5570-103P-2022.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-24-R-000004
About this file
This bridge inspection report details the findings of a routine inspection conducted on March 10, 2022 of Structure No. 5570-103P, a 26-foot concrete bridge located at milepoint 193.00 on the Natchez Trace Parkway that carries a county road over the parkway. The report documents the structure's features, condition ratings, load capacity, maintenance needs, and estimated rehabilitation costs. It finds the bridge's deck, superstructure, and substructure to be in fair condition, with needs including cleaning debris, sealing cracks, and replacing expansion joint material. Estimated preliminary rehabilitation costs total approximately $XX,XXX. Relatedly, solicitation 693C73-24-R-000004 concerns upcoming Natchez Trace Parkway drainage improvements including work on Structure No. 5570-103P and other sites along NP-NATR 3N17 3H26.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 59 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 193.00
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER COUNTY ROAD
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
LS
STRUCTURE NO. 5570-103P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 3/10/2022
WS
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
MILE POINT: 193.00
KILOMETER POINT: 58.83
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-103P
COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 193.00 INSPECTION DATE : 03/10/2022
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
Item No.
Maintenance Recommendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
58.7
REMOVE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG WEST
CURBLINE AND FROM GRATE OF NORTHEAST DROP
INLET.
60.7
REMOVE SEDIMENT TO CLEAR COVERED WEEP HOLES.
222.7
PROVIDE TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT
BRIDGE CORNERS ALONG UNDERPASS ROADWAY.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
Item REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
UNIT
UNIT PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
No. (TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. COST
REHAB RECONSTR
58.2,60.8 REPLACE EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL IN
CURBS, RAILINGS AND VERTICAL JOINTS.
58.6 CLEAN AND COAT EXPOSED REBAR ON
UNDERSIDE OF EAST RAIL WITH APPROVED
PROTECTIVE COATING.
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES.
58.3,222.
SEAL CRACKS IN ASHPALT OVER STRUCTURE
AND AT APPROACHES.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-103P
COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 193.00 INSPECTION DATE : 03/10/2022
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that the recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-103P
COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 193.00 INSPECTION DATE: 03/09/2022
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 24 22 40 36
HS 43 39 71 64
TYPE 3 37 34 63 57
TYPE 3S2 57 52 96 87
TYPE 3-3 73 66 122 111
DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 06/11/2015
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: POSITIVE MOMENT
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-103P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 193.00
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-103 P
4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................DANCY
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3H20
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........NONE
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
284 - MISSISSIPPI
28019 CHOCTAW
00000
1 6 1 00001 0
COUNTY ROAD
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
5570103P0000000
2 5 MILES SOUTH OF MS ROUTE 9
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
193.0 (KM PT: 58.83)
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
CULVERTS)
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............26 FT ( 7.9 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 26.0 FT ( 7.9 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-
CAPACITY RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............43 TONS ( 39 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............71 TONS ( 64.4 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/10/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-103P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 24'57 30" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°16 '16 20" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.4 FT ( 9.9 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 25 MI ( 40 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......02 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 1 - HIGHWAY, WITH OR W/OUT (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
PEDESTRIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1230 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1353 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........N - NOT APPLICABLE, NO WATERWAY RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:..............................3.00 FT ( 0.91 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2.42 FT ( 0.74 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 13.75 FT ( 4.19 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............7 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(61) CHANNEL:................................N (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:........... N
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... N - NOT OVER WATERWAY
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 1 - MAINTENANCE
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2007-NEW PAVEMENT.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
Inspector: Killian Baptiste Structure Number: 5570103P0000000
Inspection Date: 03/10/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING NORTH TOWARD TUPELO
PHOTO 4
Description EAST SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO 6
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF DECK LOOKING NORTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE
PHOTO 8
Description TYPICAL MISSING JOINT FILLER MATERIAL IN RAIL AND CURB EXPANSIONS JOINTS, WEST CURB AND RAILING OVER NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE SPALL AND GAP IN
CURB
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF RAILING, NORTH END OF WEST RAILING SHOWN
PHOTO 10
Description SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON UNDERSIDE OF EAST RAILING OVER NORTH
ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON UNDERSIDE OF EAST RAILING NEAR MIDSPAN
PHOTO 12
Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES, WEST CURBLINE SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description TYPICAL EDGE SPALLING AND VEHICULAR SCRAPES OF PARAPETS, SOUTHWEST
PARAPET SHOWN
PHOTO 14
Description DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON NORTHEAST DRAIN INLET
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description TYPICAL HORIZONTAL CRACKS WITH EFFLORESCENCE UNDER FASCIA AT MIDSPAN, EAST OVERHANG SHOWN
PHOTO 16
Description DIAGONAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT SOUTHEAST CORNER OF DECK
UNDERSIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description CRACKS WITH EFFLORESCENCE ALONG CENTERLINE OF DECK UNDERSIDE
PHOTO 18
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACK AT CENTERLINE OF ABUTMENTS, SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO 20
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 21
Description TYPICAL CRACKING AT DECK AND ABUTMENT COLD JOINTS, NORTHEAST CORNER
SHOWN
PHOTO 22
Description TYPICAL MISSING JOINT MATERIAL BETWEEN ABUTMENTS AND WINGWALLS, NORTHEAST CORNER SHOWN
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .