5570-104P.pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Attached to
- MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC - Geotechnical, Pavement Rehabilitation, and Structural Repairs
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-25-B-000003
About this file
This document is a Bridge Inspection Report for the Little Byway Creek Bridge on the Natchez Trace Parkway in Mississippi. The report provides details on the bridge's condition, recommendations for maintenance and rehabilitation, and cost estimates. Key findings include the need to repair scour and erosion at the abutments and piers, remove unsound concrete from the east end of the breastwall, and underpin the north abutment. The report also includes a load rating analysis and structure inventory information. While this document does not directly address a federal contract opportunity, it provides supporting technical information that could be relevant to a future solicitation for bridge rehabilitation or reconstruction work on the Natchez Trace Parkway.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 53 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
LITTLE BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER LITTLE BYWAY CREEK
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
LS
STRUCTURE NO. 5570-104P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 3/10/2022
EU
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
MILE POINT: 192.40
KILOMETER POINT: 58.64
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-104P
LITTLE BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 03/10/2022
serious or costly problems in the future.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-104P
LITTLE BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 03/10/2022
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT C
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
Item No.
Maintenance Recommendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
61.4
REMOVE WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS FROM CHANNEL
AND UNDER STRUCTURE.
222.7
REPLACE MISSING OBJECT MARKER AT SOUTHEAST
APPROACH.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
Item REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
UNIT
UNIT PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
No. (TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. COST
REHAB RECONSTR
60.9,60.
17,61.2
REPAIR SCOUR AND EROSION AT ABUTMENT
SLOPES, PIERS, AND CHANNEL BANKS WITH
ENGINEERED RIPRAP.
58.1,59.3, 60.3
REMOVE UNSOUND CONCRETE FROM EAST
END OF BREASTWALL AT NORTH ABUTMENT,
AND REPLACE CONCRETE TO ORIGINAL
DIMENSIONS.
60.9 UNDERPIN NORTH ABUTMENT WITH GROUT.
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-104P
LITTLE BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 03/10/2022
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT C
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-104P
LITTLE BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 03/09/2022
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 23 21 38 34
HS 28 25 47 43
TYPE 3 26 24 44 40
TYPE 3S2 41 37 68 62
TYPE 3-3 50 45 84 76
DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 11/16/2015
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: NEGATIVE MOMENT
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-104P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............LITTLE BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-104 P
4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................DANCY
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3H4-10
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........2356A
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
284 - MISSISSIPPI
28019 CHOCTAW
00000
1 6 1 00001 0
LITTLE BYWAY CREEK
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
5570104P0000000
2 9 MILES SOUTH OF MS ROUTE 9
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
192.4 (KM PT: 58.64)
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 01 - SLAB (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............003 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............40.4 FT ( 12.3 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 102. FT ( 31.3 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-
CAPACITY RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............28 TONS ( 25.4 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............47 TONS ( 42.6 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/10/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-104P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 24'24 80" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°16 '29.10" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.3 FT ( 9.8 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 25 MI ( 40 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1230 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1353 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT
REQUIRED)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2.46 FT ( 0.75 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 6 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............6 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 6 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N
(61) CHANNEL:................................4 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 4 - ACTION IS REQUIRED TO
PROTECT EXPOSED FOUNDATIONS
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: C - MODERATE
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2012-STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES REPAVED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
Inspector: Killian Baptiste Structure Number: 5570104P0000000
Inspection Date: 03/10/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING NORTH TOWARD TUPELO; NOTE MISSING REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKER ON
EAST SIDE
PHOTO 4
Description WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO 6
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF NORTH SPAN LOOKING SOUTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF CENTER SPAN LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO 8
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SOUTH SPAN LOOKING SOUTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description TYPICAL MISSING JOINT MATERIAL IN CURB AND RAILING EXPANSION JOINTS, EAST
CURB AND RAILING OVER NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO 10
Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF RAILINGS, WEST RAILING NEAR SOUTH END
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description TYPICAL VERTICAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF CURBS, NORTH END OF EAST
CURB SHOWN
PHOTO 12
Description CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE, DELAMINATION, AND SPALLING OF EAST CURB NEAR
MIDSPAN; NOTE MOSS GROWTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description TYPICAL DEBRIS AND GRAVEL ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES, WEST CURBLINE
SHOWN
PHOTO 14
Description TYPICAL ADHESION FAILURE OF SAWCUT DECK JOINTS, NORTH ABUTMENT JOINT
SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description SPALLING AND DELAMINATION AT NORTHEAST DECK JOINT; NOTE CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON FASCIA
PHOTO 16
Description TYPICAL SCALING AT SCUPPERS, EAST SIDE OF SOUTH SPAN SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 18
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH FACE OF SOUTH PIER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description EROSION ON EAST SIDE OF SOUTH PIER
PHOTO 20
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH FACE OF NORTH PIER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 21
Description SOUTH FACE OF NORTH PIER FOOTING EXPOSED UP TO 1'
PHOTO 22
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 23
Description NORTH ABUTMENT UNDERMINING
PHOTO 24
Description TYPICAL VERTICAL CUTTING OF CHANNEL EMBANKMENTS, NORTHEAST EMBANKMENT
SHOWN; NOTE TREE ACROSS CHANNEL
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 25
Description EROSION OF NORTHWEST EMBANKMENT
PHOTO 26
Description EROSION AT EAST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 27
Description MISSING REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKER ON SOUTHEAST PARAPET
PHOTO 28
Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND VEGETATION GROWTH AT DRAIN INLETS, NORTHWEST DRAIN INLET SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 29
Description LOOKING UPSTREAM FROM DECK
PHOTO 30
Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM FROM DECK
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .