5570-107P-2018.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
Natchez Trace Parkway Drainage Improvements - NP-NATR 3N17 3H26 ETC
Solicitation number
693C73-24-R-000004
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a bridge inspection report and related federal contract opportunity. The inspection report provides details on County Road Bridge No. 5570-107P located at mile point 169.69 on the Natchez Trace Parkway in Mississippi. The 30.5-foot single span concrete frame bridge was built in 1964 and is in overall good condition. Noted defects include cracking and efflorescence on the deck and minor deterioration of curbs and railings. The document recommends routine maintenance like cleaning debris and graffiti, as well as installation of vertical clearance signs. The related federal contract opportunity is a pre-solicitation for drainage improvements along the Natchez Trace Parkway, specifically work under project numbers NP-NATR 3N17 3H26. No other contract details are provided.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
NTP 3H2 3 5-A.pdf PDF
NATR BMS FY20(1)_As-Built Drawings-Final.pdf PDF
NTP 3H2 3 5-B.pdf PDF
5570-092P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-093P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-098P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-106P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-105P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-103P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-094P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-106P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-096P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-110P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-097P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-101P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-103P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-097P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-104P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-093P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-099P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-091P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-108P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-109P-2022.pdf PDF
Amendment 0002 - NP-NATR 3N17 3H26.pdf PDF
5570-092P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-095P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-100P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-099P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-102P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-101P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-095P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-094P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-107P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-100P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-104P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-108P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-109P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-105P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-096P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-102P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-110P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-098P-2022.pdf PDF
Amendment 001 - NP NATR 3N17 3H26.pdf PDF
5570-090P-2020.pdf PDF
L_Pavement Rehabilitation and Safety Improvements_NPS CE.pdf PDF
5570-090P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-091P-2020.pdf PDF
G_NATR 2019 Traffic Counts MP 121 and 204.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B_CULVERT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A_MS NP NATR 3N17 3H26_ETC_concept plans.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 59 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-107P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 169.69 INSPECTION DATE: 11/29/18

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 30.5 FT (9.3 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 30.5 FT (9.3 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 32.9 FT (10.0 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ UNKNOWN CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 28.5 FT (8.7 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 3L9 / NONE SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 10 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ N/A

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1981-BRIDGE RAIL REPAIR/REPLACEMENT.

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 169.69 (KM PT 273.08)

STATE: ................................. MISSISSIPPI LOCATION: 4.0 MILES NORTH OF MS ROUTE 12

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. COUNTY ROAD

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete frame bridge is in good condition overall. However, there are some items that should be addressed to help prevent deterioration, and improve motorist safety. Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report.

INSPECTION TEAM: M. REGER, R. DARJI

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

MICHAEL REGER, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-948-1424

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/31/19

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-107P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D 226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

222.7 INSTALL VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS AND OBJECT MARKERS AT UNDERPASS

APPROACHES.

60.1 PAINT OVER GRAFFITI ON ABUTMENT BREAST WALLS.

60.6,12 REMOVE DEBRIS FROM PIPE CULVERTS IN BOTH ABUTMENTS. REMOVE

VEGETATION GROWTH FROM WINGWALLS.

222.5 REPAIR EROSION AT SOUTH END OF PARAPETS.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that the recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-107P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE 3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

9 EXCELLENT CONDITION Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems. or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration. 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal 5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. corrective action may return structure to light service.

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour. 0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

58. DECK 7 ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

G 1. DECK SLAB

N 2. EXPANSION JOINTS

G 3. WEARING SURFACE

G 4. RIDEABILITY

G 5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

G 6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

G 7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

N 8. UTILITIES

G 9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

N 10. OTHER

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 7

N 1. BEARING DEVICES

N 2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

G 3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

N 4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

N 5. TRUSSES

N 6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

N 7. PAINT

N 8. FASCIA(E)

G 9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

G 10. ALIGNMENT

N 11. OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE 7

58.1, 59.3 MINOR TO MODERATE DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE. MINOR VERTICAL

CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WEST SIDE OF DECK.

MINOR COLLISION DAMAGE AT BOTH SIDES AND SCRAPING OF

DECK UNDERSIDE. MINOR EFFLORESCENCE ALONG LONGITUDINAL

CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT BOTH SIDES OF DECK UNDERSIDE.

58.5 MODERATE SPALLING OF CURB FINISH COAT THROUGHOUT. MOSS

GROWTH ON TOP OF WEST CURB.

58.5,6 MINOR TRANSVERSE AND VERTICAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE OF CURBS AND RAILINGS. TIMBER FORMWORK

EMBEDDED IN WEST RAIL.

58.6 MINOR SPALLING OF RAILING FINISH COAT AND POPOUTS AT

ISOLATED LOCATIONS. MODERATE SPALL OF RAIL POST AT

SOUTHWEST END. MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACK WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ALONG WEST RAILING, NORTH APPROACH.

60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKS AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS ON BOTH

BREASTWALLS. BOTTOM HALF OF BREASTWALLS ARE PAINTED.

GRAFFITI ON BOTH ABUTMENTS

60.6 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND WATER

STAINS ON ALL WINGWALLS; MINOR MOWER SCRAPES AT BASE OF

WINGWALLS. MINOR VINE GROWTH ON WINGWALLS

60.7 MINOR LOSS OF FILL THROUGH WEEP HOLES.

60.9 MINOR EROSION AT BASE OF SOUTHWEST WINGWALL.

60.12 PIPE CULVERT THROUGH ABUTMENTS ARE UP TO 75% FILLED WITH

SEDIMENT.

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N

5. FOUNDATIONS N

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES G

8. EXPANSION JOINTS N

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11. SLOPE PROTECTION N

12. OTHER (PIPE CULVERT) G

PIER(S)

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N

14. PILE BENTS N

15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N

16. FOUNDATIONS N

17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N

18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION N

19. OTHER N

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-107P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

61. CHANNEL N

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :

222. APPROACHES 7

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

N N N G F G G G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

N N N

222.5 MINOR TO MODERATE EROSION AT ENDS OF SOUTH WINGWALLS.

MINOR EROSION OF EAST EMBANKMENT BEHIND SOUTHEAST

WINGWALL DUE TO ROADWAY RUN OFF.

222.7 OBJECT MARKERS PRESENT AT ALL FOUR CORNERS OF

STRUCTURE.

NO VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS AT UNDERPASS OR OBJECT

MARKERS.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-107P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 51 46 86 78

HS 83 75 139 126

TYPE 3 71 64 119 108

TYPE 3S2 105 95 176 160

TYPE 3-3 143 130 238 216

DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 8/15

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-107P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 169.69

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5570-107P

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........107P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. KOSCIUSKO

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................3L9

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..

284 - MISSISSIPPI (MS)

007 - ATTALA

161000010

COUNTY ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570107P0000000

4.0 MILES NORTH OF MS RO

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

169.69 (KM PT 273.08)

N/A

3 - FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

1 - CONCRETE

07 - FRAME

30.5 FT (9.3 M)

30.5 FT (9.3 M)

0 - UNKNOWN

0 - UNKNOWN

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 83.0 TONS (75.3 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 99.9 TONS (99.9 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 11/18 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-107P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 33°08'58.60"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 89°28'43.40"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 24 MI (39 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 3.0 FT (0.9 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

28.5 FT (8.7 M)

32.9 FT (10.0 M)

32.0 FT (9.8 M)

22.0 FT (6.7 M)

5.0 FT (1.5 M)

5.0 FT (1.5 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

10 °

NO

28.5 FT (8.7 M)

1.3 FT (0.4 M)

1.3 FT (0.4 M)

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

1 - CONCRETE

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

2.33 FT (0.71 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

14.70 FT (4.48 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N

(62) CULVERT: ...........................N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N - Not over waterway.

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

$6,000

$0

$0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1981-BRIDGE RAIL REPAIR/REPLACEMENT.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5570-107P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-107P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTHBOUND

PHOTO #2 - EAST SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW, LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #4 - EMBEDDED TIMBER BLOCK IN WEST RAIL ON SOUTHWEST

WINGWALL AND TYPICAL SPALLING OF FINISH COAT ON CURB

PHOTO #5 - SPALLING OF FINISH COAT, SOUTHEAST PARAPET SHOWN

PHOTO #6 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF DECK, DIAGONAL

CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE DECK, LOOKING

WEST

PHOTO #7 - CLOSE-UP OF UNDERSIDE OF DECK SHOWING CRACKING

WITH EFFLORESCENCE

PHOTO #8 - COLLISION DAMAGE WEST EDGE OF DECK; NOTE VEHICLE

SCRAPS ON UNDERSIDE OF DECK

PHOTO #9 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT, NOTE NEW

GRAFFITI ON WALL SINCE LAST INSPECTION

PHOTO #10 - CLOGGED PIPE CULVERT AT BASE OF SOUTHWEST

WINGWALL

PHOTO #11 - VINE GROWTH ON NORTHEAST

WINGWALL

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .