA AND UNDERSIDE OVER WESTBOUND LANE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 16
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description HORIZONTAL CRACKING WITH WATER STAINING ON WEST FACE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 18
Description TYPICAL HORIZONTAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT ABUTMENT AND DECK
INTERFACE, NORTHWEST INTERFACE SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description FAILING JOINT SEALANT AT BOTTOM OF NORTHWEST WINGWALL JOINT
PHOTO 20
Description EROSION HOLE AT END OF SOUTHWEST WINGWALL
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 21
Description CLEARANCE SIGN AT WEST APPROACH; NOTE GRIME ON SIGN
PHOTO 22
Description CLEARANCE SIGN AT EAST APPROACH; NOTE BULLET DAMAGE AND TYPICAL GRIME ON
CLEARANCE SIGNS
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .