5570-118P.pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Attached to
- MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC - Geotechnical, Pavement Rehabilitation, and Structural Repairs
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-25-B-000003
About this file
This document is a Bridge Inspection Report for Structure No. 5570-118P, the County Road Bridge at Mile Point 151.00 on the Natchez Trace Parkway. The report provides a detailed assessment of the bridge's condition, including recommendations for maintenance and rehabilitation/reconstruction, as well as a summary of the structure's load rating and inventory. The key findings include the need to remove vegetation, replace expansion joint material, seal cracks in the pavement, and address damaged channel protection. The report also notes that the operating values for certain vehicle types are below the design load capacity. A preliminary cost estimate is provided for the recommended maintenance and rehabilitation/reconstruction work.
The related federal contract opportunity is for geotechnical, pavement rehabilitation, and structural repairs on the Natchez Trace Parkway, identified as Solicitation Number 693C73-25-B-000003. This opportunity is being issued by the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 53 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 151.00
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER COUNTY ROAD & STREAM
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
LN
STRUCTURE NO. 5570-118P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 3/14/2022
ED
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
MILE POINT: 151.00
KILOMETER POINT: 242.96
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-118P
COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 151.00 INSPECTION DATE : 03/14/2022
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
Item No.
Maintenance Recommendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
60.12
REMOVE VINES AND SMALL TREES AT ABUTMENT ENDS.
222.7
REPLACE MISSING OBJECT MARKERS AT SOUTH ENDS
OF RAILINGS.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
Item REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
UNIT
UNIT PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
No. (TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. COST
REHAB RECONSTR
61.2,61.3 BREAK UP BROKEN SECTION OF CHANNEL
PROTECTION AND BREAK UP AND REMOVE
DAMAGED CHANNEL PROTECTION
REPURPOSE AS RIP RAP.
60.8 REPLACE EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL IN
VERTICAL JOINTS.
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES.
58.3,222.
SEAL CRACKS IN PAVEMENT OVER
STRUCTURE AND AT APPROACHES.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-118P
COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 151.00 INSPECTION DATE : 03/14/2022
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-118P
COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 151.00 INSPECTION DATE: 03/13/2022
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 15 14 25 23
HS 21 19 35 32
TYPE 3 18 16 31 28
TYPE 3S2 28 25 48 44
TYPE 3-3 36 33 60 54
DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 05/29/2019
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: OPERATING VALUES ARE BELOW 1.0 FOR HS20, SU6, SU7, AND EV3 VEHICLES. SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-118P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 151.00
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-118 P
4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 118P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................KOSCIUSKO
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3M10
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........2204A
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
284 - MISSISSIPPI
28079 LEAKE
00000
1 6 1 00001 0
COUNTY ROAD & STREAM
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
5570118P0000000
8 9 MILES SOUTH OF MS ROUTE 35
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
151.0 (KM PT: 242 9)
0 6
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
CULVERTS)
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............38 FT ( 11.6 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 38.0 FT ( 11.6 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-
CAPACITY RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............21.3 TONS ( 19.3 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............35 TONS ( 31.8 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/14/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-118P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 32° 54'56 90" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 29.0 FT ( 8.8 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°37 '07 00" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.7 FT ( 10 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 17 MI ( 27 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......01 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 6 - HIGHWAY - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1641 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1805 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 29 FT ( 8.8 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT
REQUIRED)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
3 - PARAPET ONLY(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 1 88 FT ( 0 57 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............7 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(61) CHANNEL:................................6 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF
FOOTING OR PILES
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 0 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1981-JOINT REPAIR. 2007 - ROADWAY RESURFACED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
Inspector: Killian Baptiste Structure Number: 5570118P0000000
Inspection Date: 03/14/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD JACKSON
PHOTO 4
Description WEST (UPSTREAM) SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO 6
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF DECK LOOKING NORTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description TYPICAL MISSING JOINT FILLER MATERIAL IN CURB AND PARAPET EXPANSION JOINT
PHOTO 8
Description SPALL ON TOP OF EAST PARAPET NEAR MIDSPAN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description TYPICAL CRACKING OF CURBS AND PARAPER, SOUTH END OF EAST PARAPET SHOWN
PHOTO 10
Description LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF PAVEMENT BY SOUTH DECK JOINT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING ALONG CENTERLINE
PHOTO 12
Description LONGITUDINAL CRACK AND DETERIORATION OF ASPHALT PATCH IN SOUTHBOUND LANE
AT MIDSPAN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description TYPICAL CRACK AT ABUTMENT AND DECK COLD JOINTS, NORTHWEST CORNER SHOWN
PHOTO 14
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE VINE GROWTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACK ON DECK UNDERSIDE ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINTS, EAST SIDE SHOWN
PHOTO 16
Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKS ON DECK UNDERSIDE, WEST SIDE SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 18
Description TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKS IN ABUTMENTS, SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description TYPICAL MISSING JOINT SEALANT BETWEEN ABUTMENTS AND WINGWALLS, SOUTHWEST CORNER SHOWN
PHOTO 20
Description TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKS IN WINGWALLS, SOUTHWEST WINGWALL SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 21
Description LOOKING UPSTREAM
PHOTO 22
Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 28
Description BROKEN SLOPE PROTECTION UNDER BRIDGE ALONG NORTH CHANNEL BANK
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .