5570-109P-2022.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-24-R-000004
About this file
This bridge inspection report details the condition of Structure No. 5570-109P, the Poplar Creek Bridge on the Natchez Trace Parkway in Mississippi. The 34.7-foot single-span concrete bridge was inspected on March 11, 2022 by the Federal Highway Administration. The report finds the deck, superstructure, and substructure to be in fair condition, with the channel and approaches in good condition. It recommends sealing cracks in the asphalt, stabilizing eroded embankments, and restoring pavement markings. Estimated rehabilitation and reconstruction costs range from $22,000 to over $58,000. Accompanying photos document cracking, spalling, erosion, and deficiencies to be addressed.
The related federal contract opportunity is a pre-solicitation for drainage improvements on the Natchez Trace Parkway in Mississippi, specifically structures NP-NATR 3N17 and 3H26. The solicitation will be issued by the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. The pre-solicitation provides advance notice of a future procurement but no other details regarding required services, response timing, or contract terms.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 59 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
POPLAR CREEK BRIDGE
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER POPLAR CREEK
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
LN
STRUCTURE NO. 5570-109P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 3/11/2022
EU
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
MILE POINT: 180.88
KILOMETER POINT: 55.13
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-109P
POPLAR CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 03/11/2022
PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D
Item No.
Maintenance Recommendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
58.3,222.
SEAL CRACK IN ASPHALT ALONG CENTERLINE OVER
STRUCTURE AND AT APPROACHES.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
Item No.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
REHAB RECONSTR
61.2,60.9 STABILIZE SLOUGHING OF CHANNEL BANKS
WITH ENGINEERED RIPRAP AND FILL EROSION
AT SOUTHEAST WINGWALL.
58.1 RESTRIPE LANE PAVEMENT MARKINGS.
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-109P
POPLAR CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 03/10/2022
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 12 11 20 18
HS 21 19 35 32
TYPE 3 18 16 31 28
TYPE 3S2 28 25 48 44
TYPE 3-3 36 33 61 55
DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 05/16/2019
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: POSITIVE MOMENT
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-109P
POPLAR CREEK BR DGE INSPECTION DATE: 03/10/2022
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............POPLAR CREEK BRIDGE
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-109 P
4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 109P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................KOSCIUSKO
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3J8
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........2294C
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
284 - MISSISSIPPI
28019 CHOCTAW
00000
1 6 1 00001 0
POPLAR CREEK
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
5570109P0000000
14.5 MILES SOUTH OF MS ROUTE 9
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
180.8 (KM PT: 55.13)
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
CULVERTS)
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............34.7 FT ( 10.6 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 34.7 FT ( 10.6 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-
CAPACITY RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............21 TONS ( 19.1 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............35 TONS ( 31.8 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/11/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-109P
POPLAR CREEK BR DGE INSPECTION DATE: 03/10/2022
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 17'38.60" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°24 '10 20" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.4 FT ( 9.9 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 25 MI ( 40 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1230 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 30 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1353 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT
REQUIRED)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2.42 FT ( 0.74 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 6 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............6 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N
(61) CHANNEL:................................6 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF
FOOTING OR PILES
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1982-JOINT REPAIR.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
Inspector: Killian Baptiste Structure Number: 5570109P0000000
Inspection Date: 03/11/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD JACKSON
PHOTO 4
Description WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO 6
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF DECK LOOKING NORTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING ALONG CENTERLINE OF WEARING SURFACE; NOTE
DETERIORATION OF LANE STRIPING
PHOTO 8
Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF SHOULDER LANE STRIPING, EAST SHOULDER SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description TYPICAL MISSING JOINT FILLER MATERIAL IN RAIL EXPANSION JOINTS, EAST RAILING
OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO 10
Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF RAILINGS, WEST RAILING NEAR MIDSPAN SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description DIAGONAL CRACK IN WEST RAIL POST OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 12
Description TYPICAL DEBRIS AND GRAVEL ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES, WEST CURBLINE
SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKS WITH EFFLORESCENCE ALONG COLD JOINTS, WEST
SIDE SHOWN
PHOTO 14
Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING ALONG EDGES OF DECK UNDERSIDE AT MIDSPAN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 16
Description SCALING UNDER CENTER WEEP HOLE OF NORTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 18
Description EROSION OF NORTHEAST EMBANKMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description EROSION ALONG SOUTHEAST WINGWALL; NOTE NO JOINT SEALENT BETWEEN
WINGWALL AND ABUTMENT
PHOTO 20
Description VERTICAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN SOUTHWEST WINGWALL
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 21
Description TYPICAL EDGE SPALLING OF PARAPETS, SOUTHEAST PARAPET SHOWN; NOTE
UNDERMINING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT
PHOTO 22
Description LOOKING UPSTREAM FROM DECK
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 23
Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM FROM DECK
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .