01 26 13 - Requests for Interpretation.pdf
PDF 216 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Skytop Lodge Sewage Treatment Plant Improvements Project – Contract : 2026-01- Project Number 005153. 0436
- Solicitation number
- Not on record
- Issued by
- Monroe County, Pennsylvania
About this file
This is a Requests for Interpretation specification section prepared by Herbert, Rowland & Grubic, Inc. for the Skytop Lodge Sewage Treatment Plant Improvements Project (Contract 2026-01, Project Number 005153.0436) in Pennsylvania. The specification establishes the procedural requirements and standards for contractors to submit Requests for Information/Interpretation (RFIs) regarding clarifications needed on contract drawings and specifications. RFIs must be submitted using the designated RFI Form (Document 00 63 13) with complete information identifying the specific drawing numbers, locations, specification sections, pages, and paragraphs requiring clarification. All RFIs must be submitted in consecutive numerical order through the Project Documentation Website or official correspondence, with subcontractor and supplier RFIs routed through the prime contractor for approval before submission to the Engineer. The Engineer will endeavor to respond to properly prepared RFIs in a timely manner, though requested response dates are not guaranteed if deemed too expeditious.
RFIs that are improperly prepared or request information already available in the contract documents will be classified as improper or frivolous and will be processed at the Engineer's standard hourly rate, with costs deducted from monies due the contractor. RFIs cannot be used to request approval of submittals or substitutions, request changes involving additional costs, or request different work methods. RFIs addressing coordination issues must include a contractor-prepared scaled drawing or sketch with a suggested solution. Contractors must not proceed with work based on RFI responses if they believe the clarification results in additional cost or time; instead, a Change Proposal must be submitted. Unanswered RFIs will be returned with a "Not Reviewed" notation, and RFI responses do not constitute approval to perform extra work or justify cost increases or schedule changes.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 157 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
01 26 13 – REQUESTS FOR INTERPRETATION
Herbert, Rowland & Grubic, Inc. 01 26 13 - 1 005153.0436
SECTION 01 26 13 – REQUESTS FOR INTERPRETATION
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Requests For Interpretation.
B. Related Sections:
1. Document 00 60 00 – Project Forms.
2. Document 00 63 13 – RFI Form.
3. Section 01 26 00 – Contract Modification.
1.2 DEFINITIONS
A. Request For Information / Interpretation (RFI):
1. A properly prepared request for information / interpretation shall include a detailed written statement that indicates the specific Drawings or Specification in need of clarification and the nature of the clarification requested:
a. Drawings shall be identified by drawing number and location on the drawing sheet.
b. Specifications shall be identified by Section number, page and paragraph.
2. Requests for Information: Request made by Contractor concerning items not indicated on drawings or contained in Contract Documents that is required to properly perform the work.
B. Improper and Frivolous RFIs:
1. RFIs that are not properly prepared, or
2. RFIs that request information that is clearly shown on the Contract Documents.
1.3 CONTRACTOR'S REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION
A. Format: use form Document 00 63 13 – RFI Form:
1. Forms shall be completely filled in, and if prepared by hand, shall be fully legible after photocopying or scanning.
2. RFIs shall be submitted in numerical order with no breaks in the consecutive numbering.
3. Each page of attachments to RFIs shall bear the RFI number and shall be consecutively numbered in chronological order.
4. Submit RFI through Project Documentation Website or correspondence.
B. Contractor shall carefully study the Contract Documents to assure that the requested information is not available therein. RFIs which request information available in the Contract Documents will be deemed either "improper" or "frivolous":
1. Improper or Frivolous RFIs will be processed by the Engineer at the Engineer's standard hourly rate and Engineer will charge the Owner, and such costs will be
Herbert, Rowland & Grubic, Inc. 01 26 13 - 2 005153.0436 deducted from monies still due the Contractor. The Contractor will be notified by the Engineer prior to the processing of improper RFIs.
C. When the Contractor is unable to determine from the Contract Documents, the material, process or system to be installed, the Engineer shall be requested to make a clarification of the indeterminate item.
D. RFIs shall be originated by the Contractor:
1. RFIs from subcontractors or suppliers shall be submitted through, reviewed by, and approved by the Contractor prior to submittal to the Engineer.
2. RFIs from subcontractors or material suppliers sent directly to the Engineer shall not be accepted and will be returned unanswered.
E. In cases where RFIs are issued to request clarification of coordination issues, the Contractor shall fully lay out a suggested solution using drawings or sketches drawn to scale, and submit same with the RFI. RFIs which fail to include a suggested solution will be returned unanswered with a requirement that the Contractor submit a complete request.
F. RFIs shall not be used for the following purposes:
1. To request approval of submittals.
2. To request approval of substitutions.
3. To request changes which are known to entail additional cost or credit.
4. To request different methods of performing work.
G. Contractor shall allow a reasonable time for review and response time for RFIs.
1. The Engineer will endeavor to respond in a timely fashion to RFIs.
2. RFI shall state requested date/time for response, however, this requested date/time for response is not a guarantee that the RFI will be answered by that date/time if that date/time is too expeditious.
1.4 ENGINEER'S RESPONSE TO RFIs
A. Engineer will respond to RFIs on one of the following forms:
1. Properly prepared RFIs:
a. Response directly upon Request for Information / Interpretation form.
b. Request for Proposal.
2. Improper or Frivolous RFIs:
a. Notification of Processing Fee(s).
b. Unanswered RFIs will be returned with a notation: Not Reviewed.
3. Answers to properly prepared RFIs will be directly upon the RFI form as deemed appropriate by the Engineer.
B. Engineer may opt to retain RFIs for discussion during regularly scheduled project meetings for inclusion of responses in meeting minutes.
C. In the event the Contractor believes that a clarification by the Engineer results in additional cost or time, Contractor shall submit a Change Proposal and not proceed with the Work indicated by the RFI until a Change Order (or Work Change Directive) is prepared
Herbert, Rowland & Grubic, Inc. 01 26 13 - 3 005153.0436 and approved. RFIs shall not justify a cost increase in the work or a change in the project schedule.
1. Answered RFIs shall not be construed as approval to perform extra work.
2. Unanswered RFIs will be returned with a stamp or notation: Not Reviewed.
PART 2 - PRODUCTS - Not Used.
PART 3 - EXECUTION - Not Used.
END OF SECTION
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .