5570-106P.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC - Geotechnical, Pavement Rehabilitation, and Structural Repairs
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-25-B-000003
About this file
This document is a Bridge Inspection Report for the Dry Creek Canal Bridge on the Natchez Trace Parkway. The report outlines the condition of the bridge structure and provides recommendations for maintenance, rehabilitation, and reconstruction work. The key findings include:
The bridge is generally in good condition, rated as a "Minor" priority for improvement. Recommended maintenance actions include removing debris from the curbs and channels. Rehabilitation/reconstruction work is needed within 5 years, such as repairing erosion, removing and replacing unsound concrete on the railings, and performing other structural repairs. The bridge has adequate load capacity, meeting or exceeding the original design load. The report provides preliminary cost estimates for the recommended work.
The related federal contract opportunity appears to be for geotechnical, pavement rehabilitation, and structural repair services on the Natchez Trace Parkway. The solicitation number is 693C73-25-B-000003, issued by the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. No additional details on the contract requirements, response dates, or other salient information are provided in the given materials.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 53 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
DRY CREEK CANAL BRIDGE
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER DRY CREEK CANAL
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
LN
STRUCTURE NO. 5570-106P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 3/11/2022
EU
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
MILE POINT: 186.28
KILOMETER POINT: 56.78
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-106P
DRY CREEK CANAL BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 03/11/2022
PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D
Item No.
Maintenance Recommendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
58.5
REMOVE DEBRIS ALONG CURBS.
61.4
REMOVE DEBRIS DAM FROM UPSTREAM CHANNEL AND
TREES FROM DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
Item No.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
REHAB RECONSTR
60.9 REPAIR EROSION ALONG NORTHWEST
WINGWALL.
58.6 REMOVE UNSOUND CONRETE FROM EAST
RAIL AND RAIL POST, AND PLACE NEW
CONCRETE TO ORIGINAL DIMENSIONS.
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : ..
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-106P
DRY CREEK CANAL BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 03/10/2022
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 17 15 29 26
HS 29 26 49 44
TYPE 3 26 24 43 39
TYPE 3S2 40 36 67 61
TYPE 3-3 51 46 85 77
DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 05/16/2019
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: POSITIVE MOMENT
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-106P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............DRY CREEK CANAL BRIDGE
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-106 P
4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 106P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................KOSCIUSKO
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3J6
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........2292B
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
284 - MISSISSIPPI
28019 CHOCTAW
00000
1 6 1 00001 0
DRY CREEK CANAL
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
5570106P0000000
9 0 MILES SOUTH OF MS ROUTE 9
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
186.2 (KM PT: 56.78)
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
CULVERTS)
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............32.5 FT ( 9.9 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 32.5 FT ( 9.9 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-
CAPACITY RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............29 TONS ( 26.3 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............49 TONS ( 44.5 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/11/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-106P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 21'06 80" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°20 '36.70" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.4 FT ( 9.9 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 25 MI ( 40 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1230 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 10 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1353 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT
REQUIRED)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 1 83 FT ( 0 56 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............7 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N
(61) CHANNEL:................................6 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF
FOOTING OR PILES
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 0 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1980-JOINT REPAIR. 2010- ROADWAY RESURFACED
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
Inspector: Killian Baptiste Structure Number: 5570106P0000000
Inspection Date: 03/11/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD JACKSON
PHOTO 4
Description WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH TOWARD TUPELO; NOTE DETERIORATION OF
SHOULDER LANE STRIPING
PHOTO 6
Description TYPICAL MISSING JOINT FILLER MATERIAL IN RAIL EXPANSION JOINTS, WEST RAILING
OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF RAILING
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR AND CRACKING OF EAST RAIL POST OVER SOUTH
ABUTMENT
PHOTO 8
Description DETERIORATION OF FINISH COAT SOUTHWEST APPROACH CURB; NOTE DEBRIS ALONG
CURB
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES, EAST CURBLINE SHOWN; NOTE
DETERIORATION OF LANE STRIPING
PHOTO 10
Description TYPICAL HORIZONTAL CRACKS AT ABUTMENT AND DECK COLD JOINTS, WEST FACE OF
SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ALONG COLD JOINTS, WEST
SIDE SHOWN
PHOTO 12
Description LONGITUDINAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ALONG CENTERLINE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE ON WEST EDGE
NEAR MIDPSAN
PHOTO 14
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 16
Description TYPICAL VERTICAL CUTTING OF DOWNSTREAM EMBANKMENTS; NOTE FALLEN TREES IN
CHANNEL
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description EROSION HOLE ALONG NORTHWEST WINGWALL
PHOTO 18
Description TYPICAL EDGE SPALLING OF PARAPETS, SOUTHEAST PARAPET SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description EROSION AT SOUTHWEST PARAPET; NOTE EDGE SPALLS AND MOWER DAMAGE
PHOTO 20
Description LOOKING UPSTREAM FROM DECK
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 21
Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM FROM DECK
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .