About this file

This document is a Culvert Inspection Report for Structure No. 5570-355P, located at Mile Point 180.20 on the Natchez Trace Parkway in Mississippi. The double barrel concrete box culvert is in fair condition overall, with issues including silt buildup, missing headwall markers, minor spalling and cracking, erosion at the wingwalls, and a collapsed paved drainage ditch. The report provides recommendations and estimated costs for maintenance, rehabilitation, and reconstruction work totaling $40,000. The structure's load rating meets or exceeds the design load, and the overall condition warrants priority improvements in the minor category. The report includes detailed field inspection findings and photos documenting the culvert's condition.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Tabulation of Bids - MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC - Signed.pdf PDF
Bid Opening Slides- MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 etc.pdf PDF
Amendment 0003 - MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 Etc.pdf PDF
Amendment 0002 - MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 etc.pdf PDF
Amendment 0001 - MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 etc.pdf PDF
5570-121P.pdf PDF
5570-100P.pdf PDF
5570-110P.pdf PDF
5570-496P.pdf PDF
5570-112P.pdf PDF
5570-101P.pdf PDF
5570-108P.pdf PDF
5570-114P.pdf PDF
5570-203P.pdf PDF
5570-117P.pdf PDF
5570-321P.pdf PDF
5570-113P.pdf PDF
5570-105P.pdf PDF
5570-122P.pdf PDF
5570-111P.pdf PDF
5570-103P.pdf PDF
5570-116P.pdf PDF
5570-109P.pdf PDF
5570-102P.pdf PDF
5570-107P.pdf PDF
5570-099P.pdf PDF
5570-123P.pdf PDF
5570-106P.pdf PDF
5570-104P.pdf PDF
5570-118P.pdf PDF
5570-314P.pdf PDF
5570-119P.pdf PDF
5570-204P.pdf PDF
5570-120P.pdf PDF
5570-383P.pdf PDF
5570-098P.pdf PDF
NATR 3n18_3h27 Categorical Exclusion Form (NEPA).pdf PDF
FP14_Eng.pdf PDF
IFB Solicitation - MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC.pdf PDF
Subcontracting Plan - MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC.doc DOC document
5570-093P.pdf PDF
5570-096P.pdf PDF
MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC_GEO_Memo_adv.pdf PDF
5570-094P.pdf PDF
5570-091P.pdf PDF
5570-097P.pdf PDF
5570-090P.pdf PDF
VETS-4212 Form.pdf PDF
5570-095P.pdf PDF
ADV Bidders Qualifications Form.doc DOC document
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 53 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

CULVERT INSPECTION REPORT

CULVERT AT MP 180.20

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER STREAM

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LS

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-355P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 3/11/2022

WU

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

MILE POINT: 180.20

KILOMETER POINT: 289.94

https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-355P

CULVERT AT MP 180.20 INSPECTION DATE: 03/11/2022

CULVERT IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

FOUNDATION:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH:

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1 - CONCRETE NO. OF BARRELS:

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING BARREL LENGTH: ............. 126 FT (38.4 M)

24.0 FT (7.3 M) SKEW ANGLE: ................... 45 °

12 FT (3.7 M) YEAR BUILT:

3L2 YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

2011-ROADWAY RESURFACED

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: .. 180.20 (KM PT 289.94)

STATE: ................................ 284 - MISSISSIPPI LOCATION: .... 14.5 MILES NORTH OF MS ROUTE 12

FACILITY CARRIED: .......... NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: STREAM

INSPECTION TEAM: K. Baptiste, N. Hughes

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Killian Baptiste

REPORT REVIEW:

Mark Bostick

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 08/29/2022

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This double barrel concrete box culvert is in fair condition overall. Problems include buildup of silt through the south barrel; missing headwall markers; minor spalls with exposed rebar in both barrels; bottom slab exposure at the upstream and downstream end of the north barrel; moderate erosion at the wingwall ends; and a collapsed paved drainage ditch located northwest of the culvert.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-355P

CULVERT AT MP 180.20 INSPECTION DATE : 03/11/2022

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

Item No.

Maintenance Recommendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

61.4,62.5

REMOVE SILT FROM SOUTH BARREL.

1 LS 4000 4000

222.7

INSTALL HEADWALL MARKERS.

1 LS 1000 1000

61.4

REMOVE FALLEN TREES ACROSS UPSTREAM CHANNEL.

1 LS 3000 3000

61.5

REMOVE COLLAPSED PAVED DRAINAGE IN EROSION

TRENCH. 1 LS 2000 2000

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 10000

Item REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

UNIT

UNIT PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

No. (TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. COST

REHAB RECONSTR

62.6 PLACE ENGINEERED RIPRAP AT DOWNSTREAM

AND UPSTREAM END OF NORTH BARREL. 1 LS 10000 10000

62.6 FILL AND STABILIZE EROSION AT WINGWALLS.

1 LS 10000 10000

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES. 1 LS 10000 10000

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : 30000

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-355P

CULVERT AT MP 180.20 INSPECTION DATE : 03/11/2022

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 0

40000TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-355P

CULVERT AT MP 180 20 INSPECTION DATE: 03/10/2022

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE 3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or 9 EXCELLENT CONDITION shear cracks in concrete may be present.

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems. substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

1 “IMM NENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical

5 FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. Structure is closed to

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour. 0 FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

61. CHANNEL 6 222. APPROACHES 7

1. ALIGNMENT: G 1. APPROACH SLABS: N

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR: G 2. RELIEF JOINTS: N

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION: F 3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL: N

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS: F 4. SURFACING: G

5. OTHER: PAVED DRAINAGE DITCH P 5. EROSION: G

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING: 1- SUFF 6. SETTLEMENT: G

7. NORMAL VELOCITY: 3 - LOW 7. SIGNS: N

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING: 6 FT 8. ALIGNMENT: G

9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION: 9. OTHER: N

SILT 223. RETAINING WALL N

62. CULVERT 6

1. BARREL(S): F

2. FOOTINGS: N

3. HEADWALLS: G

4. WINGWALLS: F

5. DEBRIS AND/OR SLIT: P

6. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR: F

7. SETTLEMENT AND/OR DEFLECTION: G

8. ADEQUACY OF COVER: G

9. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS: N

10. ROADWAY SURFACE: G

11. RIDEABILITY: G

12. OTHER: VEGETATION F

1. WALL:

2. WEEP HOLES:

3. FOUNDATION:

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR:

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION:

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS: N

B. TRANSITIONS: N

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS: N

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS: N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

(cont'd)FIELD INSPECTION REPORT - CULVERT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-355P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

61.3 OLD CONCRETE PAVERS LINE UPSTREAM CHANNEL.

61.4

62.5

APPROXIMATELY 4' SILT ACCUMULATION IN SOUTH BARREL. PONDING WATER IN EAST HALF OF SOUTH BARREL.

FALLEN TREES ACROSS UPSTREAM CHANNEL.

61.5 COLLAPSED 35' OF PAVED DRAINAGE DITCH IN EROSION TRENCH, 4' DEEP BY 5' WIDE. 2' OF UNDERMINING AT EDGE OF REMAINING DITCH PAVING. ACCUMULATION OF VEGETATION IN PAVED DITCH HINDERS DRAINAGE.

62.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE, RUST STAINING, WATER LEAKAGE, POPOUTS, HONEYCOMBING, AND

SCALING OF BARREL WALLS AND TOP AND BOTTOM SLABS.

MINOR SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON NORTH SIDE OF CENTER WALL AT EAST END. TWO MINOR SPALLS WITH EXPOSED

REBAR ON TOP SLAB UNDERSIDE AT EAST END OF SOUTH BARREL.

MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT DOWNSTREAM END OF NORTH BARREL, NORTH WALL. SPALLING IN

TWO AREAS ON CENTER WALL IN NORTH BARREL; APPEARS TO HAVE CINDER BLOCK IMPRINTS.

11" DEEP VOID IN TOP SLAB WEST END OF NORTH BARREL.

62.3 MINOR SPALLING AND CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE. MINOR DELAMINATION AT CRACKS IN EAST HEADWALL. FLAKING OF

FINISH COAT AT EAST HEADWALL.

62.4 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND SPALLING IN WINGWALL FACES. MINOR SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR OF WINGWALL ENDS DUE TO MOWER DAMAGE. MINOR CRACKING ALONG TOP OF EAST WINGWALLS. MODERATE SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON END OF NORTHEAST WINGWALL. MINOR RANDOM CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT NORTHEAST

WINGWALL INTERFACE.

62.6 MINOR TO MODERATE EROSION AT ENDS OF ALL WINGWALLS. UP TO 1'-6" OF CONCRETE FLOOR EXPOSED DUE TO SCOUR AT WEST AND EAST ENDS OF NORTH BARREL. SEVERE EROSION AT PAVED DRAINAGE DITCH NEAR NORTHWEST WINGWALL.

62.12 LARGE TREE GROWING BY SOUTHWEST WINGWALL. SMALL TREES GROWING NEXT TO STRUCTURE ON DOWNSTREAM

CHANNEL BANKS.

222.7 NO HEADWALL MARKERS IN PLACE.

62.10

222.4

MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING ALONG CENTERLINE AND TRANSVERSE EXPANSION CRACKS AT APPROACHES AND OVER

STRUCTURE.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-355P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 54 49 90 82

HS 132 120 220 200

TYPE 3 91 83 152 138

TYPE 3S2 131 119 218 198

TYPE 3-3 145 132 242 220

DESIGN LOADING: 4 - H 20

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 02/02/2016

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: TOP SLAB - POSITIVE MOMENT

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-355P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............CULVERT AT MP 180.20

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 2 - CULVERT

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-355 P

4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 356P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................KOSCIUSKO

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3L2

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

284 - MISSISSIPPI

28007 ATTALA

00000

1 6 1 00001 0

STREAM

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570355P0000000

14.5 MILES NORTH OF MS ROUTE 12

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

180.2 (KM PT: 289 9)

0 4

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 19 - CULVERT (INCLUDES FRAME (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

CULVERTS)

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............002 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............12 FT ( 3.7 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 24.0 FT ( 7.3 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. N - NA

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. N - NA

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. N - NA

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... N - NOT APPLICABLE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................4 - H 20 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-

CAPACITY RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............99.9 TONS ( 90.6 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............99.9 TONS ( 90.6 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/11/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

https://RATING:

https://RATING:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-355P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 17'04 20" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°24 '23.40" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 25 MI ( 40 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1140 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 45 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1254 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 22 FT ( 6.7 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT

REQUIRED)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

0 - N/A(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 0 - N/A

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 0 - N/A

(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... .00 FT ( 0 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... N (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............N (68) DECK GEOMETRY:......................N

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... N (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N

(61) CHANNEL:................................6 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(62) CULVERT:.................................6 (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 4 - ACTION IS REQUIRED TO

PROTECT EXPOSED FOUNDATIONS

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: N N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 10000

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 30000

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2011-ROADWAY RESURFACED

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

Inspector: Killian Baptiste Structure Number: 5570355P0000000

Inspection Date: 03/11/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING NORTH TOWARD TUPELO

PHOTO 4

Description EAST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE; NOTE NO HEADWALL MARKERS IN PLACE

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 6

Description GENERAL VIEW LOOKING EAST THROUGH SOUTH BARREL; NOTE SILT ACCUMULATION

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description GENERAL VIEW LOOKING EAST THROUGH NORTH BARREL

PHOTO 8

Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF PAVEMENT OVER STRUCTURE, SOUTH END

SHOWN

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF PAVEMENT ALONG CENTERLINE OVER

STRUCTURE

PHOTO 10

Description FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACK IN WEST HEADWALL OVER CENTER WALL

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description TYPICAL FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN BARREL WALLS, SOUTH BARREL 25' FROM WEST END SHOWN

PHOTO 12

Description CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN SOUTH BARREL 40' FROM EAST END

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description CRACKING ON UNDERSIDE OF EAST END OF NORTH BARREL

PHOTO 14

Description DIAGONAL CRACKING ON EAST END OF NORTH WALL

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description EFFLORESCENCE 25' FROM EAST END ON NORTH WALL

PHOTO 16

Description TYPICAL HONEYCOMBING ON UNDERSIDES OF BARRELS, NORTH BARREL UNDERSIDE

SHOWN

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description WATER LEAKAGE WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT CONSTRUCTION JOINT NEAR CENTERLINE

IN NORTH BARREL

PHOTO 18

Description EROSION AROUND NORTHEAST WINGWALL; NOTE SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description EROSION AROUND SOUTHWEST WINGWALL

PHOTO 20

Description EROSION AT NORTHWEST WINGWALL

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 21

Description DOWSTREAM FOOTING OF NORTH BARREL EXPOSED, NO UNDERMINING PRESENT

PHOTO 22

Description UPSTREAM FOOTING OF NORTH BARREL EXPOSED UP TO 1.5', NO UNDERMINING

PRESENT

Culvert Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 23

Description LOOKING UPSTREAM; NOTE FALLEN TREE ACROSS CHANNEL AND DETERIORATED

PAVED DITCH UPSTREAM OF TREE

PHOTO 24

Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM; NOTE TREE ACROSS CHANNEL

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .