5570-096P-2022.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
Natchez Trace Parkway Drainage Improvements - NP-NATR 3N17 3H26 ETC
Solicitation number
693C73-24-R-000004
Issued by

About this file

This bridge inspection report details the condition of a county road bridge within the Natchez Trace Parkway. The single-span concrete bridge was built in 1958 and last inspected on March 9, 2022. It carries the Natchez Trace Parkway over a county road and has a curb-to-curb width of 28 feet.

The report recommends minor maintenance like replacing missing object markers and cleaning debris. Rehabilitation work within five years includes replacing joint filler material and sealing cracks. The bridge's deck, superstructure, and substructure were rated 7 out of 9. The inspection frequency is every 24 months. The preliminary total estimated costs range from several thousand to several tens of thousands of dollars.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
NTP 3H2 3 5-A.pdf PDF
NATR BMS FY20(1)_As-Built Drawings-Final.pdf PDF
NTP 3H2 3 5-B.pdf PDF
5570-092P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-093P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-098P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-106P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-105P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-103P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-094P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-106P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-096P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-110P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-097P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-101P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-103P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-097P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-107P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-104P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-093P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-099P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-091P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-108P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-109P-2022.pdf PDF
Amendment 0002 - NP-NATR 3N17 3H26.pdf PDF
5570-092P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-095P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-100P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-099P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-102P-2020.pdf PDF
5570-101P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-095P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-094P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-107P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-100P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-104P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-108P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-109P-2018.pdf PDF
5570-105P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-102P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-110P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-098P-2022.pdf PDF
Amendment 001 - NP NATR 3N17 3H26.pdf PDF
5570-090P-2020.pdf PDF
L_Pavement Rehabilitation and Safety Improvements_NPS CE.pdf PDF
5570-090P-2022.pdf PDF
5570-091P-2020.pdf PDF
G_NATR 2019 Traffic Counts MP 121 and 204.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B_CULVERT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A_MS NP NATR 3N17 3H26_ETC_concept plans.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 59 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 197.10

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER COUNTY ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LS

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-096P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 3/9/2022

WS

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

MILE POINT: 197.10

KILOMETER POINT: 60.08

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-096P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 197.10 INSPECTION DATE : 03/09/2022

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

Item No.

Maintenance Recommendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

222.7

REPLACE MISSING OBJECT MARKER AT NORTHEAST

APPROACH RAILING. REPLACE VERTICAL CLEARANCE

SIGNS AT UNDERPASS APPROACHES. INSTALL OBJECT

MARKERS AT ABUTMENTS ON UNDERPASS ROADWAY.

222.9,60.

7,58.5,58.

REMOVE SOIL AND DEBRIS FROM DROP INLET IN

UNDERPASS ROADWAY DITCH, NORTHEAST CORNER OF

STRUCTURE AND CURBLINES.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

Item REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

UNIT

UNIT PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

No. (TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. COST

REHAB RECONSTR

58.2,60.8 REPLACE FILLER MATERIAL IN CURB

EXPANSION JOINTS AND IN VERTICAL JOINTS

BETWEEN ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS AND

WINGWALLS.

58.6 CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR IN

NORTHWEST APPROACH RAIL WITH

APPROVED PROTECTIVE COATING AND PATCH.

58.3 SEAL TRANSVERSE CRACKS IN WEARING

SURFACE NEAR ABUTMENTS.

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-096P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 197.10 INSPECTION DATE : 03/09/2022

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-096P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 197.10 INSPECTION DATE: 03/08/2022

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 22 20 37 34

HS 39 35 66 60

TYPE 3 34 31 57 52

TYPE 3S2 52 47 87 79

TYPE 3-3 67 61 112 102

DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 06/15/2015

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: POSITIVE MOMENT

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-096P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 197.10

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-096 P

4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 096P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................DANCY

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3H17

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........3019A

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

284 - MISSISSIPPI

28019 CHOCTAW

00000

1 6 1 00001 0

COUNTY ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570096P0000000

7 9 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. ROUTE 82

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

197.1 (KM PT: 60.08)

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

CULVERTS)

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............26.6 FT ( 8.1 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 33.8 FT ( 10.3 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-

CAPACITY RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............39 TONS ( 35.4 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............66 TONS ( 59.9 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/09/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-096P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 27'28.70" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°13 '23 30" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.4 FT ( 9.9 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 15 MI ( 24 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......02 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 1 - HIGHWAY, WITH OR W/OUT (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

PEDESTRIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1075 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 12 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1183 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........N - NOT APPLICABLE, NO WATERWAY RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:..............................5.00 FT ( 1.52 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2 50 FT ( 0.76 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 13.08 FT ( 3.99 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............7 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(61) CHANNEL:................................N (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:........... N

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... N - NOT OVER WATERWAY

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2007, 2013-STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES REPAVED; PAVEMENT SAWCUT AND SEALED OVER FRAME ENDS.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

Inspector: Killian Baptiste Structure Number: 5570096P0000000

Inspection Date: 03/09/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING NORTH TOWARD TUPELO

PHOTO 4

Description EAST SIDE; NOTE MISSING OBJECT MARKERS ON ABUTMENTS

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 6

Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF DECK LOOKING NORTH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description TYPICAL SETTLEMENT CRACKING OF PAVEMENT OVER ABUTMENTS, WEST SHOULDER

OVER NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO 8

Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF JOINT FILLER MATERIAL IN RAIL EXPANSION JOINTS, WEST

RAILING OVER NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES, WEST CURBLINE SHOWN

PHOTO 10

Description MISSING REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKER ON NORTHEAST PARAPET

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description COLLISION SCRAPES ON EAST END AND UNDERSIDE OF DECK

PHOTO 12

Description COLLISION DAMAGE OF WEST END AND UNDERSIDE OF DECK

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 14

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE UNDERPASS ROADWAY DITCH COVERED

AT NORTHEAST SIDE OF STRUCTURE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACK IN ABUTMENTS, CENTER OF NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO 16

Description TYPICAL PARTIALLY CLOGGED WEEP HOLES ON NORTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description TYPICAL CRACKING AT COLD JOINTS, SOUTHEAST WINGWALL SHOWN; NOTE LACK OF

VERTICAL JOINT FILLER MATERIAL

PHOTO 18

Description VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGN AT EAST APPROACH OF UNDERPASS ROADWAY

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .