5570-122P.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC - Geotechnical, Pavement Rehabilitation, and Structural Repairs
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-25-B-000003
About this file
This document is a Bridge Inspection Report for the MS Route 16 Bridge over the Natchez Trace Parkway, Structure No. 5570-122P. The report provides an evaluation of the bridge's condition, including a detailed inspection, load rating, and recommendations for maintenance, rehabilitation, and reconstruction work. Key findings include the need to remove unsound concrete, clean exposed rebar, and place new concrete on both sides of the slab. Recommended repairs also include installing vertical clearance signs, repairing the damaged north underpass guardrail, and cleaning debris from drop inlet grates. The report includes preliminary cost estimates for the recommended work.
The related federal contract opportunity is for geotechnical, pavement rehabilitation, and structural repairs on various National Park Service roads, including the Natchez Trace Parkway. This solicitation, Solicitation Number 693C73-25-B-000003, is being issued by the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 53 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
MS ROUTE 16 BRIDGE
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER MS ROUTE 16
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
LS
STRUCTURE NO. 5570-122P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 3/15/2022
ES
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
MILE POINT: 135.02
KILOMETER POINT: 217.25
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-122P
MS ROUTE 16 BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 03/15/2022
PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D
Item No.
Maintenance Recommendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
58.7
CLEAN DEBRIS FROM DROP INLET GRATES.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
Item No.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
REHAB RECONSTR
58.1,59.3 REMOVE UNSOUND CONCRETE FROM BOTH
SIDES OF SLAB, CLEAN EXPOSED REBAR WITH
APPROVED COATING AND PLACE NEW
CONCRETE TO ORIGINAL DIMENSIONS.
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES.
222.7 INSTALL VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS FOR
UNDERPASS ROADWAY.
222.9 REPAIR DAMAGED NORTH UNDERPASS
GUARDRAIL TERMINAL.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-122P
MS ROUTE 16 BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 03/14/2022
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 13 12 21 19
HS 16 15 26 24
TYPE 3 15 14 25 23
TYPE 3S2 21 19 36 33
TYPE 3-3 25 23 40 36
DESIGN LOADING: 0 - UNKNOWN
CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
X CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 05/01/2019
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: ENGINEERING JUDGMENT
REMARKS: LOAD RATING IS BASED ON ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO MANUAL FOR BRIDGE EVALUATION (MBE). SEE
BRIDGE FILE FOR MORE INFORMATION.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-122P
MS ROUTE 16 BR DGE INSPECTION DATE: 03/14/2022
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............MS ROUTE 16 BRIDGE
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-122 P
4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 122P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................KOSCIUSKO
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3M3
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........2053D
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
284 - MISSISSIPPI
28079 LEAKE
00000
1 6 1 00001 0
MS ROUTE 16
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
5570122P0000000
13.5 MILES FROM MERCHANT
CREEK.
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
135.0 (KM PT: 217 2)
2 5
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
CULVERTS)
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............1 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............60.3 FT ( 18.4 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 60.3 FT ( 18.4 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............15.9 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGALTONS ( 14.4
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............26.5 TONS ( 24 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/15/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-122P
MS ROUTE 16 BR DGE INSPECTION DATE: 03/14/2022
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 32° 42'13 32" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.1 FT ( 8.6 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°42 '41 82" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.3 FT ( 9.8 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 37 MI ( 60 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 34.0 FT ( 10.4 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......02 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 6 0 FT ( 1.8 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 6 0 FT ( 1.8 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 1 - HIGHWAY, WITH OR W/OUT (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
PEDESTRIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............2080 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 44 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................2288 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28.1 FT ( 8.6 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........N - NOT APPLICABLE, NO WATERWAY RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0.0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0.0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:..............................5.0 FT ( 1.52 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 1 92 FT ( 0 59 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0.0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 14.00 FT ( 4.27 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 6 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............5 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(61) CHANNEL:................................N (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:........... N
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 6 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... N - NOT OVER WATERWAY
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 0 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1981-JOINT REPAIR. 2010-ROADWAY REPAVED, DROP INLETS INSTALLED. 2022-JOINT REPAIR, SPALLS ON SLAB AND EAST RAIL PATCHED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
Inspector: Beau Kamrath Structure Number: 5570122P0000000
Inspection Date: 03/15/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING NORTHBOUND TOWARD TUPELO
PHOTO 4
Description WEST SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO 6
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH; NOTE EFFLORESCENCE ALONG
LONGITUDINAL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description GENERAL VIEW OF EAST RAIL
PHOTO 8
Description CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE ALONG JOINT OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description JOINTS IN CURBS SEALED SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION, JOINT NEAR SOUTH END OF
WEST CURB SHOWN
PHOTO 10
Description PREVIOUSLY NOTED SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR NEAR NORTH END OF EAST PARAPET
PATCHED SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AROUND DROP INLET AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF STRUCTURE
PHOTO 12
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTHWEST WINGWALL; NOTE VERTICAL JOINT SEALED SINCE
PREVIOUS INSPECTION
PHOTO 14
Description SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR DUE TO COLLISION DAMAGE AT WEST FACE OF SLAB
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description PREVIOUSLY NOTED COLLISION DAMAGE TO WEST FACE OF SLAB PATCHED SINCE
PREVIOUS INSPECTION; NOTE COLLISION DAMAGE TO PATCHED AREA
PHOTO 16
Description CLOSE-UP OF PREVIOUS PHOTO
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description EFFLORESCENCE ALONG WEST CONSTRUCTION JOINT NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 18
Description TREES GROWING AGAINST NORTHEAST WINGWALL
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON NORTHEAST WINGWALL
PHOTO 20
Description COLLISION DAMAGE TO WEST END OF NORTH UNDERPASS GUARDRAIL
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .