5570-314P.pdf

CULVERT INSPECTION REPORT

CULVERT AT MP 128.30

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER STREAM

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LN

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-314P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 3/15/2022

ED

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

MILE POINT: 128.30

KILOMETER POINT: 206.43

https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-314P

CULVERT AT MP 128.30 INSPECTION DATE: 03/15/2022

CULVERT IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ..... 1 - CONCRETE NO. OF BARRELS:

FOUNDATION: .................... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING BARREL LENGTH: ............. 55 FT (16.76 M)

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: 26.0 FT (7.9 M) SKEW ANGLE: ................... 0 °

MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ........ 9.0 FT (2.7 M) YEAR BUILT:

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ....... 3N1 YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: .. 128.30 (KM PT 206.43)

STATE: ................................ 284 - MISSISSIPPI LOCATION: .... 6.8 MILES TO MS ROUTE 16

FACILITY CARRIED: .......... NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: STREAM

INSPECTION TEAM: N. Brown, D. Martin

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

David Martin

REPORT REVIEW:

Marcus Miller

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 07/13/2022

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This triple barrel concrete culvert is in fair condition overall. The main problem is heavy accumulation of silt and debris in the channel at the ends of the barrels. Up to 50% of south and center barrels are currently blocked at the upstream end.

Other problems include moderate to severe cracking of the top of the wingwalls and headwalls; minor to moderate cracking of asphalt pavement; minor deterioration of the barrel concrete, with rebar exposed in some locations; missing headwall markers; and moderate erosion of the upstream channel banks. The erosion of the channel banks will continue to be monitored during future inspections.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-314P

CULVERT AT MP 128.30 INSPECTION DATE : 03/15/2022

PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

C

Item No.

Maintenance Recommendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

222.7

INSTALL ADDITIONAL HEADWALL MARKERS AS

NECESSARY. 1 LS 1000 1000

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 1000

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

61.4,62.5 REMOVE SILT AND DEBRIS FROM CHANNEL AT

ENDS OF BARRELS. 1 LS 10000 10000

62.10, 222.4

CLEAN AND SEAL CRACKING OF PAVEMENT.

1 LS 5000 5000

62.3,62.4 CLEAN AND SEAL CRACKING OF WINGWALLS

AND HEADWALLS WITH APPROVED SEALANT. 1 LS 5000 5000

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, DESIGN, AND

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.

1 LS 14000 14000

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : 34000

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 0

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

Condition of channel banks will continue to be monitored.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-314P

CULVERT AT MP 128 30 INSPECTION DATE: 03/14/2022

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE 3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or 9 EXCELLENT CONDITION shear cracks in concrete may be present.

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems. substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

1 “IMM NENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical

5 FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. Structure is closed to

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour. 0 FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

61. CHANNEL 5 222. APPROACHES 6

1. ALIGNMENT: G 1. APPROACH SLABS: N

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR: F 2. RELIEF JOINTS: N

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION: N 3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL: N

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS: P 4. SURFACING: F

5. OTHER: N 5. EROSION: G

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING: 1- SUFF 6. SETTLEMENT: G

7. NORMAL VELOCITY: 3 - LOW 7. SIGNS: F

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING: 5 FT 8. ALIGNMENT: G

9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION: 9. OTHER: N

SAND, SILT 223. RETAINING WALL N

62. CULVERT 6

1. BARREL(S): F

2. FOOTINGS: N

3. HEADWALLS: F

4. WINGWALLS: F

5. DEBRIS AND/OR SLIT: F

6. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR: F

7. SETTLEMENT AND/OR DEFLECTION: G

8. ADEQUACY OF COVER: G

9. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS: N

10. ROADWAY SURFACE: F

11. RIDEABILITY: G

12. OTHER: N

1. WALL:

2. WEEP HOLES:

3. FOUNDATION:

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR:

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION:

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS: N

B. TRANSITIONS: N

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS: N

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS: N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

(cont'd)FIELD INSPECTION REPORT - CULVERT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-314P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

61.2 MODERATE EROSION OF UPSTREAM CHANNEL BANKS AND ALONG SOUTHWEST AND NORTHWEST WINGWALLS.

SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

61.4

62.5

HEAVY ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IN CHANNEL AT UPSTREAM END OF SOUTH BARREL AND CENTER BARREL. HEAVY ACCUMULATION OF SILT AND DEBRIS IN CHANNEL AT DOWNSTREAM END OF CENTER AND NORTH BARRELS. MINOR ACCUMULATION SILT IN NORTH BARREL, UP TO 1-1/2'H (COULD NOT VERIFY DUE TO HIGH WATER).

62.1 COULD NOT PASS THROUGH CULVERT DUE TO HIGH WATER. MINOR SCALING OF BARREL WALLS AT WATERLINE (COULD NOT VERIFY DUE TO HIGH WATER). MINOR CRACKING OF TOP SLAB UNDERSIDE WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND WATER LEAKAGE AT ENDS. MINOR CRACKING AND DELAMINATION OF SOUTH WALL OF SOUTH BARREL AT EAST END. MINOR SPALLING OF TOP SLAB UNDERSIDE WITH EXPOSED REBAR AT EAST END OF CENTER BARREL. MINOR HONEYCOMBING OF TOP SLAB UNDERSIDE WITH

EXPOSED REBAR AT WEST END OF NORTH BARREL.

62.3

62.4

MODERATE TO SEVERE LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF TOP OF WINGWALLS AND HEADWALLS; SOME AREAS ARE PATCHED.

62.6

62.4

MINOR EROSION AT WINGWALL ENDS. MINOR SCOUR AT DOWNSTREAM END OF SOUTH BARREL, WITH FLOOR SLAB EXPOSURE, UP TO 4"H.

62.10

222.4

MINOR TO MODERATE RANDOM, TRANSVERSE, AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT OVER STRUCTURE AND

AT APPROACHES.

222.7 ONE HEADWALL MARKER PRESENT ON EAST AND WEST SIDES.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-314P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 39 35 66 60

HS 82 74 136 123

TYPE 3 63 57 105 95

TYPE 3S2 95 86 159 144

TYPE 3-3 105 95 175 159

DESIGN LOADING: 4 - H 20

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 03/14/2016

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: TOP SLAB - POSITIVE MOMENT

REMARKS: SEE STRUCTURE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-314P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............CULVERT AT MP 128.30

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 2 - CULVERT

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-314 P

4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 314P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................RIDGELND

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3N1

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

284 - MISSISSIPPI

28079 LEAKE

00000

1 6 1 00001 0

STREAM

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570314P0000000

6 8 MILES TO MS ROUTE 16

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

128.3 (KM PT: 206.4)

0 3

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 19 - CULVERT (INCLUDES FRAME (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

CULVERTS)

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............3 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............9.0 FT ( 2.7 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 26.0 FT ( 7.9 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. N - NA

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. N - NA

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. N - NA

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... N - NOT APPLICABLE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................4 - H 20 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............82.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGALTONS ( 74.4

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............99.9 TONS ( 90.6 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/15/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

https://RATING:

https://RATING:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-314P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 32° 38'30.10" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°47 '54 00" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 24 MI ( 39 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 34.0 FT ( 10.4 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 6 0 FT ( 1.8 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 6 0 FT ( 1.8 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............2080 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................2288 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 34 FT ( 10.4 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT

REQUIRED)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0.0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

0 - N/A(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0.0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 0 - N/A

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 0 - N/A

(55) RIGHT:..............................99.9 FT ( 30.45 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 0 00 FT ( 0 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0.0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 0 00 FT ( 0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... N (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............N (68) DECK GEOMETRY:......................N

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... N (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N

(61) CHANNEL:................................5 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(62) CULVERT:.................................6 (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 6 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF

FOOTING OR PILES

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: N N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: C - MODERATE

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 1000

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 34000

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

https://RIGHT:

https://38'30.10

Inspector: David Martin Structure Number: 5570314P0000000

Inspection Date: 03/15/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD JACKSON

PHOTO 4

Description WEST (UPSTREAM) SIDE; NOTE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH; NOTE LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE

CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE

PHOTO 6

Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST, NORTH BARREL

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE OVER NORTH BARREL

PHOTO 8

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH END WALL

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH INTERMEDIATE WALL, SOUTH FACE

PHOTO 10

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH INTERMEDIATE WALL, NORTH FACE

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description LOOKING WEST THROUGH NORTH BARREL

PHOTO 12

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH END WALL

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description LONGITUDINAL CRACKING ON NORTHWEST WINGWALL; NOTE EROSION AND

VEGETATION GROWTH

PHOTO 14

Description CRACKING ON EAST HEADWALL OVER NORTH BARREL

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description LONGITUDINAL CRACKING ON TOP OF NORTHEAST WINGWALL; NOTE EROSION TRENCH

AND VEGETATION GROWTH

PHOTO 16

Description ACCUMULATION OF SILT AND DEBRIS IN DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description UPSTREAM CHANNEL

PHOTO 18

Description DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL