5570-090P.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC - Geotechnical, Pavement Rehabilitation, and Structural Repairs
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-25-B-000003
About this file
This document is a Bridge Inspection Report for the Pigeon Roost Canal Bridge on the Natchez Trace Parkway. The report provides details on the condition of the bridge, including structural deficiencies, scour issues, and cracking in the deck, railings, and substructure. It includes recommendations for maintenance and rehabilitation work, as well as estimated costs. The bridge is owned by the National Park Service and carries the Natchez Trace Parkway over the Pigeon Roost Canal. The report indicates that the bridge is rated as a "moderate" priority for improvement. The related federal contract opportunity is for geotechnical, pavement rehabilitation, and structural repairs on the Natchez Trace Parkway, which may include work on this bridge.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 53 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
PIGEON ROOST CANAL BRIDGE
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER PIGEON ROOST CANAL
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
LS
STRUCTURE NO. 5570-090P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 3/8/2022
EU
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
MILE POINT: 203.10
KILOMETER POINT: 326.79
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-090P
PIGEON ROOST CANAL BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 03/08/2022
PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
C
Item No.
Maintenance Recommendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
61.4
REMOVE TREE GROWTH AT UPSTREAM SOUTH CHANNEL
BANK AND FALLEN TREES ACROSS UPSTREAM CHANNEL.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
Item No.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
REHAB RECONSTR
60.17 REPAIR SCOUR AND EROSION AT PIERS WITH
ENGINEERED RIPRAP.
222.4,58.
SEAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF PAVEMENT
AT SOUTH APPROACH AND ON DECK.
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : ..
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-090P
PIGEON ROOST CANAL BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 03/07/2022
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 24 22 41 37
HS 36 33 61 55
TYPE 3 34 31 58 53
TYPE 3S2 42 38 70 64
TYPE 3-3 53 48 89 81
DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 07/13/2015
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: NEGATIVE MOMENT
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-090P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............PIGEON ROOST CANAL BRIDGE
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-090 P
4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 090P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................DANCY
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3H3
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
284 - MISSISSIPPI
28019 CHOCTAW
00000
1 6 1 00001 0
PIGEON ROOST CANAL
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
5570090P0000000
1 0 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. ROUTE 82
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
203.1 (KM PT: 326.7)
0 9
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 01 - SLAB (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............003 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............38.7 FT ( 11.8 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 105. FT ( 32.2 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-
CAPACITY RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............36 TONS ( 32.7 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............61 TONS ( 55.3 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/08/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-090P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 31'41 00" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°09 '32.40" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.4 FT ( 9.9 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 15 MI ( 24 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1075 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 40 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1183 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT
REQUIRED)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2.42 FT ( 0.74 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 6 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............6 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N
(61) CHANNEL:................................6 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 4 - ACTION IS REQUIRED TO
PROTECT EXPOSED FOUNDATIONS
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: C - MODERATE
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2003-APPROACHES RESURFACED. 2014-STRUCTURE REPAVED, PAVEMENT SAWCUT AND SEALED OVER ENDS OF STRUCTURE.
2019-REPAIRED SPALL AT CURB, JOINT SEALS INSTALLED AT CURBS.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
Inspector: Killian Baptiste Structure Number: 5570090P0000000
Inspection Date: 03/08/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING NORTH TOWARD TUPELO
PHOTO 4
Description WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO 6
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SOUTH SPAN LOOKING NORTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF CENTER SPAN LOOKING NORTH; NOTE LONGITUDINAL
CRACKS WITH EFFLORESCENCE
PHOTO 8
Description VERTICAL CRACKING OF WEST RAILING AND RAIL POST OVER NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE
TYPICAL CURB JOINT SEALANT REPAIR
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING IN RAILINGS, WEST RAILING OVER NORTH SPAN
SHOWN
PHOTO 10
Description CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND DELAMINATION ON EAST CURB OVER SOUTH
PIER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description SPALL ON BOTTOM OF WEST RAILING OVER SOUTH SPAN
PHOTO 12
Description TYPICAL DIAGONAL AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKS WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK
UNDERSIDE, WEST END OF SOUTH SPAN SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description LONGITUDINAL CRACKS WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE, EAST SIDE OF
SOUTH SPAN SHOWN
PHOTO 14
Description EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE ON EAST SIDE BY NORTH PIER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 16
Description CRACK IN NORTH ABUTMENT NEAR CENTERLINE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH PIER
PHOTO 18
Description EROSION AT EAST END OF NORTH PIER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PIER
PHOTO 20
Description EFFLORESCENCE ON NORTH FACE OF SOUTH PIER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 21
Description EROSION AT EAST END OF SOUTH PIER
PHOTO 22
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 23
Description SOUTHWEST WINGWALL; NOTE TYPICAL LAWN MOWER SCRAPES
PHOTO 24
Description NORTHWEST WINGWALL; NOTE VEGETATION GROWTH AND CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 25
Description LOOKING UPSTREAM
PHOTO 26
Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .