5570-090P-2020.pdf

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

PIGEON ROOST CANAL BRIDGE

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER PIGEON ROOST CANAL

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LOOKING SOUTH

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-090P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 10/30/2020

EAST (UPSTREAM) SIDE

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-090P

PIGEON ROOST CANAL BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/30/2020

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUDNATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

01 - SLAB NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: . 105.7 FT (32.2 M)

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ......... 38.7 FT (11.8 M)

6 - BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ..................... 32.4 FT (9.9 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: .... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES YEAR BUILT:

1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: . 0

3H3 SKEW ANGLE: .................... 40 °

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ....... N

1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2003-APPROACHES RESURFACED. 2014-STRUCTURE

REPAVED, PAVEMENT SAWCUT AND SEALED OVER ENDS OF STRUCTURE.

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

STATE: .............................. 284 - MISSISSIPPI

FACILITY CARRIED: ......... NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: PIGEON ROOST CANAL

MILE POINT: .. 203.10 (KM PT 61.9)

LOCATION: .... 1.0 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. ROUTE 82

INSPECTION TEAM: B. Cazenas, R. Silvestry

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Reinaldo Silvestry

REPORT REVIEW:

Marcus Miller

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 03/04/2021

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete slab bridge is generally in good to fair condition overall. Main problems include moderate scour that has exposed the concrete footing (up to a depth of 1.5') of both piers, and moderate cracking of the slab underside in the south and center spans.

Additional problems include abandoned piles and submerged drift in the channel under the center span;

moderate sloughing of the channel banks; tree growth at upstream south bank; fallen trees across upstream channel; missing joint filler material and cracks in the curbs and railings; and transverse cracking of wearing surface at both approaches.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-090P

PIGEON ROOST CANAL BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 10/30/2020

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

Item No.

Maintenance Recomendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

61.4

REMOVE TREE GROWTH AT UPSTREAM SOUTH CHANNEL

BANK AND FALLEN TREES ACROSS UPSTREAM CHANNEL.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

60.17 STABILIZE EROSION AND PLACE SCOUR

COUNTERMEASURES AROUND PIERS.

61.4 CUT OFF ABANDONED PILES AT GROUNDLINE

UNDER BRIDGE AND REMOVE SUBMERGED

DRIFT.

58.2 REPLACE FILLER MATERIAL IN CURB

EXPANSION JOINTS.

222.4 SEAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF PAVEMENT

AT BOTH APPROACHES.

58.5 CLEAN EXPOSED REBAR AND COAT WITH

APPROVED SEALANT, AND REPAIR SPALL IN

EAST CURB AT NORTH ABUTMENT.

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, DESIGN, AND

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (70% TOTAL

REHAB COST) PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-090P

PIGEON ROOST CANAL BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 10/30/2020

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-090P

PIGEON ROOST CANAL BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/2020

58. DECK

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.OTHER:

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

61. CHANNEL

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

222. APPROACHES

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

223. RETAINING WALL

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

F

G

F

G

G

G

N

N

N

F

N

N

N

N

N

G

G

F

G

F

N

F

N

1- SUFF

3 - LOW

N

N

N

F

G

G

G

N

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS F

3. WEARING SURFACE G

N

VEGETATION

12 FT

G

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0

SAND, SILT

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N

5. FOUNDATIONS N

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES G

8. EXPANSION JOINTS N

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11.SLOPE PROTECTION N

12.OTHER VEGETATION F

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

N

N

N

PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

14.PILE BENTS

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

16.FOUNDATIONS

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19.OTHER VEGETATION

G

N

G

N

F

G

F

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-090P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

58.1

59.3

59.10

MODERATE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SLAB UNDERSIDE, SOUTH AND CENTER SPANS, MAINLY ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AND ON SLAB EDGES. MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINT IN NORTH SPAN.

SLAB IS OFFSET FROM ABUTMENT BY 1" AT NORTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST CORNERS, LIKELY DUE TO THERMAL EXPANSION OF A

SKEWED STRUCTURE.

58.2 MISSING FILLER MATERIAL IN CURB AND RAILING EXPANSION JOINTS.

58.3

222.4

PAVEMENT SAWCUT AND SEALED OVER ENDS OF STRUCTURE. MODERATE DIAGONAL CRACKING IN WEARING SURFACE EXTENDING FROM NORTH ABUTMENT JOINT IN NORTHBOUND LANE OF NORTH SPAN. CRACK EXTENDS INTO APPROACH

PAVEMENT.

MODERATE TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF PAVEMENT AT BOTH APPROACHES.

58.5

58.6

WIDESPREAD MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON CURBS THROUGHOUT. AREA OF MODERATE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND DELAMINATION ON EAST CURB AT SOUTH PIER, 16' LONG, AND ON OUTSIDE OF DECK. MODERATE SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR (10" LONG X FULL HEIGHT X 9" ON TOP X 3" DEEP) ON EAST CURB AT NORTH ABUTMENT. MINOR

CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WEST CURB.

MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON RAILINGS. MINOR SPALL ON BOTTOM OF WEST RAIL, SOUTH SPAN. MINOR SPALL ON EXTERIOR FACE OF WEST RAIL, NORTH APPROACH AT EXPANSION JOINT. CRACKING OF WEST RAIL AND RAIL POST AT

NORTH ABUTMENT.

59.11

60.12

60.19

MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG BOTH SIDES OF STRUCTURE.

60.1

60.13

MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF BOTH BREASTWALLS WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON NORTH BREASTWALL. MINOR RANDOM

CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WEST SIDE OF SOUTH BREASTWALL.

MINOR SPALLING AND CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTH PIER. MINOR SCALING OF PIERS AT WATERLINE; SEVERAL

SMALL AREAS OF MODERATE HONEYCOMBING.

60.3 MINOR DETERIORATION OF BITUMINOUS MATERIAL AT BEARING SEATS.

60.6 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WINGWALLS. MINOR MOWER DAMAGE AT ALL WINGWALL ENDS; MINOR

MOWER SCRAPES ALONG ALL WINGWALLS.

60.9 MINOR EROSION ALONG BOTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS.

60.15 MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE ON NORTH FACE OF SOUTH PIER.

60.17 MODERATE SCOUR UP TO 1.5' ALONG NORTH FACE OF SOUTH PIER, UPSTREAM SIDE; UP TO 1.0' ALONG SOUTH FACE OF NORTH PIER, UPSTREAM SIDE. MINOR EROSION AT UPSTREAM END OF NORTH PIER IN NORTH SPAN. FOOTINGS ARE ON PILES

(UNABLE TO VERIFY DURING THIS INSPECTION).

61.2

61.4

MODERATE SLOUGHING ALONG UPSTREAM CHANNEL BANKS; MINOR ALONG DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL BANKS.

ABANDONED TIMBER PILES EXPOSED IN CHANNEL UNDER CENTER SPAN WITH SUBMERGED DRIFT. SEVERAL DOWNED TREES

IN CHANNEL BOTH SIDES OF BRIDGE.

SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

222.7 5"X16" BLACK AND YELLOW STRIPED OBJECT MARKERS AT ALL PARAPET ENDS.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-090P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 24 22 41 37

HS 36 33 61 55

TYPE 3 34 31 58 53

TYPE 3S2 42 38 70 64

TYPE 3-3 53 48 89 81

DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 07/13/2015

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: NEGATIVE MOMENT

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-090P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............PIGEON ROOST CANAL BRIDGE

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-090 P

4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................DANCY

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3H3

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

284 - MISSISSIPPI

01019 CHEROKEE

00000

1 6 1 00001 0

PIGEON ROOST CANAL

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570090P0000000

1 0 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. ROUTE 82

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

203.1 (KM PT: 61.9 )

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 01 - SLAB (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............003 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............38.7 FT ( 11.8 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 105. FT ( 32.2 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-

CAPACITY RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............36 TONS ( 32.7 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............36 TONS ( 32.7 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 10/30/2020 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

https://LENGTH:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-090P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 31'41 00" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°09 '32.40" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.4 FT ( 9.9 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 15 MI ( 24 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1075 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 40 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1183 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT

REQUIRED)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2.42 FT ( 0.74 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... 6 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............6 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N

(61) CHANNEL:................................6 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 4 - ACTION IS REQUIRED TO

PROTECT EXPOSED FOUNDATIONS

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PROPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 2000

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 69000

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2003-APPROACHES RESURFACED. 2014-STRUCTURE REPAVED, PAVEMENT SAWCUT AND SEALED OVER ENDS OF STRUCTURE.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

Inspector: Reinaldo Silvestry Structure Number: 5570090P0000000

Inpsection Date: 10/30/2020 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING NORTH TOWARD TUPELO

PHOTO 4

Description WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 6

Description TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE AT SOUTH APPROACH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE, DELAMINATION AND SPALLING EXTENDING ABOUT

16FT ALONG EAST CURB OVER SOUTH PIER

PHOTO 8

Description AREA OF SPALL AT WEST RAILING TOWARDS SOUTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description EAST RAILING OVER NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE AREA OF SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR

PHOTO 11

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 12

Description UNDERSIDE VIEW OF NORTH SPAN LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 13

Description GENREAL VIEW OF NORTH PIER; NORTH FACE SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 14

Description EROSION AROUND UPSTREAM SIDE OF NORTH PIER

PHOTO 15

Description LONGITUDINAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON CENTER SPAN SLAB UNDERSIDE

ADJACENT TO WEST SIDE OF NORTH PIER

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 16

Description SOUTH PIER NORTH FACE; NOTE EFFLORESCENCE ON WEST SIDE OF PIER

PHOTO 17

Description SOUTH PIER NORTH FACE; NOTE EFFLORESCENCE AT JUNCTION BETWEEN SLAB AND

PIER ON EAST SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 18

Description LONGITUDINAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTH SPAN SLAB UNDERSIDE

EXTENDING FROM WEST SIDE OF SOUTH PIER TOWARDS CENTER OF SPAN

PHOTO 19

Description LONGITUDINAL CRACKS WITH EFFLORESCENCE ALONG EAST SIDE OF SLAB UNDERSIDE

ON SOUTH SPAN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 20

Description EROSION ALONG UPSTREAM SIDE OF SOUTH PIER

PHOTO 21

Description EROSION TRENCH ALONG WEST SIDE OF SOUTH SPAN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 22

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE EROSION TRENCH EXTENDING FROM

ABUTMENT WEEPHOLE

PHOTO 23

Description LOOKING UPSTREAM

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 24

Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM