5570-117P.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC - Geotechnical, Pavement Rehabilitation, and Structural Repairs
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-25-B-000003
About this file
This document is a Bridge Inspection Report for the Drainage Canal Bridge at Mile Point 152.10 on the Natchez Trace Parkway. The bridge is owned and maintained by the National Park Service. The inspection was conducted on March 14, 2022 and found the bridge to be generally in good condition, with some deficiencies noted, primarily in the railings, wearing surface, and substructure. The report provides recommendations for maintenance, rehabilitation, and reconstruction work, with preliminary cost estimates. The load rating analysis indicates the bridge can support normal highway traffic loads. The related federal contract opportunity is for geotechnical, pavement rehabilitation, and structural repairs on the Natchez Trace Parkway, but this specific bridge is not referenced in the opportunity details provided.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 53 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
DRAINAGE CANAL BRIDGE AT MP 152.10
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER CANAL, ROAD, & TRAIL
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
LN
STRUCTURE NO. 5570-117P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 3/14/2022
WU
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
MILE POINT: 152.10
KILOMETER POINT: 244.73
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-117P
DRAINAGE CANAL BRIDGE AT MP 152.10 INSPECTION DATE : 03/14/2022
PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D
Item No.
Maintenance Recommendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
Item No.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
REHAB RECONSTR
58.6,60.
CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR ON
RAILINGS AND NORTH PIER WITH APPROVED
PROTECTIVE COATING.
58.3,222.
SEAL TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL
CRACKS ON WEARING SURFACE AND
APPROACHES.
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-117P
DRAINAGE CANAL BRIDGE AT MP 152.10 INSPECTION DATE: 03/13/2022
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 18 16 30 27
HS 27 24 45 41
TYPE 3 25 23 42 38
TYPE 3S2 30 27 51 46
TYPE 3-3 41 37 68 62
DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 05/17/2019
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: MOMENT
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-117P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............DRAINAGE CANAL BRIDGE AT MP
152.10
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-117 P
4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 117P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................KOSCIUSKO
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3M6
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........2288A
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
284 - MISSISSIPPI
28079 LEAKE
00000
1 6 1 00001 0
CANAL, ROAD, & TRAIL
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
5570117P0000000
7 8 MILES SOUTH OF MS ROUTE 35
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
152.1 (KM PT: 244.7)
0 3
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 01 - SLAB (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............003 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............40 FT ( 12.2 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 105. FT ( 32.1 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-
CAPACITY RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............27 TONS ( 24.5 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............45 TONS ( 40.8 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/14/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-117P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 32° 55'51 80" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.7 FT ( 8.7 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°36 '50.40" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.5 FT ( 9.9 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 17 MI ( 27 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......01 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 6 - HIGHWAY - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1641 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 30 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1805 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28.7 FT ( 8.7 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT
REQUIRED)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2 33 FT ( 0.71 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 10.17 FT ( 3.1 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............7 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(61) CHANNEL:................................6 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF
FOOTING OR PILES
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2010 - ROADWAY RESURFACED
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
Inspector: Killian Baptiste Structure Number: 5570117P0000000
Inspection Date: 03/14/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description EAST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE (FROM 2019 INSPECTION)
PHOTO 4
Description LOOKING SOUTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH TOWARD TULEPO
PHOTO 6
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SOUTH SPAN LOOKING NORTHWEST
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF CENTER SPAN LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO 8
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF NORTH SPAN LOOKING SOUTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description TYPICAL MISSING JOINT FILLER MATERIAL IN RAILING EXPANSION JOINT, WEST RAILING
OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE TYPICAL REPAIRS TO RAILING AND RAIL POST
PHOTO 10
Description SPALLING ON UNDERSIDE OF WEST RAILING AT SOUTH END
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE AND VERTICAL CRACKING OF CURBS AND RAILINGS, NORTH END
OF WEST CURB AND RAILING SHOWN
PHOTO 12
Description SPALLING AND CRACKING OF FOURTH EAST RAIL POST FROM SOUTH END
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE, SOUTH END OF
SOUTHBOUND LANE SHOWN
PHOTO 14
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH FACE OF SOUTH PIER; NOTE EAST SIDE SCOUR HOLE
PHOTO 16
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH FACE OF NORTH PIER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description TYPICAL FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACKS WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND MOWER
SCRAPES ON WINGWALLS, SOUTHEAST WINGWALL SHOWN
PHOTO 18
Description SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON EAST RAIL POST AT SOUTH EXPANSION JOINT (FROM
2019 INSPECTION)
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description SPALL ON NORTHEAST APPROACH RAILING; NOTE MOWER SCRAPES
PHOTO 20
Description EDGE SPALLING OF NORTHEAST PARAPET; NOTE DETERIORATION OF REFLECTIVE
OBJECT MARKER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 21
Description LOOKING UPSTREAM
PHOTO 22
Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .