5570-094P-2020.pdf

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

MS ROUTE 49 BRIDGE

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER MS ROUTE 49

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LOOKING NORTH

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-094P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020

EAST SIDE

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-094P

MS ROUTE 49 BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUDNATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1 - CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: . 59.2 FT (18 M)

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ......... 47.2 FT (14.4 M)

6 - BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ..................... 32.3 FT (9.8 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: .... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

6 - N/A YEAR BUILT:

1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: . 0

3H14 SKEW ANGLE: .................... 39 °

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ....... N

2007, 2013 - STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES REPAVED. 2013 - PAVEMENT SAWCUT

AND SEALED OVER ENDS OF STRUCTURE.

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

STATE: .............................. 284 - MISSISSIPPI

FACILITY CARRIED: ......... NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: MS ROUTE 49

MILE POINT: .. 198.50 (KM PT 60.5)

LOCATION: .... 5.5 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. ROUTE 82

INSPECTION TEAM: B. Cazenas, R. Silvestry

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Reinaldo Silvestry

REPORT REVIEW:

Marcus Miller

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 03/04/2021

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete frame bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include missing and deteriorated filler material in the curb and railing expansion joints and in the vertical joints between the abutment breastwalls and wingwalls; and minor outward rotation of the wingwalls (this condition will continue to be monitored during future inspections). In addition, vertical clearance signs are not present on the structure or along the underpass roadway, and an object marker for the underpass roadway is missing on the northeast corner of the bridge.

Corrective actions should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-094P

MS ROUTE 49 BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 10/29/2020

PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D

Item No.

Maintenance Recomendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

222.7

INSTALL VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS ON STRUCTURE

AND ALONG UNDERPASS ROADWAY. REPLACE MISSING

OBJECT MARKER FOR UNDERPASS ROADWAY AT

NORTHEAST CORNER OF BRIDGE.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

58.2,60.8 REPLACE FILLER MATERIAL IN CURB

EXPANSION JOINTS AND VERTICAL JOINTS

BETWEEN ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS AND

WINGWALLS.

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND DESIGN

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (70% TOTAL

REHAB COST) PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-094P

MS ROUTE 49 BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/28/2020

58. DECK

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.OTHER:

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

61. CHANNEL

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

222. APPROACHES

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

223. RETAINING WALL

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

G

G

G

G

G

G

N

N

N

G

N

N

N

N

N

G

G

N

N

N

N

N

G

G

G

G

N

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS P

3. WEARING SURFACE G

N FT

G

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N

5. FOUNDATIONS N

6. WINGWALLS F

7. WEEP HOLES N

8. EXPANSION JOINTS P

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION F

11.SLOPE PROTECTION N

12.OTHER N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

N

N

N

PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N

N

N

N

N

N

N

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

16.FOUNDATIONS

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19.OTHER

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-094P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

58.1

59.3

MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE AND EVIDENCE OF LEAKAGE ON SLAB UNDERSIDE ALONG LONGITUDINAL CONSTRUCTION JOINT.

MINOR SCALING THROUGHOUT SLAB UNDERSIDE.

MINOR TO MODERATE COLLISION DAMAGE TO BOTH SIDES OF SLAB WITH SCRAPES ON SLAB UNDERSIDE. MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND FLAKING OF FINISH COAT ON CORNERS OF FRAME; MINOR SPALLING AT SOUTHWEST CORNER. MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON BOTH SIDES OF SLAB AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS.

58.2 SEVERELY DETERIORATED OR MISSING FILLER MATERIAL IN CURB AND RAILING EXPANSION JOINTS.

58.5

58.6

MINOR VERTICAL, DIAGONAL, AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF CURBS AND RAILINGS; MINOR SPALLING AT EXPANSION JOINTS.

MINOR DELAMINATION OF WEST RAILING OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT. MISALIGNED CURB ON EAST SIDE OF NORTH ABUTMENT.

MINOR MOWER DAMAGE TO PARAPET ENDS.

58.7 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS ALONG CURBLINES.

60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE AND EVIDENCE OF WATER LEAKAGE ON BOTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS. HEAVY GRAFFITI ON BOTH BREASTWALLS. MINOR FLAKING OF FINISH COAT ON WEST SIDE OF SOUTH

BREASTWALL.

MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND WATER LEAKAGE, 2" BELOW SLAB ON SOUTH ABUTMENT.

60.6 MINOR TO MODERATE VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON ALL WINGWALLS. MINOR SPALLING OF

WINGWALL FINISH COAT ADJACENT TO SOME CRACKS.

60.8 SEVERELY DETERIORATED OR MISSING FILLER MATERIAL IN VERTICAL JOINT BETWEEN WINGWALLS AND ABUTMENTS.

60.10 MINOR OUTWARD ROTATION OF WINGWALLS, MEASURED AT TOP OF WINGWALLS: 1" AT NORTHEAST, 3/4" AT NORTHWEST, 1/2"

AT SOUTHEAST, AND 1/2" AT SOUTHWEST (NO CHANGE SINCE LAST INSPECTION).

222.4 MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKS 1' FROM CURBS NEAR ABUTMENTS.

222.7 NO MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS ON STRUCTURE OR ALONG UNDERPASS ROADWAY. TYPE 3 OBJECT MARKER FOR UNDERPASS ROADWAY MISSING AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF BRIDGE. OBJECT MARKER AT NORTHWEST HAS BULLET HOLES.

5" X 16" BLACK AND YELLOW STRIPED OBJECT MARKERS IN PLACE AT PARAPET ENDS.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-094P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 75 68 125 113

HS 91 83 152 138

TYPE 3 86 78 143 130

TYPE 3S2 127 115 213 193

TYPE 3-3 163 148 272 247

DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 06/20/2016

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: NEGATIVE MOMENT

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-094P

MS ROUTE 49 BR DGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/28/2020

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............MS ROUTE 49 BRIDGE

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-094 P

4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................DANCY

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3H14

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........NONE

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

284 - MISSISSIPPI

01019 CHEROKEE

00000

1 6 1 00001 0

MS ROUTE 49

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570094P0000000

5 5 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. ROUTE 82

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

198.5 (KM PT: 60.5 )

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

CULVERTS)

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............47.2 FT ( 14.4 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 59.2 FT ( 18 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-

CAPACITY RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............91 TONS ( 82.6 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............99.9 TONS ( 90.6 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

https://RATING:

https://LENGTH:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-094P

MS ROUTE 49 BR DGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/28/2020

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 28'29.10" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°12 '21 50" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.3 FT ( 9.8 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 15 MI ( 24 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......02 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 1 - HIGHWAY, WITH OR W/OUT (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

PEDESTRIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1075 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 39 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1183 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........N - NOT APPLICABLE, NO WATERWAY RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:..............................6.80 FT ( 2.07 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2 50 FT ( 0.76 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 13.92 FT ( 4.24 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............7 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(61) CHANNEL:................................N (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:........... N

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... N - NOT OVER WATERWAY

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PROPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 2000

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 14000

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2007, 2013 - STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES REPAVED. 2013 - PAVEMENT SAWCUT AND SEALED OVER ENDS OF STRUCTURE.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

https://28'29.10

Inspector: Reinaldo Silvestry Structure Number: 5570094P0000000

Inpsection Date: 10/29/2020 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD JACKSON

PHOTO 4

Description WEST SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 6

Description NORTH APPROACH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description TRANSVERSE CRACKING OFF SAW CUT JOINT OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE ALSO

EVIDENCE OF SETTLEMENT AT CORNERS

PHOTO 8

Description SETTLEMENT OF APPROACHES AT SOUTH END; EAST SIDE OF ABUTMENT SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description GENERAL VIEW OF EAST RAILING LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO 10

Description CLOSE UP OF SOUTHEAST CORNER; NOTE SPALLING DUE TO MOWER DAMAGE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description SOUTHEAST WINGWALL; NOTE VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE, VEGETATION GROWTH ON WINGWALL, AND EROSION TRENCH RUNNING ALONG

WINGWALL

PHOTO 12

Description SOUTHWEST WINGWALL; NOTE EFFLORESCENCE FROM HORIZONTAL CONSTRUCTION

JOINT AT SOUTHWEST WINGWALL AND AT BEARING AREA

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 14

Description FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT CENTER OF SOUTH

ABUTMENT; NOTE ALSO GRAFFITI AT ABUTMENT BREASTWALL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description VERTICAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ABOUT 15 FT FROM EAST END ON SOUTH

ABUTMENT

PHOTO 16

Description UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SLAB LOOKING SOUTH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description EFFLORESCENCE AND STAINING FROM LONGITUDINAL CONSTRUCTION JOINT ALONG

CENTERLINE OF SLAB UNDERSIDE

PHOTO 18

Description EAST SIDE OF SLAB; NOTE SCRAPES AND SPALLING DUE TO COLLISION DAMAGE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description SPALLING DUE TO COLLISION DAMAGE ON WEST SIDE OF SLAB OVER EASTBOUND LANE

PHOTO 20

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE GRAFFITI

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 21

Description HORIZONTAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT BEARING AREA ON EAST SIDE OF

NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 22

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTHWEST WINGWALL