5570-496P.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC - Geotechnical, Pavement Rehabilitation, and Structural Repairs
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-25-B-000003
About this file
This document is a Bridge Inspection Report for the Pigeon Roost Creek Bridge on the Natchez Trace Parkway. The report provides an assessment of the bridge's condition, a load rating analysis, and recommendations for maintenance and rehabilitation work.
Key details include:
- The bridge is structure number 5570-496P and carries the Natchez Trace Parkway over Pigeon Roost Creek.
- The bridge is a 3-span concrete slab structure built in 1909. It has a curb-to-curb width of 34.2 ft and a total length of 88 ft.
- The inspection found the bridge to be generally in good condition, with a few deficiencies including cracking in the wearing surface, debris/vegetation accumulation, and erosion issues at the wingwalls and approach railing.
- Recommended maintenance and rehabilitation work includes sealing cracks, repairing erosion, and removing debris/vegetation. The preliminary cost estimate for this work is approximately $60,000.
- The bridge has an HL-93 design load rating, with an inventory rating of 36 tons and an operating rating of 58 tons.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 53 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
PIGEON ROOST CREEK BRIDGE
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER PIGEON ROOST CREEK
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
LS
STRUCTURE NO. 5570-496P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 3/8/2022
EU
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
MILE POINT: 203.60
KILOMETER POINT: 327.59
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-496P
PIGEON ROOST CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 03/08/2022
PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D
Item No.
Maintenance Recommendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
61.4
REMOVE FALLEN TREES ACROSS UPSTREAM CHANNEL.
58.7
REMOVE DEBRIS AND VEGETATION GROWTH FROM
ALONG CURBLINES.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
Item No.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
REHAB RECONSTR
58.3 SEAL CRACKS IN WEARING SURFACE.
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES.
60.9,222.
REPAIR EROSION AT NORTHEAST AND
SOUTHEAST WINGWALLS AND AT SOUTHEAST
APPROACH RAILING.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-496P
PIGEON ROOST CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 03/07/2022
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 34 31 58 53
HS 58 53 96 87
TYPE 3 49 44 82 74
TYPE 3S2 73 66 123 112
TYPE 3-3 94 85 157 142
DESIGN LOADING: A - HL 93
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 06/04/2015
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: POSITIVE MOMENT
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-496P
PIGEON ROOST CREEK BR DGE INSPECTION DATE: 03/07/2022
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............PIGEON ROOST CREEK BRIDGE
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-496 P
4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................DANCY
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3H2
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
284 - MISSISSIPPI
28019 CHOCTAW
00000
1 6 1 00001 0
PIGEON ROOST CREEK
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
5570496P0000000
0 5 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. ROUTE 82
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
203.6 (KM PT: 327 5)
0 9
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 01 - SLAB (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............003 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............32 FT ( 9.8 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 88.0 FT ( 26.8 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................A - HL 93 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............36 TONS ( 32.7 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............58 TONS ( 52.6 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/08/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: Y - 1 - DECK SURVEY (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-496P
PIGEON ROOST CREEK BR DGE INSPECTION DATE: 03/07/2022
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 31'56.10" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 34.2 FT ( 10.4 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°09 '13 80" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 36.8 FT ( 11.2 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 15 MI ( 24 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1075 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 13 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1183 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 34.2 FT ( 10.4 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT
REQUIRED)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2 56 FT ( 0.78 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............7 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N
(61) CHANNEL:................................7 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF
FOOTING OR PILES
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... 31 - REPLACEMENT - LOAD/GEOMETRY (227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. 1 - WORK TO BE DONE BY CONTRACT (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
Inspector: Killian Baptiste Structure Number: 5570496P0000000
Inspection Date: 03/08/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING NORTH TOWARD TUPELO
PHOTO 4
Description WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO 6
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SOUTH SPAN LOOKING SOUTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF CENTER SPAN LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO 8
Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACK IN WEARING SURFACE, NEAR SOUTH END SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE, NEAR
CENTER SPAN SHOWN
PHOTO 10
Description TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACK ALONG CENTERLINE OF WEARING SURFACE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG CURBLINES, EAST
CURBLINE SHOWN
PHOTO 12
Description TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON FASCIA OVER PIERS, WEST
FASCIA OVER SOUTH PIER SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description TYPICAL CONDITION OF BEARINGS, NORTH BEARINGS SHOWN
PHOTO 14
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH FACE OF NORTH PIER
PHOTO 16
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH FACE OF SOUTH PIER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 18
Description EROSION HOLE AT SOUTH END OF EAST RAILING
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description EROSION AT NORTHEAST WINGWALL
PHOTO 20
Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACK AT CHEEK WALLS, NORTHEAST CHEEK WALL SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 21
Description DETACHED OBJECT MARKER AT END OF NORTHWEST PARAPET
PHOTO 22
Description LOOKING UPSTREAM; NOTE FALLEN TREES
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 23
Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .