5570-204P.pdf

CULVERT INSPECTION REPORT

JAYBIRD CREEK CULVERT

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER JAYBIRD CREEK

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LS

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-204P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 3/12/2022

ED

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

MILE POINT: 165.45

KILOMETER POINT: 266.21

https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-204P

JAYBIRD CREEK CULVERT INSPECTION DATE: 03/12/2022

CULVERT IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

FOUNDATION:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH:

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1 - CONCRETE NO. OF BARRELS:

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING BARREL LENGTH: ............. 94 FT (28.65 M)

51.7 FT (15.8 M) SKEW ANGLE: ................... 45 °

17.7 FT (5.4 M) YEAR BUILT:

3L2 YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

2010- ROADWAY REPAVED.

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: .. 165.45 (KM PT 266.21)

STATE: ................................ 284 - MISSISSIPPI LOCATION: .... 0.1 MILES SOUTH OF MS ROUTE 12

FACILITY CARRIED: .......... NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: JAYBIRD CREEK

INSPECTION TEAM: K. Baptiste, N. Hughes

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Killian Baptiste

REPORT REVIEW:

Mark Bostick

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 08/29/2022

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This triple barrel concrete box culvert is in fair condition overall. The primary issue continues to be severe scour at both sides of the culvert with undermining along the entire length of both the upstream and downstream sides. There is also moderate to severe sloughing of the channel banks, with several undermined trees along the northeast channel bank. A large horizontal erosion hole at the north downstream channel bank, has undermined the undergrowth. The channel has degraded up to 5.5' at the downstream end since the 1983 inspection, but appears to have stabilized in recent years.

Additional problems include minor debris accumulation at the upstream side of the south barrel; minor to moderate erosion at the wingwall ends; moderate vegetation growth on the roadway embankments above the headwalls; and missing headwall markers.

It should also be noted that no railing system exists at this culvert. In the interest of public safety, consideration should be given to installing a guardrail system meeting current safety standards.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future. Recommend conducting inspection during a period of low water or

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-204P

JAYBIRD CREEK CULVERT INSPECTION DATE: 03/12/2022

performing underwater inspection to determine the extent of the undermining.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-204P

JAYBIRD CREEK CULVERT INSPECTION DATE : 03/12/2022

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT C

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

Item No.

Maintenance Recommendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

62.6

FILL AND STABILIZE EROSION AT WINGWALL ENDS.

1 LS 2000 2000

62.12

REMOVE TREES AND VEGETATION GROWTH FROM

BEHIND HEADWALLS AT ROADWAY EMBANKMENTS. 1 LS 1000 1000

222.7

INSTALL HEADWALL MARKERS.

1 LS 1000 1000

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 4000

Item REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

UNIT

UNIT PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

No. (TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. COST

REHAB RECONSTR

36.A,36.

C,36.D

INSTALL GUARDRAIL SYSTEM OVER

STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES. 1 LS 40000 40000

61.2,62.6 PLACE SCOUR COUNTERMEASURES AT BOTH

SIDES OF STRUCTURE TO REPAIR SCOUR AND

UNDERMINING, AND STABILIZE EROSION AND

SLOUGHING OF CHANNEL BANKS.

1 LS 160000 160000

61.4,62.5 REMOVE DEBRIS AND FALLEN TREES FROM

UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM SIDES OF

STRUCTURE AS NECESSARY.

1 LS 5000 5000

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES. 1 LS 105000 105000

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : 310000

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-204P

JAYBIRD CREEK CULVERT INSPECTION DATE : 03/12/2022

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT C

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 0

314000TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-204P

JAYBIRD CREEK CULVERT INSPECTION DATE: 03/11/2022

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE 3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or 9 EXCELLENT CONDITION shear cracks in concrete may be present.

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems. substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

1 “IMM NENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical

5 FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. Structure is closed to

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour. 0 FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

61. CHANNEL 5 222. APPROACHES 7

1. ALIGNMENT: G 1. APPROACH SLABS: N

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR: P 2. RELIEF JOINTS: N

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION: N 3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL: N

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS: F 4. SURFACING: G

5. OTHER: N 5. EROSION: G

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING: 1- SUFF 6. SETTLEMENT: G

7. NORMAL VELOCITY: 2 - MED 7. SIGNS: P

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING: 10 FT 8. ALIGNMENT: G

9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION: 9. OTHER: N

SILT 223. RETAINING WALL N

62. CULVERT 5

1. BARREL(S): F

2. FOOTINGS: N

3. HEADWALLS: G

4. WINGWALLS: G

5. DEBRIS AND/OR SLIT: G

6. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR: P

7. SETTLEMENT AND/OR DEFLECTION: G

8. ADEQUACY OF COVER: G

9. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS: N

10. ROADWAY SURFACE: G

11. RIDEABILITY: G

12. OTHER: N

1. WALL:

2. WEEP HOLES:

3. FOUNDATION:

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR:

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION:

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS: 0

B. TRANSITIONS: N

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS: 0

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS: 0

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

(cont'd)FIELD INSPECTION REPORT - CULVERT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-204P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

61.2 MODERATE TO SEVERE SLOUGHING ALONG CHANNEL BANKS WITH SEVERAL UNDERMINED TREES ALONG NORTH DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL BANK AND EROSION HOLE BENEATH UNDERGROWTH. FALLEN TREE FROM NORTHEAST CHANNEL BANK RESTS ON EAST HEADWALLL. CHANNEL DEGRADATION UP TO 5.5' SINCE 1983. CHANNEL SOUNDINGS AT DOWNSTREAM

END CAN NOT BE TAKEN DUE TO HEAVY VEGETATION ABOVE EAST HEADWALL.

SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

61.4 MODERATE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT UPSTREAM END OF SOUTH BARREL. SEVERAL FALLEN TREES AT DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF

NORTH CHANNEL BANK.

62.1 MINOR EMBANKMENT LOSS THROUGH WEEP HOLES. SURFACE OF FLOOR UNEVEN FROM ABRASION IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS.

MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON NORTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST CORNERS OF TOP SLAB. MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKS WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN LINE WITH SKEW IN TOP SLAB FROM OUTER CONSTRUCTION JOINTS TO SIDES

OF CULVERT.

MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF SOUTH BARREL WALLS, 6' ON CENTER, WITH SOME EFFLORESCENCE AND WATER LEAKAGE, SEVERAL EXTENDING INTO TOP SLAB. MINOR VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL CRACKING WITH SOME EFFLORESCENCE AT SEVERAL

LOCATIONS IN REMAINING BARRELS.

ISOLATED AREAS OF MINOR DELAMINATION ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT BARREL ENDS. MINOR HONEYCOMBING IN

NORTH INTERMEDIATE WALL.

62.3 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE. MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH ON BOTH HEADWALLS. SOIL EROSION BEHIND BOTH HEADWALLS AND WINGWALLS. EROSION TRENCHES EXTEND TYPICALLY 10' ALONG WINGWALLS X UP TO 2' DEEP.

TREE GROWTH BEHIND HEADWALLS.

62.4 HEAVY MOSS GROWTH ON ALL WINGWALLS. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON NORTHWEST WINGWALL.

MODERATE DIAGONAL CRACK UP TO 1/8" WIDE AT NORTH END OF SOUTHEAST WINGWALL.

62.6 SEVERE SCOUR WITH UP TO FULL HEIGHT EXPOSURE (60" IN 2020 AND 50" IN 2018) OF FLOOR AT UPSTREAM SIDE, WITH UNDERMINING FULL LENGTH X 6" HIGH AND UNABLE TO DETERMINE DEPTH; FULL HEIGHT EXPOSURE (36" IN 2020 AND 50" IN 2018) OF FLOOR AT DOWNSTREAM SIDE WITH UNDERMINING FULL LENGTH X UP TO 3' HIGH X 2'-3" UNDER.

PIECES OF ASPHALT HAVE PREVIOUSLY BEEN PLACED ALONG BOTH SIDES; NOT ADEQUATE TO COUNTER SCOUR HOWEVER.

MODERATE EROSION AT WINGWALL ENDS;

62.10

222.4

MINOR TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKS ON WEARING SURFACE OVER STRUCTURE AND AT APPROACHES. MINOR

CRACKING AND FLAKING OF LANE STRIPING.

222.7 NO HEADWALL MARKERS PRESENT. HEADWALL MARKERS WOULD NOT BE VISIBLE UNTIL VEGETATION IS CLEARED AT ROADWAY

EMBANKMENTS.

36.A

36.C

36.D

NO GUARDRAIL SYSTEM PRESENT.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-204P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 103 93 172 156

HS 116 105 194 176

TYPE 3 97 88 163 148

TYPE 3S2 154 140 258 234

TYPE 3-3 190 172 317 288

DESIGN LOADING: 0 - UNKNOWN

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 06/05/2015

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: TOP SLAB

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-204P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............JAYBIRD CREEK CULVERT

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 2 - CULVERT

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-204 P

4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 204P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................KOSCIUSKO

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3L2

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........NONE

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

284 - MISSISSIPPI

28007 ATTALA

00000

1 6 1 00001 0

JAYBIRD CREEK

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570204P0000000

0.1 MILES SOUTH OF MS ROUTE 12

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

165.4 (KM PT: 266 2)

5 1

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 19 - CULVERT (INCLUDES FRAME (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

CULVERTS)

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............003 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............17.7 FT ( 5.4 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 51.7 FT ( 15.8 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. N - NA

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. N - NA

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. N - NA

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... N - NOT APPLICABLE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-

CAPACITY RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............99.9 TONS ( 90.6 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............99.9 TONS ( 90.6 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/12/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

https://RATING:

https://RATING:

https://LENGTH:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-204P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 05'44 20" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°30 '51.60" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 8 MI ( 13 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1430 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 45 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1573 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 32 FT ( 9.8 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT

REQUIRED)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

0 - N/A(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 0 - N/A

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 0 - N/A

(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... .00 FT ( 0 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... N (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............N (68) DECK GEOMETRY:......................N

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... N (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N

(61) CHANNEL:................................5 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(62) CULVERT:.................................5 (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 4 - ACTION IS REQUIRED TO

PROTECT EXPOSED FOUNDATIONS

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 0 N 0 0 (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: C - MODERATE

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 4000

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 310000

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2010- ROADWAY REPAVED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

Inspector: Killian Baptiste Structure Number: 5570204P0000000

Inspection Date: 03/12/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING NORTH TOWARD TUPELO

PHOTO 4

Description WEST (UPSTREAM) SIDE

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH; NOTE NO GUARDRAIL PRESENT

PHOTO 6

Description GENERAL VIEW LOOKING WEST THROUGH NORTH BARREL

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description GENERAL VIEW LOOKING WEST THROUGH CENTER BARREL

PHOTO 8

Description GENERAL VIEW LOOKING WEST THROUGH SOUTH BARREL

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description TYPICAL CRACKING OF PAVEMENT OVER STRUCTURE, SOUTHBOUND LANE SHOWN

PHOTO 10

Description TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ALONG UNDERSIDE AND VERTICAL

CRACKING OF HEADWALL, EAST END OF SOUTH BARREL SHOWN; NOTE TREE AND

VEGETATION ALONG HEADWALL

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description VERTICAL CRACKING AT WEST END OF NORTH END WALL

PHOTO 12

Description TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKS IN PIER WALLS, NORTH WALL OF SOUTH BARREL AT

CENTERLINE SHOWN

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description HORIZONTAL CRACKING ON SOUTH WALL OF CENTER BARREL 15' FROM WEST END

PHOTO 14

Description DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT UPSTREAM SIDE OF SOUTH BARREL

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description TYPICAL VERTICAL SLOUGHING OF DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL BANKS

PHOTO 16

Description DIAGONAL CRACK IN SOUTHEAST WINGWALL

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description EROSION AT NORTHEAST CHANNEL BANK

PHOTO 18

Description EROSION BEHIND SOUTHWEST WINGWALL

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description LOOKING UPSTREAM

PHOTO 20

Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM