5570-099P.pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Attached to
- MS NP NATR 3N18 3H27 ETC - Geotechnical, Pavement Rehabilitation, and Structural Repairs
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-25-B-000003
About this file
This document is a Bridge Inspection Report for the MS Route 9 Bridge over the Natchez Trace Parkway in Mississippi. The report provides details on the inspection conducted on March 10, 2022, including the structure's condition, maintenance and rehabilitation recommendations, and cost estimates.
Key details include:
- The bridge is generally in good condition, classified as a "D - Minor" priority for improvement. Recommended actions include filling and stabilizing abutment slopes, extending scuppers, repairing erosion, and sealing cracks.
- Preliminary cost estimates total $115,000 for maintenance and $164,000 for rehabilitation/reconstruction, excluding additional contract costs.
- The bridge is owned and maintained by the National Park Service. It was built in 1958 with a load rating of 18 tons.
The report contains detailed inspection photos and inventory data for the structure. This information would be relevant to a federal contract opportunity focused on geotechnical, pavement, and structural repairs for this specific bridge asset.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 53 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
MS ROUTE 9 BRIDGE
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER MS ROUTE 9
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
LS
STRUCTURE NO. 5570-099P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 3/10/2022
WS
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
MILE POINT: 195.50
KILOMETER POINT: 59.59
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-099P
MS ROUTE 9 BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 03/10/2022
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
Item No.
Maintenance Recommendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
58.2
REPLACE EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL IN RAILINGS.
222.7
POST VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS ALONG UNDERPASS
ROUTE.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
Item No.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
REHAB RECONSTR
60.9 FILL AND STABILIZE ABUTMENT SLOPES WITH
ENGINEERED RIPRAP.
59.2 EXTEND SCUPPERS WITH TELESCOPING
SPOUTS TO DIRECT DRAINAGE AWAY FROM
BEAMS.
60.17 REPAIR EROSION AND PROTECT DRAINAGE
DITCHES AT PIERS WITH RIPRAP.
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES.
58.3,222.
SEAL CRACKS IN WEARING SURFACE OVER
STRUCTURE AND AT APPROACHES.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-099P
MS ROUTE 9 BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 03/10/2022
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-099P
MS ROUTE 9 BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 03/09/2022
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............MS ROUTE 9 BRIDGE
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-099 P
4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 099P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................DANCY
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 3H13
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........3022A
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
284 - MISSISSIPPI
28019 CHOCTAW
00000
1 6 1 00001 0
MS ROUTE 9
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
5570099P0000000
9.1 MILES SOUTH OF U.S. ROUTE 82
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
195.5 (KM PT: 59.59)
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 04 - TEE BEAM (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............003 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............60 FT ( 18.3 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 150. FT ( 45.7 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-
CAPACITY RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............18 TONS ( 16.3 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............31 TONS ( 28.1 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/10/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-099P
MS ROUTE 9 BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 03/09/2022
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 33° 26'25.10" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.3 FT ( 8.6 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 89°14 '28 20" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.7 FT ( 10 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 15 MI ( 24 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 32.0 FT ( 9.8 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......02 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 5 0 FT ( 1.5 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 1 - HIGHWAY, WITH OR W/OUT (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
PEDESTRIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1075 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 48 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2012 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1183 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28.3 FT ( 8.6 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2032 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........N - NOT APPLICABLE, NO WATERWAY RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:..............................2.20 FT ( 0.67 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2 37 FT ( 0.72 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 16.08 FT ( 4.9 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............7 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(61) CHANNEL:................................N (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:........... N
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... N - NOT OVER WATERWAY
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 0 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1982-JOINT REPAIR. 2007, 2009-ROADWAY RESURFACED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
Inspector: Killian Baptiste Structure Number: 5570099P0000000
Inspection Date: 03/10/2022 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING NORTH TOWARD TUPELO
PHOTO 4
Description EAST SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO 6
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF NORTH SPAN LOOKING NORTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF CENTER SPAN LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO 8
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SOUTH SPAN LOOKING SOUTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACK IN WEARING SURFACE, NORTH END OF SOUTHBOUND
LANE SHOWN
PHOTO 10
Description TYPICAL ADHESION FAILURE OF SAWCUT JOINT SEALANT OVER DECK JOINTS, JOINT
OVER NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE PAVEMENT CRACKING IN SOUTHBOUND LANE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description TYPICAL MISSING FILLER MATERIAL IN RAILING EXPANSION JOINTS, WEST RAILING
OVER NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO 12
Description TRANSVERSE CRACK AND SPALL IN EAST RAILING OVER NORTH SPAN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR IN WEST RAILING OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 14
Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES, WEST CURBLINE SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description TYPICAL ROLLER BEARING, BEARING #3 AT NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO 16
Description SOUTH PIER BEARING AREA
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description NORTH PIER CAP AND BEARING AREA
PHOTO 18
Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKS IN BAYS, BAY #1 IN CENTER SPAN SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description TYPICAL SCALING OF BOTTOM OF BEAMS, BEAM #3 OVER CENTER SPAN SHOWN
PHOTO 20
Description TYPICAL IMPACT DAMAGE ON EXTERIOR BEAMS, EAST EXTERIOR BEAM SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 21
Description TYPICAL WATER STAINING OF EXTERIOR BEAMS UNDER SCUPPERS, WEST SIDE OF
NORTH SPAN SHOWN
PHOTO 22
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 23
Description CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON NORTH ABUTMENT, EAST END SHOWN
PHOTO 24
Description TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKS IN ABUTMENTS, NORTH ABUTMENT UNDER BEARING #3
SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 25
Description EROSION AT EAST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 26
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH FACE OF NORTH PIER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 27
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH FACE OF SOUTH PIER
PHOTO 28
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 29
Description EROSION OF SOUTH DRAINAGE DITCH
PHOTO 30
Description TYPICAL EROSION OF DRAINAGE DITCHES, NORTH DRAINAGE DITCH SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 31
Description SETTLEMENT OF NORTH APPROACH PAVEMENT WITH ASPHALT PATCH; NOTE PAVEMENT
CRACKING AT CURB
PHOTO 32
Description SOUTH APPROACH PAVEMENT NEAR END OF BRIDGE; NOTE PATCHES FOR SETTLEMENT
AND SEALED CRACKS
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .