5570-096P-2020.pdf

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 197.10

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER COUNTY ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LOOKING SOUTH

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-096P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020

WEST SIDE

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-096P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 197.10 INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUDNATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1 - CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: . 33.8 FT (10.3 M)

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ......... 26.6 FT (8.1 M)

6 - BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ..................... 32.4 FT (9.9 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: .... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

6 - N/A YEAR BUILT:

1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: . 0

3H17 SKEW ANGLE: .................... 12 °

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ....... N

1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2007, 2013-STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES REPAVED;

PAVEMENT SAWCUT AND SEALED OVER FRAME ENDS.

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

STATE: .............................. 284 - MISSISSIPPI

FACILITY CARRIED: ......... NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: COUNTY ROAD

MILE POINT: .. 197.10 (KM PT 60.08)

LOCATION: .... 7.9 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. ROUTE 82

INSPECTION TEAM: B. Cazenas, R. Silvestry

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Reinaldo Silvestry

REPORT REVIEW:

Marcus Miller

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 03/04/2021

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete frame bridge is in good condition overall. Main problems include severe deterioration of the filler material in the vertical joints between the abutment breastwalls and wingwalls that has caused settlement of the roadway behind the abutments; severe deterioration of the filler material in the curb and railing expansion joints; a minor spall with exposed rebar in the northwest approach rail; and minor erosion at the southwest wingwall.

Additional problems include transverse cracking of the wearing surface behind the previously sawcut joints over abutments. Additionally, the drop inlets in the underpass roadway ditches on the northeast corner of the structure is covered with soil.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-096P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 197.10 INSPECTION DATE : 10/29/2020

PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D

Item No.

Maintenance Recomendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

222.7

REPLACE VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS. INSTALL OBJECT

MARKERS AT ABUTMENTS FOR UNDERPASS ROADWAY.

222.9,60.

REMOVE SOIL AND DEBRIS FROM DROP INLET IN

UNDERPASS ROADWAY DITCH, NORTHEAST CORNER OF

STRUCTURE. UNCLOG WEEPHOLES AT BOTH

ABUTMENTS.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

58.2,60.8 REPLACE FILLER MATERIAL IN CURB

EXPANSION JOINTS AND IN VERTICAL JOINTS

BETWEEN ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS AND

WINGWALLS.

58.6 CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR IN

NORTHWEST APPROACH RAIL WITH

APPROVED PROTECTIVE COATING.

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, DESIGN, AND

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (70% TOTAL

REHAB COST) PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-096P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 197.10 INSPECTION DATE: 10/28/2020

58. DECK

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.OTHER:

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

61. CHANNEL

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

222. APPROACHES

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

223. RETAINING WALL

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

G

G

G

G

G

G

N

N

N

G

N

N

N

N

N

G

G

N

N

N

N

N

G

G

G

G

P

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS P

3. WEARING SURFACE G

N FT

UNDERPASS DROP INLET

F

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N

5. FOUNDATIONS N

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES P

8. EXPANSION JOINTS P

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11.SLOPE PROTECTION N

12.OTHER N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

N

N

N

PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N

N

N

N

N

N

N

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

16.FOUNDATIONS

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19.OTHER

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-096P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

58.1

59.3

MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON ALL EXTERIOR CORNERS OF FRAME AT SPRINGLINE. MINOR COLLISION DAMAGE TO BOTH SIDES OF SLAB WITH SCRAPES ON SLAB UNDERSIDE. MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF SLAB

UNDERSIDE; MINOR ABRASION THROUGHOUT.

58.2 FILLER MATERIAL IS MISSING OR SEVERELY DETERIORATED IN CURB AND RAILING EXPANSION JOINTS.

58.3

222.4

PAVEMENT SAWCUT AND SEALED OVER ENDS OF STRUCTURE. MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT.

58.5

58.6

MINOR POPOUTS ON CURBS. MINOR SPALL ON END OF NORTHEAST APPROACH CURB. MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF

CURBS.

MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF RAILS. MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON RAIL POSTS AT BRIDGE ENDS. MINOR SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON NORTHWEST APPROACH RAIL AT EXPANSION JOINT. MOWER DAMAGE ON END OF NORTHEAST

WINGWALL PARAPET END.

58.7 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IN CURBLINES.

60.1

60.6

MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS WITH FLAKING OF FINISH COAT AT TWO CRACKS. GRAFFITI ON BOTH

BREASTWALLS.

MINOR HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON ALL WINGWALLS.

60.7 WEEP HOLES ARE PARTIALLY BURIED OR CLOGGED.

60.8 SEVERE DETERIORATION OF FILLER MATERIAL IN VERTICAL JOINTS BETWEEN WINGWALLS AND ABUTMENTS.

60.9 MINOR TO MODERATE EROSION (5'L X 2'W X 2'D) ADJACENT TO SOUTHWEST WINGWALL. MINOR TO MODERATE EROSION (6'L X

2'W X 2'D) ADJACENT TO NORTHWEST WINGWALL.

222.4

222.6

UP TO 1" SETTLEMENT OF APPROACHES BEHIND ABUTMENTS FOR 2'.

222.7 "13FT 0IN" SIGN ON BOTH SIDES OF SLAB. "13'-0"" VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS AT BOTH UNDERPASS APPROACHES; EAST APPROACH SIGN DAMAGED AND BARELY LEGIBLE DUE TO MILDEW AND WEST APPROACH SIGN HAS MINOR GUNSHOT DAMAGE.

OBJECT MARKERS NOT PRESENT AT ABUTMENTS FOR UNDERPASS ROADWAY.

5" X 16" BLACK AND YELLOW STRIPED OBJECT MARKERS AT PARAPET ENDS.

222.9 SOIL AND DEBRIS COVERED DROP INLET AT UNDERPASS ROADWAY DITCHES ON NORTHEAST SIDE OF STRUCTURE.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-096P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 22 20 37 34

HS 39 35 66 60

TYPE 3 34 31 57 52

TYPE 3S2 52 47 87 79

TYPE 3-3 67 61 112 102

DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 06/15/2015

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: POSITIVE MOMENT

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-096P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 197.10

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-096 P

4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................DANCY

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3H17

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........3019A

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

284 - MISSISSIPPI

01019 CHEROKEE

00000

1 6 1 00001 0

COUNTY ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570096P0000000

7 9 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. ROUTE 82

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

197.1 (KM PT: 60.08)

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

CULVERTS)

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............26.6 FT ( 8.1 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 33.8 FT ( 10.3 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-

CAPACITY RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............39 TONS ( 35.4 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............66 TONS ( 59.9 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

https://LENGTH:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-096P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 27'28.70" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°13 '23 30" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.4 FT ( 9.9 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 15 MI ( 24 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......02 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 1 - HIGHWAY, WITH OR W/OUT (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

PEDESTRIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1075 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 12 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1183 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........N - NOT APPLICABLE, NO WATERWAY RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:..............................5.00 FT ( 1.52 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2 50 FT ( 0.76 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 13.08 FT ( 3.99 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............7 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(61) CHANNEL:................................N (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:........... N

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... N - NOT OVER WATERWAY

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PROPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 3000

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 16000

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2007, 2013-STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES REPAVED; PAVEMENT SAWCUT AND SEALED OVER FRAME ENDS.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

https://27'28.70

Inspector: Reinaldo Silvestry Structure Number: 5570096P0000000

Inpsection Date: 10/29/2020 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING NORTHBOUND TOWARD TUPELO

PHOTO 4

Description EAST SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH APPROACH

PHOTO 6

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH APPROACH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description EXPANSION JOINT OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 8

Description NORTH ABUTMENT EXPANSION JOINT; NOTE EVIDENCE OF SETTLEMENT IN NORTH

APPROACH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description WEST RAILING OVER NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR

PHOTO 10

Description TYPICAL DRAINAGE INLET IN SOUTHWEST CORNER; NOTE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION

AROUND DRAIN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description SOUTHWEST WINGWALL; NOTE VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG WINGWALL

PHOTO 12

Description EFFLORESCENCE FROM HORIZONTAL CONSTRUCTION JOINT AT SOUTHEAST WINGWALL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description HORIZONTAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT BEARING AREA ON WEST SIDE OF

SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 14

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE PARTIALLY BURIED WEEP HOLES

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description SPALLING AND VEHICULAR SCRAPES AT EAST SIDE OF SLAB UNDERSIDE

PHOTO 16

Description UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SLAB LOOKING NORTH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description WEST SIDE OF SLAB UNDERSIDE; NOTE SPALL AND SCRAPES DUE TO COLLISION

DAMAGE

PHOTO 18

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTHEAST WINGWALL; NOTE VEGETATION GROWTH

PHOTO 20

Description NORTHWEST WINGWALL; NOTE EROSION HOLE (6'L X 2'W X 2'D) ALONG WINGWALL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 21

Description VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGN AT THE WEST APPROACH OF UNDERPASS ROAD; NOTE

GUN SHOTS

PHOTO 22

Description FADED VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGN AT EAST APPROACH OF UNDERPASS ROAD