5570-094P-2022.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-24-R-000004
About this file
This bridge inspection report details the findings of a routine inspection conducted on March 9, 2022 of Structure Number 5570094P0000000, known as the Natchez Trace Parkway Bridge over Mississippi Route 49. The 59.2-foot single span concrete bridge was found to be in fair condition overall but displayed signs of aging, including cracking and spalling of the concrete deck and curbs. Minor maintenance such as debris removal and installation of vertical clearance signs is recommended. More significant rehabilitation involving joint repair and concrete patching is suggested within five years at an estimated preliminary cost of under $100,000. The bridge is rated to carry legal loads but vertical underclearance is limited. This report documents the inspection and provides a summary of findings and recommended repairs.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 59 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
MS ROUTE 49 BRIDGE
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER MS ROUTE 49
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
LN
STRUCTURE NO. 5570-094P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 3/9/2022
ES
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
MILE POINT: 198.50
KILOMETER POINT: 60.5
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-094P
MS ROUTE 49 BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 03/09/2022
PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D
Item No.
Maintenance Recommendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
222.7
INSTALL VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS ON STRUCTURE
AND ALONG UNDERPASS ROADWAY.
222.7
AT UNDERPASS ROADWAY PLACE OBJECT MARKERS AT
EAST SIDE AND REPLACE NORTHWEST OBJECT MARKER.
58.5,58.7
CLEAR DEBRIS ALONG CURBS.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
Item No.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
REHAB RECONSTR
58.2,60.8 REPLACE FILLER MATERIAL IN CURB
EXPANSION JOINTS AND VERTICAL JOINTS
BETWEEN ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS AND
WINGWALLS.
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : ..
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-094P
MS ROUTE 49 BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 03/08/2022
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 75 68 125 113
HS 91 83 152 138
TYPE 3 86 78 143 130
TYPE 3S2 127 115 213 193
TYPE 3-3 163 148 272 247
DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 06/20/2016
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: NEGATIVE MOMENT
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-094P
MS ROUTE 49 BR DGE INSPECTION DATE: 03/08/2022
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............MS ROUTE 49 BRIDGE
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-094 P
4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 094P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................DANCY
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3H14
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........NONE
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
284 - MISSISSIPPI
28019 CHOCTAW
00000
1 6 1 00001 0
MS ROUTE 49
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
5570094P0000000
5 5 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. ROUTE 82
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
198.5 (KM PT: 60.5 )
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
CULVERTS)
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............47.2 FT ( 14.4 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 59.2 FT ( 18 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-
CAPACITY RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............91 TONS ( 82.6 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............99.9 TONS ( 90.6 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/09/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-094P
MS ROUTE 49 BR DGE INSPECTION DATE: 03/08/2022
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 28'29.10" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°12 '21 50" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.3 FT ( 9.8 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 15 MI ( 24 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......02 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 1 - HIGHWAY, WITH OR W/OUT (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
PEDESTRIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1075 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 39 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1183 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........N - NOT APPLICABLE, NO WATERWAY RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:..............................6.80 FT ( 2.07 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2 50 FT ( 0.76 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 13.92 FT ( 4.24 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............7 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(61) CHANNEL:................................N (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:........... N
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... N - NOT OVER WATERWAY
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2007, 2013 - STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES REPAVED. 2013 - PAVEMENT SAWCUT AND SEALED OVER ENDS OF STRUCTURE.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
Inspector: Killian Baptiste Structure Number: 5570094P0000000
Inspection Date: 03/09/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD JACKSON
PHOTO 4
Description WEST SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO 6
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF DECK LOOKING NORTH; NOTE LONGITUDINAL CRACK
WITH EFFLORESCENCE ALONG COLD JOINT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description NORTH EXPANSION JOINT; NOTE TYPICAL SETTLEMENT CRACKING IN SHOULDER, EAST
SHOULDER SHOWN
PHOTO 8
Description TYPICAL MISSING JOINT FILLER MATERIAL IN RAILING EXPANSION JOINTS, EAST RAILING
OVER NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE SPALL IN CURB
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF RAILINGS, NORTH END OF EAST RAILING SHOWN
PHOTO 10
Description TYPICAL SPALLING OF SOUTH CURB AT EXPANSION JOINT; NOTE CRACKING AND
DELAMINATION OF RAILING AND RAIL POST
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES, WEST CURBLINE SHOWN
PHOTO 12
Description COLLISION DAMAGE ON EAST FASCIA
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description SCRAPES ON EAST UNDERSIDE OF DECK
PHOTO 14
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 16
Description TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACK IN ABUTMENTS, SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKS IN ABUTMENTS AT COLD JOINTS
PHOTO 18
Description TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN WINGWALLS, NORTHEAST
WINGWALL SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description SOUTHWEST WINGWALL; NOTE GRAFFITI AND EFFLORESCENCE
PHOTO 20
Description SPALLS IN SOUTHWEST WINGWALL
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 26
Description BULLET HOLES IN NORTHWEST OBJECT MARKER FOR UNDERPASS ROADWAY
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .