5570-112P.pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Attached to
- MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC - Geotechnical, Pavement Rehabilitation, and Structural Repairs
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-25-B-000003
About this file
This document is a Bridge Inspection Report for the Hurricane Creek Bridge on the Natchez Trace Parkway. The bridge, designated as Structure No. 5570-112P, was inspected on March 12, 2022 and found to be in generally good condition with some minor deficiencies.
The report provides detailed recommendations and estimated costs for maintenance, rehabilitation, and reconstruction activities. Recommended maintenance items include removing debris from the deck. Rehabilitation/reconstruction needs include repairing scour at piers, removing obstructions from the channel, replacing deck joint sealant, and repairing the asphalt wearing surface. The total preliminary estimated cost for all recommended work is provided. The report also includes the bridge's load rating information, structure inventory and appraisal data, condition and appraisal ratings, and photographs documenting the bridge's current state.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 53 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
HURRICANE CREEK BRIDGE
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER HURRICANE CREEK
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
LN
STRUCTURE NO. 5570-112P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 3/12/2022
ED
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
MILE POINT: 164.29
KILOMETER POINT: 50.08
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-112P
HURRICANE CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 03/12/2022
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
Item No.
Maintenance Recommendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
58.5,58.7
REMOVE DEBRIS FROM DECK.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
Item No.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
REHAB RECONSTR
60.17,61.
REPAIR SCOUR AT PIERS #2 AND #3 AND
SLOUGHING BENEATH SPAN #3 WITH
ENGINEERED RIPRAP.
61.4 REMOVE OBSTRUCTIONS FROM CHANNEL.
58.2 REPLACE SEALANT MATERIAL OVER DECK
JOINTS AT BOTH ABUTMENTS.
222.4 REPAIR ASPHALT TRANSITION PATCH AT
SOUTH ABUTMENT AND SEAL CRACKS IN
WEARING SURFACE.
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-112P
HURRICANE CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 03/12/2022
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-112P
HURRICANE CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 03/11/2022
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 22 20 37 34
HS 28 25 47 43
TYPE 3 26 24 44 40
TYPE 3S2 40 36 94 85
TYPE 3-3 51 46 86 78
DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 08/10/2015
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: NEGATIVE MOMENT
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-112P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............HURRICANE CREEK BRIDGE
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-112 P
4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 112P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................KOSCIUSKO
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3L3
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........2200B
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
284 - MISSISSIPPI
28007 ATTALA
00000
1 6 1 00001 0
HURRICANE CREEK
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
5570112P0000000
1.4 MILES SOUTH OF MS ROUTE 12
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
164.2 (KM PT: 50.08)
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 01 - SLAB (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............005 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............40 FT ( 12.2 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 185. FT ( 56.4 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-
CAPACITY RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............28 TONS ( 25.4 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............47 TONS ( 42.6 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/12/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 5 - SCOUR INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-112P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 04'57 80" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°31 '30.60" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.3 FT ( 9.8 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 8 MI ( 13 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1430 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1573 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28 FT ( 8.5 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT
REQUIRED)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 1 83 FT ( 0 56 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 6 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............6 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 6 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N
(61) CHANNEL:................................4 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF
FOOTING OR PILES
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 0 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1984-ABUTMENT REPAIRS. 2010-ROADWAY RESURFACED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
Inspector: Killian Baptiste Structure Number: 5570112P0000000
Inspection Date: 03/12/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD JACKSON
PHOTO 4
Description WEST (UPSTREAM) SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO 6
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SPAN #5 LOOKING SOUTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SPAN #4 LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO 8
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SPAN #3 LOOKING NORTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SPAN #2 LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO 10
Description TRANSITION PATCH IN WHEEL PATH DETERIORATED AT SOUTH APPROACH IN
NORTHBOUND LANE; NOTE WEARING SURFACE CRACK AT SOUTH END OF DECK
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE, SOUTH END OF
NORTHBOUND LANE SHOWN
PHOTO 12
Description TYPICAL MISSING FILLER MATERIAL IN RAILING EXPANSION JOINT, WEST RAILING OVER
SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE SPALL IN RAILING
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE AND VERTICAL CRACKING OF RAILINGS, WEST RAILING NEAR
MIDSPAN SHOWN
PHOTO 14
Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES, EAST CURBLINE SHOWN; NOTE
DETERIORATED STRIPING
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACK IN FASCIAS OVER PIERS, EAST FASCIA OVER PIER #3 SHOWN
PHOTO 16
Description TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE ALONG
CONSTRUCTION JOINTS, WEST SIDE OF SOUTH SPAN SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACK FROM SCUPPER TO CONSTRUCTION JOINT, WEST SIDE
OF SPAN #4 SHOWN
PHOTO 18
Description EDGE SPALLING OF EAST SIDE OF DECK AT SOUTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 20
Description CRACKING AND WATER LEAKAGE AT PATCH ON WEST END OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 21
Description TYPICAL EROSION AROUND ENDS OF PIERS, WEST SIDE OF PIER #4 SHOWN
PHOTO 22
Description TYPICAL CRACK IN PIERS, NORTH FACE OF PIER #4 SHWON
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 23
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH FACE OF PIER #3
PHOTO 24
Description TYPICAL SCALING OF PIERS AT WATERLINE, NORTH FACE OF PIER #3 SHOWN; NOTE
SCOUR HOLE AT UPSTREAM END
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 25
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH FACE OF PIER #2
PHOTO 26
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 27
Description HORIZONTAL CRACKING ON WEST SIDE OF NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 28
Description TYPICAL DELAMINATION OF NORTH ABUTMENT PATCHES UNDER FASCIA BEAMS, WEST
SIDE SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 29
Description SLOUGHING OF UPSTREAM CHANNEL; NOTE UNDERMINED TREES
PHOTO 30
Description VERTICAL CRACKS IN WINGWALLS, SOUTHWEST WINGWALL SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 31
Description LOOKING UPSTREAM
PHOTO 32
Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM; NOTE TREES AND TIMBER DEBRIS IN CHANNEL
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .