5570-121P.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC - Geotechnical, Pavement Rehabilitation, and Structural Repairs
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-25-B-000003
About this file
This document is a Bridge Inspection Report for the County Road Bridge at Mile Point 147.80 on the Natchez Trace Parkway. The bridge is owned and maintained by the National Park Service. The report provides detailed information on the condition of the bridge structure, including the deck, superstructure, substructure, channel, and approaches. Key findings include deteriorated expansion joints, erosion along the channel banks and underpass roadway, debris and vegetation accumulation, and minor structural cracking and spalling. The report recommends rehabilitation and reconstruction work within the next 5 years, with preliminary cost estimates provided. The bridge's load rating capacities are also included. The related federal contract opportunity is for geotechnical, pavement rehabilitation, and structural repair work on various National Park Service roads and bridges, including this specific bridge.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 53 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 147.80
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER COUNTY ROAD & STREAM
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
LS
STRUCTURE NO. 5570-121P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 3/14/2022
WU
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
MILE POINT: 147.80
KILOMETER POINT: 45.05
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-121P
COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 147.80 INSPECTION DATE : 03/14/2022
PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D
Item No.
Maintenance Recommendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
58.7
REMOVE DEBRIS FROM ALONG CURBS.
61.4
REMOVE VEGETATION GROWTH AND DEBRIS IN
CHANNEL.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
Item No.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
REHAB RECONSTR
60.8 RESEAL EXPANSION JOINTS AT ALL
WINGWALLS, CURBS AND PARAPETS.
61.2,61.3 REPAIR EROSION ALONG CHANNEL BANKS
AND UNDERPASS ROADWAY.
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that the recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-121P
COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 147.80 INSPECTION DATE: 03/13/2022
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 26 24 43 39
HS 42 38 70 64
TYPE 3 38 34 63 57
TYPE 3S2 58 53 97 88
TYPE 3-3 86 78 144 131
DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 06/12/2015
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: FRAME
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-121P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 147.80
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-121 P
4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 121P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................KOSCIUSKO
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3M1
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........2204A
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
284 - MISSISSIPPI
28079 LEAKE
00000
1 6 1 00001 0
COUNTY ROAD & STREAM
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
5570121P0000000
12.1 MILES SOUTH OF MS ROUTE 35
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
147.8 (KM PT: 45.05)
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
CULVERTS)
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............38 FT ( 11.6 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 38.0 FT ( 11.6 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............42 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGALTONS ( 38.1
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............70 TONS ( 63.5 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/14/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-121P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 32° 52'38 50" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 29.0 FT ( 8.8 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°38 '53.10" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.8 FT ( 10 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 17 MI ( 27 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......01 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 3 5 FT ( 1.1 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 3 5 FT ( 1.1 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 6 - HIGHWAY - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1641 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1805 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 29 FT ( 8.8 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT
REQUIRED)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
3 - PARAPET ONLY(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:...............................1.50 FT ( 0.46 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 1 83 FT ( 0 56 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 9.60 FT ( 2.93 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 6 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............6 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(61) CHANNEL:................................5 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF
FOOTING OR PILES
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 0 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
Inspector: Killian Baptiste Structure Number: 5570121P0000000
Inspection Date: 03/14/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING NORTH TOWARD TUPELO
PHOTO 4
Description [2018] EAST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO 6
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF DECK LOOKING SOUTH; NOTE LONGITUDINAL CRACKS
ALONG COLD JOINTS
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description TYPICAL DETERIORATED JOINT SEALS IN PARAPETS AND CURBS, WEST PARAPET OVER
NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO 8
Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF PARAPET, WEST PARAPET NEAR MIDPSAN SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description SETTLEMENT UP TO 0.5" IN WEST SHOULDER OVER NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE ADHESION
FAILURE OF JOINT MATERIAL IN SHOULDER
PHOTO 10
Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG CURBLINES, EAST
CURBLINE SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description VEHICULAR SCRAPES ON THE NORTH END OF WEST SIDE FASCIA
PHOTO 12
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description TYPICAL EROSION AT ENDS OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 14
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKS AND MOWER SCRAPES IN WINGWALLS, SOUTHWEST
WINGWALL SHOWN
PHOTO 16
Description CONDITION OF SLOPE PROTECTION
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description DEBRIS BLOCKING UPSTREAM CHANNEL
PHOTO 18
Description TYPICAL EROSION OF CHANNEL BANKS, DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description TYPICAL EDGE SPALLING AT PARAPET ENDS, SOUTHEAST PARAPET SHOWN
PHOTO 20
Description LOOKING UPSTREAM
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 21
Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .