5570-096P-2022.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-24-R-000004
About this file
This bridge inspection report details the condition of a county road bridge within the Natchez Trace Parkway. The single-span concrete bridge was built in 1958 and last inspected on March 9, 2022. It carries the Natchez Trace Parkway over a county road and has a curb-to-curb width of 28 feet.
The report recommends minor maintenance like replacing missing object markers and cleaning debris. Rehabilitation work within five years includes replacing joint filler material and sealing cracks. The bridge's deck, superstructure, and substructure were rated 7 out of 9. The inspection frequency is every 24 months. The preliminary total estimated costs range from several thousand to several tens of thousands of dollars.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 59 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 197.10
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER COUNTY ROAD
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
LS
STRUCTURE NO. 5570-096P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 3/9/2022
WS
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
MILE POINT: 197.10
KILOMETER POINT: 60.08
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-096P
COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 197.10 INSPECTION DATE : 03/09/2022
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
Item No.
Maintenance Recommendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
222.7
REPLACE MISSING OBJECT MARKER AT NORTHEAST
APPROACH RAILING. REPLACE VERTICAL CLEARANCE
SIGNS AT UNDERPASS APPROACHES. INSTALL OBJECT
MARKERS AT ABUTMENTS ON UNDERPASS ROADWAY.
222.9,60.
7,58.5,58.
REMOVE SOIL AND DEBRIS FROM DROP INLET IN
UNDERPASS ROADWAY DITCH, NORTHEAST CORNER OF
STRUCTURE AND CURBLINES.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
Item REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
UNIT
UNIT PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
No. (TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. COST
REHAB RECONSTR
58.2,60.8 REPLACE FILLER MATERIAL IN CURB
EXPANSION JOINTS AND IN VERTICAL JOINTS
BETWEEN ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS AND
WINGWALLS.
58.6 CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR IN
NORTHWEST APPROACH RAIL WITH
APPROVED PROTECTIVE COATING AND PATCH.
58.3 SEAL TRANSVERSE CRACKS IN WEARING
SURFACE NEAR ABUTMENTS.
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-096P
COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 197.10 INSPECTION DATE : 03/09/2022
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-096P
COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 197.10 INSPECTION DATE: 03/08/2022
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 22 20 37 34
HS 39 35 66 60
TYPE 3 34 31 57 52
TYPE 3S2 52 47 87 79
TYPE 3-3 67 61 112 102
DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 06/15/2015
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: POSITIVE MOMENT
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-096P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 197.10
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-096 P
4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 096P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................DANCY
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3H17
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........3019A
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
284 - MISSISSIPPI
28019 CHOCTAW
00000
1 6 1 00001 0
COUNTY ROAD
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
5570096P0000000
7 9 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. ROUTE 82
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
197.1 (KM PT: 60.08)
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
CULVERTS)
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............26.6 FT ( 8.1 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 33.8 FT ( 10.3 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-
CAPACITY RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............39 TONS ( 35.4 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............66 TONS ( 59.9 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/09/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-096P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 27'28.70" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°13 '23 30" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.4 FT ( 9.9 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 15 MI ( 24 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......02 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 1 - HIGHWAY, WITH OR W/OUT (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
PEDESTRIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1075 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 12 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1183 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........N - NOT APPLICABLE, NO WATERWAY RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:..............................5.00 FT ( 1.52 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2 50 FT ( 0.76 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 13.08 FT ( 3.99 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............7 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(61) CHANNEL:................................N (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:........... N
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... N - NOT OVER WATERWAY
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2007, 2013-STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES REPAVED; PAVEMENT SAWCUT AND SEALED OVER FRAME ENDS.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
Inspector: Killian Baptiste Structure Number: 5570096P0000000
Inspection Date: 03/09/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING NORTH TOWARD TUPELO
PHOTO 4
Description EAST SIDE; NOTE MISSING OBJECT MARKERS ON ABUTMENTS
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO 6
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF DECK LOOKING NORTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description TYPICAL SETTLEMENT CRACKING OF PAVEMENT OVER ABUTMENTS, WEST SHOULDER
OVER NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO 8
Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF JOINT FILLER MATERIAL IN RAIL EXPANSION JOINTS, WEST
RAILING OVER NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES, WEST CURBLINE SHOWN
PHOTO 10
Description MISSING REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKER ON NORTHEAST PARAPET
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description COLLISION SCRAPES ON EAST END AND UNDERSIDE OF DECK
PHOTO 12
Description COLLISION DAMAGE OF WEST END AND UNDERSIDE OF DECK
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 14
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE UNDERPASS ROADWAY DITCH COVERED
AT NORTHEAST SIDE OF STRUCTURE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACK IN ABUTMENTS, CENTER OF NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO 16
Description TYPICAL PARTIALLY CLOGGED WEEP HOLES ON NORTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description TYPICAL CRACKING AT COLD JOINTS, SOUTHEAST WINGWALL SHOWN; NOTE LACK OF
VERTICAL JOINT FILLER MATERIAL
PHOTO 18
Description VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGN AT EAST APPROACH OF UNDERPASS ROADWAY
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .