About this file

This document is a Bridge Inspection Report for the Illinois Central RR Bridge Kosciusko on the Natchez Trace Parkway. The report provides a detailed assessment of the structure's condition, including recommendations and estimated costs for maintenance, rehabilitation, and reconstruction work. Key findings include the need to remove debris and vegetation, clean and seal exposed rebar, reseal expansion joints, and replace deck joint seals. The report also includes the structure's load rating information and inventory and appraisal data. The related federal contract opportunity is for geotechnical, pavement rehabilitation, and structural repairs on the Natchez Trace Parkway, issued by the Federal Highway Administration.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Tabulation of Bids - MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC - Signed.pdf PDF
Bid Opening Slides- MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 etc.pdf PDF
Amendment 0003 - MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 Etc.pdf PDF
Amendment 0002 - MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 etc.pdf PDF
Amendment 0001 - MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 etc.pdf PDF
5570-121P.pdf PDF
5570-100P.pdf PDF
5570-110P.pdf PDF
5570-496P.pdf PDF
5570-112P.pdf PDF
5570-101P.pdf PDF
5570-108P.pdf PDF
5570-114P.pdf PDF
5570-203P.pdf PDF
5570-117P.pdf PDF
5570-321P.pdf PDF
5570-105P.pdf PDF
5570-122P.pdf PDF
5570-111P.pdf PDF
5570-103P.pdf PDF
5570-116P.pdf PDF
5570-109P.pdf PDF
5570-355P.pdf PDF
5570-102P.pdf PDF
5570-107P.pdf PDF
5570-099P.pdf PDF
5570-123P.pdf PDF
5570-106P.pdf PDF
5570-104P.pdf PDF
5570-118P.pdf PDF
5570-314P.pdf PDF
5570-119P.pdf PDF
5570-204P.pdf PDF
5570-120P.pdf PDF
5570-383P.pdf PDF
5570-098P.pdf PDF
NATR 3n18_3h27 Categorical Exclusion Form (NEPA).pdf PDF
FP14_Eng.pdf PDF
IFB Solicitation - MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC.pdf PDF
Subcontracting Plan - MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC.doc DOC document
5570-093P.pdf PDF
5570-096P.pdf PDF
MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC_GEO_Memo_adv.pdf PDF
5570-094P.pdf PDF
5570-091P.pdf PDF
5570-097P.pdf PDF
5570-090P.pdf PDF
VETS-4212 Form.pdf PDF
5570-095P.pdf PDF
ADV Bidders Qualifications Form.doc DOC document
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 53 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

ILLINOIS CENTRAL RR BRIDGE KOSCIUSKO

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER ILLINOIS CENTRAL RR

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LS

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-113P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 3/12/2022

ES

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

MILE POINT: 162.59

KILOMETER POINT: 49.56

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-113P

ILLINOIS CENTRAL RR BRIDGE KOSCIUSKO INSPECTION DATE : 03/12/2022

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

Item No.

Maintenance Recommendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

58.5,58.7

REMOVE PINE STRAW ACCUMULATION ALONG

CURBLINES AND DEBRIS IN DECK DRAINS.

60.1

REMOVE VINE AND MOSS GROWTH FROM ABUTMENT

BREASTWALLS.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

Item REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

UNIT

UNIT PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

No. (TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. COST

REHAB RECONSTR

59.2,60.1 CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR WITH

APPROVED SEALANT.

58.2 RESEAL VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINTS ON

RAILINGS.

58.2 REPLACE SAWCUT DECK JOINT SEALS.

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-113P

ILLINOIS CENTRAL RR BRIDGE KOSCIUSKO INSPECTION DATE : 03/12/2022

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-113P

ILLINOIS CENTRAL RR BRIDGE KOSCIUSKO INSPECTION DATE: 03/11/2022

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 27 24 46 42

HS 34 31 57 52

TYPE 3 32 29 53 48

TYPE 3S2 46 42 77 70

TYPE 3-3 59 54 98 89

DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 07/18/2016

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: MOMENT

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-113P

ILL NOIS CENTRAL RR BR DGE KOSCIUSKO INSPECTION DATE: 03/11/2022

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............ILLINOIS CENTRAL RR BRIDGE

KOSCIUSKO

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-113 P

4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 113P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................KOSCIUSKO

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3L4

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........2060D

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

284 - MISSISSIPPI

28007 ATTALA

00000

1 6 1 00001 0

ILLINOIS CENTRAL RR

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570113P0000000

3.1 MILES SOUTH OF MS ROUTE 12

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

162.5 (KM PT: 49.56)

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........3 - STEEL (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

GIRDER

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............49 FT ( 14.9 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 52.0 FT ( 15.8 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-

CAPACITY RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............34 TONS ( 30.8 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............57 TONS ( 51.7 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/12/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-113P

ILL NOIS CENTRAL RR BR DGE KOSCIUSKO INSPECTION DATE: 03/11/2022

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 04'03.60" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°32 '58.60" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.4 FT ( 9.9 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 8 MI ( 13 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 2 - RAILROAD (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1430 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 55 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1573 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........N - NOT APPLICABLE, NO WATERWAY RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:...............................12.00 FT ( 3.66 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2 33 FT ( 0.71 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 21.50 FT ( 6.55 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............6 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 6 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(61) CHANNEL:................................N (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:........... N

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... N - NOT OVER WATERWAY

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2013-WEEP HOLE FILTERS INSTALLED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

Inspector: Killian Baptiste Structure Number: 5570113P0000000

Inspection Date: 03/12/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING NORTH TOWARD TUPELO

PHOTO 4

Description WEST SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO 6

Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF DECK LOOKING SOUTH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description TYPICAL MISSING JOINT FILLER MATERIAL IN RAILING EXPANSION JOINTS, WEST

RAILING OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE SPALL

PHOTO 8

Description TYPICAL VERTICAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF RAILINGS, SOUTH END OF WEST

RAILING SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE AND VERTICAL CRACKING OF CURB, SOUTH END OF WEST CURB

SHOWN

PHOTO 10

Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG CURBLINES, WEST

CURBLINE SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description TYPICAL ADHESION FAILURE OF SEALANT IN SAWCUT JOINT, SOUTH JOINT SHOWN

PHOTO 12

Description LONGITUDINAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN WESTERNMOST BAY

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT, SOUTHBOUND LANE OF NORTH APPROACH SHOWN

PHOTO 14

Description TYPICAL SCALING AND HONEYCOMBING AT BEAM ENDS

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description LONGITUDINAL CRACK AND SPALLING OF EASTERNMOST BEAM AT NORTH ABUTMENT;

NOTE EXPOSED REBAR

PHOTO 16

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING IN ABUTMENTS AT COLD JOINTS, NORTH ABUTMENT

NEAR CENTERLINE SHOWN

PHOTO 18

Description VERTICAL CRACK AT EAST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 20

Description SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR AT EAST END OF SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE CRACKING IN

BEAM

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 21

Description TYPICAL MOSS AND VINE GROWTH ON ABUTMENTS, WEST END OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

SHOWN

PHOTO 22

Description VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTHEAST WINGWALL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 23

Description DIAGONAL AND VERTICAL CRACKING IN NORTHWEST WINGWALL

PHOTO 24

Description TRANSVERSE CRACK AND SPALL ON SOUTHEAST PARAPET

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .