5570-100P-2020.pdf

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 194.60

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER COUNTY ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LOOKING NORTH

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-100P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020

WEST SIDE

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-100P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 194.60 INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUDNATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1 - CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: . 37.0 FT (11.3 M)

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ......... 30 FT (9.1 M)

6 - BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ..................... 32.7 FT (10 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: .... 28.3 FT (8.6 M)

6 - N/A YEAR BUILT:

1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: . 0

3H19 SKEW ANGLE: .................... 0 °

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ....... N

1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2007,2012-STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES REPAVED.

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: .. 194.60 (KM PT 59.31)

STATE: .............................. 284 - MISSISSIPPI LOCATION: .... 0.9 MILES SOUTH OF MS ROUTE 9

FACILITY CARRIED: ......... NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: COUNTY ROAD

INSPECTION TEAM: B. Cazenas, R. Silvestry

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Reinaldo Silvestry

REPORT REVIEW:

Marcus Miller

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 03/04/2021

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete frame bridge remains in good condition overall. Primary issues at this time include the settlement of the west approach pavement at north abutment due to loss of soil through the joint between the wingwall and abutment. Other problems include deterioration of the expansion joint material in the curbs, railings, and vertical joints; erosion adjacent to the drainage inlets at the northeast and southeast corners of the underpass roadway; an erosion hole at southwest wingwall; missing reflective object markers at the bridge corners on the underpass roadway; and exposed rebar on the east side of slab underside.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-100P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 194.60 INSPECTION DATE : 10/29/2020

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

Item No.

Maintenance Recomendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

222.7

INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT

BRIDGE CORNERS ON UNDERPASS ROADWAY.

58.7,60.6

REMOVE DEBRIS FROM ALONG CURBLINES AND TREES

FROM ALONG WINGWALLS.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

58.2,60.8 REPLACE EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL IN

CURBS, RAILINGS, AND VERTICAL JOINTS.

60.9 REPAIR EROSION ADJACENT TO DRAINAGE

INLETS AT NORTHEAST AND SOUTHEAST

CORNERS NEAR UNDERPASS ROADWAY, AND

EROSION HOLE AT SOUTHWEST WINGWALL.

222.5, 222.6

FILL SETTLED AREA AND REPAVE, RESEAL

JOINTS BETWEEN WINGWALLS AND

ABUTMENTS.

58.1 CLEAN AND COAT EXPOSED REBAR ON EAST

SIDE OF SLAB UNDERSIDE WITH APPROVED

PROTECTIVE COATING.

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, DESIGN, AND

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING

(APPROXIMATELY 70% OF TOTAL REHAB COST)

PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-100P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 194.60 INSPECTION DATE : 10/29/2020

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-100P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 194.60 INSPECTION DATE: 10/28/2020

58. DECK

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.OTHER:

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

61. CHANNEL

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

222. APPROACHES

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

223. RETAINING WALL

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

G

G

G

F

G

G

G

N

N

G

N

N

N

N

N

G

G

N

N

N

N

N

G

G

F

G

G

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS P

3. WEARING SURFACE G

N FT

STRIPING

G

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0

STRIPING

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N

5. FOUNDATIONS N

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES N

8. EXPANSION JOINTS P

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR F

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11.SLOPE PROTECTION N

12.OTHER N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

N

N

N

PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N

N

N

N

N

N

N

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

16.FOUNDATIONS

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19.OTHER

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-100P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

58.1

59.3

MINOR VEHICLE SCRAPES ON SLAB UNDERSIDE EXTENDING FROM EAST SIDE. MODERATE COLLISION DAMAGE TO OUTSIDE

EDGES OF SLAB UNDERSIDE; 3" LONG AREA OF EXPOSED REBAR ON EAST SIDE.

MINOR SCALING OF SLAB UNDERSIDE THROUGHOUT. MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON ALL OUTSIDE CORNERS OF FRAME AT SPRINGLINE; ALSO AT MID-HEIGHT AT NORTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST CORNERS.

58.2 EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL IS SEVERELY DETERIORATED OR MISSING IN CURBS AND RAILINGS.

58.5 MINOR POPOUTS THROUGHOUT CURBS. MINOR TRANSVERSE AND VERTICAL CRACKING OF CURBS AND RAILINGS

58.6

60.10

MINOR TRANSVERSE AND VERTICAL CRACKING OF RAILINGS. MINOR SPALL ON EAST RAILING AT NORTH ABUTMENT EXPANSION JOINT. MINOR SPALL ON TOP OF EAST RAIL AT SOUTH APPROACH. MINOR CRACKING AND SPALLING OF EAST RAIL

POST AT SOUTH ABUTMENT DUE TO SETTLEMENT OF WINGWALL. SEE ALSO 222.6.

58.7 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS ALONG CURBLINES.

60.1 MINOR ABRASION, SCRAPING, AND SURFACE DEFECTS IN FINISH COAT AT SOUTH ABUTMENT. STAINING AT ENDS OF

ABUTMENTS. MINOR GRAFFITI ON WEST SIDE OF NORTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL.

60.6 MINOR EDGE SPALLING AND SCRAPING OF WINGWALLS. SMALL TREES GROWING ALONG AND AGAINST WINGWALLS.

PREVIOUSLY NOTED MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON NORTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST WINGWALLS NOT OBSERVED.

60.8 SEVERE DETERIORATION OF VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL BETWEEN WINGWALLS AND ABUTMENTS WITH EVIDENCE

OF ACTIVE LEAKAGE. (SEE 222.6)

60.9 MINOR TO MODERATE EROSION HOLES (3'DIA X UP TO 2'D) ADJACENT TO DRAINAGE INLETS AT NORTHEAST AND SOUTHEAST

CORNERS NEAR UNDERPASS ROADWAY.

60.10

222.6

EAST CURB AT SOUTH APPROACH IS 1/2" LOWER THAN CURB ON STRUCTURE; WEST CURB IS 1/4" LOWER THAN CURB ON

STRUCTURE. SEE ALSO 58.6, 60.10.

222.5 EROSION HOLE (2' DIAMETER X 8' DEEP) IN FRONT OF SOUTHWEST WINGWALL AT SOUTH END.

222.6 UP TO 3" OF SETTLEMENT OF ASPHALT FOR 5' BEHIND AND 5' ALONG NORTH ABUTMENT AT WEST CURB.

222.7 13' - 6" CLEARANCE SIGN MOUNTED ON BOTH SIDES OF STRUCTURE. 13'-6" ADVANCED CLEARANCE SIGNS IN PLACE AND IN

GOOD CONDITION.

6"X16" BLACK AND YELLOW STRIPED OBJECT MARKERS IN PLACE AT PARAPET ENDS. REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS NOT

PROVIDED AT BRIDGE CORNERS ALONG UNDERPASS ROADWAY.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-100P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 24 22 40 36

HS 41 37 69 63

TYPE 3 36 33 60 54

TYPE 3S2 54 49 91 83

TYPE 3-3 70 64 117 106

DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 05/11/2016

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: POSITIVE MOMENT

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-100P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 194.60

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-100 P

4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................DANCY

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3H19

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........3020B

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

284 - MISSISSIPPI

01019 CHEROKEE

00000

1 6 1 00001 0

COUNTY ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570100P0000000

0 9 MILES SOUTH OF MS ROUTE 9

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

194.6 (KM PT: 59.31)

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

CULVERTS)

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............30 FT ( 9.1 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 37.0 FT ( 11.3 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-

CAPACITY RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............41 TONS ( 37.2 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............69 TONS ( 62.6 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-100P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 25'53 30" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.3 FT ( 8.6 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°15 '08 30" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.7 FT ( 10 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 25 MI ( 40 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......02 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 1 - HIGHWAY, WITH OR W/OUT (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

PEDESTRIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1230 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1353 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28.3 FT ( 8.6 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........N - NOT APPLICABLE, NO WATERWAY RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:..............................5.00 FT ( 1.52 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2.42 FT ( 0.74 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 13.75 FT ( 4.19 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............7 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(61) CHANNEL:................................N (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:........... N

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 8 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... N - NOT OVER WATERWAY

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PROPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 2000

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 24000

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2007,2012-STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES REPAVED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

Inspector: Reinaldo Silvestry Structure Number: 5570100P0000000

Inpsection Date: 10/29/2020 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD JACKSON

PHOTO 4

Description EAST SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH; NOTE TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF WEARING

SURFACE

PHOTO 6

Description UP TO 3" SETTLEMENT OF PAVEMENT AT WEST CURB OVER NORTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description CLOSE UP VIEW OF PREVIOUS PHOTO; NOTE 3" SETTLEMENT OF PAVEMENT AND

EXPANSION JOINT FAILURE

PHOTO 8

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTHWEST RAILING

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description DRAINAGE INLET AT SOUTHWEST CORNER; NOTE DRAIN PARTIALLY BLOCKED DUE TO

DEBRIS ACCUMULATION

PHOTO 10

Description 6" EROSION HOLE AT NORTHEAST CORNER

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description SOUTHWEST WINGWALL; NOTE EROSION HOLE (2' DIAMETER X 8' DEEP)

PHOTO 12

Description VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINT AT SOUTHWEST CORNER; NOTE MOISTURE AND MOSS

GROWTH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 14

Description SLAB UNDERSIDE LOOKING SOUTH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description SPALLING DUE TO COLLISION DAMAGE AT WEST SIDE OF SLAB; NOTE ALSO VERTICAL

CLEARANCE SIGN IN PLACE

PHOTO 16

Description SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR DUE TO COLLISION DAMAGE AT EAST SIDE OF SLAB

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 18

Description NORTHEAST WINGWALL; NOTE ACTIVE LEAKAGE THROUGH VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGN AT WEST APPROACH

PHOTO 20

Description VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGN AT EAST APPROACH