5570-107P.pdf

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 169.69

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER COUNTY ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LS

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-107P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 3/12/2022

ES

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

MILE POINT: 169.69

KILOMETER POINT: 51.72

https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-107P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 169.69 INSPECTION DATE: 03/12/2022

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ..... 1 - CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: .............. 07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: . 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: . 30.5 FT (9.3 M)

DECK TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ......... 30.5 FT (9.3 M)

WEARING SURFACE: ......... 6 - BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ..................... 32.9 FT (10 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ....... CURB TO CURB WIDTH: .... 28.5 FT (8.7 M)

PIER FOUDNATION(S): ...... 6 - N/A YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: .. 1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: . 0

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ....... 3L9 SKEW ANGLE: .................... 10 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ....... N

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ..... 1981-BRIDGE RAIL REPAIR/REPLACEMENT.

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

STATE: .............................. 284 - MISSISSIPPI

FACILITY CARRIED: ......... NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: COUNTY ROAD

MILE POINT: .. 169.69 (KM PT 51.72)

LOCATION: .... 4.0 MILES NORTH OF MS ROUTE 12

INSPECTION TEAM: K. Baptiste, N. Hughes

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Killian Baptiste

REPORT REVIEW:

Mark Bostick

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 08/29/2022

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete frame bridge is in good condition overall. The most significant defects found are missing object markers at the southwest corner and the underpass approaches, missing vertical clearance signs, up to 75% sediment blockage of the pipes at the base of the abutments, and widespread minor cracking in the wearing surface over the deck and at the approaches. Additionally there is minor to moderate cracking with efflorescence on the underside of the deck.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-107P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 169.69 INSPECTION DATE : 03/12/2022

PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D

Item No.

Maintenance Recommendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

222.7

INSTALL VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS AND OBJECT

MARKERS AT UNDERPASS APPROACHES. ADDITIONALLY,

REPLACE MISSING SOUTHWEST OBJECT MARKER.

1 LS 2500 2500

60.1

PAINT OVER GRAFFITI ON NORTH ABUTMENT

BREASTWALL. 1 LS 1000 1000

60.6,60.

REMOVE DEBRIS FROM PIPE CULVERTS IN BOTH

ABUTMENTS. REMOVE VEGETATION GROWTH FROM

WINGWALLS.

1 LS 1000 1000

58.3,222.

SEAL CRACKS IN WEARING SURFACE OVER STRUCTURE

AND AT APPROACHES. 1 LS 2500 2500

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 7000

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 0

7000TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that the recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-107P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 169.69 INSPECTION DATE: 03/11/2022

58. DECK

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.OTHER:

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

61. CHANNEL

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

222. APPROACHES

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

223. RETAINING WALL

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

G

G

G

G

G

G

N

N

N

G

N

N

N

N

N

G

G

N

N

N

N

N

G

F

F

G

N

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS N

3. WEARING SURFACE G

N FT

G

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N

5. FOUNDATIONS N

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES G

8. EXPANSION JOINTS N

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11.SLOPE PROTECTION N

12.OTHER PIPE CULVERT F

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

N

N

N

PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N

N

N

N

N

N

N

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

16.FOUNDATIONS

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19.OTHER

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-107P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

58.1

59.3

MINOR TO MODERATE DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WEST SIDE OF DECK. MINOR COLLISION DAMAGE AT BOTH SIDES AND SCRAPING OF DECK UNDERSIDE.

MINOR EFFLORESCENCE ALONG LONGITUDINAL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT BOTH SIDES OF DECK UNDERSIDE.

58.5 MODERATE SPALLING OF CURB FINISH COAT THROUGHOUT. MOSS GROWTH ON TOP OF WEST CURB.

58.5

58.6

MINOR TRANSVERSE AND VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE OF CURBS AND RAILINGS. TIMBER FORMWORK

EMBEDDED IN WEST RAIL.

58.6 MINOR SPALLING OF RAILING FINISH COAT AND POPOUTS AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS. MODERATE SPALL OF RAIL POST AT SOUTHWEST END. MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ALONG WEST RAILING, NORTH APPROACH.

60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKS AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS ON BOTH BREASTWALLS. 4" DIA. SHALLOW POPOUT SPALL WITH EXPOSED CORRODED REINFORCEMENT DUE TO SHALLOW COVER 5' FROM WEST END OF SOUTH ABUTMENT. GRAFFITI ON BOTH ABUTMENTS HAS BEEN PAINTED OVER, HOWEVER, THERE IS NEW GRAFFITI ON NORTH ABUTMENT.

60.6 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND WATER STAINS ON ALL WINGWALLS. MINOR MOWER SCRAPES AT BASE OF WINGWALLS. ISOLATED MINOR FLAKING OF FINISH COAT. MINOR VINE GROWTH ON WINGWALLS.

60.7 MINOR LOSS OF FILL THROUGH WEEP HOLES.

60.9 MINOR EROSION AT BASE OF SOUTHWEST WINGWALL.

60.12 PIPE CULVERTS THROUGH ABUTMENTS ARE UP TO 75% FILLED WITH SEDIMENT.

222.5 MINOR TO MODERATE EROSION AT ENDS OF SOUTH WINGWALLS. MINOR EROSION OF EAST EMBANKMENT BEHIND SOUTHEAST

WINGWALL DUE TO ROADWAY RUN OFF.

222.7 OBJECT MARKERS PRESENT AT APPROACH PARAPET ENDS EXCEPT AT SOUTHWEST CORNER.

NO VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS AT UNDERPASS OR OBJECT MARKERS.

58.3

58.7

222.4

WIDESPREAD MINOR LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OVER STRUCTURE AND THROUGHOUT APPROACH

PAVEMENT.

MODERATE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBS.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-107P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 51 46 86 78

HS 83 75 139 126

TYPE 3 71 64 119 108

TYPE 3S2 105 95 176 160

TYPE 3-3 143 130 238 216

DESIGN LOADING: 4 - H 20

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 03/14/2016

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: TOP SLAB - POSITIVE MOMENT

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-107P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 169.69

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-107 P

4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 107P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................KOSCIUSKO

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3L9

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........NONE

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

284 - MISSISSIPPI

28007 ATTALA

00000

1 6 1 00001 0

COUNTY ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570107P0000000

4 0 MILES NORTH OF MS ROUTE 12

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

169.6 (KM PT: 51.72)

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

CULVERTS)

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............30.5 FT ( 9.3 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 30.5 FT ( 9.3 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 0 - UNKNOWN B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................4 - H 20 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-

CAPACITY RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............83 TONS ( 75.3 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............99.9 TONS ( 90.6 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/12/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

https://RATING:

https://LENGTH:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-107P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 08'58.60" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.5 FT ( 8.7 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°28 '43.40" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.9 FT ( 10 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 24 MI ( 39 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......02 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 1 - HIGHWAY, WITH OR W/OUT (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

PEDESTRIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1140 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 10 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1254 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28.5 FT ( 8.7 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 1 3 FT ( 0.4 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........N - NOT APPLICABLE, NO WATERWAY RIGHT:.................................. 1 3 FT ( 0.4 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:..............................3.00 FT ( 0.91 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2 33 FT ( 0.71 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 14.70 FT ( 4.48 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............7 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(61) CHANNEL:................................N (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:........... N

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... N - NOT OVER WATERWAY

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 1 - MAINTENANCE

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 7000

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 0

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1981-BRIDGE RAIL REPAIR/REPLACEMENT.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

https://08'58.60

Inspector: Killian Baptiste Structure Number: 5570107P0000000

Inspection Date: 03/12/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING NORTH TOWARD TUPELO; NOTE MISSING REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKER ON

WEST SIDE

PHOTO 4

Description WEST SIDE; NOTE LACK OF OBJECT MARKERS AND CLEARANCE SIGN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 6

Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF DECK LOOKING SOUTH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE AND POTHOLE, NEAR

MIDSPAN SHOWN

PHOTO 8

Description DIAGONAL CRACK IN SOUTHBOUND LANE OF WEARING SURFACE NEAR SOUTH

ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description TYPICAL VERTICAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF RAILINGS, EAST RAILING NEAR

MIDSPAN SHOWN

PHOTO 10

Description EMBEDDED TIMBER BLOCK IN WEST RAIL ON SOUTHWEST WINGWALL AND TYPICAL

SPALLING OF FINISH COAT ON CURB

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description SPALLING OF FINISH COAT, SOUTHEAST PARAPET SHOWN

PHOTO 12

Description SPALL AND CRACKING AT SOUTHWEST PARAPET TRANSITION

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES, EAST CURBLINE SHOWN

PHOTO 14

Description VEHICULAR SCRAPES AT MIDSPAN ON EAST FASCIA

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKS ALONG COLD JOINTS NEAR DECK EDGE, WEST SIDE

SHOWN

PHOTO 16

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE GRAFFITI

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 18

Description POPOUT SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR 5' FROM WEST END OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description TYPICAL FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACKS IN ABUTMENTS, SOUTH ABUTMENT AT

CENTERLINE SHOWN

PHOTO 20

Description VERTICAL CRACKING OF SOUTHEAST WINGWALL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 21

Description HORIZONTAL CRACKING OF SOUTHEAST WINGWALL AND TYPICALLY PARTIALLY

CLOGGED PIPE CULVERT