5570-097P-2022.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-24-R-000004
About this file
This bridge inspection report details the condition of Structure No. 5570-097P, the Sand Creek Bridge in Natchez Trace Parkway over Sand Creek. The three-span concrete slab bridge was built in 1956 and last inspected on March 9, 2022. It carries two lanes of traffic and has a length of 85 feet. The report finds the deck, superstructure, and substructure to be in fair condition, with needs including replacing expansion joint material in the railings, stabilizing erosion and scour at piers, and removing debris and vegetation along the curblines. The preliminary cost estimate provided ranges from $0 to $30,000 to address these moderate priority issues. This inspection report relates to the pre-solicitation notice for the Natchez Trace Parkway Drainage Improvements project to be conducted by the Federal Highway Administration, which may include work on this bridge.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 59 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
SAND CREEK BRIDGE DANCY
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER SAND CREEK
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
LS
STRUCTURE NO. 5570-097P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 3/9/2022
WD
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
MILE POINT: 196.50
KILOMETER POINT: 59.89
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-097P
SAND CREEK BRIDGE DANCY INSPECTION DATE : 03/09/2022
PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
C
Item No.
Maintenance Recommendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
58.7,58.5
REMOVE DEBRIS AND VEGETATION ALONG CURBLINES.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
Item No.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
REHAB RECONSTR
58.2 REPLACE EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL IN
RAILINGS.
60.17,61.
STABILIZE EROSION AND SCOUR AT PIERS.
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-097P
SAND CREEK BRIDGE DANCY INSPECTION DATE: 03/08/2022
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 15 14 25 23
HS 22 20 38 34
TYPE 3 19 17 32 29
TYPE 3S2 29 26 49 44
TYPE 3-3 39 35 65 59
DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 05/30/2019
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-097P
SAND CREEK BR DGE DANCY INSPECTION DATE: 03/08/2022
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............SAND CREEK BRIDGE DANCY
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-097 P
4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 097P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................DANCY
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3H6
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........2352A
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
284 - MISSISSIPPI
28019 CHOCTAW
00000
1 6 1 00001 0
SAND CREEK
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
5570097P0000000
7.6 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. ROUTE 82
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
196.5 (KM PT: 59.89)
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 01 - SLAB (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............003 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............32 FT ( 9.8 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 85.0 FT ( 25.9 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-
CAPACITY RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............22 TONS ( 20 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............38 TONS ( 34.5 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/09/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-097P
SAND CREEK BR DGE DANCY INSPECTION DATE: 03/08/2022
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 27'04 80" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°13 '45 90" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.4 FT ( 9.9 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 15 MI ( 24 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1075 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1183 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT
REQUIRED)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 1 83 FT ( 0 56 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............7 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N
(61) CHANNEL:................................5 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 4 - ACTION IS REQUIRED TO
PROTECT EXPOSED FOUNDATIONS
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 0 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: C - MODERATE
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2007-NEW PAVEMENT. 2019-RAILING REPAIRS.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
Inspector: Killian Baptiste Structure Number: 5570097P0000000
Inspection Date: 03/09/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING NORTH TOWARD TUPELO
PHOTO 4
Description EAST (UPSTREAM) SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO 6
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SOUTH SPAN LOOKING NORTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF NORTH SPAN LOOKING EAST
PHOTO 8
Description TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACK IN WEARING SURFACE, SOUTH END OF SOUTHBOUND
LANE SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description TYPICAL MISSING JOINT FILLER MATERIAL IN RAILING EXPANSION JOINTS, WEST
RAILING OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE NEW CURB JOINT MATERIAL
PHOTO 10
Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG CURBLINES AND
MOSS GROWTH ON CURBS, EAST CURBLINE SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description DETERIORATION OF WEST SHOULDER LANE STRIPING
PHOTO 12
Description TYPICAL MOSS GROWTH ON FASCIAS, WEST FASCIA SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description SPALLING AND CRACKING ON EXTERIOR FACE OF EAST PARAPET
PHOTO 14
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF SOUTH SPAN AT
EAST END
PHOTO 16
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH FACE OF SOUTH PIER; NOTE SCOUR HOLE AT EAST END OF
PIER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH FACE OF NORTH PIER
PHOTO 18
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description TYPICAL LAWNMOWER SCRAPES ON WINGWALLS, SOUTHEST WINGWALL SHOWN
PHOTO 20
Description LOOKING UPSTREAM FROM DECK
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 21
Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM FROM DECK
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .