52.212-2.pdf

FA489722Q0006

Furnishing Management Services

1. Basis for Contract Award: This is a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) Parts 12 and 13.

These regulations are available electronically at Acquisition.gov, www.acquisition.gov. By submission of its offer IAW the instructions provided in FAR Clause 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items, the offeror accedes to the terms of this model contract. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offeror being determined unacceptable

2. Number of Contracts to be Awarded: The Government intends to award one (1) contract for Furnishing Management Services (FMS) at Mountain Home AFB, ID.

The Government intends to evaluate quotes and award a contract without any discussions, questions, or clarifications to quoter’s. Each quoter's initial quote shall contain the quoter's best terms from a technical, past performance, and price standpoint. Unclear or inconsistent quotes may not result in exchanges, questions, or clarifications to the quoters. In addition, quotes with an omission, failure to follow the instructions of the RFQ, or quotes that are unclear/inconsistent, regardless of their proposed prices, may be ineligible for award. The Government reserves the right to conduct exchanges if the Contracting Officer determines them to be necessary

3. Solicitation Requirements, Terms and Conditions: Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as factors. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the offeror being ineligible for award.

Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and must provide complete supporting rationale. The Government reserves the right to determine any such exceptions unacceptable.

4. EVALUATION FACTORS

a. Evaluation Factors: The following evaluation factors will be used to evaluate each proposal.

The Government will evaluate proposals for acceptability, but will not rank the proposals by the non-price factors.

Factor 1: Technical Factor 2: Past Performance Factor 3: Price

b. Technical Factor: The Government’s technical evaluation team shall evaluate the technical proposals on an acceptable or unacceptable basis, assigning one of the ratings described below.

Only those proposals determined to be technically acceptable, either initially or as a result of correspondence, will be considered for award.

http://www.acquisition.gov/

TABLE 1 - TECHNICAL RATINGS

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirement.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation and, thus, contains one or more deficiencies and is unawardable.

c. Factor 2: Past Performance Factor (Acceptable/Unacceptable: The Past Performance evaluation results are an assessment of the offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. Offerors must receive a past performance rating of “Acceptable” to be eligible for award. Any past performance rating of Unacceptable will make the quoter ineligible for award.

i. Ratings. The Past Performance factor will receive one of the ratings described below.

TABLE 2- PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RATINGS

Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

ii. Evaluation Process: The past performance evaluation considers each offeror’s demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance in supplying products and services that meet the solicitation requirements. In conducting the Past Performance evaluation, the Government shall use both the information provided in the offeror’s Past Performance proposal volume and information obtained from other sources available to the Government, such as Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS); Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), or other databases; and interviews/questionnaires from Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and commercial sources.

(1) Recency Assessment: An assessment of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is recent. To be recent, the effort must be ongoing or must have been performed during the past five (5) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated.

(2) Relevancy Assessment: The Government shall conduct an evaluation of all recent performance information obtained to determine whether the products provided/services performed under those contracts relate to a similar work and magnitude as those required by this solicitation. The Government will use the following relevancy definitions when assessing recent, relevant contracts:

TABLE 3 – PAST PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY RATINGS

Rating Definition

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant

Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

(3) Assigning Ratings: As a result of the relevancy of the recent contracts evaluated, offerors will receive an integrated past performance rating at the factor level (see Table 2). More recent performance will have a greater impact on the Past Performance rating than less recent effort.

d. Price Factor: For award purposes, the Government will evaluate offers by the total contract price. The total contract price consists of the total price of all base and option periods (to include a potential extension under clause 52.217-8) of this solicitation. The total price of the base and option periods is the sum of:

(1) All CLINs and;

(2) Potential Option Extension.

Price will not be assigned an adjectival rating; prices will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness in accordance with FAR 13.106-3.

(5) Price evaluation will be conducted as follows:

(a) Total Evaluated Amount for Base Period and Option Period CLINs (SF 1449 Continuation Sheet Schedule): The CLINs (0001 through 0005 only) are all added together for an extended total price for each specific period. The “specific period” is defined as the Base Period or Option Period.

(b) Total Evaluated Amount for Exhibit 1, Base Period and Option Periods: Each line item will be calculated by multiplying the quantity in the column title against the unit price for each specific period. All line items will be added together for an extended total price for each specific period.

(c) Total Evaluated Contract Amount:

CLIN 0001 Furnishing Management Services 3 Months

CLIN 0002 Reimbursable Materials, Parts, and Appli 3 Months

CLIN 0003 Annual Inventory 1 Each CLIN 0004 High Value & Pilferable Item Inventory 1 Each CLIN 0005 Extended Hourly Service/Overtime 3 Each

TOTAL EVALUATED AMOUNT

FOR BASE PERIOD

TOTAL CONTRACT VALUE = TOTAL EVALUATED AMOUNT FOR

BASE PERIOD AND OPTION PERIODS 1 THROUGH 4

(e) The Option to Extend Services Clause 52.217-8 is included in this solicitation and will be incorporated into the resultant contract. If exercised, the clause will extend the terms and conditions of the contract period being extended at the rates specified in the contract of the current option year. The Contracting Officer (CO) may exercise this clause during the life of the contract at any option period to extend services for up to 6-months. Evaluation of options and FAR 52.217-8 will not obligate the Government to exercise such options.

5. A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer e-mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offeror’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there is correspondence after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.