AMEND_02.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

West Sound Base Operations Support (BOS) Services

This admendment is issued to update various sections of the RFP.

CS: jennifer.s.jordan@navy.mil

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

140 1 14

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 17-Jan-2019

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6247018R3002

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

07-Jan-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

17-Jan-2019

CODE

COMMANDER NAVFAC ATLANTIC

6506 HAMPTON BLVD

NORFOLK VA 23508-1278

N62470 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6247018R3002

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0002

The purpose of this amendment is to disseminate the below information.

1. Section A:

The pre-proposal conference will commence at 8:00 A.M. PST on Naval Base Kitsap Bangor and will start at the Bangor Theater, Bldg. 2501, on Sargo Circle near the Navy Exchange, Commissary, and Gymnasium. It pops up as Bangor Cinema Plus on Google Maps.

2. Section C:

Section C, Annex 0402000 Fire and Emergency Services has been revised.

3. Section J –

Amendment 0002 pre-award inquiry responses.

4. Section J-

Section J Table of Contents was updated to delete the reference to Attachment F.5 Section F Deliverables and replace with Attachment J.F-1 Section F Deliverables

4. Section M – Revisions in the section are provided as noted below.

(Revisions are provided by the use of red font; deletions are indicated by the use of red strikethrough font.)

WS BOS Site Visit and Badging updated location

a. PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE AND SITE VISIT A pre-proposal conference, to include a site visit, will be held Wednesday, January 23, 2019 and Thursday, January 24, 2019. The site visit tour will be predominately a windshield tour. There may be some opportunities to enter various buildings during the site visit and will be identified the day of the site visit; however, it is not guaranteed that Offerors will have the opportunities to enter any buildings during the site visit. Offerors are encouraged to visit the Technical Reference Center for more site specific information.

The pre-proposal conference will commence at 8:00 A.M. PST and will start at Naval Base Kitsap Bangor near Silverdale, Washington. It is anticipated that the conference and the tour will last approximately 2 days. Exact location of the pre-proposal conference will be provided via subsequent amendment. The pre-proposal conference will commence at 8:00 A.M. PST on Naval Base Kitsap Bangor and will start at the Bangor Theater, Bldg. 2501, on Sargo Circle near the Navy Exchange, Commissary, and Gymnasium. It pops up as Bangor Cinema Plus on Google Maps. The purpose of the conference is to provide offerors an opportunity to participate in a briefing and associated presentation and site visit regarding the functional and operational aspects of the naval activities where Contractor's services shall be provided.

a. The site visit will be conducted in the NBK areas of Bangor and Bremerton. Offerors interested in sending representatives without base access or access shall submit a request for a region badge through the BAVR system. The BAVR system may be accessed at the following link: https://www.bavr.cnic.navy.mil. BAVR requests are to be submitted no later than 14 January 2019. Exceptions to this deadline shall NOT be granted. If this request is submitted less than five working days prior to the site visit date, base access may not be granted. Please ensure that all required fields are completed in your region badge request and input the following into the fields specified:

Command You Are Visiting: “NBK BANGOR” Sponsor E-mail: steven.e.chavez1@navy.mil Purpose of Visit: “Request access per solicitation number N62470-18-R-3002 to attend Pre-Proposal Site Visit for WS BOSC, at NBK Bangor, Bremerton, NUWC Keyport, and Naval Magazine Indian Island. Request codes B9, I9, K4, S9, and W2.

Once your region badge request has been approved an e-mail will be generated confirming the approval. On the day of the site visit, check in at Pass & ID with the appropriate citizenship documentation: Valid Passport or State Certified Birth Certification (the Birth Certificate shall be the original in good condition) AND one piece of valid photo ID. ESCORT WILL NOT BE PROVIDED BY THE GOVERNMENT. It is recommended for each representative to bring a completed/unsigned SECNAV_5512_1_11787 APPROVED AC PASS ID FORM 05282014 with them to the Pass & ID office.

b. Offerors interested in attending the pre-proposal conference and site visit shall submit the below information to Jennifer Jordan (Jennifer.s.jordan@navy.mil and Erin Quimby (erin.quimby@navy.mil) for reservations no later than the close of business on 16 January 2019. Site Visit attendance is limited to three (3) representatives per Contractor. Offeror must provide the following for all attendees:

(a) Full name

(b) Offeror name and company name if different than the Offeror Substitutions CANNOT be made after the deadline. Upon receiving a reservation request with the above information, you will receive a confirmation e-mail confirming your reservation.

Attendees must be U.S. Citizens. All requests for reservations for the site visit portion must be received by close of business on 16 January 2019. Exceptions to the deadline shall NOT be granted. Substitutions CANNOT be made after the deadline. Firms may elect to attend only the pre-proposal conference which lasts two hours on the first day.

All prospective Offerors are urged to attend this conference.

Cameras, tape recorders, other electrical recording devices, alcohol/narcotics or firearms/hand weapons are prohibited on the base. Laptop computers, cell phones, PDAs or any other non-prohibited devices with the ability to record visual or audio data are prohibited in restricted areas. The Government will require those attending the pre-proposal conference to leave prohibited devices in a designated location when near or entering restricted areas.

Security rules will be strictly enforced. Violation of security rules may result in the individual’s removal from the pre-proposal conference and from the installation. Security will be notified and if a recording device is involved, the device will be secured and its contents will be inspected. Contents may be deleted and the device may be confiscated and destroyed. An offeror’s representatives’ entry onto Navy facilities for the pre-proposal conference and site visit constitutes consent to search of their person and any property under their control.

Smoking is prohibited on Federal installations except in designated areas.

b. Technical Reference Center The Technical Reference Center (TRC) at Naval Base Kitsap (addressing all contract locations) is available to prospective contractors during regular working hours from the date of issue of the Request for Proposal through the date for receipt of proposals. Reference materials and documents may be checked out for use in the TRC only and shall not be removed from the TRC. Limited copying of information is available free of charge--additional printing may be allowed at contractor's expense.

For access and coordination of visits to the TRC please contact Matthew Adams at (360) 396-6175 or matthew.adams1@navy.mil.

AMEND 0002 PRE-AWARD INQUIRIES

Page Section Para. QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

RFP Will the WD and Davis Bacon Schedules be posted with the RFP files?

Attachments were provided with Amendment 0001. Reference additional documents on NECO under the solicitation number.

RFP Will the CBA be posted ASAP wiith the RFP Files?

Attachments were provided with Amendment 0001. Reference additional documents on NECO under the solicitation number.

of

RFP M.2(

b) (3) a.

When will the JB-2 Excel File be posted?

Reference revised Section M.2( b) (3).issued via Amendment 0002.

PWS

Annex 1700000

Spec Item 3.1.1

Will the Government provide J.F-1 as it is not provided with the current documents? Or provide correct reference.

See Amendment 0002 J.F-1 provided as an attachment and updated in Section J Table of Contents

PWS

Annex 1700000

Spec Item 3.1.2

Will the Government provide J.F-1 as it is not provided with the current documents? Or provide correct reference.

See Amendment 0002 J.F-1 provided as an attachment.

PWS

Annex 1700000

Spec Item 3.1.3

Will the Government provide J.F-1 as it is not provided with the current documents? Or provide correct reference.

See Amendment 0002 J.F-1 provided as an attachment.

PWS

Annex 1700000

Spec Item 3.2.5.1

Will the Government provide J.F-1 as it is not provided with the current documents? Or provide correct reference.

See Amendment 0002 J.F-1 provided as an attachment.

All

PWS

Sections

Will the Government provide J.F-1 as it is not provided with the current documents? Or provide correct reference.

See Amendment 0002 J.F-1 provided as an attachment.

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The following have been modified:

N62470-18-R-3002

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND (NAVFAC), ATLANTIC

6506 HAMPTON BLVD

NORFOLK, VIRGINIA 23508-1278

NAVFAC RFP NUMBER: N62470-18-R-3002

BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT (BOS) SERVICES AT NAVAL INSTALLATIONS

LOCATED IN JEFFERSON, AND KITSAP, WASHINGTON

REFERRED TO AS WEST SOUND BOS (WSBOS)

NOTICE: PROPOSALS ARE DUE BY 2:00 P.M. NORFOLK, VA LOCAL TIME ON 21 FEBRUARY 2019

Proposal is to be submitted to office listed below:

Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC), Atlantic Attn: Jennifer Jordan, Code ACQ22 6506 Hampton Blvd, Mail Room Norfolk, Virginia 23508-1278

PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE/SITE VISIT:

A pre-proposal conference, to include a site visit, will be held Wednesday, January 23, 2019 and Thursday,January 24, 2019. The pre-proposal conference will commence at 8:00 A.M. PST and will start at the Bangor Theater, Bldg.

2501, on Sargo Circle near the Navy Exchange, Commissary, and Gymnasium.at Naval Base Kitsap Bangor near Silverdale, Washington. All prospective Offerors are urged to attend this conference. The site visit tour will be predominately a windshield tour.

A.1 CONTRACT TITLE

West Sound Base Operations Support (BOS) Services

A.2 TYPE OF CONTRACT

This acquisition will result in the award of a single award Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ), Fixed-price with award fee performance-based type contract comprised of both Recurring Work (RW) and Non-Recurring Work (NRW) Items.

A.3 COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS/SET-ASIDE

This procurement is unrestricted.

A.4 NAICS CODE

The NAICS code assigned to this procurement is 561210, Facility Support Services, having a small business size standard of $38.5 Million. Refer to Section K, Representations, Certifications and Other Statements of Offerors.

A.5 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) FILES

It is the sole responsibility of the Offeror to obtain the RFP files, along with any amendments, from either Navy Electronic Commerce Online (NECO) website (www.neco.gov) or Federal Business Opportunities (www.fbo.gov.). Offerors are advised to check both of the aforementioned websites on a regular basis, as technological difficulties sometimes prevent the Government from simultaneously uploading to both sites.

Unprotected editable electronic file copies of the RFP documents, including Word, Excel, and/or Adobe files will not be provided. Please plan accordingly.

SECTION C - DESCRIPTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS

C 0402000

Table of Contents

Spec Item Title

1 General Information

1.1 Concept of Operations

2 Management and Administration

2.1 Definitions and Acronyms

2.2 References and Technical Documents

2.3 Personnel

2.3.1 Certification and Training

2.4 Records and Reports

3 Fire Extinguisher Inspection, Test, and Maintenance 4 Nonrecurring Work

0402000 – Fire and Emergency Services Spec Item Title Description 1 General Information The Contractor shall provide labor, management, supervision, tools, material, and equipment required to perform fire extinguisher inspection, test and maintenance services at NBK and NAVMAG II and outlying locations.

1.1 Concept of

Operations

The intent of Fire and Emergency Services is to provide tenant commands that have fiscal responsibility the means to maintain fire extinguisher in their facilities and equipment. NRNW Fire and Emergency Services performs this service for facilities funded by NRNW Sustainment.

2 Management and Administration

2.1 Definitions and

Acronyms

National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) - A national professional association that publishes fire protection and prevention standards.

NRNW Fire and Emergency Services (F&ES) is responsible for fire protection, hazardous material response, fire prevention/public education, airfield rescue, firefighting, and emergency medical service transport.

2.2 References and

Technical Documents

NFPA 10 - Standard for Portable Fire Extinguishers

UFC 3-600-01

2.3 Personnel

2.3.1 Certification and

Training The Contractor personnel performing fire extinguisher maintenance, inspection, testing and certification shall be trained and certified IAW NFPA. See Attachment F.5. J.F-1

2.4 Records and Reports Records and reports are listed in. Attachment F.5. J.F-1

0402000 – Fire and Emergency Services Spec Item Title Performance

Objective Related Information Performance

Standard 3 Fire

Extinguisher Inspection, Test, and Maintenance

The Contractor shall service fire extinguishers to ensure constant readiness of fire suppression

The fire extinguishers inventory by location is listed in J-0402000-01.

The Contractor shall inspect, test, maintain, and repair portable fire extinguishers in accordance with NFPA

Fire extinguishers are inspected, tested and maintained on schedule capability and accurate documentation of serviceability.

10, Standard for Portable Fire Extinguishers. Services shall includes annual maintenance, six-year maintenance, five /twelve year hydrostatic testing, and annual conductivity testing.

The Contractor shall coordinate all new portable fire extinguisher requests with a representative from the NRNW F&ES IAW NFPA 10 and UFC 3-600-01.

The Contractor shall record all portable fire extinguisher inspection, testing, and maintenance, removal and replacement data and provide monthly reports and schedule to NRNW F&ES. See.

Attachment F.5. . J.F-1

The Contractor shall coordinate inspection, testing, and maintenance with the assigned Building Manager at each facility. The Government will provide the Building Manager list.

The Contractor shall provide and use a NFPA 10 compliant six-year tag and verification of service collar approved by the NRNW Fire Prevention Chief.

The Contractor shall maintain sufficient numbers of portable fire extinguishers as a reserve supply to facilitate one for one replacement of the same size and type in facilities as shop maintenance occurs.

Facilities shall not be left unprotected.

The Contractor shall service expended fire extinguishers and damaged extinguishers that can be restored to service within five days of notification or discovery, at no additional cost to the Government.

Historically, there have been approximately 100 of these services annually. Where allowed by NFPA10 and as approved by NRNW F&ES, 10-lb.

ABC extinguishers shall be replaced with 5-lb. ABC extinguishers during scheduled servicing. Missing or damaged fire extinguishers that cannot be restored to service will be replaced via Nonrecurring Work.

The Contractor shall replace cartridge type extinguishers with pressurized ABC extinguishers.

and per applicable standards.

Fire extinguisher Inspection and Maintenance Reports are accurate, complete, and submitted as scheduled.

Fully functional and tested fire extinguishers are present at required locations at all times.

Addition of any extinguishers or the removal of extinguishers for other than maintenance shall be approved by NRNW

F&ES.

Informational Note: Monthly visual inspections and annual external inspections are performed by facility occupants and/or the assigned Fire Warden.

4 Nonrecurring Work

Nonrecurring work may be ordered utilizing FedMall in accordance with Section H or on a task order in accordance with the

PROCEDURES

FOR ISSUING

ORDERS clause in Section H.

The order will specify the exact locations and types of work to be accomplished.

The period of performance will be specified in each order.

Refer to Nonrecurring Work Line Items for task listings, descriptions, and related requirements. All periods of performance are measured from issue date of order to acceptance of the work. Performance Standards for Nonrecurring Work will be the same as those in Spec Item 3 where applicable.

Performance standards for Nonrecurring Work will be the same as those in Spec Item 3 where applicable.

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

SECTION J

DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS, AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOTE: The individual files for Section J are attached separately. (Note: The documents are provided under “additional documents” on NECO under the solicitation number.)

This contract incorporates by reference the following attachments as if they were fully set forth herein. Please see the following attachments as part of this solicitation:

DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS, AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATTACHMENT NUMBER

ATTACHMENT TITLE

J-1 Reserved

J-2 Pre-Award Inquiry Form

J-3 Award Fee Plan (File to be provided via amendment)

J-4 Corporate Experience Project Data Form (File is a separate Word attachment)

J-5 Full Time Equivalent (FTE) worksheet

J-6 Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

J-7 Small Business Achievement Record

J-8 Small Business Participation and Commitment Strategy

J-9 Small Business Subcontracting Plan format template

F.5 J.F-1 Section F Deliverables

B Section B, Supplies or Services and Prices (Provided via Amendment 0001)

J-0200000

0200000 MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION

(J-0200000-01 to J-0200000-03, J-0200000-04a, J-0200000-04d, J-0200000-08, J- 0200000-09 and J-0200000-11)

J-0200000-04c Government-Furnished Equipment (EXCEL File)

J-0200000-05 Service Provider Information

J-0200000-06 Asset Information

J-0200000-07 Characteristic Meter Reading Information

J-0200000-10 Installation Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plans (Reference four separate attachments)

J-0200000-12 Exhibit Line Items Numbers (ELINs) (EXCEL File)

J-0200000-13 Service Work Proposal Template (EXCEL File) J-0200000-14 Construction Work Proposal Template (EXCEL File)

J-0200000-15 a. 2015-5545 REVISION 8, 01/01/2019: CLALLAM, JEFFERSON

J-0200000-15 b. 2015-5551 Revision 8, 01/01/2019: Grays Harbor, Mason

J-0200000-15 c. 2015-5525 Revision 9, 01/01/2019: Kitsap

J-0200000-15 d. WA190001 Mod 0, 01/04/2019: Highway, Washington Statewide

J-0200000-15 e. WA190037 Mod 0, 01/04/2019: Building, Washington County: Kitsap

J-0200000-15 f. WA190054 Mod 0, 01/04/2019: Building, Washington County: Jefferson

J-0200000-15 g. WA190047 Mod 0, 01/04/2019: Building, Washington County: Clallam

J-0200000-15 h. WA 190096 Mod 0, 01/04/2019: Heavy, Washington County: Kitsap

J-0200000-15 i. WA 190073 Mod 0, 01/04/2019: Heavy, Washington County: Jefferson

J-0200000-15 j. WA190069 Mod 0, 01/04/2019: Heavy, Washington County: Clallam

J-0200000-15 k. WA190110 Mod 0, 01/04/2019: Residential, Washington Counties: Grays Harbor, Island, Jefferson, Mason & San Juan

J-0200000-15 l. WA190117 Mod 0, 01/04/2019: Residential, Washington County: Kitsap

J-0200000-15 m. CBA 1 - LOA CFSI USW Local 9241

J-0200000-15 n. CBA 2 - CFSI & IBEW

J-0200000-15 o. CBA 3 - IUEC LOCAL 19

J-0402000-01 FIRE & EMERGENCY SERVICES

J-1501000 FACILITY MANAGEMENT (J-1501000-01 THRU J-1501000-03)

J-1501000-04 Uniformat Table (EXCEL File)

J-1501000-05 Non-Dynamic Roof Assets (EXCEL File)

J-1501000-06 TRC Inventory (EXCEL File)

J-1502000

FACILITY INVESTMENT (J-1502000-01, J-1502000-02, J-1502000-07, J-

1502000-10 THRU J-1502000-21)

J-1502000-03 Facility Inventory (EXCEL File)

J-1502000-04 Structures Inventory (EXCEL File)

J-1502000-06 Historical Data for Service Orders and Bullets (EXCEL File)

J-1502000-08 NAVFAC Maximo Asset Inventory (EXCEL File)

J-1502000-09 Marked Reserved

J-1502010

1502010 BUMED FACILITY INVESTMENT (J-1502010-01 THRU J-1502010-

04 AND J-1502010-07 THRU J-1502010-10 )

J-1502010-05 Historical Data for Service Orders and Bullets (PDF File)

J-1502010-06 NAVFAC Maximo Asset Inventory (PDF File) Provided via Amendment 0001

J-1503060 1503060 PAVEMENT CLEARANCE (J-1503060-01 THRU J-1503060-08)

J-1604000 WASTEWATER (J-1604000-01 THRU J-1608000-05)

J-1700000

1700000 BASE SUPPORT VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT (J-1700000-01

THRU J- J-1700000-14)

J-1800000 1800000 ENVIRONMENTAL (J-1800000-01 THRU J-1800000-15)

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

SECTION M

M.1 BASIS FOR AWARD

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value—the proposal most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

2. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

3. The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

4. All technical factors are equal to each other, and when combined are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating; and all technical factors and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating, when combined are significantly more important than price.

5. Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal.

M.2 EVALUATION FACTORS

(a) Price:

Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option items (see Section B of the solicitation). The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in Section M of the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

(v) Fair and reasonable CLIN and ELIN/unit pricing

(b) Non-Price Factors:

(1) Factor 1 – Corporate Experience:

Basis of Evaluation: The minimum standard for Corporate Experience has been met when the Offeror has demonstrated adequate experience in successfully performing at least one (1) recent and relevant project of similar size, scope and complexity to this requirement. Beyond the minimum standards, the Government will consider the depth and breadth of the recent and relevant experience, focusing on performance of technical specifications to be performed under this contract, to evaluate the level of risk of unsuccessful performance. The assessment of the offeror’s recent and relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will review only five (5) projects actions. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) project limit will not be considered.

Experience performing as a prime contractor may be considered more favorably than experience performed by the Offeror as a subcontractor, or by a proposed subcontractor. Projects submitted by Joint Ventures, where the Joint Venture firms performed together (either as partners or in a prime-sub relationship) may be viewed more favorably than contracts submitted in which the Joint Venture firms did not perform together.

With the exception of offerors covered by Mentor-Protégé Agreements approved by the Small Business Administration, if the offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), each member of the JV must demonstrate experience on at least one relevant project. If each member of the Joint Venture does not have at least one relevant experience project, then the offeror will be considered unacceptable.

For multiple award contracts (MACs) or indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (IDIQ) projects, the specific relevant task order, not the entire MAC or IDIQ contract, will be considered a project for evaluation purposes.

(2) Factor 2, Management: Management Approach:

Basis of Evaluation: Factor 2 will be evaluated as an overall factor with no subfactors. The Government will evaluate the management approach considering the extent to which the offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the requirements of the project. The Government will evaluate the effectiveness of the approach to determine the likelihood that the work will be performed in accordance with the requirements of the RFP. The degree to which the offeror demonstrates a management plan that demonstrates an effective and resource efficient approach to management of their workforce; labor; quality management; scheduling; phase-in and phase- out plans; and energy management will be evaluated.

Please note, statements such as “will comply”, or “noted and understood”, without supporting narrative to define compliance are not acceptable. Cursory responses or responses which merely reiterate or reformulate solicitation language may not be considered as satisfying the requirement of the RFP or as demonstrating the ability to perform.

(3) Factor 3, Technical Approach:

Basis of Evaluation: Factor 3 will be evaluated as an overall factor with no sub-factors. The Government will evaluate the degree to which the offeror’s technical approach:

a.Demonstrates adequate staffing levels on an overall level, as well as for each annex, sub-annex, and spec item supported by a reasonable Basis of Estimate (BOE), a reasonable understanding of the requirements and labor quantities and skills needed to successfully perform. Offerors who fail to provide a completed hard copy and MS EXCEL version of the Attachment JB-2 J-5 for the total effort to include the prime contractor and all subcontractors for the base period will be considered unacceptable. The Government will also evaluate the degree to which the technical approach demonstrates realistic labor (direct and indirect), material, and equipment in relation to the work to be performed that reflects a clear understanding of the requirements, and is consistent with other portions of the offeror’s proposal. Offerors who propose staffing that falls short of Government expectations without a logical explanation of how it will be able to perform at its proposed staffing level may be rated less favorably or found unacceptable, depending on the risk assessment.

b.Demonstrates an approach/methodology to effectively achieve performance objectives and standards for each annex, sub-annex, and spec item that reflects the current industry and/or commercial practices, standards and procedures for each major task, including the extent to which (i) the offeror’s methodology clearly demonstrates an approach to performing service on the systems for applicable sub-annexes to include but not limited to PM and Directive Maintenance requirements; (ii) the offeror demonstrates an understanding of all limits of liability identified in each respective spec item; (iii) the methodology demonstrates a state-of-the-art maintenance and repair program that ensures equipment and systems are maintained fully functional in accordance with design parameters and OEM specifications; (iv) the methodology presents a labor efficient approach that ensures best industry practices are applied to accomplish all requirements (v) the approach demonstrates an understanding of supply chain management necessary to ensure materials, supplies, and equipment availability meet contractual delivery timelines; (vi) the approach demonstrates an understanding of current industry standards, policies, procedures, and processes utilized in accomplishing the complexity and magnitude of service requirements set forth in the performance objectives and standards of the Performance Work Statement.

c.Demonstrates an effective approach to how they will staff and complete the requirements in the PWS to cover the workload of approximately 25,000 service orders, across the contract AOR, during each performance period in the categories provided in the solicitation.

d.Demonstrates an effective approach to how it will implement: 1) data entry in the Government MAXIMO and the Defense Medical Logistics Standard Support (DMLSS) and 2) Infrastructure Condition Assessment Program (ICAP) requirements in technical specification 1501000 Facility Management.

e.Demonstrates an accurate understanding of the potential, relevant risks to be encountered during contract performance as well as an approach/contingency plan to effectively mitigate risks across all annexes and sub-annexes.

(4) Factor 4 – Safety:

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s overall safety record, the Offeror’s plan to select and monitor subcontractors, any and innovative safety methods that the Offeror plans to implement for this procurement.

The Government’s sources of information for evaluating safety may include, but are not limited to, OSHA, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS) in Enterprise Safety Applications Management Systems (ESAMS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), and other related databases. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror. The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

- Experience Modification Rate (EMR)

- OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) and OSHA

Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rates

- Offeror Technical Approach to Safety

- Other sources of information available to the Government(if Government determines necessary)

(1) EMR: The Government will evaluate the EMR to determine the extent to which the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

(2) DART Rate: The Government will evaluate the DART Rate to determine the extent to which the

Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rates. Lower OSHA DART Rates will be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(3) TRC Rate: The Government will evaluate the TRC Rate to determine the extent to which the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rates.

(4) Technical Approach to Safety: The Government will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project. The Government will also evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which any proposed innovations may enhance safety on this procurement and validate the Offeror has addressed methodology to be used in the execution of an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques/processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. Those Offerors whose plan demonstrates a commitment to hire subcontractors with a culture of safety and who propose innovative methods to enhance a safe working environment may be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(5) Factor 5 – Small Business Utilization:

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: Offerors will be evaluated on the following:

a.Achievements:

(1) The extent to which the proposals and other performance information (i.e. small business achievement records and ISRs) available to the Government demonstrate a history of successfully supporting Government policies concerning utilization of small business concerns as subcontractors including, when applicable, achievements against established small business subcontracting plan goals.

b. Small Business Participation and Commitment

(1) Quantitative degree to which small business (including small business in all socio-economic categories) will participate in the acquisition relative to the total contract value.

(2) The extent to which small business concerns are specifically identified by name and socio-economic category in the proposal

(3) The levels of small business participation proposed and the degree of commitment to use named sources (formal agreements/letters of intent).

(4) Complexity and variety of the work small businesses are to perform.

(5) Realism and the likelihood of success in achieving the small business objectives of this acquisition.

Forms to be used for offeror submission of Small Business Utilization Factor information are:

Attachment J-7– Small Business Achievement Record Attachment J-8 –Small Business Participation and Commitment Strategy

(6) Factor 6 – Past Performance:

Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate how well the Offeror performed on the projects submitted under Factor 1 – Corporate Experience and on other contracts documented in known sources.

The government will consider the recency and degree of similarity between the example project and the subject contract, using the parameters established in Factor 1 as a guideline.

The Government will also evaluate the degree to which past performance evaluations and all other past performance information reviewed by the Government (e.g., PPIRS, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), performance recognition documents, and information obtained from any other source) reflect a trend of satisfactory performance considering:

– A pattern of successful completion of tasks;

– A pattern of deliverables that are timely and of good quality;

– A pattern of cooperativeness and teamwork with the Government at all levels (task managers, contracting officers, auditors, etc.); and

– Recency of tasks performed that are identical to, similar to, or related to the task at hand.

In the case of offerors without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonable assigned, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)), and will receive a Neutral Confidence Rating.

(End of Summary of Changes)