CN-370000-HW685-BIL02C.pdf

Funding Information:

Org. Code E.O. Object Code Budget Entity Appropriation

Category Grant # Project # Year Amount

☐ Additional Funding Information attached on separate page.

Rev. 8/26/2020

STATE OF FLORIDA

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

Task Assignment This Task Assignment (TA) is entered into between the Parties named below, pursuant to Contract Number: .

1. TA Number: TA Completion Date:

TA Description:

2. Parties State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection

(Department)

Department Project Manager: Department Project Manager Phone:

Contractor Name: (Contractor ) ntractor’st ’s Project Manager: ontractor’s t’s Project Manager Phone:

3. Project Number:

(If different from TA Number)

Project Location(s):

Project Name:

4. As consideration for the services rendered by Contractor under the terms of this TA, the Department shall pay the Contractor on the following bases, up to the Total TA Value as indicated below:

☐ Fixed Price:

☐ Fixed Unit Rate: (Extended Price)

☐ Cost Reimbursement:

Total TA Value:

5. The Parties agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the underlying the Contract, and the following attachments which are hereby incorporated by reference:

Attachment 1:

☐ Additional Attachments (if necessary):

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this TA shall be effective on the last date signed below.

State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection CONTRACTOR Department Name:

Title:

Secretary or Designee

(Authorized Signature) (Authorized Signature) Date:

☐ Additional signatures attached on separate page.

HW685

BIL02C Completion May 30, 2025

The Department approves this Task Assignment (TA), based upon the Cost Proposal and Level of Effort (CP/LOE), for Supplemental Site Assessment evaluation activities at the below project site, submitted to the Department on September 27, 2024, revised October 3, 2024, by WSP USA Inc.

Megan Johnson 850.245.8994 Contractor Contractor

Contractor Contractor

Contractor Contractor

Contractor

WSP USA Inc.

WSP USA Inc.

Justin Spengler 904.363.3430

ERIC_15269

101 Port Avenue, Fort Pierce, St. Lucie County

Port of Fort Pierce

✔ $ 68,123.37

$ 68,123.37

Scope of Work

Matt Crews, P.E.

Assistant Vice President

10/7/2024

Crews, Matt (USMC700671) Digitally signed by Crews, Matt (USMC700671) Date: 2024.10.07 09:35:43 -04'00'

Jennifer Farrell

Digitally signed by Jennifer Farrell Date: 2024.10.04 13:17:31 -04'00'

N/A

Task Assignment Notification/Change Order Deliverables and Invoice Schedule Attachment

WCP TAFORM 04-2017

Contract Number:

Task Assignment #:

Deliverables:

Deliverable Deliverable Due Date

Invoice Schedule:

Requirements for Invoice Submittal Amount to be Invoiced

TOTAL COST

Field documentation and laboratory analytical report for soil sampling activities.

02/21/2025

Field documentation and laboratory analytical report for groundwater sampling activities. 03/14/2025

Non-hazardous waste manifest.

04/11/2025

Supplemental Site Assessment Report.

04/25/2025

Department approval of field documentation and laboratory analytical report for soil sampling activities.(Subtask 2) $ 43,713.99

Department approval of field documentation and laboratory analytical report for groundwater sampling activities.(Subtask 3) $ 13,021.37

Department approval of non-hazardous waste manifest. (Subtask 4) $ 1,415.00

Department approval of Project Management and Supplemental Site Assessment Report. (Subtasks 1 and 5) $ 9,973.01

$ 68,123.37

HW685

BIL02C

www.FloridaDEP.gov

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF

Environmental Protection

Bob Martinez Center

2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400

Ron DeSantis Governor

Jeanette Nuñez

Lt. Governor

Shawn Hamilton Secretary

Memorandum

TO: WSP USA Inc., HW685 Contract File

FROM: Megan Johnson, Contract Manager

DATE: October 4, 2024

SUBJECT: Negotiation Summary – BIL22 Task Assignment (TA) BIL02C

Port of Fort Pierce – Site ID # ERIC_15269 Supplemental Site Assessment evaluation activities

This TA is intended for Supplemental Site Assessment evaluation activities at the Port of Fort Pierce site, located at 101 Port Avenue A, Fort Pierce, St. Lucie County. The services under this task are being conducted using federal funds from the State & Tribal Response Program Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) funding cooperative agreement that is administered by the Department on behalf of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

(EPA).

Subtask 1: Project Management This subtask is a percentage of the overall project fees and has been negotiated as a contract rate. The agreed upon cost of this subtask is $3,944.05.

Subtask 2: Soil Sampling and Monitoring Well Installation Activities under this subtask will include site access and utility clearance, soil sampling activities in the agreed upon areas of the site, monitoring well installation, and an email deliverable including copies of field notes, well construction diagrams, and laboratory analytical coordinate reports. The agreed upon cost of this subtask is $43,713.99.

Subtask 3: Groundwater Sampling Activities Under this subtask, WSP will collect groundwater samples from the 21 existing monitoring wells and the seven proposed monitoring wells. An email interim deliverable will include copies of the field notes, groundwater sampling forms, equipment calibration forms, and survey data. The agreed upon cost of this subtask is $13,021.37.

Subtask 4: IDW Transportation and Disposal Under this subtask, the IDW generated during the field activities will be transported offsite for disposal. The agreed upon cost of this subtask is $1,415.00.

Subtask 5: Supplemental Site Assessment Report Under this subtask, WSP will prepare a Supplemental Site Assessment Report. The report will include a description of the sampling procedures, an evaluation of the analytical results, comparison of current to historical data, a tabulated summary of the current and historical analytical data, a site map showing the soil and groundwater analytical results, http://www.floridadep.gov/

Negotiation Summary – Task Assignment BIL02C Port of Fort Pierce – Site ID # ERIC_15269 October 4, 2024 www.FloridaDEP.gov water level elevation information in tables and figures, laboratory analytical data, conclusions, and recommendations. The agreed upon cost of this subtask is $6,028.96.

Summary The Department’s BIL Contract Manager and WSP USA Inc’s Contract Manager have both agreed to the scope of work and associated costs. The final cost associated with this TA is $68,123.37. Documentation of these costs is included in the Cost Proposal/Level of Effort (CP/LOE) Form and CP/LOE narrative provided by WSP USA Inc. on September 27, 2024, revised October 3, 2024, and the TA Form for BIL02C prepared by the Department. The final deliverable for this TA must be received by the Department no later than April 25, 2025.

http://www.floridadep.gov/

ATTACHMENT A

Level of Effort Sheets and Cost Estimate Form

FDEP COST ESTIMATE

Contractor: WSP USA Inc.

Date: 10/3/2024

Task #: BIL02C SubTask 1 Project Management SubTask 6

Site: Port of Fort Pierce SubTask 2 Soil Sampling and MW Installation SubTask 7

Activity/Phase: Assessment SubTask 3 GW Sampling Activities SubTask 8

Project Manager: Megan Johnson SubTask 4 IDW Transportation & Disposal SubTask 9

SubTask 5 Reporting SubTask 10

Totals 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Labor Rate Category

$68.39 Project Manager (MC) 19 19.2

$0.00 Program Leader - X-14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

$0.00 Practice Leader - X-13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

$68.39 Senior Consultant - X-12 (MC) 19 12 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0

$0.00 Senior Sci/Eng - X-11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

$43.72 Senior Project Sci/Eng - P-10 (JS) 30 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0

$53.09 Project Sci/Eng - P-9 (BL) 8 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0

$0.00 Project Sci/Eng - P-9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

$34.92 Staff Sci/Eng - P-8 (AS) 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

$0.00 Staff Sci/Eng - P-8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

$32.56 Sci/Eng/Admin - P-7 (LK) 99 57 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

$37.18 Staff Sci/Eng - P-8 (JW) 102 59 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

$0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

$0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

$0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

$0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

$0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

$0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

$0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

$0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

$0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

$0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

$0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

$0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

$0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Hours 279 19.2 128.0 88 1 43 0 0 0 0 0

Direct Labor $11,437.15 $1,315.78 $4,870.22 $3,171.43 $68.39 $2,011.33 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Overhead 172.50% $19,729.08 $2,269.72 $8,401.13 $5,470.72 $117.97 $3,469.54 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Gen & Admin 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Fringe 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Total Labor $31,166.23 $3,585.50 $13,271.35 $8,642.15 $186.36 $5,480.87 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

REV: 02/03 CEF GOLDER Page 1

FDEP COST ESTIMATEContractor: WSP USA Inc.

Date: 10/3/2024

Task #: BIL02C SubTask 1 Project Management SubTask 6

Site: Port of Fort Pierce SubTask 2 Soil Sampling and MW Installation SubTask 7

Activity/Phase: Assessment SubTask 3 GW Sampling Activities SubTask 8

Project Manager: Megan Johnson SubTask 4 IDW Transportation & Disposal SubTask 9

SubTask 5 Reporting SubTask 10

Totals 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Travel

Vehicle Rental $960.00 $480.00 $480.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Mileage Costs $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Air Fare $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Per diem + Hotel $3,120.00 $1,932.00 $1,188.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Total Travel $4,080.00 $2,412.00 $1,668.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Subcontractor (Equipment Procurement)

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Subcontractor Subtotal $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Procurement Fee $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Total Subcontractor Cost $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Subcontractor (Services Procurement)

Drilling (Conventional) $15,955.00 $15,955.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Drilling (Non-conventional) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Mobile Laboratory $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Surveying $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

IDW $1,100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Utilities $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Utility Location $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Lab (TRPH Fractions) $2,250.00 $2,250.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Subcontractor Subtotal $20,805.00 $19,705.00 $0.00 $1,100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Handling Fee $2,080.50 $1,970.50 $0.00 $110.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Total Subcontractor Cost $22,885.50 $21,675.50 $0.00 $1,210.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Laboratory

Analytical Costs $3,294.00 $2,878.00 $416.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Fast Turnaround Charges $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Sample Shipping $750.00 $600.00 $150.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Total Laboratory $4,044.00 $3,478.00 $566.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Field Expenses

Personal Protection $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Expendables $360.00 $200.00 $160.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Equipment (Drilling related) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Equipment (Analytical related) $1,571.00 $700.00 $871.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Equipment (IDW related) $200.00 $0.00 $200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Equipment (Other) $700.00 $650.00 $50.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Total Field Expenses $2,831.00 $1,550.00 $1,281.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Subtotal $65,006.73 $3,585.50 $42,386.85 $12,157.15 $1,396.36 $5,480.87 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Completion Fee $3,116.64 $358.55 $1,327.14 $864.22 $18.64 $548.09 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Total Estimated Cost $68,123.37 $3,944.05 $43,713.99 $13,021.37 $1,415.00 $6,028.96 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

REV: 02/03 CEF GOLDER Page 2

LEVEL OF EFFORT/EXPENSE WORKSHEET

SITE : Port of Fort Pierce SUBTASK 2: Soil Sampling and MW Installation

DATE: 10/3/2024

LABOR CATEGORY *PROVIDE TIME REQUIRED FOR EACH PERSON

STAFF-TITLE WORK DESCRIPTION HOURS

Senior Consultant (M. Crews) 12

Staff Sci/Eng (J. Whipple) 59

Staff Sci/Eng (L. Kamikazi) 57

TOTAL LABOR 128

VEHICLE TYPE RATE UNIT USEAGE

Truck $480.00 Per Week 1 $480.00

TOTAL VEHICLE $480.00

PER DIEM STAFF RATE UNIT USEAGE

Per Diem L. Kamikazi $36.00 Per Day 6 $216.00

Per Diem J. Whipple $36.00 Per Day 6 $216.00

Hotel L. Kamikazi $150.00 Per Day 5 $750.00

Hotel J. Whipple $150.00 Per Day 5 $750.00

TOTAL PER DIEM $1,932.00

SUBCONTRACTOR COSTS

NAME PURPOSE COST

Pace TRPH - Fractionation 9 250.00$ $2,250.00

Geotek Utility Location 1 1,500.00$ $1,500.00

GWP MW Installation 1 15,955.00$ $15,955.00

TOTAL $19,705.00

LABORATORY COSTS

PARAMETER RATE # SAMPLES #QAQC

Area B

Arsenic - Method 6010 $13.00 21 3 $312.00

TRPH - FLPRO $88.00 3 3 $528.00

Area C

Arsenic - Method 6010 $13.00 21 3 $312.00

Area F&G

Arsenic - Method 6010 $13.00 15 0 $195.00

Area H

Arsenic - Method 6010 $13.00 15 3 $234.00

TRPH - FLPRO $88.00 6 0 $528.00

Area I

Arsenic - Method 6010 $13.00 33 3 $468.00

TRPH - Equipment Blanks $88.00 0 1 $88.00

Arsenic - Equipment Blanks $13.00 0 5 $65.00

TCLP Metals - IDW Soil $135.00 1 0 $135.00

Arsenic - IDW Water $13.00 1 0 $13.00

Shipping (large) $150.00 4 0 $600.00

TOTAL LAB $3,478.00

EQUIPMENT ITEM RATE COSTING UNIT USEAGE TOTALS

Miscellaneous Expendables $40.00 Per Day 5 $200.00

Monitor Well Installation Kit $325.00 Per Day 2 $650.00

Soil Assessment Kit $700.00 Per Week 1 $700.00

TOTAL EQUIPMENT $1,550.00

Verify existing site access agreements and obtain offsite access agreements for offsite well installation activities and soil sampling activities (8 hours). Submit e-mail deliverable with field documentation and laboratory analytical reports (4 hours).

Round trip travel (7 hours). Update Health and Safety Plan (1 hour). Field event preparation (1 hour).

Soil sampling and MW install (10 hours per day x 5 days = 50 hours).

Round trip travel (7 hours). Soil sampling and MW install (10 hours per day x 5 days = 50 hours).

FINAL --7/24/96

SUBTASK 3: GW Sampling Activities

DATE: 10/3/2024

LABOR CATEGORY *PROVIDE TIME REQUIRED FOR EACH PERSON

STAFF-TITLE WORK DESCRIPTION HOURS

Senior Consultant (M. Crews) 3

Staff Sci/Eng (J. Whipple) 43

Staff Sci/Eng (L. Kamikazi) 42

TOTAL LABOR 88

VEHICLE TYPE RATE UNIT USEAGE

Truck $120.00 Per Day 4 $480.00

TOTAL VEHICLE $480.00

PER DIEM STAFF RATE UNIT USEAGE

Per Diem L. Kamikazi $36.00 Per Day 4 $144.00 Per Diem J. Whipple $36.00 Per Day 4 $144.00

Hotel L. Kamikazi $150.00 Per Day 3 $450.00 Hotel J. Whipple $150.00 Per Day 3 $450.00

TOTAL PER DIEM $1,188.00

SUBCONTRACTOR COSTS

NAME PURPOSE COST

TOTAL $0.00

LABORATORY COSTS

PARAMETER RATE # SAMPLES #QAQC

Arsenic - Method 6010 $13.00 28 3 $403.00

Arsenic - IDW Water $13.00 1 0 $13.00

Shipping (large) $150.00 1 0 $150.00

TOTAL LAB $566.00

EQUIPMENT ITEM RATE COSTING UNIT USEAGE TOTALS

Miscellaneous Expendables $40.00 Per Day 4 $160.00 Shallow Groundwater Sampling Kit $290.00 Per Day 2 $580.00 Tubing, Poly HDPE $0.30 Per Foot 750 $225.00 Tubing, Silicon 3/16 x 3/8 $3.00 Per foot 22 $66.00 Total Survey Station $50.00 Per Day 1 $50.00 Drum, 55-gallon $100.00 Per Drum 2 $200.00

TOTAL EQUIPMENT $1,281.00

Submit e-mail deliverable for groundwater sampling activities (3 hours).

Round trip travel (7 hours). Field event preparation (1 hour). Groundwater sampling activities (10 hours per day x 3.5 days = 35 hours).

Round trip travel (7 hours). Groundwater sampling activities (10 hours per day x 3.5 days = 35 hours).

SUBTASK 4: IDW Transportation & Disposal

DATE: 10/3/2024

LABOR CATEGORY *PROVIDE TIME REQUIRED FOR EACH PERSON

STAFF-TITLE WORK DESCRIPTION HOURS

Senior Consultant (M. Crews) 1

TOTAL LABOR 1

VEHICLE TYPE RATE UNIT USEAGE

TOTAL VEHICLE $0.00

PER DIEM STAFF RATE UNIT USEAGE

TOTAL PER DIEM $0.00

SUBCONTRACTOR COSTS

NAME PURPOSE COST

Erwin IDW Disposal (Subtask 2) 8 110.00$ $880.00 Erwin IDW Disposal (Subtask 3) 2 110.00$ $220.00

TOTAL $1,100.00

LABORATORY COSTS

PARAMETER RATE # SAMPLES #QAQC

TOTAL LAB $0.00

EQUIPMENT ITEM RATE COSTING UNIT USEAGE TOTALS

TOTAL EQUIPMENT $0.00

Characterization and waste profile for transportation and disposal of IDW drum (1 hour).

SUBTASK 5: Reporting

DATE: 10/3/2024

LABOR CATEGORY *PROVIDE TIME REQUIRED FOR EACH PERSON

STAFF-TITLE WORK DESCRIPTION HOURS

Senior Consultant (M. Crews) 3

Senior Project Sci/Eng (J. Spengler) 30

Senior Project Sci/Eng (B. Lucero) 8

Staff Sci/Eng (A.Strayer) 2

TOTAL LABOR 43

VEHICLE TYPE RATE UNIT USEAGE

TOTAL VEHICLE $0.00

PER DIEM STAFF RATE UNIT USEAGE

TOTAL PER DIEM $0.00

SUBCONTRACTOR COSTS

NAME PURPOSE COST

TOTAL $0.00

LABORATORY COSTS

PARAMETER RATE # SAMPLES #QAQC

TOTAL LAB $0.00

EQUIPMENT ITEM RATE COSTING UNIT USEAGE TOTALS

TOTAL EQUIPMENT $0.00

Prepare final SSA Report (3 hours).

Update data tables and prepare draft SSA Report (30 hours).

Prepare CAD figures for SSA Report.

Reporting-document production (1 hour).

WSP USA Inc.

9428 Baymeadows Road, Suite 400 Jacksonville, FL 32256 USA

T: +1 904 363 3430 F: +1 904 363 3445 wsp.com

October 3, 2024 Proposal No. 2024US273652.R1

Ms. Megan Johnson Florida Department of Environmental Protection 2600 Blair Stone Road, MS 4520 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400

RE: COST PROPOSAL FOR SUPPLEMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES

PORT OF FORT PIERCE

101 PORT AVENUE A

FORT PIERCE, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA

FDEP FACILITY NUMBER: ERIC_15269

Dear Ms. Johnson:

WSP USA Inc. (WSP) is providing the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) with this cost proposal and Level of Effort to implement the Targeted Brownfield Assessment and Supplemental Site Assessment activities for the above-referenced site. The FDEP approved the initial Work Plan in October 2022. This proposal includes a description of the proposed scope of services, level of effort sheets for each subtask, and a cost estimate form that summarizes the costs of the proposed services. The proposed scope of services is described below. The site location is shown on Figure 1.

The supplemental site assessment activities will focus on areas where suspected or known contaminants may be present to provide information about the possible environmental impacts of the former hazardous materials handling and waste storage activities at the site. Based on the results of previous assessment activities, the site was broken down into nine areas of concern (Area A through Area I), as shown on Figure 2. WSP recommends collecting surface and subsurface soil samples from borings, and groundwater samples from existing and proposed monitoring wells. The primary constituent of concern in the soil is arsenic, and to a lesser extent total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH), in Areas B, C, F, G, H, and I. Areas with existing soil impacts above Soil Cleanup Target Levels are Area B, C, F, G, H, and I. The groundwater data are summarized on Figure 4. The soil data for each area are summarized on Figures 5 through 9. The existing and proposed monitoring well locations are shown on Figure 10. The proposed soil boring locations are shown on Figures 11 through 15.

SUBTASK 1 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT

To facilitate project quality and satisfactory completion of the proposed scope of work, all aspects of this project will be overseen by an experienced project manager. The project manager will be responsible for the schedule, budget, invoicing, project activities, and communications with the FDEP and the field team. Project management will include coordination of field activities; resource allocation to confirm the work is conducted by qualified professionals in

Ms. Megan Johnson Proposal No. 2024US273652.R1

Florida Department of Environmental Protection October 3, 2024 accordance with the project schedule; cost control and tracking of the budget status; and submittal of project invoices in accordance with FDEP requirements. The project manager will oversee the work so that it is conducted in a manner that is consistent with the requirements of the FDEP-approved task assignment.

SUBTASK 2 – SOIL SAMPLING AND MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION

Site Access and Utility Clearance Following authorization to proceed, WSP will coordinate with the appropriate property owners or owner representatives for access to complete the scope of work. This plan assumes adequate site access will be granted to perform the scope of work. WSP will obtain the applicable local, county, and state-required permits before implementing the proposed scope of work. The location of underground utilities will be identified and marked.

Sunshine State One Call, a utility location service provider, will be contacted at least three working days (72 hours) before any subsurface work begins. Sunshine State One Call might not be able to provide details regarding specific utilities in the area where site assessment activities will be conducted. Therefore, WSP will contract a private company to locate shallow subsurface utilities or other buried hazards near the proposed soil sampling locations and monitor well locations using electromagnetic and groundwater penetrating radar. The locations will be marked with paint or pin flags on the ground surface. WSP will discuss any conflicts between suspected underground utilities and the proposed assessment locations with the FDEP before any adjustments in the field.

Soil Sampling Activities The proposed soil boring locations have been selected to be outside of the footprint of Derecktor’s proposed pavement plan. WSP does not recommend additional soil sampling within the footprint of the proposed pavement plan, as these areas will be incorporated into an engineering control cap. WSP proposes to advance 35 soil borings located in the following areas: Area B (seven borings, TRPH and/or arsenic, Figure 11); Area C (seven borings, arsenic, Figure 12); Area F (two borings, arsenic, Figure 13); Area G (three borings, arsenic, Figure 13); Area H (five borings, TRPH and/or arsenic, Figure 14); and Area I (11 borings, arsenic, not including one arsenic/TRPH sample that is labeled as area H, Figure 15).

At each of the soil boring locations, WSP will use a decontaminated stainless-steel hand auger to collect discrete soil samples from the ground surface to the top of the water table. WSP will collect soil samples from 0 to 0.5 feet below ground surface (bgs) and 0.5 to 2 feet bgs. If the depth-to-groundwater is greater than 2 feet bgs, then soil samples will be collected in 2-foot intervals to a depth of 10 feet bgs, or the top of the water table, whichever is encountered first (e.g., 2 to 4 feet bgs, 4 to 6 feet bgs, etc.). These sampling intervals meet both the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Hazard Ranking System and the State of Florida’s subparagraph

62.780.600 (5) (c) 1 requirements. Soil sampling activities will be completed in accordance with DEP Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for Field Activities (DEP SOP-001/01 [FS 3000]), dated January 2017 (effective April 16, 2018). WSP will collect a primary soil sample from the bottom of each depth interval. For cost estimating purposes, WSP has assumed the depth-to-groundwater is 4 feet bgs or three soil samples per boring location.

WSP will place the soil samples on ice and ship the coolers to a Florida Department of Health and National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program-certified fixed-based laboratory, along with the completed chain-of-custody documentation. The laboratory will analyze the primary samples for arsenic and/or TRPH using EPA Method 6010 and/or Method FLPRO, respectively. Based on the TRPH results, WSP may request FDEP approval to analyze the samples for TRPH fractions using the Criteria Working Group or MADEP Method. WSP has included the cost for nine TRPH fraction analyses in the cost estimate, although the actual number recommended may differ based on the preliminary results. In addition, WSP recommends any soil samples with arsenic results over 100 milligrams per kilogram be further analyzed by TCLP analysis, the costs of which have not been included in this cost estimate. The proposed soil sampling plan, including Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) samples, is summarized in Table 2.

The boreholes will be backfilled. If the boring was advanced into a concrete or asphalt surface, the borehole will be backfilled to approximately 6 inches below grade, followed by a layer of concrete or asphalt patch (as appropriate) to match the existing surface.

Monitoring Well Installation Four new shallow monitoring wells and three new intermediate monitoring wells are proposed for installation to further evaluate the horizontal and vertical extent of arsenic in groundwater. Each shallow monitoring well will be installed with a track-mounted direct-push rig, with the top of its screened interval intersecting the water table, or slightly below it, depending on the soil conditions and presence of near-surface turbidity influences. Before well installation, a continuous soil core may be collected with the direct-push rig at the well location to obtain information on site lithology and the depth to groundwater in the surficial aquifer that will guide the selection of monitoring well screen depths. Each well will be constructed of 1.5-inch-diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC) with a 10-foot long, pre-packed, 0.010-inch slotted, PVC screen. Intermediate wells will be similarly installed to an estimated depth of 30 to 35 feet bgs. The existing and proposed monitoring well locations are shown on Figure 10.

Monitoring well depth will be determined from the site-specific conditions, but it is anticipated that each shallow well will be installed to a depth of 12 to 15 feet bgs, and each intermediate well will be installed to a depth of 30 to 35 feet bgs, depending on the depth to groundwater and soil conditions. Additional 20/30-grade sand pack will be installed in the annular space opposite the pre-packed screen interval to a depth of 1-foot above the screen, and bentonite pellets or fine grain sand (30/65-grade) will be installed to a depth of 0.5 to 1-foot above the 20/30-grade filter pack. The remaining annular space will be grouted to the surface. Each well will be completed with a locking expansion cap within a flush-mounted, steel manhole with a bolt-down lid set in a 2-foot by 2-foot concrete pad to assure sample integrity. Upon completion, each micro-well will be developed by pumping with a peristaltic pump until it produces non-turbid water. The top-of-casing elevations will be surveyed to a common arbitrary benchmark and static depth to water will be measured in each well to determine the groundwater flow direction at the time of the field investigation.

The development water from the new monitoring wells and soil cuttings from the monitoring well installation will be containerized in 55-gallon drums and stored, in coordination with Derecktor, in a secured area until the drums can be transported to a licensed waste disposal facility for proper disposal.

Interim Deliverable and Schedule Upon completion of Subtask 2, an e-mail deliverable will be submitted and will include copies of the field notes, well construction diagrams, and laboratory analytical coordinate reports (if available). WSP estimates five days to complete the Subtask 2 field activities.

SUBTASK 3 – GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ACTIVITIES

Groundwater samples will be collected from the 21 existing monitoring wells and the seven proposed monitoring wells (28 wells total). The samples will be analyzed for arsenic. Groundwater sampling will adhere to the FDEP SOP FS 2200. After a minimum of 24 hours, groundwater samples will be collected from each new monitoring well using low-flow purging techniques with a peristaltic pump and new HDPE tubing. Field parameters including temperature, pH, specific conductance, turbidity, dissolved oxygen, and oxygen reduction potential will be measured following removal of each well volume. A minimum of three well volumes will be purged from each monitoring well. If the field parameters have stabilized (i.e., two consecutive measurements are within ranges specified in SOPs) and the water turbidity is less than 20 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU) after three well volumes, the groundwater sample will be collected. If turbidity below 20 NTU cannot be attained, the well will be purged until the turbidity measurements become stable, at which time the groundwater sample will be collected. In addition, field observations, such as color, odor, and sheen will be documented. The proposed groundwater sampling plan, including QA/QC samples, is summarized in Table 2.

The groundwater samples will be placed in laboratory-supplied containers, labeled with a unique identification number attached to the outside of the sample container, preserved on ice in a laboratory-provided cooler at a maximum temperature of 4 Celsius, and delivered to a Florida Department of Health and National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program-certified fixed-based laboratory, along with the completed chain-of-custody documentation. The laboratory will analyze the samples for arsenic using EPA Method 6010.

The purge water from the monitoring wells will be containerized in 55-gallon drums and stored in a secured area until the drums can be transported to a licensed waste disposal facility for proper disposal.

Interim Deliverable and Schedule Upon completion of Subtask 3, an e-mail deliverable will be submitted and will include copies of the field notes, groundwater sampling forms, equipment calibration forms, and survey data. WSP estimates three days to complete the Subtask 3 field activities.

SUBTASK 4 – IDW TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL

The IDW generated during the Subtask 2 and Subtask 3 field activities will be transported offsite for disposal as part of this subtask. For cost-estimating purposes, WSP has assumed that the IDW can be transported and disposed of as non-hazardous waste at an approved facility. WSP estimates up to ten drums of IDW will be generated during supplemental site assessment activities.

SUBTASK 5 – REPORTING

Upon completion of the field activities, WSP will prepare a Supplemental Site Assessment Report. The report will include a description of the sampling procedures, an evaluation of the analytical results, comparison of current to historical data, a tabulated summary of the current and historical analytical data, a site map showing the soil and groundwater analytical results, water level elevation information in tables and figures, laboratory analytical data, conclusions, and recommendations.

COST AND SCHEDULE

The estimated cost to complete the proposed scope of work is $68,123.37. The Level of Effort/Cost Estimate Form cost sheets are included in Attachment A. Subcontractor quotes are included in Attachment B. The following table summarizes the proposed costs and deliverable schedule. The proposed deliverable schedule is subject to change based on driller availability. WSP will discuss any modifications to the proposed schedule with the FDEP. The following table summarizes the proposed costs and deliverable schedule.

Task Proposed Cost Proposed Schedule / Deliverables

Subtask 1 Project Management $3,944.05 May 30, 2025

Subtask 2 Soil Sampling and Monitoring Well Installation

$43,713.99 February 21, 2025

(Field Documentation and Laboratory Analytical Report via E-mail Deliverable)

Subtask 3 Groundwater Sampling Activities $13,021.37

March 14, 2025 (Field Documentation and Laboratory Analytical Report via E-mail Deliverable)

Subtask 4 IDW Transportation and Disposal $1,415.00

April 11, 2025 (Non-hazardous Waste Manifest via E-mail Deliverable)

Subtask 5 Reporting $6,028.96 April 25, 2025(Supplemental Site Assessment Report)

Total/Completion Date $68,123.37 May 30, 2025

WSP appreciates the opportunity to provide services to the FDEP. Should you require additional information or clarifications, please contact us at (904) 363-3430.

Sincerely, WSP USA Inc.

Justin W. Spengler Matthew C. Crews, PE Consultant, Environmental Engineer Assistant Vice President, Environmental Engineer

JWS/MCC/as

TABLES

Table 1 Proposed Soil Sample Locations and Identifications Table 2 Proposed Groundwater Sample Locations and Identifications

FIGURES

Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Site Layout Figure 3 Potentiometric Map of the Shallow Surficial Aquifer Figure 4 Historical Groundwater Analytical Results Figure 5 Historical Soil Analytical Results (Area B) Figure 6 Historical Soil Analytical Results (Area C) Figure 7 Historical Soil Analytical Results (Area F and G) Figure 8 Historical Soil Analytical Results (Area H) Figure 9 Historical Soil Analytical Results (Area I)

Figure 10 Proposed Monitoring Well Locations Figure 11 Proposed Soil Boring Locations Area B Figure 12 Proposed Soil Boring Locations Area C Figure 13 Proposed Soil Boring Locations Area F and G Figure 14 Proposed Soil Boring Locations Area H Figure 1 5 Proposed Soil Boring Locations Area I

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A Level of Effort Sheets and Cost Estimate Form Attachment B Subcontractor Quotes

G:\Projects\DEP - Brownfields\Port of Fort Pierce\BIL02C - SSA\Proposal\Rev1\BIL02C - Port of Fort Pierce SSA Proposal Rev1.docx

TABLES

October 2024 2024US273652

Arsenic

TRPH/TRPH

Fractions2

EPA Method

Method

FLPRO

Area B

Onsite KMB-28-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMB-28-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMB-28-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

Onsite KMB-29-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMB-29-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMB-29-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

Onsite KMB-30-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMB-30-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMB-30-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

Onsite KMB-31-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMB-31-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMB-31-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

Onsite KMB-32-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X X

Onsite KMB-32-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X X

Onsite KMB-32-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X X

Onsite KMB-33-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMB-33-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMB-33-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

Onsite KMB-34-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMB-34-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMB-34-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

TABLE 1

PROPOSED SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND IDENTIFICATIONS

Port of Fort Pierce Fort Pierce, St Lucie County, Florida DEP Facility ID Number: ERIC_15269

Onsite / Offsite Matrix

Supplemental Site Assessment (2024)

Rationale Sample

Identification

FN: Port Ft Pierce - Proposed Sampling Tables.xlsx Page 1 of 5

TRPH/TRPH

Fractions2

EPA Method

Method

FLPRO

TABLE 1

PROPOSED SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND IDENTIFICATIONS

Port of Fort Pierce Fort Pierce, St Lucie County, Florida DEP Facility ID Number: ERIC_15269

Onsite / Offsite Matrix Rationale Sample

Identification

Area C

Onsite KMC-18-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMC-18-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMC-18-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

Onsite KMC-19-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMC-19-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMC-19-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

Onsite KMC-20-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMC-20-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMC-20-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

Offsite KMC-21-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Offsite KMC-21-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Offsite KMC-21-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

Offsite KMC-22-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Offsite KMC-22-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Offsite KMC-22-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

Offsite KMC-23-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Offsite KMC-23-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Offsite KMC-23-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

Offsite KMC-24-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Offsite KMC-24-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Offsite KMC-24-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

Area F

Onsite KMF-12-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMF-12-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMF-12-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

Onsite KMF-13-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMF-13-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMF-13-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

FN: Port Ft Pierce - Proposed Sampling Tables.xlsx Page 2 of 5

TRPH/TRPH

Fractions2

EPA Method

Method

FLPRO

TABLE 1

PROPOSED SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND IDENTIFICATIONS

Port of Fort Pierce Fort Pierce, St Lucie County, Florida DEP Facility ID Number: ERIC_15269

Onsite / Offsite Matrix Rationale Sample

Identification

Area G

Onsite KMG-13-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMG-13-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMG-13-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

Onsite KMG-14-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMG-14-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMG-14-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

Onsite KMG-15-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMG-15-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMG-15-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

Area H

Onsite KMH-10-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X X

Onsite KMH-10-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X X

Onsite KMH-10-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X X

Onsite KMH-11-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X X

Onsite KMH-11-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X X

Onsite KMH-11-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X X

Onsite KMH-12-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMH-12-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMH-12-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

Onsite KMH-13-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMH-13-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMH-13-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

Onsite KMH-14-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMH-14-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMH-14-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

FN: Port Ft Pierce - Proposed Sampling Tables.xlsx Page 3 of 5

TRPH/TRPH

Fractions2

EPA Method

Method

FLPRO

TABLE 1

PROPOSED SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND IDENTIFICATIONS

Port of Fort Pierce Fort Pierce, St Lucie County, Florida DEP Facility ID Number: ERIC_15269

Onsite / Offsite Matrix Rationale Sample

Identification

Area I

Onsite KMI-26-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMI-26-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMI-26-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

Onsite KMI-27-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMI-27-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMI-27-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

Onsite KMI-28-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMI-28-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMI-28-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

Onsite KMI-29-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMI-29-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMI-29-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

Onsite KMI-30-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMI-30-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMI-30-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

Onsite KMI-31-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMI-31-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMI-31-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

Onsite KMI-32-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMI-32-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMI-32-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

Onsite KMI-33-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMI-33-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMI-33-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

Onsite KMI-34-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMI-34-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMI-34-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

Onsite KMI-35-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMI-35-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMI-35-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

Onsite KMI-36-0.5 Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMI-36-2.0 Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Delineation X

Onsite KMI-36-4.0 Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Delineation X

FN: Port Ft Pierce - Proposed Sampling Tables.xlsx Page 4 of 5

TRPH/TRPH

Fractions2

EPA Method

Method

FLPRO

TABLE 1

PROPOSED SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND IDENTIFICATIONS

Port of Fort Pierce Fort Pierce, St Lucie County, Florida DEP Facility ID Number: ERIC_15269

Onsite / Offsite Matrix Rationale Sample

Identification

Quality Assurance / Quality Control3

NA KMB-x-0.5-DUP Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Duplicate Soil Sample X

NA KMB-x-2.0-DUP Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Duplicate Soil Sample X

NA KMB-x-4.0-DUP Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Duplicate Soil Sample X

NA KMB-x-0.5-DUP Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Duplicate Soil Sample X

NA KMB-x-2.0-DUP Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Duplicate Soil Sample X

NA KMB-x-4.0-DUP Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Duplicate Soil Sample X

NA KMC-x-0.5-DUP Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Duplicate Soil Sample X

NA KMC-x-2.0-DUP Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Duplicate Soil Sample X

NA KMC-x-4.0-DUP Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Duplicate Soil Sample X

NA KMH-x-0.5-DUP Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Duplicate Soil Sample X

NA KMH-x-2.0-DUP Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Duplicate Soil Sample X

NA KMH-x-4.0-DUP Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Duplicate Soil Sample X

NA KMI-x-0.5-DUP Surface Soil (0 – 0.5 ft) Duplicate Soil Sample X

NA KMI-x-2.0-DUP Subsurface Soil (0.5 – 2 ft) Duplicate Soil Sample X

NA KMI-x-4.0-DUP Subsurface Soil (2 – 4 ft)1 Duplicate Soil Sample X

NA S-EQB1 Water Equipment Rinsate Blank X

NA S-EQB2 Water Equipment Rinsate Blank X

NA S-EQB3 Water Equipment Rinsate Blank X

NA S-EQB4 Water Equipment Rinsate Blank X

NA S-EQB5 Water Equipment Rinsate Blank X

NA S-EQB6 Water Equipment Rinsate Blank X

Notes:

KMB-x-0.5 - Duplicate soil samples to be determined in the field

X -Parameter measured or analyzed 1 - If water table is encountered above 4 feet bls, SB2 sampling interval will be from 2 feet to depth of water table.

3 - Number of QA/QC samples may be reduced if fewer samples are collected. At least 1 duplicate per 20 field samples per matrix per analysis and at least 1 equipment rinsate blank per 20 field samples per matrix per analysis will be collected.

2 - TRPH fraction samples will be placed on laboratory hold, pending the TRPH results and FDEP approval to proceed with analysis.

FN: Port Ft Pierce - Proposed Sampling Tables.xlsx Page 5 of 5

EPA Method

Shallow Surficial Aquifer

MW001 2 - 12 3 Existing X X

MW004 2 - 12 4 Existing X X

MW006 2 - 12 3 Existing X X

MW007 2 - 12 4 Existing X X

MW008 2 - 12 3 Existing X X

MW009 2 - 12 3 Existing X X

MW010 2 - 12 3 Existing X X

MW011 2 - 12 4 Existing X X

MW012 2 - 12 3 Existing X X

MW013 2 - 12 2 Existing X X

MW014 2 - 12 4 Existing X X

MW015 2 - 12 3 Existing X X

MW016 2 - 12 4 Existing X X

MW017 2 - 12 4 Existing X X

MW018 2 - 12 5 Existing X X

MW022 1 - 10 2 Existing X X

MW023 1 - 11 2 Existing X X

MW024 2 - 12 2 Existing X X

MW025 2 - 12 NA Proposed X X

MW026 2 - 12 6 Existing X X

MW027 2 - 12 5 Existing X X

MW028 1 - 11 1 Existing X X

MW029 2 - 12 NA Proposed X X

MW030 2 - 12 NA Proposed X X

MW031 2 - 12 NA Proposed X X

Intermediate Surficial Aquifer

MW032 25 - 35 NA Proposed X X

MW033 25 - 35 NA Proposed X X

MW034 25 - 35 NA Proposed X X

Approximate Depth to

Water (DTW) (ft bgs)

TABLE 2

PROPOSED GROUNDWATER SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND IDENTIFICATIONS

Port of Fort Pierce Fort Pierce, St Lucie County, Florida DEP Facility ID Number: ERIC_15269

Well Identification

Screen Interval (feet)

Existing / Proposed Field

Parameters1

ANNUAL SAMPLING EVENT (August 2024)

FN: Port Ft Pierce - Proposed Sampling Tables.xlsx Page 1 of 2

EPA Method

Approximate Depth to

Water (DTW) (ft bgs)

TABLE 2

PROPOSED GROUNDWATER SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND IDENTIFICATIONS

Port of Fort Pierce Fort Pierce, St Lucie County, Florida DEP Facility ID Number: ERIC_15269

Well Identification

Screen Interval (feet)

Existing / Proposed Field

Parameters1

Quality Assurance / Quality Control

MWx-DUP TBD NA Duplicate GW Sample X X

MWx-DUP TBD NA Duplicate GW Sample X X

MWx-DUP TBD NA Duplicate GW Sample X X

GW-EQB-1 NA NA GW Equipment Blank X X

GW-EQB-2 NA NA GW Equipment Blank X X

GW-EQB-3 NA NA GW Equipment Blank X X

Notes:

MWx -Duplicate monitoring well to be determined in the field

X -Parameter measured or analyzed

Monitoring plan may be adjusted based on evaluation of prior results.

1Field parameters include dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity, temperature, turbidity, and oxidation-reduction

FN: Port Ft Pierce - Proposed Sampling Tables.xlsx Page 2 of 2

FIGURES

in

31404452-15269 Control No.

BF02A-B001

FIGURE

2024-01-09

BCL

JWS

JWS

MCC 1

PORT OF FORT PIERCE (FORMER KING MARITIME GROUP)

ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA

FL. DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

SITE LOCATION MAP

TITLE

PROJECT NO. REV.

PROJECTCLIENT

IF

T

H

IS

M

EA

SU

R

EM

EN

T D

O

ES

N O

T M

AT

C

H W

H

AT

IS

S

H O

W N

, T H

E

SH

EE

T

SI

ZE

H

AS

B

EE

N M

O D

IF

IE

D F

R O

M : A

N

SI

A

CONSULTANT

PREPARED

DESIGNED

REVIEWED

APPROVED

YYYY-MM-DD

Pa th

\g ol de r.g ds

\c om pl ex da ta

\O ffi ce \J ac ks on vi lle \d ra fti ng \P ro je ct s\

FD

EP

\F D

EP

-D

C \3

2\

_1

_P or tO fF or tP ie rc e\

BF

A_

Pr op Sa m pl eL oc at io ns \A ct iv e D ra w in gs

Fi le

N am e:

B

F0 2A

-B

1.

dw g

SITE

County

ST. LUCIE

FLORIDA

SCALE

0 1200 2400

FEET

1. USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP, 7.5 MIN. QUADRANGLE MAP SERIES:

FORT PIERCE QUADRANGLE, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA.

REFERENCE(S)

2403-314-0005-000-2

2403-314-0004-000-5

2403-431-0001-000-4 2403-432-0001-000-7

2403-432-0003-000-12403-432-0002-000-4

2403-341-0001-000-8 2403-314-0005-000-2

2403-341-0002-000-5

2403-221-0000-010-5

2403-313-0003-000-5

2403-313-0003-010-8

2403-314-0002-000-1

2403-314-0003-000-8

A

B

C

G

D

F

H

E

HIG

HW

AY 1

FLO

RIDA EAST CO

AST RR

FISHERMANS WHARF

N 2nd STR

EET

B

E

D C

G

F

H

I A

J

I 2403-705-0009-000-0

MW05

2403-341-0010-000-4 in

31404452-15269 Control No.

BF02A-B002

FIGURE

2024-01-09

BCL

JWS

JWS

MCC

PORT OF FORT PIERCE (FORMER KING MARITIME GROUP)

ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA

FL. DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

SITE LAYOUT

TITLE

PROJECT NO. REV.

PROJECTCLIENT

CONSULTANT

PREPARED

DESIGNED

REVIEWED

APPROVED

YYYY-MM-DD

IF

T

H

IS

M

EA

SU

R

EM

EN

T D

O

ES

N O

T M

AT

C

H W

H

AT

IS

S

H O

W N

, T H

E

SH

EE

T

SI

ZE

H

AS

B

EE

N M

O D

IF

IE

D F

R O

M : A

N

SI

B

Pa th

\g ol de r.g ds

\c om pl ex da ta

\O ffi ce \J ac ks on vi lle \d ra fti ng \P ro je ct s\

FD

EP

\F D

EP

-D

C \3

2\

_1

_P or tO fF or tP ie rc e\

BF

A_

Pr op Sa m pl eL oc at io ns \A ct iv e D ra w in gs

Fi le

N am e:

B

F0 2A

-B

2.

dw g

APPROXIMATE PROPERTY BOUNDARY

SCALE

0 75 150

FEET

1. AERIAL IMAGE TAKEN FROM FDEP BUREAU OF SURVEY AND MAPPING

(LAND BOUNDARY INFORMATION SYSTEM), DATED JANUARY 2021.

2. PROPERTY BOUNDARY TAKEN FROM FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF

REVENUE.

LEGEND

REFERENCE(S)

A

A AREA OF FOCUS

INITIAL NOTICE OF CONTAMINATION BEYOND

PROPERTY BOUNDARIES PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION

LAND PARCEL NUMBER2403-314-0005-000-2

APPROXIMATE FORMER RAILROAD SPUR

LINE LOCATION

EXISTING RAILROAD

PROJECT BOUNDARY

PROPOSED PHASE AREA 1 PAVEMENT PLAN

PROPOSED PHASE AREA 2 PAVEMENT PLAN

PROPOSED PHASE AREA 3 PAVEMENT PLAN

PROPOSED PHASE AREA 4 PAVEMENT PLAN

A

B

C

G

D

F

H

E

J

MW05

MW04

(2.19)

MW01

(2.46)

MW16

(3.30)MW15

(3.56)

MW09

(1.14)

MW13

(4.90)

MW26

MW24

MW28

MW08

(3.40)

MW11

(2.46)

MW07

(1.37)

MW17

(3.03)

MW18

(-1.57)

MW14

(0.55)

MW06

(3.42)

MW23

(3.45)

MW27

MW12

(3.37)

MW10

(3.26)

MW22

(4.07)

FISHERMANS WHARF

N 2nd STR

EET

2403-314-0005-000-2

2403-314-0004-000-5

2403-431-0001-000-42403-432-0001-000-7

2403-432-0003-000-1

2403-432-0002-000-4

2403-341-0001-000-82403-314-0005-000-2 2403-341-0002-000-5

2403-221-0000-010-5

2403-313-0003-000-5

2403-313-0003-010-8

2403-314-0002-000-1

2403-314-0003-000-8

2403-705-0009-000-0

2403-341-0010-000-4

2.

3.0

2.

03.

4.

4.

MW03

MW02

in

31404452-15269 Control No.

BF02A-B003A

FIGURE

2024-01-09

BCL

JWS

JWS

MCC

POTENTIOMETRIC MAP OF THE SHALLOW SURFICIAL AQUIFER

TITLE

PROJECT NO. REV.

PROJECTCLIENT

CONSULTANT

PREPARED

DESIGNED

REVIEWED

APPROVED

YYYY-MM-DD

IF

T

H

IS

M

EA

SU

R

EM

EN

T D

O

ES

N O

T M

AT

C

H W

H

AT

IS

S

H O

W N

, T H

E

SH

EE

T

SI

ZE

H

AS

B

EE

N M

O D

IF

IE

D F

R O

M : A

N

SI

B

Pa th

\g ol de r.g ds

\c om pl ex da ta

\O ffi ce \J ac ks on vi lle \d ra fti ng \P ro je ct s\

FD

EP

\F D

EP

-D

C \3

2\

_1

_P or tO fF or tP ie rc e\

BF

A_

Pr op Sa m pl eL oc at io ns \A ct iv e D ra w in gs

Fi le

N am e:

B

F0 2A

-B

3A .d w

0 60 120

FEET

LEGEND

A

LAND PARCEL NUMBER2403-314-0005-000-2

APPROXIMATE FORMER RAILROAD SPUR

LINE LOCATION

EXISTING RAILROAD

PROJECT BOUNDARY

PROPOSED PHASE AREA 1 PAVEMENT PLAN

PROPOSED PHASE AREA 2 PAVEMENT PLAN

PROPOSED PHASE AREA 3 PAVEMENT PLAN

PROPOSED PHASE AREA 4 PAVEMENT PLAN

EXCEED ARSENIC GCTL OF 10 µg/L

EXISTING MONITORING WELL LOCATION

1. AERIAL IMAGE TAKEN FROM FDEP BUREAU OF SURVEY AND MAPPING (LAND

BOUNDARY INFORMATION SYSTEM), DATED JANUARY 2021.

2. PROPERTY BOUNDARY TAKEN FROM FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE.

REFERENCE(S)

NOTE(S)

INITIAL NOTICE OF CONTAMINATION BEYOND

PROPERTY BOUNDARIES PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION

DESTROYED MONITORING WELL LOCATION

(2.19) GROUNDWATER ELEVATION

GROUNDWATER CONTOUR INTERVAL

(DASHED WHERE INFERRED)

ESTIMATED GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION

2.0

ELEVATION NOT USED FOR CONTOURING**

2403-431-0001-000-4 2403-432-0001-000-7

2403-432-0003-000-1

2403-432-0002-000-4

2403-341-0001-000-8 2403-314-0005-000-2

2403-341-0002-000-5

2403-221-0000-010-5

2403-313-0003-000-5

2403-313-0003-010-8

2403-314-0002-000-1

2403-314-0003-000-8

A

B

C

G

D

F

H

E

FISHERMANS WHARF

N 2nd STR

EET

J

2403-705-0009-000-0

MW05

MW04

MW01

MW03 MW02

MW16MW15

MW09

MW13

2403-341-0010-000-4

THE 5/2020 RESAMPLE

WAS BELOW SCTL FOR

TRPH

MW26

MW28

MW08

MW11

MW07

MW17

MW18

MW14

MW06

MW23

MW27

MW12

MW10

MW22

MW24

1. All values in micrograms per liter (µg/L)

2. GCTL - Groundwater…