About this file

This document is a Bridge Inspection Report for the MS Route 16 Bridge over the Natchez Trace Parkway, Structure No. 5570-122P. The report provides an evaluation of the bridge's condition, including a detailed inspection, load rating, and recommendations for maintenance, rehabilitation, and reconstruction work. Key findings include the need to remove unsound concrete, clean exposed rebar, and place new concrete on both sides of the slab. Recommended repairs also include installing vertical clearance signs, repairing the damaged north underpass guardrail, and cleaning debris from drop inlet grates. The report includes preliminary cost estimates for the recommended work.

The related federal contract opportunity is for geotechnical, pavement rehabilitation, and structural repairs on various National Park Service roads, including the Natchez Trace Parkway. This solicitation, Solicitation Number 693C73-25-B-000003, is being issued by the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Tabulation of Bids - MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC - Signed.pdf PDF
Bid Opening Slides- MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 etc.pdf PDF
Amendment 0003 - MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 Etc.pdf PDF
Amendment 0002 - MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 etc.pdf PDF
Amendment 0001 - MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 etc.pdf PDF
5570-121P.pdf PDF
5570-100P.pdf PDF
5570-110P.pdf PDF
5570-496P.pdf PDF
5570-112P.pdf PDF
5570-101P.pdf PDF
5570-108P.pdf PDF
5570-114P.pdf PDF
5570-203P.pdf PDF
5570-117P.pdf PDF
5570-321P.pdf PDF
5570-113P.pdf PDF
5570-105P.pdf PDF
5570-111P.pdf PDF
5570-103P.pdf PDF
5570-116P.pdf PDF
5570-109P.pdf PDF
5570-355P.pdf PDF
5570-102P.pdf PDF
5570-107P.pdf PDF
5570-099P.pdf PDF
5570-123P.pdf PDF
5570-106P.pdf PDF
5570-104P.pdf PDF
5570-118P.pdf PDF
5570-314P.pdf PDF
5570-119P.pdf PDF
5570-204P.pdf PDF
5570-120P.pdf PDF
5570-383P.pdf PDF
5570-098P.pdf PDF
NATR 3n18_3h27 Categorical Exclusion Form (NEPA).pdf PDF
FP14_Eng.pdf PDF
IFB Solicitation - MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC.pdf PDF
Subcontracting Plan - MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC.doc DOC document
5570-093P.pdf PDF
5570-096P.pdf PDF
MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC_GEO_Memo_adv.pdf PDF
5570-094P.pdf PDF
5570-091P.pdf PDF
5570-097P.pdf PDF
5570-090P.pdf PDF
VETS-4212 Form.pdf PDF
5570-095P.pdf PDF
ADV Bidders Qualifications Form.doc DOC document
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 53 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

MS ROUTE 16 BRIDGE

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER MS ROUTE 16

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LS

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-122P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 3/15/2022

ES

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

MILE POINT: 135.02

KILOMETER POINT: 217.25

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-122P

MS ROUTE 16 BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 03/15/2022

PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D

Item No.

Maintenance Recommendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

58.7

CLEAN DEBRIS FROM DROP INLET GRATES.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

58.1,59.3 REMOVE UNSOUND CONCRETE FROM BOTH

SIDES OF SLAB, CLEAN EXPOSED REBAR WITH

APPROVED COATING AND PLACE NEW

CONCRETE TO ORIGINAL DIMENSIONS.

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES.

222.7 INSTALL VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS FOR

UNDERPASS ROADWAY.

222.9 REPAIR DAMAGED NORTH UNDERPASS

GUARDRAIL TERMINAL.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-122P

MS ROUTE 16 BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 03/14/2022

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 13 12 21 19

HS 16 15 26 24

TYPE 3 15 14 25 23

TYPE 3S2 21 19 36 33

TYPE 3-3 25 23 40 36

DESIGN LOADING: 0 - UNKNOWN

CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

X CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 05/01/2019

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: ENGINEERING JUDGMENT

REMARKS: LOAD RATING IS BASED ON ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO MANUAL FOR BRIDGE EVALUATION (MBE). SEE

BRIDGE FILE FOR MORE INFORMATION.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-122P

MS ROUTE 16 BR DGE INSPECTION DATE: 03/14/2022

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............MS ROUTE 16 BRIDGE

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-122 P

4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 122P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................KOSCIUSKO

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3M3

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........2053D

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

284 - MISSISSIPPI

28079 LEAKE

00000

1 6 1 00001 0

MS ROUTE 16

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570122P0000000

13.5 MILES FROM MERCHANT

CREEK.

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

135.0 (KM PT: 217 2)

2 5

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

CULVERTS)

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............1 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............60.3 FT ( 18.4 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 60.3 FT ( 18.4 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............15.9 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGALTONS ( 14.4

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............26.5 TONS ( 24 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/15/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-122P

MS ROUTE 16 BR DGE INSPECTION DATE: 03/14/2022

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 32° 42'13 32" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.1 FT ( 8.6 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°42 '41 82" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.3 FT ( 9.8 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 37 MI ( 60 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 34.0 FT ( 10.4 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......02 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 6 0 FT ( 1.8 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 6 0 FT ( 1.8 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 1 - HIGHWAY, WITH OR W/OUT (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

PEDESTRIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............2080 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 44 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................2288 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28.1 FT ( 8.6 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........N - NOT APPLICABLE, NO WATERWAY RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0.0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0.0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:..............................5.0 FT ( 1.52 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 1 92 FT ( 0 59 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0.0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 14.00 FT ( 4.27 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... 6 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............5 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(61) CHANNEL:................................N (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:........... N

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 6 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... N - NOT OVER WATERWAY

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 0 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1981-JOINT REPAIR. 2010-ROADWAY REPAVED, DROP INLETS INSTALLED. 2022-JOINT REPAIR, SPALLS ON SLAB AND EAST RAIL PATCHED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

Inspector: Beau Kamrath Structure Number: 5570122P0000000

Inspection Date: 03/15/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING NORTHBOUND TOWARD TUPELO

PHOTO 4

Description WEST SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 6

Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH; NOTE EFFLORESCENCE ALONG

LONGITUDINAL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description GENERAL VIEW OF EAST RAIL

PHOTO 8

Description CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE ALONG JOINT OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description JOINTS IN CURBS SEALED SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION, JOINT NEAR SOUTH END OF

WEST CURB SHOWN

PHOTO 10

Description PREVIOUSLY NOTED SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR NEAR NORTH END OF EAST PARAPET

PATCHED SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AROUND DROP INLET AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF STRUCTURE

PHOTO 12

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTHWEST WINGWALL; NOTE VERTICAL JOINT SEALED SINCE

PREVIOUS INSPECTION

PHOTO 14

Description SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR DUE TO COLLISION DAMAGE AT WEST FACE OF SLAB

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description PREVIOUSLY NOTED COLLISION DAMAGE TO WEST FACE OF SLAB PATCHED SINCE

PREVIOUS INSPECTION; NOTE COLLISION DAMAGE TO PATCHED AREA

PHOTO 16

Description CLOSE-UP OF PREVIOUS PHOTO

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description EFFLORESCENCE ALONG WEST CONSTRUCTION JOINT NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 18

Description TREES GROWING AGAINST NORTHEAST WINGWALL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON NORTHEAST WINGWALL

PHOTO 20

Description COLLISION DAMAGE TO WEST END OF NORTH UNDERPASS GUARDRAIL

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .