5570-203P.pdf

CULVERT INSPECTION REPORT

MUNSON CREEK CULVERT

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER MUNSON CREEK

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LN

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-203P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 3/12/2022

WU

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

MILE POINT: 162.48

KILOMETER POINT: 261.43

https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-203P

MUNSON CREEK CULVERT INSPECTION DATE: 03/12/2022

CULVERT IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ..... 1 - CONCRETE NO. OF BARRELS:

FOUNDATION: .................... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES BARREL LENGTH: ............. 110 FT (33.53 M)

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: 38.3 FT (11.7 M) SKEW ANGLE: ................... 20 °

MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ........ 13.3 FT (4.1 M) YEAR BUILT:

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ....... 3L4 YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: .. 162.48 (KM PT 261.43)

STATE: ................................ 284 - MISSISSIPPI LOCATION: .... 3.2 MILES SOUTH OF MS ROUTE 12

FACILITY CARRIED: .......... NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: MUNSON CREEK

INSPECTION TEAM: K. Baptiste, N. Hughes

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Killian Baptiste

REPORT REVIEW:

Mark Bostick

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 08/29/2022

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This triple barrel concrete box culvert is in fair condition overall. Problems include scour with up to 6" to 12" of upstream floor slab exposed this inspection cycle (corroborated by soundings, unable to access footings due to water depth); diagonal cracks in the southeast and northwest wingwalls; fallen trees across the downstream channel and resting on the east headwall; and erosion at the ends of the northeast, southeast, and northwest wingwalls.

It should also be noted that no railing system exists at this culvert. In the interest of public safety, consideration should be given to installing a guardrail system meeting current safety standards.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-203P

MUNSON CREEK CULVERT INSPECTION DATE : 03/12/2022

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

Item No.

Maintenance Recommendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

61.4

CLEAR TREES AND VEGETATION FROM OVER EAST

DOWNSTREAM HEADWALL. 1 LS 2000 2000

62.6

BACKFILL EROSION BEHIND ENDS OF SOUTHEAST,

NORTHEAST, AND NORTHWEST WINGWALLS. 1 LS 2000 2000

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 4000

Item REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

UNIT

UNIT PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

No. (TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. COST

REHAB RECONSTR

36.A,36.

C,36.D

INSTALL GUARDRAIL SYSTEM OVER

STRUCTURE AND AT APPROACHES. 1 LS 20000 20000

62.6 REPAIR SCOUR AND UNDERMINING AT

UPSTREAM SIDE OF STRUCTURE WITH

ENGINEERED RIPRAP.

1 LS 10000 10000

62.4 CLEAN AND EPOXY INJECT CRACKS IN

SOUTHEAST AND NORTHWEST WINGWALLS. 1 LS 5000 5000

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES. 1 LS 20000 20000

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : 55000

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-203P

MUNSON CREEK CULVERT INSPECTION DATE : 03/12/2022

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 0

59000TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-203P

MUNSON CREEK CULVERT INSPECTION DATE: 03/11/2022

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE 3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or 9 EXCELLENT CONDITION shear cracks in concrete may be present.

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems. substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

1 “IMM NENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical

5 FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. Structure is closed to

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour. 0 FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

61. CHANNEL 6 222. APPROACHES 7

1. ALIGNMENT: G 1. APPROACH SLABS: N

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR: F 2. RELIEF JOINTS: N

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION: N 3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL: N

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS: F 4. SURFACING: G

5. OTHER: N 5. EROSION: G

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING: 1- SUFF 6. SETTLEMENT: G

7. NORMAL VELOCITY: 3 - LOW 7. SIGNS: N

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING: 12 FT 8. ALIGNMENT: G

9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION: 9. OTHER: STRIPING G

CLAY, SAND 223. RETAINING WALL N

62. CULVERT 6

1. BARREL(S): G

2. FOOTINGS: N

3. HEADWALLS: G

4. WINGWALLS: F

5. DEBRIS AND/OR SLIT: F

6. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR: F

7. SETTLEMENT AND/OR DEFLECTION: G

8. ADEQUACY OF COVER: G

9. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS: N

10. ROADWAY SURFACE: G

11. RIDEABILITY: G

12. OTHER: N

1. WALL:

2. WEEP HOLES:

3. FOUNDATION:

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR:

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION:

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS: 0

B. TRANSITIONS: N

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS: 0

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS: 0

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

(cont'd)FIELD INSPECTION REPORT - CULVERT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-203P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

61.2 MODERATE EROSION OF UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL BANKS; SEVERAL TREES UNDERMINED.

SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

61.4 FALLEN TREE 40' UPSTREAM OF CULVERT. FALLEN TREES ACROSS DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL AND RESTING AGAINST EAST HEADWALL. UNABLE TO DETERMINE THIS INSPECTION CYCLE: DRIFT DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN FRONT OF NORTH WALL; SILT IN

SOUTH BARREL AND ON FLOOR OF OTHER BARRELS.

62.1 MINOR CRACKING OF BARRELS AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT, SOME WITH EFFLORESCENCE. HONEYCOMBING IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS. MINOR SCALING ON LOWER 1/3 OF WALLS THROUGHOUT. UNABLE TO VERIFY VOID DURING THIS

INSPECTION: SMALL VOID IN NORTH WALL OF CENTER BARREL.

WEEP HOLES IN NORTH BARREL ARE OPEN AT WATERLINE AND SOUTH BARRELS WEEP HOLES ARE COVERED WITH SILT.

62.3 MODERATE VEGETATION AND SMALL TREE GROWTH ON AND ABOVE HEADWALLS. VEGETATION OVER EAST HEADWALL IS

BLOCKING ACCESS TO DOWNSTREAM SOUNDINGS.

62.4 MINOR DIAGONAL AND VERTICAL CRACKING OF WINGWALLS AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS, SOME WITH EFFLORESCENCE. TWO FULL HEIGHT DIAGONAL CRACKS (UP TO 1/4" WIDE) IN FACE OF NORTHWEST WINGWALL, EXTENDING INTO BARREL WALL. ONE FULL HEIGHT DIAGONAL CRACK (UP TO 1/4" WIDE) IN FACE OF SOUTHEAST WINGWALL, EXTENDING INTO BARREL WALL. HEAVY MOSS

GROWTH ON WINGWALLS.

62.5 2' DEEP SOIL ACCUMULATION IN SOUTH BARREL; 1' DEEP IN CENTER AND NORTH BARREL.

62.6 UNABLE TO ACCESS FOOTINGS DUE TO HIGH WATER DEPTH THIS CYCLE AND UNABLE TO RETRIEVE DOWNSTREAM SOUNDINGS DUE TO VEGETATION. UPSTREAM SOUNDINGS INDICATE SIMILAR SCOUR CONDITION TO 2018 REPORT. PREVIOUS TWO

INSPECTIONS REPORT;

2018: MODERATE SCOUR ALONG UPSTREAM SIDE OF CULVERT; UP TO 6" OF SLAB EXPOSED THIS INSPECTION CYCLE.

2016: 3' OF UPSTREAM FLOOR SLAB EXPOSED, AND UP TO 2' OF FLOOR SLAB UNDERMINED BACK UNDER NORTH BARREL.

MINOR EROSION AT NORTHEAST, NORTHWEST, AND SOUTHEAST WINGWALL ENDS; MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH AT

SOUTHEAST WINGWALL END.

36.A

36.C

36.D

NO GUARDRAIL SYSTEM PRESENT.

62.10

222.4

MINOR LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OVER STRUCTURE AND AT APPROACHES.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-203P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 181 164 302 274

HS 234 212 392 356

TYPE 3 200 181 334 303

TYPE 3S2 284 258 475 431

TYPE 3-3 334 303 558 506

DESIGN LOADING: 0 - UNKNOWN

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 06/16/2015

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: TOP SLAB

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-203P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............MUNSON CREEK CULVERT

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 2 - CULVERT

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-203 P

4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 203P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................KOSCIUSKO

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3L4

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........NONE

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

284 - MISSISSIPPI

28007 ATTALA

00000

1 6 1 00001 0

MUNSON CREEK

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570203P0000000

3 2 MILES SOUTH OF MS ROUTE 12

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

162.4 (KM PT: 261.4)

8 3

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 19 - CULVERT (INCLUDES FRAME (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

CULVERTS)

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............003 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............13.3 FT ( 4.1 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 38.3 FT ( 11.7 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. N - NA

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. N - NA

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 0 - UNKNOWN C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. N - NA

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 0 - UNKNOWN (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... N - NOT APPLICABLE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-

CAPACITY RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............99.9 TONS ( 90.6 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............99.9 TONS ( 90.6 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/12/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

https://RATING:

https://RATING:

https://LENGTH:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-203P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 03'59 20" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°33 '04.60" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 8 MI ( 13 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1430 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 20 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1573 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 32 FT ( 9.8 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT

REQUIRED)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

0 - N/A(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 0 - N/A

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 0 - N/A

(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... .00 FT ( 0 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... N (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............N (68) DECK GEOMETRY:......................N

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... N (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N

(61) CHANNEL:................................6 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(62) CULVERT:.................................6 (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF

FOOTING OR PILES

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 0 N 0 0 (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 4000

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 55000

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

Inspector: Killian Baptiste Structure Number: 5570203P0000000

Inspection Date: 03/12/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD JACKSON

PHOTO 4

Description EAST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE (FROM 2019 REPORT)

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH; NOTE NO GUARDRAIL

PHOTO 6

Description GENERAL VIEW LOOKING EAST THROUGH SOUTH BARREL

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description GENERAL VIEW LOOKING WEST THROUGH NORTH BARREL

PHOTO 8

Description TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF PAVEMENT OVER STRUCTURE

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description TYPICAL HORIZONTAL CRACKING AT ENDS OF WALLS, WEST END SHOWN

PHOTO 10

Description TYPICAL MOSS GROWTH ON WINGWALLS AND HEADWALLS, NORTHWEST WINGWALL

SHOWN; NOTE CRACKING BETWEEN MOSS PATCHES

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description TYPICAL EROSION AT WINGWALLS, NORTHWEST WINGWALL SHOWN

PHOTO 12

Description LOOKING UPSTREAM

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM; NOTE FALLEN TREE FROM SHORE TO EAST HEADWALL