5570-123P.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC - Geotechnical, Pavement Rehabilitation, and Structural Repairs
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-25-B-000003
About this file
This document is a Bridge Inspection Report for the Pellaphalia Creek Bridge, Structure No. 5570-123P, located on the Natchez Trace Parkway over Pellaphalia Creek. The report includes recommendations and estimated costs for maintenance, rehabilitation, and reconstruction work. Key details include:
The bridge is a 5-span concrete slab structure built in 1941. The report notes issues such as clogged drains, missing object markers, erosion, cracking, scaling, and ponding water. Recommended actions include cleaning drains, repairing erosion, and addressing other deficiencies. Preliminary cost estimates are provided for maintenance ($2,400) and rehabilitation/reconstruction ($27,750). The bridge has an Inventory Rating of 27 metric tons and an Operating Rating of 45 metric tons, meeting the 2-H15 design load.
The related federal contract opportunity is for geotechnical, pavement rehabilitation, and structural repairs on the Natchez Trace Parkway, with Solicitation Number 693C73-25-B-000003 issued by the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 53 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
PELLAPHALIA CREEK BRIDGE
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER PELLAPHALIA CREEK
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
LN
STRUCTURE NO. 5570-123P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 3/15/2022
ED
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
MILE POINT: 134.70
KILOMETER POINT: 216.73
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-123P
PELLAPHALIA CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 03/15/2022
PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D
Item No.
Maintenance Recommendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
58.7
CLEAN CLOGGED DRAINS AND REMOVE DEBRIS FROM
ALONG PARAPETS.
222.7
REPLACE MISSING OBJECT MARKER AT NORTHWEST
CORNER.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
Item No.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
REHAB RECONSTR
60.9 REPAIR EROSION ALONG SOUTHEAST
WINGWALL.
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, DESIGN, AND
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-123P
PELLAPHALIA CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 03/14/2022
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 16 15 28 25
HS 27 24 45 41
TYPE 3 23 21 39 35
TYPE 3S2 35 32 58 53
TYPE 3-3 46 42 77 70
DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 06/19/2015
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: END SPAN POSITIVE MOMENT
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-123P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............PELLAPHALIA CREEK BRIDGE
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-123 P
4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 123P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................KOSCIUSKO
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3N5A
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
284 - MISSISSIPPI
28079 LEAKE
00000
1 6 1 00001 0
PELLAPHALIA CREEK
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
5570123P0000000
0.4 MILES FROM MS ROUTE 16
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
134.7 (KM PT: 216.7)
0 3
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 01 - SLAB (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............5 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............36.7 FT ( 11.2 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 168. FT ( 51.3 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............27.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGALTONS ( 24.5
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............45.0 TONS ( 40.8 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/15/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-123P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 32° 41'57 30" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 30.0 FT ( 9.1 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°42 '50 50" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.3 FT ( 9.8 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 23 MI ( 37 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 34.0 FT ( 10.4 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 6 0 FT ( 1.8 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 6 0 FT ( 1.8 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............2080 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................2288 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 30 FT ( 9.1 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT
REQUIRED)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0.0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
3 - PARAPET ONLY(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0.0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:..............................0.0 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 1.66 FT ( 0 51 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0.0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 0 00 FT ( 0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 6 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............6 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 6 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N
(61) CHANNEL:................................6 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF
FOOTING OR PILES
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 0 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2000, 2010 - NEW WEARING SURFACE. 2010 - WEEP HOLE FILTERS INSTALLED. 2022 - PARAPET JOINTS SEALED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
Inspector: Beau Kamrath Structure Number: 5570123P0000000
Inspection Date: 03/15/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD JACKSON
PHOTO 4
Description WEST (UPSTREAM) SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH; NOTE LONGITUDINAL CRACKING
PHOTO 6
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH, SPAN #1
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description GENERAL VIEW OF EAST RAIL
PHOTO 8
Description TYPICAL DEBRIS AND VEGETATION ALONG CURBLINES, WEST CURBLINE IN SPAN #1
SHOWN; NOTE CLOGGED DECK DRAIN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description UNSEALED JOINT BETWEEN SOUTH END OF WEST BRIDGE RAIL AND SOUTHWEST
WINGWALL
PHOTO 10
Description TYPICAL CONDITION OF ASPHALT PLUG JOINT OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE
CRACKING ALONG EDGE OF PLUG JOINT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description PARAPET EXPANSION JOINT AT SOUTHEAST CORNER SEALED SINCE PREVIOUS
INSPECTION
PHOTO 12
Description UNDERMINING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT AT END OF SOUTHWEST APPROACH RAIL
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description TYPICAL CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT, NORTH APPROACH SHOWN
PHOTO 14
Description MISSING OBJECT MARKER AT NORTHWEST RAILING END
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 16
Description VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG SOUTHWEST WINGWALL
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description SPALL AT WEST SIDE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT NEAR BEARING AREA
PHOTO 18
Description EROSION TRENCH ALONG SOUTHEAST WINGWALL
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description GENERAL VIEW OF PIER #1, SOUTH FACE; NOTE SCALING AT WATERLINE DUE TO
PONDING WATER
PHOTO 20
Description SCALING ALONG WATERLINE ON SOUTH FACE OF PIER #1
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 21
Description DIAGONAL CRACK ON NORTHEAST CORNER OF SLAB UNDERSIDE AT SPAN #4
PHOTO 22
Description EFFLORESCENCE FROM EAST LONGITUDINAL CONSTRUCTION JOINT ON SLAB
UNDERSIDE AT SPAN #4
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 23
Description GENERAL VIEW OF PIER #4, SOUTH FACE
PHOTO 24
Description WATER PONDING BELOW SPAN #5
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 25
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE WATER STAINING DUE TO LEAKAGE
PHOTO 26
Description UPSTREAM CHANNEL
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 27
Description DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .