5570-100P.pdf

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 194.60

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER COUNTY ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LN

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-100P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 3/10/2022

WS

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

MILE POINT: 194.60

KILOMETER POINT: 59.31

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-100P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 194.60 INSPECTION DATE : 03/10/2022

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

Item No.

Maintenance Recommendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

222.7

INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT

BRIDGE CORNERS ON UNDERPASS ROADWAY.

58.7,60.6

REMOVE DEBRIS FROM ALONG CURBLINES AND TREES

FROM ALONG WINGWALLS.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

58.2,60.8 REPLACE EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL IN

RAILINGS AND VERTICAL JOINTS.

60.9 REPAIR EROSION ADJACENT TO DRAINAGE

INLETS AT SOUTHEAST CORNERS NEAR

UNDERPASS ROADWAY, AND EROSION HOLE

AT SOUTHWEST WINGWALL.

222.4, 222.6

FILL SETTLED AREAS AT NORTH APPROACH IN

WEST SHOULDER AND REPAVE.

58.1,59.3 REPAIR IMPACT SPALLS ON DECK SIDES AND

UNDERSIDE.

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-100P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 194.60 INSPECTION DATE : 03/10/2022

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-100P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 194.60 INSPECTION DATE: 03/09/2022

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 24 22 40 36

HS 41 37 69 63

TYPE 3 36 33 60 54

TYPE 3S2 54 49 91 83

TYPE 3-3 70 64 117 106

DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 05/11/2016

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: POSITIVE MOMENT

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-100P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 194.60

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-100 P

4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 100P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................DANCY

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3H19

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........3020B

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

284 - MISSISSIPPI

28019 CHOCTAW

00000

1 6 1 00001 0

COUNTY ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570100P0000000

0 9 MILES SOUTH OF MS ROUTE 9

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

194.6 (KM PT: 59.31)

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

CULVERTS)

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............30 FT ( 9.1 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 37.0 FT ( 11.3 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-

CAPACITY RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............41 TONS ( 37.2 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............69 TONS ( 62.6 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/10/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-100P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 25'53 30" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.3 FT ( 8.6 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°15 '08 30" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.7 FT ( 10 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 25 MI ( 40 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......02 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 1 - HIGHWAY, WITH OR W/OUT (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

PEDESTRIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1230 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1353 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28.3 FT ( 8.6 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........N - NOT APPLICABLE, NO WATERWAY RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:..............................5.00 FT ( 1.52 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2.42 FT ( 0.74 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 13.75 FT ( 4.19 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............7 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(61) CHANNEL:................................N (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:........... N

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... N - NOT OVER WATERWAY

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2007,2012-STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES REPAVED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

Inspector: Killian Baptiste Structure Number: 5570100P0000000

Inspection Date: 03/10/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD JACKSON

PHOTO 4

Description EAST SIDE; NOTE LACK OF OBJECT MARKERS ON ABUTMENTS

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 6

Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF DECK LOOKING SOUTH; NOTE HONEYCOMBING AND

SCALING

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description TYPICAL MISSING RAILING JOINT FILLER MATERIAL, EAST RAILING OVER SOUTH

ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE DIAGONAL CRACK IN RAIL POST

PHOTO 8

Description SPALL ON EAST RAILING OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description TYPICAL EDGE SPALLING ON RAIL POST OVER ABUTMENTS, EAST RAILING OVER NORTH

ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO 10

Description SETTLEMENT OF NORTH APPROACH PAVEMENT IN WEST SHOULDER

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT DRAIN INLETS, SOUTHWEST DRAIN INLET SHOWN

PHOTO 12

Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES, EAST CURBLINE SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description COLLISION DAMAGE OF WEST FASCIA OVER EASTBOUND LANE NEAR MIDSPAN

PHOTO 14

Description COLLISION DAMAGE ON EAST FASCIA AND UNDERSIDE OVER WESTBOUND LANE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 16

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description HORIZONTAL CRACKING WITH WATER STAINING ON WEST FACE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 18

Description TYPICAL HORIZONTAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT ABUTMENT AND DECK

INTERFACE, NORTHWEST INTERFACE SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description FAILING JOINT SEALANT AT BOTTOM OF NORTHWEST WINGWALL JOINT

PHOTO 20

Description EROSION HOLE AT END OF SOUTHWEST WINGWALL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 21

Description CLEARANCE SIGN AT WEST APPROACH; NOTE GRIME ON SIGN

PHOTO 22

Description CLEARANCE SIGN AT EAST APPROACH; NOTE BULLET DAMAGE AND TYPICAL GRIME ON

CLEARANCE SIGNS