About this file

This document is a Culvert Inspection Report for Structure No. 5570-383P located at Mile Point 143.30 on the Natchez Trace Parkway in Mississippi. The report provides a detailed assessment of the condition of the triple barrel concrete box culvert, including moderate cracking of the wingwalls due to settlement, spalling with exposed rebar, and minor scour at one end.

The report outlines recommended maintenance and rehabilitation actions, including cleaning and sealing exposed rebar, epoxy-injecting cracks in the wingwalls, and replacing damaged headwall markers. The preliminary cost estimate for the recommended work is $16,000. The structure is rated in good to fair condition overall, and it meets or exceeds the design load capacity. No immediate critical issues were identified, but the report recommends taking corrective action to prevent more serious problems in the future.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Tabulation of Bids - MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC - Signed.pdf PDF
Bid Opening Slides- MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 etc.pdf PDF
Amendment 0003 - MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 Etc.pdf PDF
Amendment 0002 - MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 etc.pdf PDF
Amendment 0001 - MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 etc.pdf PDF
5570-121P.pdf PDF
5570-100P.pdf PDF
5570-110P.pdf PDF
5570-496P.pdf PDF
5570-112P.pdf PDF
5570-101P.pdf PDF
5570-108P.pdf PDF
5570-114P.pdf PDF
5570-203P.pdf PDF
5570-117P.pdf PDF
5570-321P.pdf PDF
5570-113P.pdf PDF
5570-105P.pdf PDF
5570-122P.pdf PDF
5570-111P.pdf PDF
5570-103P.pdf PDF
5570-116P.pdf PDF
5570-109P.pdf PDF
5570-355P.pdf PDF
5570-102P.pdf PDF
5570-107P.pdf PDF
5570-099P.pdf PDF
5570-123P.pdf PDF
5570-106P.pdf PDF
5570-104P.pdf PDF
5570-118P.pdf PDF
5570-314P.pdf PDF
5570-119P.pdf PDF
5570-204P.pdf PDF
5570-120P.pdf PDF
5570-098P.pdf PDF
NATR 3n18_3h27 Categorical Exclusion Form (NEPA).pdf PDF
FP14_Eng.pdf PDF
IFB Solicitation - MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC.pdf PDF
Subcontracting Plan - MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC.doc DOC document
5570-093P.pdf PDF
5570-096P.pdf PDF
MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC_GEO_Memo_adv.pdf PDF
5570-094P.pdf PDF
5570-091P.pdf PDF
5570-097P.pdf PDF
5570-090P.pdf PDF
VETS-4212 Form.pdf PDF
5570-095P.pdf PDF
ADV Bidders Qualifications Form.doc DOC document
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 53 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

CULVERT INSPECTION REPORT

CULVERT AT MP 143.30

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER STREAM

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LN

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-383P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 3/15/2022

Report prepared by:

WU

Federal Highway Administration MILE POINT: 143.30 Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166

KILOMETER POINT: 230.57

https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-383P

CULVERT AT MP 143.30 INSPECTION DATE: 03/15/2022

CULVERT IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

FOUNDATION:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH:

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF BARRELS:

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING BARREL LENGTH: ............. 45 FT (13.72 M)

25.3 FT (7.7 M) SKEW ANGLE: ................... 0 °

8.7 FT (2.7 M) YEAR BUILT:

3M2 YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

2010-ROADWAY RESURFACED.

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: .. 143.30 (KM PT 230.57)

STATE: ................................ 284 - MISSISSIPPI LOCATION: .... 8.3 MILES NORTH OF MS ROUTE 16

FACILITY CARRIED: .......... NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: STREAM

INSPECTION TEAM: T. Arnold, M. Delveaux

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Michael Delveaux (757) 716-9400

REPORT REVIEW:

Marcus Miller

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 07/13/2022

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This triple barrel concrete box culvert is in good to fair condition overall. Problems include moderate cracking of the wingwalls due to settlement, and several areas of spalling with exposed rebar on the top slab and intermediate walls. Other problems include minor scour at west end of the south barrel, exposing the barrel floor up to 5"; and headwall markers on both sides are bent.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-383P

CULVERT AT MP 143.30 INSPECTION DATE : 03/15/2022

PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D

Item No.

Maintenance Recommendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

222.7

REPAIR/REPLACE HEADWALL MARKERS ON BOTH SIDES.

2 EA 500 1000

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 1000

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

62.1 CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR AT BARREL

ENDS AND INTERMEDIATE WALLS WITH

APPROVED COATING.

1 LS 5000 5000

62.1,62.4, 62.7

EPOXY-INJECT CRACKS IN NORTHEAST AND

SOUTHWEST WINGWALLS . 1 LS 5000 5000

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, DESIGN, AND

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.

1 LS 5000 5000

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : 15000

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 0

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-383P

CULVERT AT MP 143 30 INSPECTION DATE: 03/14/2022

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE 3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or 9 EXCELLENT CONDITION shear cracks in concrete may be present.

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems. substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

1 “IMM NENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical

5 FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. Structure is closed to

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour. 0 FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

61. CHANNEL 7 222. APPROACHES 7

1. ALIGNMENT: G 1. APPROACH SLABS: N

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR: G 2. RELIEF JOINTS: N

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION: N 3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL: N

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS: G 4. SURFACING: G

5. OTHER: N 5. EROSION: G

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING: 1- SUFF 6. SETTLEMENT: G

7. NORMAL VELOCITY: 3 - LOW 7. SIGNS: G

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING: 4 FT 8. ALIGNMENT: G

9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION: 9. OTHER: N

CLAY, SILT 223. RETAINING WALL N

62. CULVERT 6

1. BARREL(S): F

2. FOOTINGS: N

3. HEADWALLS: G

4. WINGWALLS: F

5. DEBRIS AND/OR SLIT: G

6. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR: G

7. SETTLEMENT AND/OR DEFLECTION: F

8. ADEQUACY OF COVER: G

9. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS: N

10. ROADWAY SURFACE: G

11. RIDEABILITY: G

12. OTHER: N

1. WALL:

2. WEEP HOLES:

3. FOUNDATION:

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR:

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION:

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS: N

B. TRANSITIONS: N

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS: N

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS: N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

(cont'd)FIELD INSPECTION REPORT - CULVERT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-383P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

62.1 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON BARRELS AT CONSTRUCTION JOINTS. MINOR HONEYCOMBING AND WATER

LEAKAGE ON TOP SLAB AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS.

MINOR SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR WITH MINOR SECTION LOSS ON TOP SLAB OF BARRELS NEAR ENDS. ISOLATED MINOR

SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON INTERMEDIATE WALLS.

MINOR DIAGONAL CRACK IN SOUTH ENDWALL AT WEST SIDE AND NORTH INTERMEDIATE WALL AT EAST SIDE WHERE

WINGWALLS ARE SETTLING.

62.3 MINOR MOSS AND VEGETATION GROWTH ON BOTH HEADWALLS. MINOR SCALING OF HEADWALLS.

62.4

62.7

SETTLEMENT HAS CAUSED UP TO 3/4" (PREVIOUSLY 1/4") WIDE VERTICAL CRACK IN SOUTHWEST WINGWALL AND UP TO 1" (PREVIOUSLY 3/4") WIDE VERTICAL CRACK IN NORTHEAST WINGWALL. MINOR MOWER DAMAGE AT WINGWALL ENDS. MINOR

HORIZONTAL CRACKS AT SOUTHWEST AND NORTHEAST WINGWALLS.

62.6 MINOR SCOUR AT WEST SIDE OF CULVERT WITH UP TO 5" (PREVIOUSLY 6") OF CONCRETE FLOOR EXPOSED. MINOR EROSION

AT WINGWALL ENDS.

62.10

222.4

MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACK OF WEARING SURFACE OVER BOTH APPROACHES.

MINOR FULL LENGTH LONGITUDINAL CRACKS IN BOTH LANES AND ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF WEARING SURFACE.

222.7 HEADWALL MARKERS ARE BENT.

62.5 MINOR BUILD-UP OF LEAVES AND SILT AT ENDS OF BARRELS.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-383P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 59 54 98 89

HS 106 96 177 161

TYPE 3 75 68 125 113

TYPE 3S2 115 104 193 175

TYPE 3-3 137 124 228 207

DESIGN LOADING: 4 - H 20

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 02/12/2016

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: TOP SLAB - POSITIVE MOMENT

REMARKS: SEE STRUCTURE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-383P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............CULVERT AT MP 143.30

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 2 - CULVERT

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-383 P

4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 383P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................KOSCIUSKO

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3M2

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

284 - MISSISSIPPI

28079 LEAKE

00000

1 6 1 00001 0

STREAM

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570383P0000000

8 3 MILES NORTH OF MS ROUTE 16

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

143.3 (KM PT: 230 5)

0 7

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 19 - CULVERT (INCLUDES FRAME (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

CULVERTS)

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............003 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............8.7 FT ( 2.7 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 25.3 FT ( 7.7 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. N - NA

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. N - NA

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. N - NA

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... N - NOT APPLICABLE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................4 - H 20 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............99.9 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGALTONS ( 90.6

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............99.9 TONS ( 90.6 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/15/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

https://RATING:

https://RATING:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-383P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 32° 49'06.10" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°40 '51 50" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 17 MI ( 27 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 3 0 FT ( 0.9 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 3 0 FT ( 0.9 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1641 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1805 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT

REQUIRED)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

0 - N/A(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 0 - N/A

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 0 - N/A

(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... .00 FT ( 0 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... N (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............N (68) DECK GEOMETRY:......................N

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... N (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N

(61) CHANNEL:................................7 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(62) CULVERT:.................................6 (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF

FOOTING OR PILES

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: N N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 1000

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 15000

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2010-ROADWAY RESURFACED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

https://49'06.10

Inspector: Michael Delveaux Structure Number: 5570383P0000000

Inspection Date: 03/15/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD JACKSON

PHOTO 4

Description EAST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 6

Description LONGITUDINAL CRACK IN PAVEMENT OVER CULVERT

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description TRANSVERSE CRACK IN WEARING SURFACE ALONG SOUTH APPROACH IN

NORTHBOUND LANE

PHOTO 8

Description DAMAGED OBJECT MARKER AT NORTHWEST CORNER

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH END WALL LOOKING EAST

PHOTO 10

Description LOOKING EAST THROUGH SOUTH BARREL

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description SCOUR AT WEST END OF SOUTH BARREL EXPOSING BARREL FLOOR

PHOTO 12

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH INTERMEDIATE WALL LOOKING EAST; SOUTH FACE SHOWN

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description GENERAL SLAB UNDERSIDE LOOKING EAST, NORTH BARREL; NOTE EFFLORESCENCE AT

WEST END OF SLAB UNDERSIDE

PHOTO 14

Description SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR AT WEST END OF SLAB UNDERSIDE IN SOUTH BARREL

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description FULL HEIGHT CRACK AT NORTHEAST WINGWALL

PHOTO 16

Description UPSTREAM CHANNEL

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .