5570-113P.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC - Geotechnical, Pavement Rehabilitation, and Structural Repairs
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-25-B-000003
About this file
This document is a Bridge Inspection Report for the Illinois Central RR Bridge Kosciusko on the Natchez Trace Parkway. The report provides a detailed assessment of the structure's condition, including recommendations and estimated costs for maintenance, rehabilitation, and reconstruction work. Key findings include the need to remove debris and vegetation, clean and seal exposed rebar, reseal expansion joints, and replace deck joint seals. The report also includes the structure's load rating information and inventory and appraisal data. The related federal contract opportunity is for geotechnical, pavement rehabilitation, and structural repairs on the Natchez Trace Parkway, issued by the Federal Highway Administration.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 53 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RR BRIDGE KOSCIUSKO
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER ILLINOIS CENTRAL RR
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
LS
STRUCTURE NO. 5570-113P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 3/12/2022
ES
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
MILE POINT: 162.59
KILOMETER POINT: 49.56
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-113P
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RR BRIDGE KOSCIUSKO INSPECTION DATE : 03/12/2022
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
Item No.
Maintenance Recommendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
58.5,58.7
REMOVE PINE STRAW ACCUMULATION ALONG
CURBLINES AND DEBRIS IN DECK DRAINS.
60.1
REMOVE VINE AND MOSS GROWTH FROM ABUTMENT
BREASTWALLS.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
Item REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
UNIT
UNIT PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
No. (TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. COST
REHAB RECONSTR
59.2,60.1 CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR WITH
APPROVED SEALANT.
58.2 RESEAL VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINTS ON
RAILINGS.
58.2 REPLACE SAWCUT DECK JOINT SEALS.
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-113P
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RR BRIDGE KOSCIUSKO INSPECTION DATE : 03/12/2022
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-113P
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RR BRIDGE KOSCIUSKO INSPECTION DATE: 03/11/2022
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 27 24 46 42
HS 34 31 57 52
TYPE 3 32 29 53 48
TYPE 3S2 46 42 77 70
TYPE 3-3 59 54 98 89
DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 07/18/2016
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: MOMENT
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-113P
ILL NOIS CENTRAL RR BR DGE KOSCIUSKO INSPECTION DATE: 03/11/2022
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............ILLINOIS CENTRAL RR BRIDGE
KOSCIUSKO
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-113 P
4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 113P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................KOSCIUSKO
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3L4
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........2060D
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
284 - MISSISSIPPI
28007 ATTALA
00000
1 6 1 00001 0
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RR
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
5570113P0000000
3.1 MILES SOUTH OF MS ROUTE 12
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
162.5 (KM PT: 49.56)
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........3 - STEEL (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
GIRDER
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............49 FT ( 14.9 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 52.0 FT ( 15.8 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-
CAPACITY RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............34 TONS ( 30.8 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............57 TONS ( 51.7 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/12/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-113P
ILL NOIS CENTRAL RR BR DGE KOSCIUSKO INSPECTION DATE: 03/11/2022
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 04'03.60" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°32 '58.60" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.4 FT ( 9.9 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 8 MI ( 13 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 2 - RAILROAD (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1430 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 55 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1573 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........N - NOT APPLICABLE, NO WATERWAY RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:...............................12.00 FT ( 3.66 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2 33 FT ( 0.71 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 21.50 FT ( 6.55 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............6 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 6 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(61) CHANNEL:................................N (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:........... N
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... N - NOT OVER WATERWAY
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2013-WEEP HOLE FILTERS INSTALLED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
Inspector: Killian Baptiste Structure Number: 5570113P0000000
Inspection Date: 03/12/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING NORTH TOWARD TUPELO
PHOTO 4
Description WEST SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO 6
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF DECK LOOKING SOUTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description TYPICAL MISSING JOINT FILLER MATERIAL IN RAILING EXPANSION JOINTS, WEST
RAILING OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE SPALL
PHOTO 8
Description TYPICAL VERTICAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF RAILINGS, SOUTH END OF WEST
RAILING SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE AND VERTICAL CRACKING OF CURB, SOUTH END OF WEST CURB
SHOWN
PHOTO 10
Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG CURBLINES, WEST
CURBLINE SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description TYPICAL ADHESION FAILURE OF SEALANT IN SAWCUT JOINT, SOUTH JOINT SHOWN
PHOTO 12
Description LONGITUDINAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN WESTERNMOST BAY
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT, SOUTHBOUND LANE OF NORTH APPROACH SHOWN
PHOTO 14
Description TYPICAL SCALING AND HONEYCOMBING AT BEAM ENDS
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description LONGITUDINAL CRACK AND SPALLING OF EASTERNMOST BEAM AT NORTH ABUTMENT;
NOTE EXPOSED REBAR
PHOTO 16
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING IN ABUTMENTS AT COLD JOINTS, NORTH ABUTMENT
NEAR CENTERLINE SHOWN
PHOTO 18
Description VERTICAL CRACK AT EAST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 20
Description SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR AT EAST END OF SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE CRACKING IN
BEAM
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 21
Description TYPICAL MOSS AND VINE GROWTH ON ABUTMENTS, WEST END OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
SHOWN
PHOTO 22
Description VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTHEAST WINGWALL
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 23
Description DIAGONAL AND VERTICAL CRACKING IN NORTHWEST WINGWALL
PHOTO 24
Description TRANSVERSE CRACK AND SPALL ON SOUTHEAST PARAPET
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .