5570-091P-2020.pdf

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

PIGEON ROOST SLOUGH BRIDGE

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER PIGEON ROOST SLOUGH

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LOOKING SOUTH

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-091P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 10/30/2020

WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-091P

PIGEON ROOST SLOUGH BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/30/2020

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUDNATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

01 - SLAB NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: . 85.2 FT (26 M)

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ......... 32 FT (9.8 M)

6 - BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ..................... 32.4 FT (9.9 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: .... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES YEAR BUILT:

1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: . 0

3H4 SKEW ANGLE: .................... 0 °

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ....... N

1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2012-DECK & CURB JOINTS SEALED. 2014-STRUCTURE AND

APPROACHES REPAVED, PAVEMENT SAWCUT AND SEALED OVER ENDS OF

STRUCTURE; W. RAILING RECAST IN S. SPAN.

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

STATE: .............................. 284 - MISSISSIPPI

FACILITY CARRIED: ......... NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: PIGEON ROOST SLOUGH

MILE POINT: .. 203.02 (KM PT 61.88)

LOCATION: .... 1.2 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. ROUTE 82

INSPECTION TEAM: B. Cazenas, R. Silvestry

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Reinaldo Silvestry

REPORT REVIEW:

Marcus Miller

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 03/04/2021

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete slab bridge is in good condition overall. Main problems at this time include minor erosion along southwest wingwall, and scour along the south face of the south pier with up to 1.4' of the footing exposed.

Additional problems include fallen trees and debris in the channel, and debris accumulation along the curblines.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-091P

PIGEON ROOST SLOUGH BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 10/30/2020

PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D

Item No.

Maintenance Recomendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

61.4

REMOVE FALLEN TREES IN CHANNEL.

58.7

PERIODICALLY REMOVE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG

CURBLINES.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

60.9,60.

17,61.2

PLACE SCOUR COUNTERMEASURES AROUND

PIERS AS NEEDED.

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND DESIGN AND

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING

(APPROXIMATELY 70% OF TOTAL REHAB COST)

PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-091P

PIGEON ROOST SLOUGH BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020

58. DECK

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.OTHER:

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

61. CHANNEL

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

222. APPROACHES

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

223. RETAINING WALL

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

G

G

G

G

F

G

N

N

N

G

N

N

N

N

N

G

G

N

F

F

N

F

N

1- SUFF

3 - LOW

N

N

N

G

G

G

G

N

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS F

3. WEARING SURFACE G

N 10 FT

G

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0

SAND, SILT

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N

5. FOUNDATIONS N

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES G

8. EXPANSION JOINTS N

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR F

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11.SLOPE PROTECTION N

12.OTHER N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

N

N

N

PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS G

N

G

G

P

G

N

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

16.FOUNDATIONS

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19.OTHER

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-091P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

58.1

59.3

MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SLAB UNDERSIDE IN NORTH SPAN. MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SLAB UNDERSIDE IN CENTER SPAN, NEAR EAST EDGE. SEVERAL POPOUTS ON SLAB

SIDES.

58.2 MINOR DETERIORATION OF SEALANT MATERIAL AT CURB EXPANSION JOINTS; MISSING AT RAILING EXPANSION JOINTS.

58.3 PAVEMENT SAWCUT AND SEALED OVER ENDS OF STRUCTURE. MINOR DETERIORATION OF SEALANT MATERIAL.

58.5

58.6

WIDESPREAD MINOR CRACKING OF CURBS.

WIDESPREAD MINOR CRACKING OF RAILINGS. MINOR SPALLING OF RAILING AT EXPANSION JOINT AT SOUTHWEST CORNER.

MINOR SPALLING OF RAIL POST AT NORTHEAST CORNER. WEST RAILING IN SOUTH SPAN HAS BEEN RECAST. VOID IN WEST

RAILING OVER NORTH ABUTMENT.

58.7 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS ALONG CURBLINES.

60.3 MINOR SPALL ON BREASTWALL IN BEARING AREA AT EAST SIDE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT (1.5' X 1.5') AND WEST SIDE OF NORTH

ABUTMENT (1.5' X 1').

60.6 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON NORTH WINGWALLS. MINOR MOWER DAMAGE TO WINGWALL ENDS

AND MOWER SCRAPES ALONG WINGWALLS.

60.13 ISOLATED MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF PIERS. MINOR TO MODERATE SCALING ALONG WATERLINE.

60.17

61.2

MINOR EROSION AND SCOUR ON NORTH FACE OF NORTH PIER. MODERATE TO SEVERE SCOUR ON SOUTH FACE OF SOUTH PIER EXPOSING UP TO 1.4' OF FOOTING (UNABLE TO ASSESS UNDERMINING DUE TO HIGH WATER LEVEL).

61.1

61.2

61.4

CHANNEL FLOWS INTO AND ALONG SOUTH FACE OF NORTH PIER.

SEVERAL FALLEN TREES AND TREE LIMBS IN UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL APPROXIMATELY 100' FROM STRUCTURE.

SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

222.4

222.6

ISOLATED MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT.

MINOR SETTLEMENT BEHIND ABUTMENTS.

222.7 5"X16" BLACK AND YELLOW OBJECT MARKER AT PARAPET ENDS.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-091P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 20 18 35 32

HS 27 24 45 41

TYPE 3 24 22 50 45

TYPE 3S2 42 38 71 64

TYPE 3-3 59 54 98 89

DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 06/30/2015

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: TOP SLAB - MOMENT

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-091P

PIGEON ROOST SLOUGH BR DGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............PIGEON ROOST SLOUGH BRIDGE

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-091 P

4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................DANCY

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3H4

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........2350A

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

284 - MISSISSIPPI

01019 CHEROKEE

00000

1 6 1 00001 0

PIGEON ROOST SLOUGH

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570091P0000000

1 2 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. ROUTE 82

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

203.0 (KM PT: 61.88)

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 01 - SLAB (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............003 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............32 FT ( 9.8 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 85.2 FT ( 26 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-

CAPACITY RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............27 TONS ( 24.5 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............45 TONS ( 40.8 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 10/30/2020 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-091P

PIGEON ROOST SLOUGH BR DGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 31'36.10" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°09 '39.40" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.4 FT ( 9.9 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 15 MI ( 24 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1075 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1183 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT

REQUIRED)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2.42 FT ( 0.74 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............7 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N

(61) CHANNEL:................................5 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 4 - ACTION IS REQUIRED TO

PROTECT EXPOSED FOUNDATIONS

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PROPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 3000

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 62000

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2012-DECK & CURB JOINTS SEALED. 2014-STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES REPAVED, PAVEMENT SAWCUT AND SEALED OVER

ENDS OF STRUCTURE; W. RAILING RECAST IN S. SPAN.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

https://31'36.10

Inspector: Reinaldo Silvestry Structure Number: 5570091P0000000

Inpsection Date: 10/30/2020 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING NORTH TOWARD TUPELO

PHOTO 4

Description WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO 6

Description NORTH APPROACH; NOTE FULL WIDTH TRANSVERSE CRACK OF WEARING SURFACE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description DETERIORATION OF SEALANT MATERIAL AT JOINT OVER NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 8

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTHEAST WINGWALL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 10

Description SPALLING ON BEARING AREA (1.5' X 1') AT WEST SIDE OF NORTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description UNDERSIDE VIEW OF NORTH SPAN LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 12

Description SCALING ALONG BASE OF NORTH PIER AT WATERLINE; NORTH FACE OF PIER SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF CENTER SPAN LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO 14

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PIER; NORTH FACE SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PIER; SOUTH FACE SHOWN

PHOTO 16

Description UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SOUTH SPAN LOOKING NORTH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE AREA OF SPALL (1.5' x 1.5') AND

VEGETATION GROWTH ON EAST SIDE

PHOTO 18

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTHEAST WINGWALL; NOTE MOWER SCRAPES ALONG WINGWALL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description LOOKING UPSTREAM; NOTE FALLEN TREE IN UPSTREAM PATH

PHOTO 20

Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM; NOTE FALLEN TREES