5570-098P.pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Attached to
- MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC - Geotechnical, Pavement Rehabilitation, and Structural Repairs
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-25-B-000003
About this file
This document is a Bridge Inspection Report for the Big Byway Creek Bridge on the Natchez Trace Parkway. The bridge, structure number 5570-098P, was inspected on 3/9/2022 and found to be in generally good condition, but with some deficiencies requiring rehabilitation or reconstruction within the next 5 years.
The report provides recommendations and estimated costs for maintenance, rehabilitation, and reconstruction activities. Key issues include installing engineered riprap, cleaning and painting bearings, sealing cracks in the wearing surface, and cleaning and resealing expansion joints. The structure's load rating and inventory details are also provided. The report notes that the bridge is eligible for the National Park Service's Federal Lands Highway Program. Estimated costs for the recommended work total approximately $XXX,XXX.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 53 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
BIG BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER BIG BYWAY CREEK
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
LN
STRUCTURE NO. 5570-098P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 3/9/2022
EU
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
MILE POINT: 196.20
KILOMETER POINT: 59.8
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-098P
BIG BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 03/09/2022
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT C
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
Item No.
Maintenance Recommendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
60.3
REMOVE DEBRIS FROM BEARING SEATS AT BOTH
ABUTMENTS.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
Item No.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
REHAB RECONSTR
61.2,60.
INSTALL ENGINEERED RIPRAP ON CHANNEL
BANKS AROUND PIERS.
60.9 INSTALL ENGINEERED RIPRAP FOR SCUPPER
AND WEEP HOLE DRAINAGE IN NORTH AND
SOUTH SPANS AS NEEDED.
59.1,59.7 CLEAN AND PAINT BEARINGS.
58.2 CLEAN AND RESEAL EXPANSION JOINTS IN
WEARING SURFACE.
222.4 SEAL CRACKS IN WEARING SURFACE OVER
STRUCTURE.
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-098P
BIG BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 03/09/2022
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT C
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-098P
BIG BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 03/08/2022
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 16 15 27 24
HS 29 26 48 44
TYPE 3 34 31 57 52
TYPE 3S2 40 36 67 61
TYPE 3-3 41 37 69 63
DESIGN LOADING: 0 - UNKNOWN
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 05/19/2016
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: EXTERIOR GIRDER - MOMENT
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-098P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............BIG BYWAY CREEK BRIDGE
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-098 P
4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 098P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................DANCY
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3H7
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........2353A
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
284 - MISSISSIPPI
28019 CHOCTAW
00000
1 6 1 00001 0
BIG BYWAY CREEK
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
5570098P0000000
8 2 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. ROUTE 82
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
196.2 (KM PT: 59.8 )
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........4 - STEEL CONTINUOUS (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
GIRDER
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............003 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............65 FT ( 19.8 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 171. FT ( 52.1 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-
CAPACITY RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............29 TONS ( 26.3 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............48 TONS ( 43.5 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/09/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-098P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 26'53 80" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°13 '56.70" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.4 FT ( 9.9 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 15 MI ( 24 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1075 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 25 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1183 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT
REQUIRED)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2 33 FT ( 0.71 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 6 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............6 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 6 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N
(61) CHANNEL:................................6 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 4 - ACTION IS REQUIRED TO
PROTECT EXPOSED FOUNDATIONS
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: C - MODERATE
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1985-SUPERSTRUCTURE PAINTED. 2007-NEW PAVEMENT. 2012-STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES REPAVED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
Inspector: Killian Baptiste Structure Number: 5570098P0000000
Inspection Date: 03/09/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD JACKSON
PHOTO 4
Description WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO 6
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SOUTH SPAN LOOKING SOUTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF CENTER SPAN LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO 8
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF NORTH SPAN LOOKING NORTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING ALONG CENTERLINE OF DECK WEARING SURFACE
PHOTO 10
Description SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON EXTERIOR FACE OF EAST RAILING OVER NORTH
ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF RAILINGS, SOUTH END OF EAST RAILING SHOWN
PHOTO 12
Description DETERIORATION OF WEST SHOULDER LANE STRIPING
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description TYPICAL VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG CURBLINES, EAST CURBLINE SHOWN
PHOTO 14
Description EDGE SPALLING OF SOUTHEAST PARAPET
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description EDGE SPALLING ON EAST FASCIA OVER SOUTH SPAN
PHOTO 16
Description SPALL IN EAST FASCIA AT NORTH ABUTMENT INTERFACE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description TYPICAL BEARING CONDITION, SOUTH ABUTMENT BEARING #2 SHOWN
PHOTO 18
Description TYPICAL BEARING CONDITION, SOUTH PIER BEARINGS SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description TYPICAL CORROSION OF BEARINGS, SECOND BEARING FROM EAST END OF NORTH
ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO 20
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 21
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH FACE OF NORTH PIER
PHOTO 22
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH FACE OF SOUTH PIER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 23
Description TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKS IN PIER CAPS, SOUTH FACE OF SOUTH PIER SHOWN
PHOTO 24
Description EROSION/ SCOUR AT EAST END OF SOUTH PIER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 25
Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE, BAY #1
NEAR SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO 26
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 27
Description PONDING IN FRONT OF SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE WATER STAINING
PHOTO 28
Description TYPICAL DEBRIS BUILD UP ON SIDES OF ABUTMENT BEARING SEATS, EAST END OF
NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 29
Description WATER PONDING AT SOUTH BEARING SEAT
PHOTO 30
Description LOOKING UPSTREAM FROM DECK
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 31
Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM FROM DECK
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .